Atopic DermatitisPhase 2NCT00931242
Study of Apremilast in Atopic or Contact Dermatitis
A Phase 2 study testing Apremilast in people with Atopic Dermatitis and Allergic Contact Dermatitis, run by Tufts Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of apremilast in patients with recalcitrant atopic or contact dermatitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis, Allergic Contact Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- Apremilast
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2009to Mar 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form.
- Must be male or female and aged ≥ 18 years at time of consent.
- Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
- Must have a documented history of contact or atopic dermatitis for at least 3 months prior to screening visit. Subjects will be asked to bring records at the time of screening visit; if they do not bring these records, subjects will be asked to complete and sign a release of records for which will be sent to the subject's physician. The Investigators will review records to confirm eligibility prior to enrolling a subject into the study.
- Subjects must fulfill criteria outlined in at least one of the following clinical categories:
- Unresponsive to standard systemic or topical therapy, as defined by clinical history, in the investigator's opinion, i.e. inadequate response to one or more adequate treatment course (s) of standard systemic therapy including but not limited to: topical steroids, ultraviolet light A [UVA], narrowband ultraviolet B (NBUVB), ultraviolet light B [UVB].
Show all 23Show fewer
- Intolerant to or cannot receive (e.g., contraindication to prescribe) standard systemic or topical therapy for contact or atopic dermatitis.
- Must have a IGA score of at least moderate (3 on a 0 to 5 point scale) at screening.
- Must meet the following laboratory criteria:
- White blood cell count ≥ 3000/ μL (3 x 109/L) and < 14,000/ μL (< 14 x 109/L)
- Platelet count > 100,000/ μL (100 x 109/L)
- Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL (≤ 132.6 μmol/L)
- AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Hemoglobin > 9 g/dL
- Total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL
- Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening. In addition, sexually active FCBP must agree to use TWO of the following adequate forms of contraception while on study medication:
- oral, injectable, or implantable hormonal contraceptives;
- tubal ligation;
- intrauterine device;
- barrier contraceptive with spermicide;
- vasectomized partner while on study.
- A FCBP must agree to have pregnancy tests every 4 weeks while on study medication.
- Males (including those who have had a vasectomy) must agree to use barrier contraception (latex condoms) when engaging in sexual activity with FCBP while on study medication and for 84 days after taking the last dose of study medication.
Who cannot join
- Inability to provide voluntary consent.
- History of clinically significant (as determined by the investigator) cardiac, endocrinologic, pulmonary, neurologic, psychiatric, hepatic, renal, hematologic, immunologic, or other major disease. Potential subjects with severe uncontrolled conditions, such as severe uncontrolled diabetes, will be excluded.
- Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Systemic fungal infection.
- History of active mycobacterial infection with any species (including Mycobacterium tuberculosis) within 3 years prior to screening visit. Subjects with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection more than 3 years prior to screening visit are allowed if successful treatment was completed at least 3 years prior to randomization and is documented and available for verification.
Show all 26Show fewer
- Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection as indicated by a positive Purified Protein Derivative [PPD] skin test. Subjects with a positive PPD skin test and documented completion of treatment for latent TB are eligible. Subjects with a positive PPD skin test and not treated or no documentation of completion of treatment are ineligible.
- If QuantiFERON® test is performed instead of the PPD test, only those with a negative QuantiFERON® test are allowed in the study.
- History of incompletely treated Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection as indicated by:
- Subject's medical records documenting incomplete treatment for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
- Subject's self-reported history of incomplete treatment for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
- History of recurrent bacterial infection (at least 3 major infections resulting in hospitalization and/or requiring intravenous antibiotic treatment within the past 2 years).
- Clinically significant abnormality on the chest x-ray (CXR) at screening. Chest x-rays performed within 3 months prior to start of study drug are acceptable.
- Contact or atopic Dermatitis flare within 30 days of screening, defined as a sudden intensification of contact or atopic dermatitis
- Use of systemic therapy for contact or atopic dermatitis (including but not limited to cyclosporine, corticosteroids, methotrexate, oral retinoids, mycophenolate mofetil, thioguanine, hydroxyurea, sirolimus, tacrolimus, azathioprine) within 14 days of Week 0 (Baseline).
