AzTrials
AzTrials

Exudative Age Related Macular DegenerationNCT00927303

The Spectralis-Cirrus Study

An observational study of Exudative Age Related Macular Degeneration, run by The Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Retinology and Biomicroscopic Laser Surgery at 1 site in Austria.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Retinal thickness measurement is one of the most important examinations in the follow up of exudative age-related macular degeneration. Prior studies have shown that there are a series of algorithm line failures in OCT examinations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
What is being tested?
Cirrus-Spectralis and Spectralis-Cirrus
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
110 participants
Where
1 siteAustria
Study dates
Jul 2009to Dec 2009
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: male or female persons aged more than 50 years with exudative age related macular degeneration

Who may be able to join

  • Exudative age related macular degeneration

Who cannot join

  • Macular pathologies other than age related macular degeneration (diabetic maculopathy, macular pucker, macular hole,
  • Visualization of the macula not possible (dens cataract, vitreous haemorrhage)
  • Not consented patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Austria1 site
  • Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Retinology and Biomicroscopic Lasersurgery

    Vienna, State of Vienna, 1030

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Quality and Reproducibility of Retinal Thickness Measurements in Two Spectral Domain OCT- Machines

Retinal thickness measurement is one of the most important examinations in the follow up of exudative age-related macular degeneration. Prior studies have shown that there are a series of algorithm line failures in OCT examinations. This study is conducted to compare the quality of the examinations of to different spectral domain OCT machines concerning the positioning of algorithm lines. Furthermore the reproducibility of the examinations id tested, both machines provide different techniques to guarantee that in repeated examinations the same location is examined.

Being tested
Cirrus-Spectralis, Spectralis-Cirrus
Keywords
retinal thickness, threshold algorithm, optical coherence tomography

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cirrus-SpectralisDevice

    512x128 cúbe program of Cirrus OCT first retinal volume 121 line of Spectralis OCT thereafter

  • Spectralis-CirrusDevice

    retinal volume program 121 lines Spectralis OCT first 512x128 program Cirrus OCT thereafter

Study groups in NCT00927303
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1Intervention 1 Sequence of observers: observer1, observer 2, observer 1, observer 2
Receives: Device: Cirrus-Spectralis
group 2intervention 1 sequence of observers: observer 2, observer 1, observer 2, observer 1
Receives: Device: Cirrus-Spectralis
group 3intervention 2 sequence of observers: 1,2,1,2
Receives: Device: Spectralis-Cirrus
group 4intervention 2 sequence of observers: 2,1,2,1
Receives: Device: Spectralis-Cirrus
group 5intervention 1 sequence of observers 1,1,2,2
Receives: Device: Cirrus-Spectralis
group 6intervention 1 sequence of observers 2,2,1,1
Receives: Device: Cirrus-Spectralis
group 7intervention 2 sequence of observers: 1,1,2,2
Receives: Device: Spectralis-Cirrus
group 8intervention 2 sequence of observers: 2,2,1,1
Receives: Device: Spectralis-Cirrus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of examinations with correctly set threshold algorithm lines

    Measured: 1 day

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Differences of mean retinal thickness in the central region

    Measured: 1 day

  2. Differences of retinal volume

    Measured: 1 day

  3. Distance acuity

    Measured: 1 day

  4. Age

    Measured: 1 day

  5. Classification of the lesion

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jun 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2009
  3. Primary completionDec 2009
  4. Study completionDec 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
110 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00927303
Sponsor's protocol ID
09-086-0609
Status last verified
Jun 2010
First submitted
23 Jun 2009
Last updated
9 Jun 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Krebs I, Smretschnig E, Moussa S, Brannath W, Womastek I, Binder S. Quality and reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in two spectral-domain optical coherence tomography machines. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 1;52(9):6925-33. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6612.

    PubMed 21791591

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Exudative Age Related Macular Degeneration, run by The Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Retinology and Biomicroscopic Laser Surgery at 1 site in Austria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of examinations with correctly set threshold algorithm lines (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00927303, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2010.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in