MelanomaPhase 1/2NCT00940004
Toll-like Receptor (TLR) Ligand Matured Dendritic Cell Vaccination in Melanoma Patients
A Phase 1/2 study testing autologous dendritic cell vaccination in people with Melanoma, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Objectives: This is an exploratory study, consisting of two parts. In part I a dose escalation is performed and the primary objective is the safety of different doses of TLR-dendritic cell (TLR-DC). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Melanoma
- What is being tested?
- autologous dendritic cell vaccination
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- Jun 2009to Nov 2014
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients:
- histologically documented evidence of melanoma
- stage III or IV melanoma according to the 2001 AJCC criteria
- HLA-A2.1 phenotype melanoma expressing gp100 (compulsory) and tyrosinase (non- compulsory)
- WHO performance status 0-1 (Karnofsky 100-70)
- life expectancy > 3 months
Show all 16Show fewer
- age 18-70 years
- no clinical signs or symptoms of CNS metastases
- WBC > 3.0x109/l, lymphocytes > 0.8x109/l, platelets > 100x109/l, serum creatinine < 150 µmol/l, serum bilirubin < 25 µmol/l
- normal serum LDH (< 450 U/l)
- expected adequacy of follow-up
- no pregnant or lactating women
- written informed consent
- And in addition for Part I + II:
- stage III melanoma: radical regional lymphnode dissection is planned or performed
- stage IV melanoma: at least one unidimensional measurable target lesions according to RECIST, not previously irradiated, and no significant symptoms of disease requiring other palliative treatments
Who cannot join
- prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy or radiotherapy < 4 weeks prior to planned vaccination or presence of treatment-related toxicity
- history of any second malignancy in the previous 5 years, with the exception of adequately treated basal cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix serious active infections, HbsAg or HIV positive or autoimmune diseases or organ allografts
- concomitant use of immunosuppressive drugs
- known allergy to shell fish (since it contains KLH)
- rapidly progressive disease
- any serious clinical condition that may interfere with the safe administration of DC
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Netherlands1 site
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6500HB
About this study
Official title: TLR Ligand Matured Dendritic Cell Vaccination in Melanoma Patients: the Key Towards a More Potent Immune Induction?
Objectives:
This is an exploratory study, consisting of two parts. In part I a dose escalation is performed and the primary objective is the safety of different doses of TLR-dendritic cell (TLR-DC). In part II TLR-DC vaccination will be compared with cytokine-matured DC vaccination and the primary objective of this part is the immunological response to TLR-DC vaccination, with toxicity and clinical efficacy being secondary objectives. These studies will provide important data on the safety and immunological effects of TLR-matured DC.
Read more
Study design:
This study is an open label prospective exploratory intervention study.
Study population:
The investigators' study population consists of HLA-A2.1 positive melanoma patients, with proven expression of melanoma associated tumor antigens gp100 and tyrosinase. Melanoma patients with regional lymph node metastasis in whom a radical lymph node dissection is planned or performed within 2 months of inclusion in this study (further referred to as stage III) and melanoma patients with measurable distant metastases (further referred to as stage IV) will be included.
Read the detailed description
- Rationale Immunotherapy applying ex vivo generated and tumor-antigen-loaded dendritic cells (DC) has now successfully been introduced in the clinic. A limited, but consistent, number of objective immunological and clinical responses have been observed. Thus far it remains unclear why some patients respond and others not, but there is a general consensus that the current protocols applied to generate DC may not result in the induction of optimal Th1 responses. We and others have demonstrated that DC maturation is one of the crucial factors, not only for effective DC migration but also to induce effective anti-tumor immune responses in cancer patients. Currently, the "golden standard" used to mature DC consists of a cocktail of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1beta, IL-6, TNFalpha) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Recent mouse data demonstrated, however, that maturation of DC by solely pro-inflammatory cytokines yielded DC that supported T cell clonal expansion, but failed to efficiently direct effector T cell differentiation. Interestingly, DC matured in the presence of Toll like receptor (TLR) ligands were able to induce full T cell effector function and unleashed more potent immune responses. We recently identified vaccines against infectious diseases that contain TLR ligands and are capable of inducing DC maturation. This knowledge provides a new application for these clinical applicable agents: clinical grade DC stimulators. A clinical grade DC maturation protocol is developed in which TLR ligands (preventive vaccines) and PGE2 are combined which resulted in the generation of mature DC that secrete high levels of the key cytokine IL-12. Moreover, these TLR-ligand matured DC induced T cells secreting at least 20-fold higher levels of the effector cytokines IFNalpha and TNFalpha as compared to DC matured in the absence of TLR ligands. In conclusion, these in vitro data demonstrate that TLR-ligand matured DC are promising candidates to improve immunological and clinical responses in cancer immunotherapy.
