Arterial Occlusive DiseasesPhase 3Core320NCT00934037
Combined Non-invasive Coronary Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using 320 Detector Computed Tomography
A Phase 3 study testing 320 Volume Detector Computed Tomography and Other: Multidetector Computed Tomography - 320 detectors in people with Arterial Occlusive Diseases and Coronary Disease, run by Johns Hopkins University at 16 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multi-detector computed tomography using 320 detectors for identifying the combination of coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50% and a corresponding myocardium perfusion defect in a patient with suspected coronary artery disease compared with conventional… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Coronary Disease, Heart Diseases
- What is being tested?
- 320 Volume Detector Computed Tomography and Other: Multidetector Computed Tomography - 320 detectors
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 444 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2009to Sep 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients, age 45-85. Women of child bearing potential must demonstrate a negative pregnancy test within 24 hours of the study MDCT.
- Suspected or diagnosed coronary artery disease with a clinical indication for coronary angiography; and planned coronary angiography within the next 60 days.
- Able to understand and willing to sign the Informed Consent Form.
Who cannot join
- Known allergy to iodinated contrast media.
- History of contrast-induced nephropathy.
- History of multiple myeloma or previous organ transplantation.
- Elevated serum creatinine (> 1.5 mg/dl) OR calculated creatinine clearance of < 60 ml/min (using the Cockcroft-Gault formula.
- Atrial fibrillation or uncontrolled tachyarrhythmia, or advanced atrioventricular block (second or third degree heart block).
- Evidence of severe symptomatic heart failure (NYHA Class III or IV); Known or suspected moderate or severe aortic stenosis.
Show all 17Show fewer
- Previous coronary artery bypass or other cardiac surgery.
- Coronary artery intervention within the last 6 months.
- Known or suspected intolerance or contraindication to beta-blockers including:
- Known allergy to beta-blockers
- History of moderate to severe bronchospastic lung disease (including moderate to severe asthma).
- Severe pulmonary disease (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).
- Presence of any other history or condition that the investigator feels would be problematic.
- SPECT preformed in non-validated center within 60 days prior to screening.
- SPECT performed within the previous 6 months of screening but > 60 days.
- SPECT studies performed within 60 days of screening that include rest and stress studies performed using 2 day protocols.
- BMI greater than 40
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 8 countries.
16 sites in 8 countries
United States4 sites
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Brigham and Women Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Japan4 sites
Iwate Medical University
Morioka
Keio University
Tokyo
St. Luke's International Hospital
Tokyo
Mie University
Tsu
Brazil2 sites
Albert Einstein Hospital
São Paulo
INCOR Heart Institute University-Sao Paulo
São Paulo
Singapore2 sites
Mount Elizabeth Hospital
Singapore
National Heart Center
Singapore
About this study
Official title: Multi Center Combined Non-invasive Coronary Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using 320-Detector Computed Tomography
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multi-detector computed tomography using 320 detectors for identifying the combination of coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50% and a corresponding myocardium perfusion defect in a patient with suspected coronary artery disease compared with conventional coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography myocardium perfusion imaging.
Read the detailed description
The Combined Coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320 detectors computed tomography (CORE-320) was designed as a prospective, multi-center, international, blinded study designed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multi-detector computed tomography using 320 detectors for identifying coronary artery luminal stenosis and corresponding myocardium perfusion defects in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The primary analysis will be a comparison of the diagnostic capability of the combination of quantitative 320-MDCT angiography and quantitative perfusion imaging to the combination of conventional coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging at the patient level. A positive patient will be defined as having at least one vessel with a ≥ 50% diameter stenosis defined by quantitative coronary angiography and a corresponding positive SPECT territorial myocardial perfusion defect.
- Conditions
- Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Coronary Disease, Heart Diseases, Myocardial Ischemia, Vascular Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
- Being tested
- 320 Volume Detector Computed Tomography, Other: Multidetector Computed Tomography - 320 detectors
- Keywords
- Coronary Artery Disease, Computed Tomography, Myoperfusion, Angiography, SPECT
- Medical subject headings
- Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Coronary Disease, Heart Diseases, Myocardial Ischemia, Vascular Diseases, Arteriosclerosis, Ischemia, Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
320 Volume Detector Computed TomographyProcedure or surgery
Single Arm Study. All patients undergo Volume (Multidetector) CT.