- Topical therapy (including but not limited to topical steroids, topical vitamin A or D analog preparations, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, or anthralin) within 7 days of Week 0 (Baseline). (Exception: Class VI or VII potency corticosteroids will be allowed [Appendix 18.8] for treatment of the palms, face, scalp, axillae, plantar surfaces and groin in accordance with the manufacturers suggested usage, except within 24 hours of a study visit. Non-medicated emollients [e.g., Eucerin®], and tar shampoo are also allowed.)
- Adalimumab, etanercept, efalizumab or infliximab use within 56 days of Week 0 (Baseline).
- Alefacept use within 180 days of Week 0 (Baseline).
- Phototherapy (PUVA, UVA,NB-UVB, UVB) within 14 days of Week 0 (Baseline).
- Use of any investigational medication within 4 weeks prior to start of study drug or 5 pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic half-lives (whichever is longer).
- Any clinically significant abnormality on 12-lead ECG at screening.
- History of congenital or acquired immunodeficiency (e.g., Common Variable Immunodeficiency [CVID]).
- Hepatitis B surface antigen positive or Hepatitis B core antibody positive at screening.
- History of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection.
- Antibodies to Hepatitis C at screening.
- Malignancy or history of malignancy (except for treated [i.e., cured] basal-cell skin carcinoma(s) or treated squamous-cell skin carcinomas).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Tufts Medical Center, Department of Dermatology
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Open-label, Investigator-Initiated Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Apremilast in Subjects With Recalcitrant Contact or Atopic Dermatitis
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of apremilast in patients with recalcitrant atopic or contact dermatitis.
Read the detailed description
Atopic Dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease characterized by dry, red, and itchy patches that can become thickened and lichenified with time. Contact Dermatitis, or Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD), is an eczematous reaction in response to an environmental allergen.
The etiology of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) has not been completely elucidated, and new understandings of underlying mechanisms have expanded and focused treatment regimens and paradigms.
Atopic Dermatitis (AD) is thought to be mediated by Th2 type T cells elaborating a number of cytokines which are blocked in vitro by apremilast. The chronic Atopic Dermatitis (AD) pathway may involve a change to Th1 cytokines. Genetic factors do not contribute as much to the course of Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) as in Atopic Dermatitis (AD). Rather, Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) is a type IV, T-cell mediated, delayed-hypersensitivity reaction that can be self-limited. Similar to Atopic Dermatitis (AD), a number of pro-inflammatory cytokines are involved in recruiting T cells preferentially to the skin: Th1 cytokines, Th2 cytokines, CD8 cytokines, and T-regulatory cytokines. These pathways in Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) are activated by IFN-γ, driven by TNF-α, and as above, apremilast has been shown to block these cytokines in vitro.
Current treatments for Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) include skin care, trigger avoidance (especially in the case of ACD), topical corticosteroids, steroid sparing treatments, antihistamines, topical and systemic antibiotics, and ultraviolet light. For more recalcitrant Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD)cases, several immunosuppressive treatments exist.
Subjects with recalcitrant Atopic Dermatitis (AD) or Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD)have exhausted conventional systemic treatment options because they do not respond to conventional systemic therapy or cannot use these agents due to side effects or cumulative toxicity.
There is an urgent need to evaluate new therapeutic options in recalcitrant Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD). Very few of the available drugs for recalcitrant Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) have reasonable efficacy and safety profiles in this condition, are easily available, or easy to administer. A new treatment strategy is needed for the treatment of recalcitrant contact or atopic dermatitis that would increase efficacy, minimize toxicity for both short and long-term treatment, and be easy to administer. The availability of alternative drug treatment(s) offering safe and effective short and long-term management would significantly benefit subjects with recalcitrant contact or atopic dermatitis.
This study uses a novel oral agent (apremilast) that modulates multiple anti-inflammatory pathways through targeted phosphodiesterase type IV (PDE4) inhibition decreased expression of dermatitis. Apremilast has pharmacodynamic properties with a potential therapeutic benefit for treating inflammatory autoimmune disorders that involve elevated serum cytokine levels, including Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD).
