Respiratory InsufficiencyNCT00944437
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Ventilation Using a Novel Full-Face Mask Versus Conventional Helmet
A study testing Helmet and Full-face mask in people with Respiratory Insufficiency and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, run by University of Parma at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to compare two methods of delivery of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV). Since patient compliance and mechanical characteristics of the delivery devices are two fundamental variables in the success of NIV during acute respiratory failure, our hypothesis is that an improved… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 89 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- Helmet and Full-face mask
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 23 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- May 2008to Jul 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 89 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Ongoing or recent history of respiratory failure (either primary or secondary)
- PaO2 <60 mmHg if breathing room air or PaO2/FiO2 <300 mmHg if receiving supplemental oxygen
- Acute dyspnea with respiratory rate >25 bpm and accessory muscle recruitment and/or paradoxical abdominal breathing
Who cannot join
- Refusing noninvasive ventilation
- Comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale <8) or unable to maintain a patent airway
- Hemodynamically unstable (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg on recruitment, or receiving vasopressors/inotropes; ongoing angina/myocardial infarction; newly-developed arrhythmia with hemodynamic impact)
- Having recently (≤2 weeks) undergone oesophageal or upper respiratory tract surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
University and Hospital of Parma (Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma)
Parma, PR, 43126
About this study
Official title: Noninvasive Ventilation For Postoperative Acute Respiratory Failure: Comparison of Conventional Helmet With a Novel Full-Face Mask.
The aim of this study is to compare two methods of delivery of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV).
Since patient compliance and mechanical characteristics of the delivery devices are two fundamental variables in the success of NIV during acute respiratory failure, our hypothesis is that an improved patient-ventilator interface may improve the efficacy of therapy.
Read the detailed description
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the delivery of ventilatory support without the need for an invasive artificial airway. The use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) in acute respiratory failure has been steadily increasing for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Noninvasive ventilation can often eliminate the need for intubation or tracheostomy and preserve normal swallowing, speech, and cough mechanisms. Discomfort of the device is one of the reason for the failure of NIV (30-40% of the cases).
The Novastar oro-nasal mask (Dräger Medical, Lubeck, Germany) is a flexible, transparent mask shell with a fine silicone gel cushion which adapts to the wearer's face. The pliable ring embedded inside the flexible clear shell allows the mask to be bent and adjusted to fit the patient's face (customized fit), while minimizing leakages. The mask has magnetic, self aligning clips for capture and secure fastening of the mask headgear. The magnetic clips are self-aligning.
The transparent flexible helmet for NIV (Rüsch 4-Vent, Teleflex Medical Europe, Athlone, Ireland) is fixed with two straps passing through each armpit. The braces are protected by hydrocolloid strips to prevent axillary decubitus. It is important to chose the right size of the helmet to avoid air leakages in the neck region. Two filters in the in- and expiratory way are necessary to reduce noise.
Different devices may lead to varying degrees of discomfort and, thus, improve compliance. Better tolerability of NIV may improve its efficacy. Therefore, we planned this randomized controlled trial to investigate whether different modalities of NIV delivery may affect therapeutical efficacy.
No randomized trials have compared helmets to the NOVASTAR full-face masks. This randomized, controlled study aims to assess whether the new full face mask improves gas exchange in patients admitted to ICU because of acute postoperative respiratory failure.
METHODS
Patients meeting criteria for NIV cycles will be enrolled in this trial. Informed written consent requirements were waived by the Internal Review Board since enrollment criteria meet common clinical guidelines and the two devices are both widely available (and approved for this indication).
Enrollment criteria are:
- Ongoing or recent history of respiratory failure (either primary or secondary)
- PaO2 <60 mmHg if breathing room air or PaO2/FiO2 <300 mmHg if receiving supplemental oxygen
- Acute dyspnea with respiratory rate >25 bpm and accessory muscle recruitment and/or paradoxical abdominal breathing
Patients will be excluded if:
- Refusing NIV
- Comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale <8) or unable to maintain a patent airway
- Hemodynamically unstable (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg on recruitment, or receiving vasopressors/inotropes; ongoing angina/myocardial infarction; newly-developed arrhythmia with hemodynamic impact)
- Having recently (≤2 weeks) undergone oesophageal or upper respiratory tract surgery
Upon enrolment, patients will be randomized to receive NIV via one of the two available interfaces. In group H (for "helmet"), the continuous positive pressure is obtained by a high influx of fresh gases (air + oxygen) flowing through a high-compliance reservoir, with a positive end-expiratory pressure valve limiting outflow. In the M ("oral-nasal mask") group the same flow scheme is obtained using a T-tube attached to the mask. Patients' heads will be elevated to about 45° in both groups.