Other: Multidetector Computed Tomography - 320 detectorsOther
Also called Aquilion ONE CT scanner
Multidetector computed tomography angiography
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Combined CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion | Other | Single Arm study. All patients underwent combined CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion. Receives: Procedure: 320 Volume Detector Computed Tomography; Other: Other: Multidetector Computed Tomography - 320 detectors |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diagnostic accuracy of volume (multi-detector) computed tomography using 320 detectors in a patient with suspected coronary artery disease.
Diagnostic accuracy of volume (multi-detector) computed tomography using 320 detectors for identifying coronary artery luminal stenosis and corresponding myocardium perfusion defects in a patient with suspected coronary artery disease.
Measured: 30-60 Days
Secondary outcomes (3)
Diagnostic accuracy of volume computed tomography using 320 detectors in a vessel of a patient with suspected coronary artery disease.
Diagnostic accuracy of volume computed tomography using 320 detectors for identifying coronary artery luminal stenosis and corresponding territorial myocardium perfusion defects in a vessel of a patient with suspected coronary artery disease.
Measured: 30-60 Days
Compare the relative diagnostic accuracy of 320 CT angiography vs SPECT in predicting at least one ≥ 50% coronary stenosis detected by QCA
Compare the relative diagnostic accuracy of 320 CT angiography vs SPECT in predicting at least one ≥ 50% coronary stenosis detected by QCA
Measured: 30-60 Days
Compare the relative diagnostic accuracy of 320 CT perfusion vs SPECT in predicting at least one ≥ 50% coronary stenosis detected by quantitative conventional angiography.
Compare the relative diagnostic accuracy of 320 CT perfusion vs SPECT in predicting at least one ≥ 50% coronary stenosis detected by quantitative conventional angiography.
Measured: 30-60 Days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2009
- Primary completionSep 2011
- Study completionSep 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arterial Occlusive DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Johns Hopkins UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 444 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Joao AC Lima, MD MBA, Study chair, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00934037
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NA_00022661
- Other IDs
- Core320
- Acronym
- Core320
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 11 May 2009
- Last updated
- 5 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, Paul N, Clouse ME, Shapiro EP, Hoe J, Lardo AC, Bush DE, de Roos A, Cox C, Brinker J, Lima JA. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 27;359(22):2324-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806576.
PubMed 19038879Vavere AL, Simon GG, George RT, Rochitte CE, Arai AE, Miller JM, Di Carli M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Dewey M, Niinuma H, Laham R, Rybicki FJ, Schuijf JD, Paul N, Hoe J, Kuribyashi S, Sakuma H, Nomura C, Yaw TS, Kofoed KF, Yoshioka K, Clouse ME, Brinker J, Cox C, Lima JA. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320 row detector computed tomography: design and implementation of the CORE320 multicenter, multinational diagnostic study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Nov-Dec;5(6):370-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
PubMed 22146496Miller JM, Dewey M, Vavere AL, Rochitte CE, Niinuma H, Arbab-Zadeh A, Paul N, Hoe J, de Roos A, Yoshioka K, Lemos PA, Bush DE, Lardo AC, Texter J, Brinker J, Cox C, Clouse ME, Lima JA. Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64. Eur Radiol. 2009 Apr;19(4):816-28. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1203-7. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
PubMed 18998142Yoneyama K, Vavere AL, Cerci R, Ahmed R, Arai AE, Niinuma H, Rybicki FJ, Rochitte CE, Clouse ME, George RT, Lima JA, Arbab-Zadeh A. Influence of image acquisition settings on radiation dose and image quality in coronary angiography by 320-detector volume computed tomography: the CORE320 pilot experience. Heart Int. 2012 Jun 5;7(2):e11. doi: 10.4081/hi.2012.e11. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
PubMed 23185678Cerci RJ, Arbab-Zadeh A, George RT, Miller JM, Vavere AL, Mehra V, Yoneyama K, Texter J, Foster C, Guo W, Cox C, Brinker J, Di Carli M, Lima JA. Aligning coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion territories: an algorithm for the CORE320 multicenter study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):587-95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.970608. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
PubMed 22887690George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Vavere AL, Bengel FM, Lardo AC, Lima JA. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with 320-row detector computed tomography accurately detects myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 May 1;5(3):333-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.969303. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
PubMed 22447807George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Cerci RJ, Vavere AL, Kitagawa K, Dewey M, Rochitte CE, Arai AE, Paul N, Rybicki FJ, Lardo AC, Clouse ME, Lima JA. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-MDCT: the CT angiography and perfusion methods of the CORE320 multicenter multinational diagnostic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct;197(4):829-37. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5689.