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis, Allergic Contact Dermatitis
- Being tested
- Apremilast
- Keywords
- eczema, dermatitis, TNF blockade, PDE4 inhibitor, T cell inhibitor
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact, Eczema, Dermatitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ApremilastDrug
Also called CC-10004 (apremilast)
Apremilast is being evaluated at daily doses of 20 mg by mouth (PO) twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks of treatment (treatment phase) in subjects with recalcitrant plaque-type Atopic Dermatitis (AD) or Allergic Contact Ddermatitis (ACD).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Apremilast | Experimental | Apremilast is being evaluated at daily doses of 20 mg by mouth (PO) twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks of treatment (treatment phase) in subjects with recalcitrant plaque-type Atopic Dermatitis (AD) or Allergic Contact Ddermatitis (ACD). Receives: Drug: Apremilast |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Patients Achieving an Improvement (Decrease) in IGA (Investigator Global Assessment) by Two or More Points
Improvement in IGA (Investigator Global Assessment) by two or more points on a five point scale, with 0 being no disease activity and 5 being maximum disease activity, at week 12
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of Patients Achieving 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12 in Reference to Week 0
EASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, edema, lichenification, and excoriations/erosions are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 to 6. The total qualitative score is multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant and summed to yield the EASI score.
Measured: 12 weeks
Number of Patients Achieving 50% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12 in Reference to Week 0
EASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, edema, lichenification, and excoriations/erosions are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 to 6. The total qualitative score is multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant and summed to yield the EASI score.
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2009
- Primary completionMar 2010
- Study completionMar 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tufts Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Celgene Corporation
- Investigators
- Alice B. Gottlieb, M.D., PhD., Principal investigator, Tufts Medical Center, Department of Dermatology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00931242
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AD / CD
- Other IDs
- AP-ECZ-PI-0030
- Status last verified
- Nov 2010
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2009
- Last updated
- 20 Dec 2010
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Leung DY, Boguniewicz M, Howell MD, Nomura I, Hamid QA. New insights into atopic dermatitis. J Clin Invest. 2004 Mar;113(5):651-7. doi: 10.1172/JCI21060.
PubMed 14991059Novak N, Bieber T, Leung DY. Immune mechanisms leading to atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Dec;112(6 Suppl):S128-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.09.032.
PubMed 14657843Girolomoni G, Sebastiani S, Albanesi C, Cavani A. T-cell subpopulations in the development of atopic and contact allergy. Curr Opin Immunol. 2001 Dec;13(6):733-7. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(01)00287-4.
PubMed 11677098Cavani A, Albanesi C, Traidl C, Sebastiani S, Girolomoni G. Effector and regulatory T cells in allergic contact dermatitis. Trends Immunol. 2001 Mar;22(3):118-20. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(00)01815-9.
PubMed 11286716Cone RE, Li X, Sharafieh R, O'Rourke J, Vella AT. The suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity by CD8+ regulatory T cells requires interferon-gamma. Immunology. 2007 Jan;120(1):112-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02486.x. Epub 2006 Oct 18.
PubMed 17052246Jung T, Stingl G. Atopic dermatitis: therapeutic concepts evolving from new pathophysiologic insights. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Dec;122(6):1074-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.09.042. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
PubMed 18992925Belloni B, Andres C, Ollert M, Ring J, Mempel M. Novel immunological approaches in the treatment of atopic eczema. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Oct;8(5):423-7. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32830fb8fd.
PubMed 18769195Harada D, Takada C, Nosaka Y, Takashima Y, Kobayashi K, Takaba K, Manabe H. Effect of orally administered KF66490, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, on dermatitis in mouse models. Int Immunopharmacol. 2009 Jan;9(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Oct 12.