In both groups continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) will be instituted at 5 cmH2O. Pressure will be increased by increments of 2-3 cmH2O until a maximum of 10 cmH2O in order to reach a peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 90% with the lowest FiO2 possible.
Noninvasive ventilation will be ideally maintained for up to 24 h. Patients will be asked to wear the helmet/mask as long as possible. During ventilation-free periods, which will be maintained as short as possible, patients will receive 50% oxygen supplementation. The criteria for success of therapy and discontinuation of NIV will be a reversal of all criteria listed above for enrollment.
Criteria for NIV failure and subsequent intubation and mechanical ventilation will be:
- Coma (Glasgow Coma Scale <8) or inability to maintain a patent airway
- Hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg on recruitment, or receiving vasopressors/inotropes; ongoing angina/myocardial infarction; newly-developed arrhythmia with hemodynamic impact)
- Intolerance to the interface
- Patient's inability to mobilize secretions
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio <140 mmHg after ≥1 h of ventilation
MAIN ENDPOINT AND SAMPLE SIZE
Arterial blood gas analyses will be performed upon enrollment, after 1 h, and after 24 h from enrollment. The null hypothesis of the study is that there will be no difference in the mean PaO2/FiO2 values between the two groups at 24 h. We will consider as clinically and statistically significant a difference of ≥50±60 mmHg between the groups.
A total of 50 patients will be enrolled. Sample size calculations are based on the assumption of a 5% risk of type I error and a 20% risk of type II error, while accounting for a 10-15% attrition rate.
- Conditions
- Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pulmonary Edema
- Being tested
- Helmet, Full-face mask
- Keywords
- Ventilation, Mechanical, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Pulmonary Edema, Respiratory Aspiration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HelmetDevice
Also called Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Noninvasive Ventilation, 4-Vent helmet (Rüsch, Germany)
Continuous positive airway pressure for up to 24 h. Initial pressure will be 5 cmH2O, and will be increased by 2-3 cmH2O up to 10 cmH2O, in order to maintain SpO2 ≥90%.
Full-face maskDevice
Also called Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Noninvasive Ventilation, Novastar mask (Dräger GmbH, Lubeck, Germany)
Continuous positive airway pressure for up to 24 h. Initial pressure will be 5 cmH2O, and will be increased by 2-3 cmH2O up to 10 cmH2O, in order to maintain SpO2 ≥90%.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | Active comparator | Patients in this group will receive continuous positive airway pressure delivered through a helmet connected to a high-flow reservoir system. Receives: Device: Helmet |
| Mask | Experimental | Patients in this group will receive continuous positive-airway pressure delivered through a novel full-face mask connected to a high-flow system. Expiratory pressure will be maintained using an expiratory valve connected to a T-tube. Receives: Device: Full-face mask |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Differences in PaO2/FiO2 ratio with respect to baseline (before NIV) values.
Measured: 24 h
Secondary outcomes (9)
PaO2/FiO2 improvement at 1 h after beginning of ventilation.
Measured: 1 h after enrollment
Arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2)
Measured: At 1 and 24 h post-enrollment
Arterial blood pressure and incidence of hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or mean arterial blood pressure <60 mmHg)
Measured: Up to 24 h post-enrollment
Need for intubation
Measured: Up to 24 h post-enrollment
Intensive care unit stay
Measured: Up to 30 days
In-hospital mortality
Measured: Up to 30 days
Device-related complications: pressure sores, skin necrosis, air leak, eye inflammation, gastric distension.
Measured: Up to 24 h post-enrollment
Patient's rating of comfort with the device. Numerical rating scale ranging from 1 (unbearable) to 5 (very good.)
Measured: At 1 and 24 h post-enrollment
Success rate of NIV as delivered with either helmet or full-face mask. Success is defined as ≥50 mmHg improvement of PaO2/FiO2 ratio.
Measured: 24 h from initiation of therapy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2008
- Primary completionJul 2010
- Study completionJul 2010
Why it stopped: Failed to reach expected enrollment by anticipated dates.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Respiratory InsufficiencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Parma
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Guido Fanelli, University of Parma
- Investigators
- Guido Fanelli, MD, Study chair, Dept. of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Parma, ItalyMaria Barbagallo, MD, Principal investigator, UO II Anestesia, Rianimazione e Terapia Antalgica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00944437
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ICU-ICU-02
- Status last verified
- Nov 2013
- First submitted
- 21 Jul 2009
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Appendini L, Patessio A, Zanaboni S, Carone M, Gukov B, Donner CF, Rossi A. Physiologic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and mask pressure support during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 May;149(5):1069-76. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.149.5.8173743.