PubMed 21940569Mehra VC, Valdiviezo C, Arbab-Zadeh A, Ko BS, Seneviratne SK, Cerci R, Lima JA, George RT. A stepwise approach to the visual interpretation of CT-based myocardial perfusion. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Nov-Dec;5(6):357-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
PubMed 22146495Li Z, Tu S, Matheson MB, Li G, Chen Y, Rochitte CE, Chen MY, Dewey M, Miller JM, R Scarpa Matuck B, Yang W, Qin L, Yan F, Lima JAC, Arbab-Zadeh A. Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. Radiology. 2024 Dec;313(3):e240299. doi: 10.1148/radiol.240299.
PubMed 39656122Preuss D, Garcia G, Laule M, Dewey M, Rief M. Myocardial CT perfusion imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: multisegment reconstruction does not improve diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol Exp. 2022 Jan 31;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41747-021-00256-8.
PubMed 35099638Dewey M, Rochitte CE, Ostovaneh MR, Chen MY, George RT, Niinuma H, Kitagawa K, Laham R, Kofoed K, Nomura C, Sakuma H, Yoshioka K, Mehra VC, Jinzaki M, Kuribayashi S, Laule M, Paul N, Scholte AJ, Cerci R, Hoe J, Tan SY, Rybicki FJ, Matheson MB, Vavere AL, Arai AE, Miller JM, Cox C, Brinker J, Clouse ME, Di Carli M, Lima JAC, Arbab-Zadeh A. Prognostic value of noninvasive combined anatomic/functional assessment by cardiac CT in patients with suspected coronary artery disease - Comparison with invasive coronary angiography and nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging for the five-year-follow up of the CORE320 multicenter study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021 Nov-Dec;15(6):485-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 May 12.
PubMed 34024757Kishi S, Magalhaes TA, Cerci RJ, Zimmermann E, Matheson MB, Vavere A, Tanami Y, Kitslaar PH, George RT, Brinker J, Miller JM, Clouse ME, Lemos PA, Niinuma H, Reiber JHC, Kofoed KF, Rochitte CE, Rybicki FJ, Di Carli MF, Cox C, Lima JAC, Arbab-Zadeh A. Comparative effectiveness of coronary artery stenosis and atherosclerotic plaque burden assessment for predicting 30-day revascularization and 2-year major adverse cardiac events. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec;36(12):2365-2375. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01851-3. Epub 2020 May 2.
PubMed 32361925Schuijf JD, Matheson MB, Ostovaneh MR, Arbab-Zadeh A, Kofoed KF, Scholte AJHA, Dewey M, Steveson C, Rochitte CE, Yoshioka K, Cox C, Di Carli MF, Lima JAC. Ischemia and No Obstructive Stenosis (INOCA) at CT Angiography, CT Myocardial Perfusion, Invasive Coronary Angiography, and SPECT: The CORE320 Study. Radiology. 2020 Jan;294(1):61-73. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190978. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
PubMed 31746688Song YB, Arbab-Zadeh A, Matheson MB, Ostovaneh MR, Vavere AL, Dewey M, Rochitte C, Niinuma H, Laham R, Schuijf JD, Cox C, Brinker J, di Carli M, Lima JAC, Miller JM. Contemporary Discrepancies of Stenosis Assessment by Computed Tomography and Invasive Coronary Angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):e007720. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007720.
PubMed 30764641Rief M, Chen MY, Vavere AL, Kendziora B, Miller JM, Bandettini WP, Cox C, George RT, Lima J, Di Carli M, Plotkin M, Zimmermann E, Laule M, Schlattmann P, Arai AE, Dewey M. Coronary Artery Disease: Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of CT Perfusion and MR Perfusion Imaging in Comparison with Quantitative Coronary Angiography and SPECT-Multicenter Prospective Trial. Radiology. 2018 Feb;286(2):461-470. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162447. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
PubMed 28956734
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multi Center Combined Non-invasive Coronary Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using 320-Detector Computed Tomography
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00934037
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Core320 / NA_00022661
- Conditions
- Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Coronary Disease, Heart Diseases, Myocardial Ischemia, Vascular Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
- Keywords
- Coronary Artery Disease, Computed Tomography, Myoperfusion, Angiography, SPECT
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 444 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc.