PubMed 18854230Schmitt J, Langan S, Williams HC; European Dermato-Epidemiology Network. What are the best outcome measurements for atopic eczema? A systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Dec;120(6):1389-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
PubMed 17910890Gottlieb AB, Strober B, Krueger JG, Rohane P, Zeldis JB, Hu CC, Kipnis C. An open-label, single-arm pilot study in patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis treated with an oral anti-inflammatory agent, apremilast. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 May;24(5):1529-38. doi: 10.1185/030079908x301866. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
PubMed 18419879
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Dec 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Open-label, Investigator-Initiated Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Apremilast in Subjects With Recalcitrant Contact or Atopic Dermatitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00931242
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AD / CD
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis, Allergic Contact Dermatitis
- Keywords
- eczema, dermatitis, TNF blockade, PDE4 inhibitor, T cell inhibitor
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tufts Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Celgene Corporation
- Study start
- Jun 2009
- Primary completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Dec 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of apremilast in patients with recalcitrant atopic or contact dermatitis.
Detailed description
Atopic Dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease characterized by dry, red, and itchy patches that can become thickened and lichenified with time. Contact Dermatitis, or Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD), is an eczematous reaction in response to an environmental allergen.
The etiology of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) has not been completely elucidated, and new understandings of underlying mechanisms have expanded and focused treatment regimens and paradigms.
Atopic Dermatitis (AD) is thought to be mediated by Th2 type T cells elaborating a number of cytokines which are blocked in vitro by apremilast. The chronic Atopic Dermatitis (AD) pathway may involve a change to Th1 cytokines. Genetic factors do not contribute as much to the course of Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) as in Atopic Dermatitis (AD). Rather, Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) is a type IV, T-cell mediated, delayed-hypersensitivity reaction that can be self-limited. Similar to Atopic Dermatitis (AD), a number of pro-inflammatory cytokines are involved in recruiting T cells preferentially to the skin: Th1 cytokines, Th2 cytokines, CD8 cytokines, and T-regulatory cytokines. These pathways in Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) are activated by IFN-γ, driven by TNF-α, and as above, apremilast has been shown to block these cytokines in vitro.
Current treatments for Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) include skin care, trigger avoidance (especially in the case of ACD), topical corticosteroids, steroid sparing treatments, antihistamines, topical and systemic antibiotics, and ultraviolet light. For more recalcitrant Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD)cases, several immunosuppressive treatments exist.
Subjects with recalcitrant Atopic Dermatitis (AD) or Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD)have exhausted conventional systemic treatment options because they do not respond to conventional systemic therapy or cannot use these agents due to side effects or cumulative toxicity.
There is an urgent need to evaluate new therapeutic options in recalcitrant Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD). Very few of the available drugs for recalcitrant Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) have reasonable efficacy and safety profiles in this condition, are easily available, or easy to administer. A new treatment strategy is needed for the treatment of recalcitrant contact or atopic dermatitis that would increase efficacy, minimize toxicity for both short and long-term treatment, and be easy to administer. The availability of alternative drug treatment(s) offering safe and effective short and long-term management would significantly benefit subjects with recalcitrant contact or atopic dermatitis.
This study uses a novel oral agent (apremilast) that modulates multiple anti-inflammatory pathways through targeted phosphodiesterase type IV (PDE4) inhibition decreased expression of dermatitis. Apremilast has pharmacodynamic properties with a potential therapeutic benefit for treating inflammatory autoimmune disorders that involve elevated serum cytokine levels, including Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Apremilast | Experimental | Drug: ApremilastApremilast is being evaluated at daily doses of 20 mg by mouth (PO) twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks of treatment (treatment phase) in subjects with recalcitrant plaque-type Atopic Dermatitis (AD) or Allergic Contact Ddermatitis (ACD). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (23 listed)
- Must understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form.
- Must be male or female and aged ≥ 18 years at time of consent.
- Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
- Must have a documented history of contact or atopic dermatitis for at least 3 months prior to screening visit. Subjects will be asked to bring records at the time of screening visit; if they do not bring these records, subjects will be asked to complete and sign a release of records for which will be sent to the subject's physician. The Investigators will review records to confirm eligibility prior to enrolling a subject into the study.
- Subjects must fulfill criteria outlined in at least one of the following clinical categories:
Key exclusion criteria (26 listed)
- Inability to provide voluntary consent.