PubMed 8173743Celikel T, Sungur M, Ceyhan B, Karakurt S. Comparison of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation with standard medical therapy in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure. Chest. 1998 Dec;114(6):1636-42. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.6.1636.
PubMed 9872200Chadda K, Clair B, Orlikowski D, Macadoux G, Raphael JC, Lofaso F. Pressure support versus assisted controlled noninvasive ventilation in neuromuscular disease. Neurocrit Care. 2004;1(4):429-34. doi: 10.1385/NCC:1:4:429.
PubMed 16174945Collaborative Research Group of Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Early use of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 2005 Dec 20;118(24):2034-40.
PubMed 16438899Keenan SP, Sinuff T, Cook DJ, Hill NS. Does noninvasive positive pressure ventilation improve outcome in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure? A systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2004 Dec;32(12):2516-23. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000148011.51681.e2.
PubMed 15599160Kramer N, Meyer TJ, Meharg J, Cece RD, Hill NS. Randomized, prospective trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Jun;151(6):1799-806. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.151.6.7767523.
PubMed 7767523Masip J, Roque M, Sanchez B, Fernandez R, Subirana M, Exposito JA. Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005 Dec 28;294(24):3124-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.24.3124.
PubMed 16380593Meduri GU, Turner RE, Abou-Shala N, Wunderink R, Tolley E. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation via face mask. First-line intervention in patients with acute hypercapnic and hypoxemic respiratory failure. Chest. 1996 Jan;109(1):179-93. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.1.179.
PubMed 8549183Meduri GU, Fox RC, Abou-Shala N, Leeper KV, Wunderink RG. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation via face mask in patients with acute respiratory failure who refused endotracheal intubation. Crit Care Med. 1994 Oct;22(10):1584-90.
PubMed 7924369
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Noninvasive Ventilation For Postoperative Acute Respiratory Failure: Comparison of Conventional Helmet With a Novel Full-Face Mask.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00944437
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ICU-ICU-02
- Conditions
- Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pulmonary Edema
- Keywords
- Ventilation, Mechanical, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Failed to reach expected enrollment by anticipated dates.
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ParmaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
- Study start
- May 2008
- Primary completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to compare two methods of delivery of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV).
Since patient compliance and mechanical characteristics of the delivery devices are two fundamental variables in the success of NIV during acute respiratory failure, our hypothesis is that an improved patient-ventilator interface may improve the efficacy of therapy.
Detailed description
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the delivery of ventilatory support without the need for an invasive artificial airway. The use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) in acute respiratory failure has been steadily increasing for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Noninvasive ventilation can often eliminate the need for intubation or tracheostomy and preserve normal swallowing, speech, and cough mechanisms. Discomfort of the device is one of the reason for the failure of NIV (30-40% of the cases).
The Novastar oro-nasal mask (Dräger Medical, Lubeck, Germany) is a flexible, transparent mask shell with a fine silicone gel cushion which adapts to the wearer's face. The pliable ring embedded inside the flexible clear shell allows the mask to be bent and adjusted to fit the patient's face (customized fit), while minimizing leakages. The mask has magnetic, self aligning clips for capture and secure fastening of the mask headgear. The magnetic clips are self-aligning.
The transparent flexible helmet for NIV (Rüsch 4-Vent, Teleflex Medical Europe, Athlone, Ireland) is fixed with two straps passing through each armpit. The braces are protected by hydrocolloid strips to prevent axillary decubitus. It is important to chose the right size of the helmet to avoid air leakages in the neck region. Two filters in the in- and expiratory way are necessary to reduce noise.
Different devices may lead to varying degrees of discomfort and, thus, improve compliance. Better tolerability of NIV may improve its efficacy. Therefore, we planned this randomized controlled trial to investigate whether different modalities of NIV delivery may affect therapeutical efficacy.
No randomized trials have compared helmets to the NOVASTAR full-face masks. This randomized, controlled study aims to assess whether the new full face mask improves gas exchange in patients admitted to ICU because of acute postoperative respiratory failure.
METHODS
Patients meeting criteria for NIV cycles will be enrolled in this trial. Informed written consent requirements were waived by the Internal Review Board since enrollment criteria meet common clinical guidelines and the two devices are both widely available (and approved for this indication).
