AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory InsufficiencyNCT00944437

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Ventilation Using a Novel Full-Face Mask Versus Conventional Helmet

A study testing Helmet and Full-face mask in people with Respiratory Insufficiency and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, run by University of Parma at 1 site in Italy.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare two methods of delivery of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV). Since patient compliance and mechanical characteristics of the delivery devices are two fundamental variables in the success of NIV during acute respiratory failure, our hypothesis is that an improved… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 89 years
What is being tested?
Helmet and Full-face mask
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
23 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
May 2008to Jul 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 89 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ongoing or recent history of respiratory failure (either primary or secondary)
  • PaO2 <60 mmHg if breathing room air or PaO2/FiO2 <300 mmHg if receiving supplemental oxygen
  • Acute dyspnea with respiratory rate >25 bpm and accessory muscle recruitment and/or paradoxical abdominal breathing

Who cannot join

  • Refusing noninvasive ventilation
  • Comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale <8) or unable to maintain a patent airway
  • Hemodynamically unstable (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg on recruitment, or receiving vasopressors/inotropes; ongoing angina/myocardial infarction; newly-developed arrhythmia with hemodynamic impact)
  • Having recently (≤2 weeks) undergone oesophageal or upper respiratory tract surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • University and Hospital of Parma (Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma)

    Parma, PR, 43126

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Noninvasive Ventilation For Postoperative Acute Respiratory Failure: Comparison of Conventional Helmet With a Novel Full-Face Mask.

The aim of this study is to compare two methods of delivery of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV).

Since patient compliance and mechanical characteristics of the delivery devices are two fundamental variables in the success of NIV during acute respiratory failure, our hypothesis is that an improved patient-ventilator interface may improve the efficacy of therapy.

Read the detailed description

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the delivery of ventilatory support without the need for an invasive artificial airway. The use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) in acute respiratory failure has been steadily increasing for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Noninvasive ventilation can often eliminate the need for intubation or tracheostomy and preserve normal swallowing, speech, and cough mechanisms. Discomfort of the device is one of the reason for the failure of NIV (30-40% of the cases).

The Novastar oro-nasal mask (Dräger Medical, Lubeck, Germany) is a flexible, transparent mask shell with a fine silicone gel cushion which adapts to the wearer's face. The pliable ring embedded inside the flexible clear shell allows the mask to be bent and adjusted to fit the patient's face (customized fit), while minimizing leakages. The mask has magnetic, self aligning clips for capture and secure fastening of the mask headgear. The magnetic clips are self-aligning.

The transparent flexible helmet for NIV (Rüsch 4-Vent, Teleflex Medical Europe, Athlone, Ireland) is fixed with two straps passing through each armpit. The braces are protected by hydrocolloid strips to prevent axillary decubitus. It is important to chose the right size of the helmet to avoid air leakages in the neck region. Two filters in the in- and expiratory way are necessary to reduce noise.

Different devices may lead to varying degrees of discomfort and, thus, improve compliance. Better tolerability of NIV may improve its efficacy. Therefore, we planned this randomized controlled trial to investigate whether different modalities of NIV delivery may affect therapeutical efficacy.

No randomized trials have compared helmets to the NOVASTAR full-face masks. This randomized, controlled study aims to assess whether the new full face mask improves gas exchange in patients admitted to ICU because of acute postoperative respiratory failure.

METHODS

Patients meeting criteria for NIV cycles will be enrolled in this trial. Informed written consent requirements were waived by the Internal Review Board since enrollment criteria meet common clinical guidelines and the two devices are both widely available (and approved for this indication).

Enrollment criteria are:

  • Ongoing or recent history of respiratory failure (either primary or secondary)
  • PaO2 <60 mmHg if breathing room air or PaO2/FiO2 <300 mmHg if receiving supplemental oxygen
  • Acute dyspnea with respiratory rate >25 bpm and accessory muscle recruitment and/or paradoxical abdominal breathing

Patients will be excluded if:

  • Refusing NIV
  • Comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale <8) or unable to maintain a patent airway
  • Hemodynamically unstable (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg on recruitment, or receiving vasopressors/inotropes; ongoing angina/myocardial infarction; newly-developed arrhythmia with hemodynamic impact)
  • Having recently (≤2 weeks) undergone oesophageal or upper respiratory tract surgery

Upon enrolment, patients will be randomized to receive NIV via one of the two available interfaces. In group H (for "helmet"), the continuous positive pressure is obtained by a high influx of fresh gases (air + oxygen) flowing through a high-compliance reservoir, with a positive end-expiratory pressure valve limiting outflow. In the M ("oral-nasal mask") group the same flow scheme is obtained using a T-tube attached to the mask. Patients' heads will be elevated to about 45° in both groups.

In both groups continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) will be instituted at 5 cmH2O. Pressure will be increased by increments of 2-3 cmH2O until a maximum of 10 cmH2O in order to reach a peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 90% with the lowest FiO2 possible.

Noninvasive ventilation will be ideally maintained for up to 24 h. Patients will be asked to wear the helmet/mask as long as possible. During ventilation-free periods, which will be maintained as short as possible, patients will receive 50% oxygen supplementation. The criteria for success of therapy and discontinuation of NIV will be a reversal of all criteria listed above for enrollment.

