AzTrials
AzTrials

Caloric IntakeNCT00936507

Does Portion Size Influence Intake of Low-Energy-Dense Foods in Preschool-aged Children?

A study testing Energy Density/Portion Size in people with Caloric Intake, run by The University of Tennessee, Knoxville at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this randomized controlled study using a crossover design is to investigate the main effect of portion size and food type (low-energy dense vs. high-energy dense) on caloric intake. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Caloric Intake
What is being tested?
Energy Density/Portion Size
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
17 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2008to Dec 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All children that are ≥3 years of age enrolled in the ELC preschool with parental consent can participate.
  • Eligible children must also like both the applesauce and the pudding, and be able to consume foods with a spoon.

Who cannot join

  • Children allergic to applesauce or chocolate pudding or who are lactose- intolerant will not be included in the study.
  • Did not attend all feeding sessions.
  • Did not consume more than 5 grams from any of the foods on an occasion.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Healthy Eating and Activity Laboratory, University of Tennessee

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this randomized controlled study using a crossover design is to investigate the main effect of portion size and food type (low-energy dense vs. high-energy dense) on caloric intake.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this investigation is to examine the impact of portion size on intake of a low energy dense food (fruit). Preschool-aged children will be provided with a small and large portion of applesauce (low-energy-dense food) and chocolate pudding (higher-energy-dense food) and allowed to eat the foods ad libitum during an afternoon snack in their usual preschool classroom. Measures of the amount of each food (grams and kilocalories) consumed will be taken.

The following hypotheses are proposed:

  1. A significant main effect of portion size will occur, such that children will consume more food, both in grams and kilocalories, in the large portion as compared to the small portion conditions.
  2. A main effect of food type on caloric intake will occur, such that children will consume less calories in the applesauce condition as compared to the pudding condition, due to the differences in energy density of these foods. It is not anticipated that a difference in grams consumed from each food will occur.
Conditions
Caloric Intake
Being tested
Energy Density/Portion Size
Keywords
energy density, portion size, child feeding

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Energy Density/Portion SizeOther

Study groups in NCT00936507
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Low-ED, small portionExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Energy Density/Portion Size
Low-ED, large portionExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Energy Density/Portion Size
High-ED, small portionExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Energy Density/Portion Size
High-ED, large portionExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Energy Density/Portion Size

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jul 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2008
  4. Study completionDec 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
17 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00936507
Sponsor's protocol ID
1-Smith
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
8 Jul 2009
Last updated
5 Apr 2018
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Energy Density/Portion Size in people with Caloric Intake, run by The University of Tennessee, Knoxville at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in