Coronary Artery StenosisPhase 1/2NCT00934752
De Novo Pilot Study, Lutonix Catheter in Conjunction With Bare Metal Stenting for Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions
A Phase 1/2 study testing Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in people with Coronary Artery Stenosis, run by C. R. Bard at 3 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The study will enroll patients with angiographically significant coronary de novo lesions. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 and treated with a Lutonix catheter either before or after bare-metal stenting (BMS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Stenosis
- What is being tested?
- Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- Jul 2009to Jan 2012
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or non-pregnant/non-breast feeding Female ≥ 18 years of age. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (within 7 days of the procedure);
- Documented stable angina pectoris Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCSC) 1-4, unstable angina pectoris with documented ischemia (Braunwald I-II) or documented silent ischemia;
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 25%;
- Patient is an acceptable candidate for PTCA, stenting, and emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG);
- Patient is willing to provide informed consent and comply with follow-up visits and testing schedule;
- Target lesion is a de novo lesion in a native coronary artery vessel;
Show all 11Show fewer
- Initial stenosis is ≥ 50% and < 100% by visual estimate or quantitative coronary angiography (QCA);
- Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD) is ≥ 2.5 and ≤ 3.25 prior to predilation;
- Target lesion is ≤18mm in length and can be treated in its entirety by no more than 1 single Lutonix Catheter balloon and 1 single BMS;
- Guidewire is able to cross lesion and be placed in distal vessel prior to enrollment;
- Enrollment permitted after successful treatment of 1 non-study lesion in a single other non-study vessel (not in the same vascular territory as the study lesion). Successful treatment is defined as ≤ 30% residual stenosis with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Grade III flow and not evidence of dissection.
Who cannot join
- History of stroke within past 6 months;
- History of myocardial infarction (MI) or thrombolysis within 72 hours of randomization;
- Prior vascular brachytherapy;
- Uncontrollable allergies to procedure medications, materials or contrast;
- Angiographic evidence of thrombus or dissection within the target vessel;
- Intervention of another coronary lesion ≤ 60 days before index procedure day or planned following index procedure;
Show all 18Show fewer
- Target lesion is planned to be treated with something other than PTCA and stent (i.e., cutting-balloon, atherectomy, vascular brachytherapy (VBT), etc.);
- Target lesion is in the Left Main and has excessive calcification or tortuosity or involves bifurcation disease of vessel ≥ 2.5mm;
- Known sensitivity or has received paclitaxel or other antimitogenic agent within 12 months prior to target vessel treatment;
- Patient has any previous intervention (PTCA, stent, etc.) of the target coronary vessel;
- Any medical condition, in the investigators opinion, that should preclude the patient from the study or patient has a life expectancy less than 24 months;
- Known creatine kinase-MB (CKMB) > 2x upper limit of normal (ULN) or positive Troponin;
- Creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl;
- Leukocyte < 3500/mL;
- Platelet < 100,000 mL or > 750,000 mL;
- Currently taking or must resume warfarin;
- Patient is contraindicated for antiplatelet therapy or it will need to be withdrawn for a planned procedure;
- The subject is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Netherlands3 sites
Academic Medical Center
Amsterdam
Catherina Zeikenhuis
Eindhoven
Thorax Center
Rotterdam
About this study
Official title: An Exploratory Study Investigating the Use of the Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in Conjunction With Bare Metal Stenting in Patients With De Novo Coronary Lesions.
The study will enroll patients with angiographically significant coronary de novo lesions. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 and treated with a Lutonix catheter either before or after bare-metal stenting (BMS). The purpose is to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the Lutonix Catheter for treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis using two distinct treatment strategies.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Stenosis
- Being tested
- Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon
- Keywords
- de novo stenotic lesions
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Stenosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated BalloonDevice
Also called Drug Coated Balloon
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PCTA)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lutonix Catheter | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean percent stent volume obstruction as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT)
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Stent Malposition
Measured: 6 Months
Minimal Lumen Area
Measured: 6 Months
Stent Symmetry
Measured: 6 Months
Stent Expansion
Measured: 6 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2009
- Primary completionApr 2010
- Study completionJan 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by C. R. BardThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- C. R. Bard
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Prof. P.W.J C. Serruys, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Erasmus Universtiy Medical Center; Netherlands
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00934752
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CL0013-01
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2009
- Last updated
- 16 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 25;331(8):489-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408253310801.