Enrollment criteria are:
- Ongoing or recent history of respiratory failure (either primary or secondary)
- PaO2 <60 mmHg if breathing room air or PaO2/FiO2 <300 mmHg if receiving supplemental oxygen
- Acute dyspnea with respiratory rate >25 bpm and accessory muscle recruitment and/or paradoxical abdominal breathing
Patients will be excluded if:
- Refusing NIV
- Comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale <8) or unable to maintain a patent airway
- Hemodynamically unstable (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg on recruitment, or receiving vasopressors/inotropes; ongoing angina/myocardial infarction; newly-developed arrhythmia with hemodynamic impact)
- Having recently (≤2 weeks) undergone oesophageal or upper respiratory tract surgery
Upon enrolment, patients will be randomized to receive NIV via one of the two available interfaces. In group H (for "helmet"), the continuous positive pressure is obtained by a high influx of fresh gases (air + oxygen) flowing through a high-compliance reservoir, with a positive end-expiratory pressure valve limiting outflow. In the M ("oral-nasal mask") group the same flow scheme is obtained using a T-tube attached to the mask. Patients' heads will be elevated to about 45° in both groups.
In both groups continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) will be instituted at 5 cmH2O. Pressure will be increased by increments of 2-3 cmH2O until a maximum of 10 cmH2O in order to reach a peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 90% with the lowest FiO2 possible.
Noninvasive ventilation will be ideally maintained for up to 24 h. Patients will be asked to wear the helmet/mask as long as possible. During ventilation-free periods, which will be maintained as short as possible, patients will receive 50% oxygen supplementation. The criteria for success of therapy and discontinuation of NIV will be a reversal of all criteria listed above for enrollment.
Criteria for NIV failure and subsequent intubation and mechanical ventilation will be:
- Coma (Glasgow Coma Scale <8) or inability to maintain a patent airway
- Hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg on recruitment, or receiving vasopressors/inotropes; ongoing angina/myocardial infarction; newly-developed arrhythmia with hemodynamic impact)
- Intolerance to the interface
- Patient's inability to mobilize secretions
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio <140 mmHg after ≥1 h of ventilation
MAIN ENDPOINT AND SAMPLE SIZE
Arterial blood gas analyses will be performed upon enrollment, after 1 h, and after 24 h from enrollment. The null hypothesis of the study is that there will be no difference in the mean PaO2/FiO2 values between the two groups at 24 h. We will consider as clinically and statistically significant a difference of ≥50±60 mmHg between the groups.
A total of 50 patients will be enrolled. Sample size calculations are based on the assumption of a 5% risk of type I error and a 20% risk of type II error, while accounting for a 10-15% attrition rate.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | Active comparator | Device: HelmetPatients in this group will receive continuous positive airway pressure delivered through a helmet connected to a high-flow reservoir system. |
| Mask | Experimental | Device: Full-face maskPatients in this group will receive continuous positive-airway pressure delivered through a novel full-face mask connected to a high-flow system. Expiratory pressure will be maintained using an expiratory valve connected to a T-tube. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 89 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Ongoing or recent history of respiratory failure (either primary or secondary)
- PaO2 <60 mmHg if breathing room air or PaO2/FiO2 <300 mmHg if receiving supplemental oxygen
- Acute dyspnea with respiratory rate >25 bpm and accessory muscle recruitment and/or paradoxical abdominal breathing
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Refusing noninvasive ventilation
- Comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale <8) or unable to maintain a patent airway
- Hemodynamically unstable (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg on recruitment, or receiving vasopressors/inotropes; ongoing angina/myocardial infarction; newly-developed arrhythmia with hemodynamic impact)
- Having recently (≤2 weeks) undergone oesophageal or upper respiratory tract surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HelmetAlso: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Noninvasive Ventilation, 4-Vent helmet (Rüsch, Germany)Continuous positive airway pressure for up to 24 h. Initial pressure will be 5 cmH2O, and will be increased by 2-3 cmH2O up to 10 cmH2O, in order to maintain SpO2 ≥90%. | Device | Helmet |
| Full-face maskAlso: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Noninvasive Ventilation, Novastar mask (Dräger GmbH, Lubeck, Germany)Continuous positive airway pressure for up to 24 h. Initial pressure will be 5 cmH2O, and will be increased by 2-3 cmH2O up to 10 cmH2O, in order to maintain SpO2 ≥90%. | Device | Mask |
Primary outcome
Differences in PaO2/FiO2 ratio with respect to baseline (before NIV) values.
