Dry Eye SyndromesPhase 4NCT00938704
Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Two Non-Preserved Artificial Tears for the Treatment of Dry Eye Signs and Symptoms
A Phase 4 study testing carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% +glycerin 0.9% and sodium hyaluronate 0.18% in people with Dry Eye Syndromes, run by Allergan at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
To compare the efficacy and safety of two non-preserved artificial tears, (carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, + glycerin 0.9% vs. sodium hyaluronate 0.18%) eye drops for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- What is being tested?
- carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% +glycerin 0.9% and sodium hyaluronate 0.18%
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 71 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Jun 2009to Jun 2009
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Current use of an artificial tear product at least 2 times per day (e.g. for relief of dry eye symptoms of dryness).
- Be likely to complete the entire course of study and to comply with appropriate instructions
Who cannot join
- Have undergone refractive surgery (e.g., cataract surgery, PRK, LASIK, or any surgery involving a limbal or corneal incision) within the last 12 months.
- Have uncontrolled systemic disease
- Are currently using, or have used within 14 days of study enrollment, any ocular medications other than artificial tears
- Have anticipated contact lens wear during the study
- Have an active ocular infection
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
To compare the efficacy and safety of two non-preserved artificial tears, (carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, + glycerin 0.9% vs. sodium hyaluronate 0.18%) eye drops for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.
- Conditions
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- Being tested
- carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% +glycerin 0.9%, sodium hyaluronate 0.18%
- Medical subject headings
- Dry Eye Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% +glycerin 0.9%Drug
Also called Optive™ Sensitive
To open, twist and pull tab to remove. Instill study medication as needed, but at least one drop 3 times a day as instructed in the protocol and then discard the container.
sodium hyaluronate 0.18%Drug
Also called Vismed®
To open, twist and pull tab to remove. Instill study medication as needed, but at least one drop 3 times a day as instructed in the protocol and then discard the container.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, glycerin 0.9% Receives: Drug: carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% +glycerin 0.9% |
| 2 | Active comparator | sodium hyaluronate 0.18% Receives: Drug: sodium hyaluronate 0.18% |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2
Change from baseline in OSDI at Week 2. The OSDI consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms. Each of the 12 questions is assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time; 4=all of the time). The score is converted to a 0-100 score where 0 is best and 100 is worst. Higher OSDI scores are associated with greater severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) at Week 2
Change from baseline in TBUT at Week 2. TBUT is defined as the time required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2
Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Week 2
Change from baseline in corneal staining at Week 2. Staining of the cornea following ocular administration of fluorescein dye was graded using a 6-point scale (0=no staining, 5=diffuse staining). The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2
Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Temporal) at Week 2
Change from baseline in conjunctival (temporal) staining at Week 2. Staining of the conjunctiva following ocular administration of lissamine green dye was graded using a 6-point scale (0=no staining, 5=diffuse staining). The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2
Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Nasal) at Week 2
Change from baseline in conjunctival staining (nasal) at Week 2. Staining of the conjunctiva following ocular administration of lissamine green dye was graded using a 6-point scale (0=no staining, 5=diffuse staining). The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2009
- Primary completionJun 2009
- Study completionJun 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Dry Eye SyndromesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Allergan
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Allergan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00938704
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MA-OPT-09-002
- Status last verified
- Sep 2011
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2009
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2011
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Oct 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Two Non-Preserved Artificial Tears for the Treatment of Dry Eye Signs and Symptoms
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00938704
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MA-OPT-09-002
- Conditions
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AllerganIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2009
- Primary completion
- Jun 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 31 Oct 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare the efficacy and safety of two non-preserved artificial tears, (carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, + glycerin 0.9% vs. sodium hyaluronate 0.18%) eye drops for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Drug: carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% +glycerin 0.9%carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, glycerin 0.9% |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: sodium hyaluronate 0.18%sodium hyaluronate 0.18% |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Current use of an artificial tear product at least 2 times per day (e.g. for relief of dry eye symptoms of dryness).
- Be likely to complete the entire course of study and to comply with appropriate instructions
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Have undergone refractive surgery (e.g., cataract surgery, PRK, LASIK, or any surgery involving a limbal or corneal incision) within the last 12 months.
- Have uncontrolled systemic disease
- Are currently using, or have used within 14 days of study enrollment, any ocular medications other than artificial tears
- Have anticipated contact lens wear during the study
- Have an active ocular infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% +glycerin 0.9%Also: Optive™ SensitiveTo open, twist and pull tab to remove. Instill study medication as needed, but at least one drop 3 times a day as instructed in the protocol and then discard the container. | Drug | 1 |
| sodium hyaluronate 0.18%Also: Vismed®To open, twist and pull tab to remove. Instill study medication as needed, but at least one drop 3 times a day as instructed in the protocol and then discard the container. | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2
Change from baseline in OSDI at Week 2. The OSDI consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms. Each of the 12 questions is assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time; 4=all of the time). The score is converted to a 0-100 score where 0 is best and 100 is worst. Higher OSDI scores are associated with greater severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.
4 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) at Week 2
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2
Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Week 2
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2
Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Temporal) at Week 2
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2
Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Nasal) at Week 2
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Oct 2011.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Dry Eye Syndromes
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Sjogren's Disease
Sjogren's Syndrome, Salivary Gland
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Evaluation of Allogenic Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) Injection Therapy for Refractory Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Unresponsive to Conventional Treatments
Dry Eye Disease (DED), Graft-Versus-Host Disease(GVHD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Allergan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% +glycerin 0.9% and sodium hyaluronate 0.18% in people with Dry Eye Syndromes, run by Allergan at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Oct 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2 (time frame: Baseline, Week 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2011.