PubMed 8041413Colombo A, Drzewiecki J, Banning A, Grube E, Hauptmann K, Silber S, Dudek D, Fort S, Schiele F, Zmudka K, Guagliumi G, Russell ME; TAXUS II Study Group. Randomized study to assess the effectiveness of slow- and moderate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary artery lesions. Circulation. 2003 Aug 19;108(7):788-94. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000086926.62288.A6. Epub 2003 Aug 4.
PubMed 12900339Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW; Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007 May 1;115(17):2344-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313.
PubMed 17470709Eisenstein EL, Anstrom KJ, Kong DF, Shaw LK, Tuttle RH, Mark DB, Kramer JM, Harrington RA, Matchar DB, Kandzari DE, Peterson ED, Schulman KA, Califf RM. Clopidogrel use and long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation. JAMA. 2007 Jan 10;297(2):159-68. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.2.joc60179. Epub 2006 Dec 5.
PubMed 17148711Acute platelet inhibition with abciximab does not reduce in-stent restenosis (ERASER study). The ERASER Investigators. Circulation. 1999 Aug 24;100(8):799-806. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.8.799.
PubMed 10458714Erbel R, Haude M, Hopp HW, Franzen D, Rupprecht HJ, Heublein B, Fischer K, de Jaegere P, Serruys P, Rutsch W, Probst P. Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 3;339(23):1672-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392304.
PubMed 9834304Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, Detre K, Veltri L, Ricci D, Nobuyoshi M, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 25;331(8):496-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408253310802.
PubMed 8041414Gonzalo N, Garcia-Garcia HM, Serruys PW, Commissaris KH, Bezerra H, Gobbens P, Costa M, Regar E. Reproducibility of quantitative optical coherence tomography for stent analysis. EuroIntervention. 2009 Jun;5(2):224-32. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i2a35.
PubMed 19527980Holmes DR Jr, Teirstein P, Satler L, Sketch M, O'Malley J, Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Fitzgerald PJ, Wang H, Caramanica E, Cohen SA; SISR Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the SISR randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1264-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1264. Epub 2006 Mar 12.
PubMed 16531619Joner M, Finn AV, Farb A, Mont EK, Kolodgie FD, Ladich E, Kutys R, Skorija K, Gold HK, Virmani R. Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jul 4;48(1):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.042. Epub 2006 May 5.
PubMed 16814667King SB 3rd, Smith SC Jr, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Morrison DA, Williams DO, Feldman TE, Kern MJ, O'Neill WW, Schaff HV, Whitlow PL; ACC/AHA/SCAI; Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 15;51(2):172-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.002. No abstract available.
PubMed 18191745Lee MS, Pessegueiro A, Zimmer R, Jurewitz D, Tobis J. Clinical presentation of patients with in-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Aug;20(8):401-3.
PubMed 18688064Mauri L, Hsieh WH, Massaro JM, Ho KK, D'Agostino R, Cutlip DE. Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):1020-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067731. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
PubMed 17296821Lansky AJ, Popma JJ, Cutlip D, Ho KK, Abizaid AS, Saucedo J, Zhang Y, Senerchia C, Kuntz RE, Leon MB, Baim DS. Comparative analysis of early and late angiographic outcomes using two quantitative algorithms in the Balloon versus Optimal Atherectomy Trial (BOAT). Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jun 15;83(12):1611-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00166-6.
PubMed 10392863Gutierrez-Chico JL, Wykrzykowska J, Nuesch E, van Geuns RJ, Koch KT, Koolen JJ, di Mario C, Windecker S, van Es GA, Gobbens P, Juni P, Regar E, Serruys PW. Vascular tissue reaction to acute malapposition in human coronary arteries: sequential assessment with optical coherence tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb 1;5(1):20-9, S1-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.965301. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
PubMed 22319063
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Exploratory Study Investigating the Use of the Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in Conjunction With Bare Metal Stenting in Patients With De Novo Coronary Lesions.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00934752
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CL0013-01
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Stenosis
- Keywords
- de novo stenotic lesions
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- C. R. BardIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2009
- Primary completion
- Apr 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study will enroll patients with angiographically significant coronary de novo lesions. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 and treated with a Lutonix catheter either before or after bare-metal stenting (BMS). The purpose is to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the Lutonix Catheter for treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis using two distinct treatment strategies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lutonix Catheter | Experimental | Device: Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Male or non-pregnant/non-breast feeding Female ≥ 18 years of age. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (within 7 days of the procedure);
- Documented stable angina pectoris Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCSC) 1-4, unstable angina pectoris with documented ischemia (Braunwald I-II) or documented silent ischemia;
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 25%;
- Patient is an acceptable candidate for PTCA, stenting, and emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG);
- Patient is willing to provide informed consent and comply with follow-up visits and testing schedule;
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- History of stroke within past 6 months;
- History of myocardial infarction (MI) or thrombolysis within 72 hours of randomization;
- Prior vascular brachytherapy;
- Uncontrollable allergies to procedure medications, materials or contrast;
- Angiographic evidence of thrombus or dissection within the target vessel;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated BalloonAlso: Drug Coated BalloonPercutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PCTA) | Device | Lutonix Catheter |
Primary outcome
Mean percent stent volume obstruction as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT)
Time frame: 6 months
4 secondary outcomes
Stent Malposition
Time frame: 6 Months
Minimal Lumen Area
Time frame: 6 Months
Stent Symmetry
Time frame: 6 Months
Stent Expansion
Time frame: 6 Months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jan 2017.