- Study start
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multi-detector computed tomography using 320 detectors for identifying the combination of coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50% and a corresponding myocardium perfusion defect in a patient with suspected coronary artery disease compared with conventional coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography myocardium perfusion imaging.
Detailed description
The Combined Coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320 detectors computed tomography (CORE-320) was designed as a prospective, multi-center, international, blinded study designed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multi-detector computed tomography using 320 detectors for identifying coronary artery luminal stenosis and corresponding myocardium perfusion defects in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The primary analysis will be a comparison of the diagnostic capability of the combination of quantitative 320-MDCT angiography and quantitative perfusion imaging to the combination of conventional coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging at the patient level. A positive patient will be defined as having at least one vessel with a ≥ 50% diameter stenosis defined by quantitative coronary angiography and a corresponding positive SPECT territorial myocardial perfusion defect.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Combined CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion | Other | Procedure: 320 Volume Detector Computed Tomography, Other: Other: Multidetector Computed Tomography - 320 detectorsSingle Arm study. All patients underwent combined CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Male or female patients, age 45-85. Women of child bearing potential must demonstrate a negative pregnancy test within 24 hours of the study MDCT.
- Suspected or diagnosed coronary artery disease with a clinical indication for coronary angiography; and planned coronary angiography within the next 60 days.
- Able to understand and willing to sign the Informed Consent Form.
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Known allergy to iodinated contrast media.
- History of contrast-induced nephropathy.
- History of multiple myeloma or previous organ transplantation.
- Elevated serum creatinine (> 1.5 mg/dl) OR calculated creatinine clearance of < 60 ml/min (using the Cockcroft-Gault formula.
- Atrial fibrillation or uncontrolled tachyarrhythmia, or advanced atrioventricular block (second or third degree heart block).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 320 Volume Detector Computed TomographySingle Arm Study. All patients undergo Volume (Multidetector) CT. | Procedure or surgery | Combined CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion |
| Other: Multidetector Computed Tomography - 320 detectorsAlso: Aquilion ONE CT scannerMultidetector computed tomography angiography | Other | Combined CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion |
Primary outcome
Diagnostic accuracy of volume (multi-detector) computed tomography using 320 detectors in a patient with suspected coronary artery disease.
Time frame: 30-60 Days
Diagnostic accuracy of volume (multi-detector) computed tomography using 320 detectors for identifying coronary artery luminal stenosis and corresponding myocardium perfusion defects in a patient with suspected coronary artery disease.
3 secondary outcomes
Diagnostic accuracy of volume computed tomography using 320 detectors in a vessel of a patient with suspected coronary artery disease.
Time frame: 30-60 Days
Compare the relative diagnostic accuracy of 320 CT angiography vs SPECT in predicting at least one ≥ 50% coronary stenosis detected by QCA
Time frame: 30-60 Days
Compare the relative diagnostic accuracy of 320 CT perfusion vs SPECT in predicting at least one ≥ 50% coronary stenosis detected by quantitative conventional angiography.
Time frame: 30-60 Days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Sep 2018.
- Background: PubMed 19038879Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, Paul N, Clouse ME, Shapiro EP, Hoe J, Lardo AC, Bush DE, de Roos A, Cox C, Brinker J, Lima JA. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 27;359(22):2324-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806576.