Time frame: 24 h
9 secondary outcomes
PaO2/FiO2 improvement at 1 h after beginning of ventilation.
Time frame: 1 h after enrollment
Arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2)
Time frame: At 1 and 24 h post-enrollment
Arterial blood pressure and incidence of hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or mean arterial blood pressure <60 mmHg)
Time frame: Up to 24 h post-enrollment
Need for intubation
Time frame: Up to 24 h post-enrollment
Intensive care unit stay
Time frame: Up to 30 days
In-hospital mortality
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Device-related complications: pressure sores, skin necrosis, air leak, eye inflammation, gastric distension.
Time frame: Up to 24 h post-enrollment
Patient's rating of comfort with the device. Numerical rating scale ranging from 1 (unbearable) to 5 (very good.)
Time frame: At 1 and 24 h post-enrollment
Success rate of NIV as delivered with either helmet or full-face mask. Success is defined as ≥50 mmHg improvement of PaO2/FiO2 ratio.
Time frame: 24 h from initiation of therapy
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Failed to reach expected enrollment by anticipated dates.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2013.
- Background: PubMed 8173743Appendini L, Patessio A, Zanaboni S, Carone M, Gukov B, Donner CF, Rossi A. Physiologic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and mask pressure support during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 May;149(5):1069-76. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.149.5.8173743.
- Background: PubMed 9872200Celikel T, Sungur M, Ceyhan B, Karakurt S. Comparison of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation with standard medical therapy in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure. Chest. 1998 Dec;114(6):1636-42. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.6.1636.
- Background: PubMed 16174945Chadda K, Clair B, Orlikowski D, Macadoux G, Raphael JC, Lofaso F. Pressure support versus assisted controlled noninvasive ventilation in neuromuscular disease. Neurocrit Care. 2004;1(4):429-34. doi: 10.1385/NCC:1:4:429.
- Background: PubMed 16438899Collaborative Research Group of Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Early use of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 2005 Dec 20;118(24):2034-40.
- Background: PubMed 15599160Keenan SP, Sinuff T, Cook DJ, Hill NS. Does noninvasive positive pressure ventilation improve outcome in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure? A systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2004 Dec;32(12):2516-23. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000148011.51681.e2.
- Background: PubMed 7767523Kramer N, Meyer TJ, Meharg J, Cece RD, Hill NS. Randomized, prospective trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Jun;151(6):1799-806. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.151.6.7767523.
- Background: PubMed 16380593Masip J, Roque M, Sanchez B, Fernandez R, Subirana M, Exposito JA. Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005 Dec 28;294(24):3124-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.24.3124.
- Background: PubMed 8549183Meduri GU, Turner RE, Abou-Shala N, Wunderink R, Tolley E. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation via face mask. First-line intervention in patients with acute hypercapnic and hypoxemic respiratory failure. Chest. 1996 Jan;109(1):179-93. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.1.179.
- Background: PubMed 7924369Meduri GU, Fox RC, Abou-Shala N, Leeper KV, Wunderink RG. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation via face mask in patients with acute respiratory failure who refused endotracheal intubation. Crit Care Med. 1994 Oct;22(10):1584-90.
Related trials for Respiratory Insufficiency
Recruiting
Automated Oxygen Titration With the EMILY.AI Device in a Respiratory Intermediate Care Unit
Chronic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Failure
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Oxytocin for Respiratory Compromise and Hypoventilation Induced by Drugs
Obesity & Overweight, Respiratory Depression
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Efficiency of Home Telemonitoring and Non-invasive Ventilation in Patients With COPD and Hypercapnia (EVALECO)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive (COPD), Hypercapnia
Recruiting
Humidification Effects on Airway Complications and Clinical Outcomes in Trauma ICU Patients on Mechanical Ventilation
Respiratory Insufficiency, Wounds and Injuries
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diaphragm Ultrasound and Rapid Shallow Breathing Index for Predicting Extubation Success
Ventilator Weaning, Respiratory Insufficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Guido Fanelli, MD study chair
Dept. of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Parma, Italy
Maria Barbagallo, MD principal investigator
UO II Anestesia, Rianimazione e Terapia Antalgica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Helmet and Full-face mask in people with Respiratory Insufficiency and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, run by University of Parma at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Failed to reach expected enrollment by anticipated dates.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Differences in PaO2/FiO2 ratio with respect to baseline (before NIV) values. (time frame: 24 h). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00944437, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2013; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.