- Background: PubMed 8041413Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 25;331(8):489-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408253310801.
- Background: PubMed 12900339Colombo A, Drzewiecki J, Banning A, Grube E, Hauptmann K, Silber S, Dudek D, Fort S, Schiele F, Zmudka K, Guagliumi G, Russell ME; TAXUS II Study Group. Randomized study to assess the effectiveness of slow- and moderate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary artery lesions. Circulation. 2003 Aug 19;108(7):788-94. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000086926.62288.A6. Epub 2003 Aug 4.
- Background: PubMed 17470709Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW; Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007 May 1;115(17):2344-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313.
- Background: PubMed 17148711Eisenstein EL, Anstrom KJ, Kong DF, Shaw LK, Tuttle RH, Mark DB, Kramer JM, Harrington RA, Matchar DB, Kandzari DE, Peterson ED, Schulman KA, Califf RM. Clopidogrel use and long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation. JAMA. 2007 Jan 10;297(2):159-68. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.2.joc60179. Epub 2006 Dec 5.
- Background: PubMed 10458714Acute platelet inhibition with abciximab does not reduce in-stent restenosis (ERASER study). The ERASER Investigators. Circulation. 1999 Aug 24;100(8):799-806. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.8.799.
- Background: PubMed 9834304Erbel R, Haude M, Hopp HW, Franzen D, Rupprecht HJ, Heublein B, Fischer K, de Jaegere P, Serruys P, Rutsch W, Probst P. Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 3;339(23):1672-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392304.
- Background: PubMed 8041414Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, Detre K, Veltri L, Ricci D, Nobuyoshi M, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 25;331(8):496-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408253310802.
- Background: PubMed 19527980Gonzalo N, Garcia-Garcia HM, Serruys PW, Commissaris KH, Bezerra H, Gobbens P, Costa M, Regar E. Reproducibility of quantitative optical coherence tomography for stent analysis. EuroIntervention. 2009 Jun;5(2):224-32. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i2a35.
- Background: PubMed 16531619Holmes DR Jr, Teirstein P, Satler L, Sketch M, O'Malley J, Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Fitzgerald PJ, Wang H, Caramanica E, Cohen SA; SISR Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the SISR randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1264-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1264. Epub 2006 Mar 12.
- Background: PubMed 16814667Joner M, Finn AV, Farb A, Mont EK, Kolodgie FD, Ladich E, Kutys R, Skorija K, Gold HK, Virmani R. Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jul 4;48(1):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.042. Epub 2006 May 5.
- Background: PubMed 18191745King SB 3rd, Smith SC Jr, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Morrison DA, Williams DO, Feldman TE, Kern MJ, O'Neill WW, Schaff HV, Whitlow PL; ACC/AHA/SCAI; Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 15;51(2):172-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.002. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 18688064Lee MS, Pessegueiro A, Zimmer R, Jurewitz D, Tobis J. Clinical presentation of patients with in-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Aug;20(8):401-3.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Stenosis
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Vessel-FFR Versus FFR in Intermediate Coronary Stenoses
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Stenoses
Not yet recruiting
Rapid Inflation/Deflation Compared With Prolonged High-Pressure Balloon Inflation
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Stent Occlusion
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Expanded Studies on the SCAPIS Stockholm Reexamination Cohort
Coronary Artery Disease, Arterial Stiffness, Blood Pressure
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Breathing-Maneuver-Induced Myocardial Oxygenation Reserve Validated by FFR (B-MORE)
Coronary Artery Stenosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The PICCOLETO XIII REVEAL-DCB Cohort A Study
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Stenosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Prof. P.W.J C. Serruys, MD, PhD principal investigator
Erasmus Universtiy Medical Center; Netherlands
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in people with Coronary Artery Stenosis, run by C. R. Bard at 3 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean percent stent volume obstruction as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00934752, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 3 Nov 2026.