- Background: PubMed 22146496Vavere AL, Simon GG, George RT, Rochitte CE, Arai AE, Miller JM, Di Carli M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Dewey M, Niinuma H, Laham R, Rybicki FJ, Schuijf JD, Paul N, Hoe J, Kuribyashi S, Sakuma H, Nomura C, Yaw TS, Kofoed KF, Yoshioka K, Clouse ME, Brinker J, Cox C, Lima JA. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320 row detector computed tomography: design and implementation of the CORE320 multicenter, multinational diagnostic study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Nov-Dec;5(6):370-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
- Background: PubMed 18998142Miller JM, Dewey M, Vavere AL, Rochitte CE, Niinuma H, Arbab-Zadeh A, Paul N, Hoe J, de Roos A, Yoshioka K, Lemos PA, Bush DE, Lardo AC, Texter J, Brinker J, Cox C, Clouse ME, Lima JA. Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64. Eur Radiol. 2009 Apr;19(4):816-28. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1203-7. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
- Background: PubMed 23185678Yoneyama K, Vavere AL, Cerci R, Ahmed R, Arai AE, Niinuma H, Rybicki FJ, Rochitte CE, Clouse ME, George RT, Lima JA, Arbab-Zadeh A. Influence of image acquisition settings on radiation dose and image quality in coronary angiography by 320-detector volume computed tomography: the CORE320 pilot experience. Heart Int. 2012 Jun 5;7(2):e11. doi: 10.4081/hi.2012.e11. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
- Background: PubMed 22887690Cerci RJ, Arbab-Zadeh A, George RT, Miller JM, Vavere AL, Mehra V, Yoneyama K, Texter J, Foster C, Guo W, Cox C, Brinker J, Di Carli M, Lima JA. Aligning coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion territories: an algorithm for the CORE320 multicenter study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):587-95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.970608. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
- Background: PubMed 22447807George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Vavere AL, Bengel FM, Lardo AC, Lima JA. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with 320-row detector computed tomography accurately detects myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 May 1;5(3):333-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.969303. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
- Background: PubMed 21940569George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Cerci RJ, Vavere AL, Kitagawa K, Dewey M, Rochitte CE, Arai AE, Paul N, Rybicki FJ, Lardo AC, Clouse ME, Lima JA. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-MDCT: the CT angiography and perfusion methods of the CORE320 multicenter multinational diagnostic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct;197(4):829-37. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5689.
- Background: PubMed 22146495Mehra VC, Valdiviezo C, Arbab-Zadeh A, Ko BS, Seneviratne SK, Cerci R, Lima JA, George RT. A stepwise approach to the visual interpretation of CT-based myocardial perfusion. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Nov-Dec;5(6):357-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39656122Li Z, Tu S, Matheson MB, Li G, Chen Y, Rochitte CE, Chen MY, Dewey M, Miller JM, R Scarpa Matuck B, Yang W, Qin L, Yan F, Lima JAC, Arbab-Zadeh A. Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. Radiology. 2024 Dec;313(3):e240299. doi: 10.1148/radiol.240299.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35099638Preuss D, Garcia G, Laule M, Dewey M, Rief M. Myocardial CT perfusion imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: multisegment reconstruction does not improve diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol Exp. 2022 Jan 31;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41747-021-00256-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34024757Dewey M, Rochitte CE, Ostovaneh MR, Chen MY, George RT, Niinuma H, Kitagawa K, Laham R, Kofoed K, Nomura C, Sakuma H, Yoshioka K, Mehra VC, Jinzaki M, Kuribayashi S, Laule M, Paul N, Scholte AJ, Cerci R, Hoe J, Tan SY, Rybicki FJ, Matheson MB, Vavere AL, Arai AE, Miller JM, Cox C, Brinker J, Clouse ME, Di Carli M, Lima JAC, Arbab-Zadeh A. Prognostic value of noninvasive combined anatomic/functional assessment by cardiac CT in patients with suspected coronary artery disease - Comparison with invasive coronary angiography and nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging for the five-year-follow up of the CORE320 multicenter study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021 Nov-Dec;15(6):485-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 May 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32361925Kishi S, Magalhaes TA, Cerci RJ, Zimmermann E, Matheson MB, Vavere A, Tanami Y, Kitslaar PH, George RT, Brinker J, Miller JM, Clouse ME, Lemos PA, Niinuma H, Reiber JHC, Kofoed KF, Rochitte CE, Rybicki FJ, Di Carli MF, Cox C, Lima JAC, Arbab-Zadeh A. Comparative effectiveness of coronary artery stenosis and atherosclerotic plaque burden assessment for predicting 30-day revascularization and 2-year major adverse cardiac events. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec;36(12):2365-2375. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01851-3. Epub 2020 May 2.
Related trials for Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joao AC Lima, MD MBA study chair
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
16 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing 320 Volume Detector Computed Tomography and Other: Multidetector Computed Tomography - 320 detectors in people with Arterial Occlusive Diseases and Coronary Disease, run by Johns Hopkins University at 16 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in United States, Japan, Brazil, Singapore, Canada and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diagnostic accuracy of volume (multi-detector) computed tomography using 320 detectors in a patient with suspected coronary artery disease. (time frame: 30-60 Days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00934037, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2018.