Criteria for NIV failure and subsequent intubation and mechanical ventilation will be:

  • Coma (Glasgow Coma Scale <8) or inability to maintain a patent airway
  • Hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg on recruitment, or receiving vasopressors/inotropes; ongoing angina/myocardial infarction; newly-developed arrhythmia with hemodynamic impact)
  • Intolerance to the interface
  • Patient's inability to mobilize secretions
  • PaO2/FiO2 ratio <140 mmHg after ≥1 h of ventilation

MAIN ENDPOINT AND SAMPLE SIZE

Arterial blood gas analyses will be performed upon enrollment, after 1 h, and after 24 h from enrollment. The null hypothesis of the study is that there will be no difference in the mean PaO2/FiO2 values between the two groups at 24 h. We will consider as clinically and statistically significant a difference of ≥50±60 mmHg between the groups.

A total of 50 patients will be enrolled. Sample size calculations are based on the assumption of a 5% risk of type I error and a 20% risk of type II error, while accounting for a 10-15% attrition rate.

Being tested
Helmet, Full-face mask
Keywords
Ventilation, Mechanical, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Pulmonary Edema, Respiratory Aspiration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HelmetDevice

    Also called Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Noninvasive Ventilation, 4-Vent helmet (Rüsch, Germany)

    Continuous positive airway pressure for up to 24 h. Initial pressure will be 5 cmH2O, and will be increased by 2-3 cmH2O up to 10 cmH2O, in order to maintain SpO2 ≥90%.

  • Full-face maskDevice

    Also called Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Noninvasive Ventilation, Novastar mask (Dräger GmbH, Lubeck, Germany)

    Continuous positive airway pressure for up to 24 h. Initial pressure will be 5 cmH2O, and will be increased by 2-3 cmH2O up to 10 cmH2O, in order to maintain SpO2 ≥90%.

Study groups in NCT00944437
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HelmetActive comparatorPatients in this group will receive continuous positive airway pressure delivered through a helmet connected to a high-flow reservoir system.
Receives: Device: Helmet
MaskExperimentalPatients in this group will receive continuous positive-airway pressure delivered through a novel full-face mask connected to a high-flow system. Expiratory pressure will be maintained using an expiratory valve connected to a T-tube.
Receives: Device: Full-face mask

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Differences in PaO2/FiO2 ratio with respect to baseline (before NIV) values.

    Measured: 24 h

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. PaO2/FiO2 improvement at 1 h after beginning of ventilation.

    Measured: 1 h after enrollment

  2. Arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2)

    Measured: At 1 and 24 h post-enrollment

  3. Arterial blood pressure and incidence of hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or mean arterial blood pressure <60 mmHg)

    Measured: Up to 24 h post-enrollment

  4. Need for intubation

    Measured: Up to 24 h post-enrollment

  5. Intensive care unit stay

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  6. In-hospital mortality

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  7. Device-related complications: pressure sores, skin necrosis, air leak, eye inflammation, gastric distension.

    Measured: Up to 24 h post-enrollment

  8. Patient's rating of comfort with the device. Numerical rating scale ranging from 1 (unbearable) to 5 (very good.)

    Measured: At 1 and 24 h post-enrollment

  9. Success rate of NIV as delivered with either helmet or full-face mask. Success is defined as ≥50 mmHg improvement of PaO2/FiO2 ratio.

    Measured: 24 h from initiation of therapy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jul 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2008
  3. Primary completionJul 2010
  4. Study completionJul 2010

Why it stopped: Failed to reach expected enrollment by anticipated dates.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
23 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00944437
Sponsor's protocol ID
ICU-ICU-02
Status last verified
Nov 2013
First submitted
21 Jul 2009
Last updated
5 Nov 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Appendini L, Patessio A, Zanaboni S, Carone M, Gukov B, Donner CF, Rossi A. Physiologic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and mask pressure support during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 May;149(5):1069-76. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.149.5.8173743.

    PubMed 8173743
  • Celikel T, Sungur M, Ceyhan B, Karakurt S. Comparison of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation with standard medical therapy in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure. Chest. 1998 Dec;114(6):1636-42. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.6.1636.

    PubMed 9872200
  • Chadda K, Clair B, Orlikowski D, Macadoux G, Raphael JC, Lofaso F. Pressure support versus assisted controlled noninvasive ventilation in neuromuscular disease. Neurocrit Care. 2004;1(4):429-34. doi: 10.1385/NCC:1:4:429.

    PubMed 16174945
  • Collaborative Research Group of Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Early use of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 2005 Dec 20;118(24):2034-40.

    PubMed 16438899
  • Keenan SP, Sinuff T, Cook DJ, Hill NS. Does noninvasive positive pressure ventilation improve outcome in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure? A systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2004 Dec;32(12):2516-23. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000148011.51681.e2.

    PubMed 15599160
  • Kramer N, Meyer TJ, Meharg J, Cece RD, Hill NS. Randomized, prospective trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Jun;151(6):1799-806. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.151.6.7767523.

    PubMed 7767523
  • Masip J, Roque M, Sanchez B, Fernandez R, Subirana M, Exposito JA. Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005 Dec 28;294(24):3124-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.24.3124.

    PubMed 16380593
  • Meduri GU, Turner RE, Abou-Shala N, Wunderink R, Tolley E. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation via face mask. First-line intervention in patients with acute hypercapnic and hypoxemic respiratory failure. Chest. 1996 Jan;109(1):179-93. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.1.179.

    PubMed 8549183
  • Meduri GU, Fox RC, Abou-Shala N, Leeper KV, Wunderink RG. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation via face mask in patients with acute respiratory failure who refused endotracheal intubation. Crit Care Med. 1994 Oct;22(10):1584-90.

    PubMed 7924369

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Helmet and Full-face mask in people with Respiratory Insufficiency and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, run by University of Parma at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Failed to reach expected enrollment by anticipated dates.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Differences in PaO2/FiO2 ratio with respect to baseline (before NIV) values. (time frame: 24 h). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00944437, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2013; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in