- History of clinically significant (as determined by the investigator) cardiac, endocrinologic, pulmonary, neurologic, psychiatric, hepatic, renal, hematologic, immunologic, or other major disease. Potential subjects with severe uncontrolled conditions, such as severe uncontrolled diabetes, will be excluded.
- Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Systemic fungal infection.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ApremilastAlso: CC-10004 (apremilast)Apremilast is being evaluated at daily doses of 20 mg by mouth (PO) twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks of treatment (treatment phase) in subjects with recalcitrant plaque-type Atopic Dermatitis (AD) or Allergic Contact Ddermatitis (ACD). | Drug | Apremilast |
Primary outcome
Number of Patients Achieving an Improvement (Decrease) in IGA (Investigator Global Assessment) by Two or More Points
Time frame: 12 weeks
Improvement in IGA (Investigator Global Assessment) by two or more points on a five point scale, with 0 being no disease activity and 5 being maximum disease activity, at week 12
2 secondary outcomes
Number of Patients Achieving 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12 in Reference to Week 0
Time frame: 12 weeks
Number of Patients Achieving 50% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12 in Reference to Week 0
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Dec 2010.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 14991059Leung DY, Boguniewicz M, Howell MD, Nomura I, Hamid QA. New insights into atopic dermatitis. J Clin Invest. 2004 Mar;113(5):651-7. doi: 10.1172/JCI21060.
- Background: PubMed 14657843Novak N, Bieber T, Leung DY. Immune mechanisms leading to atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Dec;112(6 Suppl):S128-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.09.032.
- Background: PubMed 11677098Girolomoni G, Sebastiani S, Albanesi C, Cavani A. T-cell subpopulations in the development of atopic and contact allergy. Curr Opin Immunol. 2001 Dec;13(6):733-7. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(01)00287-4.
- Background: PubMed 11286716Cavani A, Albanesi C, Traidl C, Sebastiani S, Girolomoni G. Effector and regulatory T cells in allergic contact dermatitis. Trends Immunol. 2001 Mar;22(3):118-20. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(00)01815-9.
- Background: PubMed 17052246Cone RE, Li X, Sharafieh R, O'Rourke J, Vella AT. The suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity by CD8+ regulatory T cells requires interferon-gamma. Immunology. 2007 Jan;120(1):112-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02486.x. Epub 2006 Oct 18.
- Background: PubMed 18992925Jung T, Stingl G. Atopic dermatitis: therapeutic concepts evolving from new pathophysiologic insights. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Dec;122(6):1074-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.09.042. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
- Background: PubMed 18769195Belloni B, Andres C, Ollert M, Ring J, Mempel M. Novel immunological approaches in the treatment of atopic eczema. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Oct;8(5):423-7. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32830fb8fd.
- Background: PubMed 18854230Harada D, Takada C, Nosaka Y, Takashima Y, Kobayashi K, Takaba K, Manabe H. Effect of orally administered KF66490, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, on dermatitis in mouse models. Int Immunopharmacol. 2009 Jan;9(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Oct 12.
- Background: PubMed 17910890Schmitt J, Langan S, Williams HC; European Dermato-Epidemiology Network. What are the best outcome measurements for atopic eczema? A systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Dec;120(6):1389-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
- Background: PubMed 18419879Gottlieb AB, Strober B, Krueger JG, Rohane P, Zeldis JB, Hu CC, Kipnis C. An open-label, single-arm pilot study in patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis treated with an oral anti-inflammatory agent, apremilast. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 May;24(5):1529-38. doi: 10.1185/030079908x301866. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
Related trials for Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of HSK60002 Tablets in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Dermatitis Atopic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Moderate-to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alice B. Gottlieb, M.D., PhD. principal investigator
Tufts Medical Center, Department of Dermatology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Apremilast in people with Atopic Dermatitis and Allergic Contact Dermatitis, run by Tufts Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 23 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Dec 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Patients Achieving an Improvement (Decrease) in IGA (Investigator Global Assessment) by Two or More Points (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00931242, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2010.