- Objectives This is an exploratory study, consisting of two parts. In part I a dose escalation is performed and the primary objective is the safety of different doses of TLR-DC. In part II TLR-DC vaccination will be compared with cytokine-matured DC vaccination and the primary objective of this part is the immunological response to TLR-DC vaccination, with toxicity and clinical efficacy being secondary objectives. These studies will provide important data on the safety and immunological effects of TLR-matured DC.
- Study design This study is an open label prospective exploratory intervention study.
- Study population Our study population consists of HLA-A2.1 positive melanoma patients, with proven expression of melanoma associated tumor antigens gp100 and tyrosinase. Melanoma patients with regional lymph node metastasis in whom a radical lymph node dissection is planned or performed within 2 months of inclusion in this study (further referred to as stage III) and melanoma patients with measurable distant metastases (further referred to as stage IV) will be included.
- Main study endpoints
The primary objectives of the study are to investigate the toxicity of TLR-DC by dose escalation of DC numbers in part I, and to investigate immunological responses upon TLR-DC vaccination in part II of the study.
Immunological responses are:
- The migratory capacity of the TLR-ligand matured DC in vivo.
- The activation of immune cells in vivo.
- The immunological response induced with TLR-ligand matured DC loaded with mRNA encoding melanoma-associated tumor antigens (gp100 and tyrosinase).
Safety and clinical efficacy are secondary objectives.
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Being tested
- autologous dendritic cell vaccination
- Keywords
- dendritic cell vaccination, melanoma, toll like receptor ligands, vaccines
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
autologous dendritic cell vaccinationBiological
Autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells electroporated with mRNA encoding gp100 and tyrosinase and matured with either cytokines or TLR ligands. Dendritic cells are vaccinated intradermal/intravenously 3 times with biweekly intervals every 6 months, if no signs of progression, for a total of 9 vaccinations.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| cytokine matured DC | Active comparator | vaccination with autologous dendritic cells matured with standard cytokine cocktail and electroporated with mRNA encoding tumor associated antigens Receives: Biological: autologous dendritic cell vaccination |
| TLR ligand matured DC | Experimental | vaccination with autologous TLR-ligand matured dendritic cells electroporated with mRNA encoding tumor associated antigens Receives: Biological: autologous dendritic cell vaccination |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Toxicity of TLR-matured DC (part I) and immunological response upon vaccination with TLR-matured DC (part II)
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
vaccination related toxicity
in terms of local injection site reaction, flu-like symptoms, or otherwise related to vaccination, scored according to CTC version 3.0
Measured: 5 years
clinical efficacy (progression free survival)
time to progression from date of start (apheresis) will be recorded
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2009
- Primary completionNov 2014
- Study completionNov 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Radboud University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- C.J.A. Punt, prof.dr., Principal investigator, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, dept of Medical Oncology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00940004
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL22750.000.08
- Other IDs
- KUN2006-3699
- Status last verified
- Nov 2014
- First submitted
- 25 Jun 2009
- Last updated
- 17 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- TLR Ligand Matured Dendritic Cell Vaccination in Melanoma Patients: the Key Towards a More Potent Immune Induction?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00940004
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NL22750.000.08
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Keywords
- dendritic cell vaccination, melanoma, toll like receptor ligands, vaccines
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2009
- Primary completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objectives:
This is an exploratory study, consisting of two parts. In part I a dose escalation is performed and the primary objective is the safety of different doses of TLR-dendritic cell (TLR-DC). In part II TLR-DC vaccination will be compared with cytokine-matured DC vaccination and the primary objective of this part is the immunological response to TLR-DC vaccination, with toxicity and clinical efficacy being secondary objectives. These studies will provide important data on the safety and immunological effects of TLR-matured DC.
Study design:
This study is an open label prospective exploratory intervention study.
Study population:
The investigators' study population consists of HLA-A2.1 positive melanoma patients, with proven expression of melanoma associated tumor antigens gp100 and tyrosinase. Melanoma patients with regional lymph node metastasis in whom a radical lymph node dissection is planned or performed within 2 months of inclusion in this study (further referred to as stage III) and melanoma patients with measurable distant metastases (further referred to as stage IV) will be included.
