AzTrials
AzTrials

EndometriosisPhase 3NCT00939861

Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy for Colorectal Endometriosis

A Phase 3 study testing laparoscopy and laparotomy in people with Endometriosis, run by Tenon Hospital, Paris at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study hypothesis: equivalency of laparoscopic compared to laparotomic colorectal resection for endometriosis on digestive, gynaecologic, general symptoms and quality of life. Morbidity and fertility outcomes will also be evaluated.Primary purpose of the protocol is the evaluation of dyschesia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Endometriosis
What is being tested?
laparoscopy and laparotomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jan 2006to Sep 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients over 18 years old
  • patients with colorectal endometriosis
  • patients affiliated to the French Health Care system
  • patients having signed the inform consent.
  • patients who can speak and read French

Who cannot join

  • patients with prior colorectal surgery
  • patients with a contraindication to laparoscopy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Tenon Hospital, Departement of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Paris, Paris, 75020

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Study Comparing Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy in the Treatment of Colorectal Endometriosis

Study hypothesis: equivalency of laparoscopic compared to laparotomic colorectal resection for endometriosis on digestive, gynaecologic, general symptoms and quality of life. Morbidity and fertility outcomes will also be evaluated.Primary purpose of the protocol is the evaluation of dyschesia.

Read the detailed description

For all patients, colorectal endometriosis will be confirmed preoperatively by clinical examination, transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography and magnetic resonance imaging.Among patients with an indication of surgery, the intensity of dyschesia and other gynecological or digestive disorders will be evaluated pre-operatively using a visual analogue scale. Quality of life will be assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire. The allocation of the surgical route will be conducted by lottery the day before surgery. Patients will be reviewed postoperatively at 1 month and a new assessment of symptoms will be made at 6 months. The duration of the study will be 7 months for the patient and 24 months in total.If considering the two surgical routes as equivalent, with a delta score (after-before surgery) = ±2, standard deviation = 1.55, risk α=2.5%, risk β=10%, and taking into account that prevalence of dyschesia in the study population is 63%, 52 patients will be included.

Conditions
Endometriosis
Being tested
laparoscopy, laparotomy
Keywords
colorectal endometriosis, laparoscopy, laparotomy, gynecologic and digestive symptoms, quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire), morbidity, fertility
Medical subject headings
Endometriosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • laparoscopyProcedure or surgery

    colorectal resection

  • laparotomyProcedure or surgery

    colorectal resection

Study groups in NCT00939861
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Experimentallaparoscopy
Receives: Procedure: laparoscopy
2Experimentallaparotomy
Receives: Procedure: laparotomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evaluation of dyschesia at 6 months using a visual analogue scale

    Measured: at 6 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Evaluation of gynaecologic symptoms (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia), digestive symptoms (diarrhea, constipation , intestinal cramps) and general symptoms (asthenia, back pain) at 6 months using visual analogue scale

    Measured: at 6 months

  2. Evaluation of quality of life at 6 months using SF-36 questionnaire

    Measured: at 6 months

  3. Morbidity

    Measured: During 6 months

  4. Postoperative fertility

    Measured: during the study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jul 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2006
  3. Primary completionMay 2009
  4. Study completionSep 2009 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00939861
Sponsor's protocol ID
13072009
Status last verified
Jul 2009
First submitted
14 Jul 2009
Last updated
15 Jul 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Touboul C, Ballester M, Dubernard G, Zilberman S, Thomin A, Darai E. Long-term symptoms, quality of life, and fertility after colorectal resection for endometriosis: extended analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopically assisted to open surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):1879-87. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3880-4. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

    PubMed 25294552

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing laparoscopy and laparotomy in people with Endometriosis, run by Tenon Hospital, Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jul 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evaluation of dyschesia at 6 months using a visual analogue scale (time frame: at 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00939861, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jul 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in