Detailed description
- Rationale Immunotherapy applying ex vivo generated and tumor-antigen-loaded dendritic cells (DC) has now successfully been introduced in the clinic. A limited, but consistent, number of objective immunological and clinical responses have been observed. Thus far it remains unclear why some patients respond and others not, but there is a general consensus that the current protocols applied to generate DC may not result in the induction of optimal Th1 responses. We and others have demonstrated that DC maturation is one of the crucial factors, not only for effective DC migration but also to induce effective anti-tumor immune responses in cancer patients. Currently, the "golden standard" used to mature DC consists of a cocktail of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1beta, IL-6, TNFalpha) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Recent mouse data demonstrated, however, that maturation of DC by solely pro-inflammatory cytokines yielded DC that supported T cell clonal expansion, but failed to efficiently direct effector T cell differentiation. Interestingly, DC matured in the presence of Toll like receptor (TLR) ligands were able to induce full T cell effector function and unleashed more potent immune responses. We recently identified vaccines against infectious diseases that contain TLR ligands and are capable of inducing DC maturation. This knowledge provides a new application for these clinical applicable agents: clinical grade DC stimulators. A clinical grade DC maturation protocol is developed in which TLR ligands (preventive vaccines) and PGE2 are combined which resulted in the generation of mature DC that secrete high levels of the key cytokine IL-12. Moreover, these TLR-ligand matured DC induced T cells secreting at least 20-fold higher levels of the effector cytokines IFNalpha and TNFalpha as compared to DC matured in the absence of TLR ligands. In conclusion, these in vitro data demonstrate that TLR-ligand matured DC are promising candidates to improve immunological and clinical responses in cancer immunotherapy.
- Objectives This is an exploratory study, consisting of two parts. In part I a dose escalation is performed and the primary objective is the safety of different doses of TLR-DC. In part II TLR-DC vaccination will be compared with cytokine-matured DC vaccination and the primary objective of this part is the immunological response to TLR-DC vaccination, with toxicity and clinical efficacy being secondary objectives. These studies will provide important data on the safety and immunological effects of TLR-matured DC.
- Study design This study is an open label prospective exploratory intervention study.
- Study population Our study population consists of HLA-A2.1 positive melanoma patients, with proven expression of melanoma associated tumor antigens gp100 and tyrosinase. Melanoma patients with regional lymph node metastasis in whom a radical lymph node dissection is planned or performed within 2 months of inclusion in this study (further referred to as stage III) and melanoma patients with measurable distant metastases (further referred to as stage IV) will be included.
- Main study endpoints
The primary objectives of the study are to investigate the toxicity of TLR-DC by dose escalation of DC numbers in part I, and to investigate immunological responses upon TLR-DC vaccination in part II of the study.
Immunological responses are:
- The migratory capacity of the TLR-ligand matured DC in vivo.
- The activation of immune cells in vivo.
- The immunological response induced with TLR-ligand matured DC loaded with mRNA encoding melanoma-associated tumor antigens (gp100 and tyrosinase).
Safety and clinical efficacy are secondary objectives.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| cytokine matured DC | Active comparator | Biological: autologous dendritic cell vaccinationvaccination with autologous dendritic cells matured with standard cytokine cocktail and electroporated with mRNA encoding tumor associated antigens |
| TLR ligand matured DC | Experimental | Biological: autologous dendritic cell vaccinationvaccination with autologous TLR-ligand matured dendritic cells electroporated with mRNA encoding tumor associated antigens |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- histologically documented evidence of melanoma
- stage III or IV melanoma according to the 2001 AJCC criteria
- HLA-A2.1 phenotype melanoma expressing gp100 (compulsory) and tyrosinase (non- compulsory)
- WHO performance status 0-1 (Karnofsky 100-70)
- life expectancy > 3 months
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy or radiotherapy < 4 weeks prior to planned vaccination or presence of treatment-related toxicity
- history of any second malignancy in the previous 5 years, with the exception of adequately treated basal cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix serious active infections, HbsAg or HIV positive or autoimmune diseases or organ allografts
- concomitant use of immunosuppressive drugs
- known allergy to shell fish (since it contains KLH)
- rapidly progressive disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| autologous dendritic cell vaccinationAutologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells electroporated with mRNA encoding gp100 and tyrosinase and matured with either cytokines or TLR ligands. Dendritic cells are vaccinated intradermal/intravenously 3 times with biweekly intervals every 6 months, if no signs of progression, for a total of 9 vaccinations. | Biological | TLR ligand matured DC, cytokine matured DC |
Primary outcome
Toxicity of TLR-matured DC (part I) and immunological response upon vaccination with TLR-matured DC (part II)
Time frame: 3 years
2 secondary outcomes
vaccination related toxicity
Time frame: 5 years
clinical efficacy (progression free survival)
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Apr 2017.
- home page Department of Medical OncologyLink provided by the sponsor.
- home page of Department of Tumor ImmunologyLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study Utilizing Immune Recall to Increase Response to Checkpoint Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Dapansutrile Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma
Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
C.J.A. Punt, prof.dr. principal investigator
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, dept of Medical Oncology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing autologous dendritic cell vaccination in people with Melanoma, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Toxicity of TLR-matured DC (part I) and immunological response upon vaccination with TLR-matured DC (part II) (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2017.