Children With Cochlear ImplantNCT00947778
Analysis of Language and Auditory Abilities in Cochlear Implanted Children
A study testing 3 sessions of evaluation tests and 1 training session in people with Children With Cochlear Implant, run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The cochlear implant appears today as one of the best technique so as to lead the congenital deaf children to speak. However the results in terms of accurate access to language remain partial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 10 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Children With Cochlear Implant
- What is being tested?
- 3 sessions of evaluation tests and 1 training session
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Jul 2009to Nov 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 10 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- children with congenital deaf to speak
- children with cochlear implant Nucleus
Who cannot join
- children unable to understand orders in the oral or in the language of signs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Analysis of Language and Auditory Abilities in Cochlear Implanted Children: Assessment by an Auditory Learning Programmed Method
The cochlear implant appears today as one of the best technique so as to lead the congenital deaf children to speak. However the results in terms of accurate access to language remain partial. These results are usually due to the children own factors (social, educational and handicap ones), one which any action has a limited effect.
Besides, there are external factors on which one can rely : " treatments ". For instance, an early cochlear implant on a child is the main stream to a better access to speak properly later. Another essential point to tackle is the early re-education training which remains essential to the treatment. Yet, there is a gap to fill between the theory and the main assistance in the auditory education practice.
Read more
The main objective of this survey is to evaluate the efficiency of this auditory teaching programme (MPAA) over the 4 tested skills (identification, discrimination, the analysis of sounds scenes and its memory) among the pre-speaking cochlear implanted congenital deaf children aged from 4 to 10.
This study will be divided into two phases separated by 3 sessions of evaluation tests.
The first session T1 will occur in the two groups (experimentation on G1 and control on G2), then the first training session will start in group G1.
The second session T2 will occur in the two groups, then the first training session will start in group G2.
The third session T3 will occur in the 2 groups at the end of the experiment.
By training the 4 perceptible operations with different auditory stimulations (speech, music, sounds and electro-acoustic sounds), we are looking for better performance in the trained skills as well as a teaching transfer on other linguistic abilities (phonetics discrimination and speech).
Read the detailed description
The cochlear implant appears today as one of the best technique so as to lead the congenital deaf children to speak. However the results in terms of accurate access to language remain partial. These results are usually due to the children own factors (social, educational and handicap ones), one which any action has a limited effect.
Besides, there are external factors on which one can rely : " treatments ". For instance, an early cochlear implant on a child is the main stream to a better access to speak properly later. Another essential point to tackle is the early re-education training which remains essential to the treatment. Yet, there is a gap to fill between the theory and the main assistance in the auditory education practice.
Researches on auditory cognitive sciences make the distinctions between different operation treatments ranged from the identification of sounds sources to the discrimination of specific acoustic parameters to the analysis of auditory scenes and the memorization of its sources. (Mc Adams and Bigand, 1994).Each operation implies a specific treatment.
Yet, these operations are not systematically followed by a re-education treatment among deaf children even if one is to know that it has a positive impact on the linguistic skills.
They can be trained by a large range of non linguistic stimuli as these specific stimuli belong to the fundamental auditory cognition, their development lead to benefits on the treatment of all the auditory stimuli. Music is part and parcel of the chosen stimuli, as many critics have proved that music was a source of transfer effect for visual and spatial skills for instance (Giomi-Costa, 2003) A synthesis of these researches has been at the source of the so called " method of programmed auditory skills " whose purpose was to develop the complete auditory skills abilities. This complete teaching programme has been integrated in a playful context for children that allows to control the action, the gesture and the game as well as the sounds atmosphere. This teaching programme is controlled by a computer with a large number of different sounds and which is linked to the playful sphere.
The main objective of this survey is to evaluate the efficiency of this auditory teaching programme (MPAA) over the 4 tested skills (identification, discrimination, the analysis of sounds scenes and its memory) among the pre-speaking cochlear implanted congenital deaf children aged from 4 to 10.
This study will take place in the CHU de La Timone in Marseilles in the ENT children department and is at the heart of a cooperation with Dr Emmanuel Bigand team in Dijon (LEAD CNRS, UMR 5022 à Dijon). The cochlear implant children department in Marseilles gathers a group of more than 70 implanted children aged from 4 to 10 that is in adequacy with the parameters for the method to evaluate.
Two groups of 21 cochlear implant children will be included in this study.
This study will be divided into two phases separated by 3 sessions of evaluation tests.
The first session T1 will occur in the two groups (experimentation on G1 and control on G2), then the first training session will start in group G1.
The second session T2 will occur in the two groups, then the first training session will start in group G2.
The third session T3 will occur in the 2 groups at the end of the experiment.
By training the 4 perceptible operations with different auditory stimulations (speech, music, sounds and electro-acoustic sounds), we are looking for better performance in the trained skills as well as a teaching transfer on other linguistic abilities (phonetics discrimination and speech).
- Conditions
- Children With Cochlear Implant
- Being tested
- 3 sessions of evaluation tests, 1 training session
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3 sessions of evaluation testsOther
3 sessions of evaluation tests, each session during 15 days
1 training sessionOther
20 sessions of 30 minutes by week during 24 semaines
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| session of training 1 | Active comparator | Arm from which members will perform their training session after the first session of evaluation |
| Session of training 2 | Active comparator | Arm from which members will perform their training session after the second session of evaluation Receives: Other: 3 sessions of evaluation tests; Other: 1 training session |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
to evaluate the efficiency of this auditory teaching programme (MPAA) over the 4 tested skills (identification, discrimination, the analysis of sounds scenes and its memory) among the pre-speaking cochlear implanted congenital deaf children.
Measured: 18 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
to evaluate the efficiency of this auditory teaching programme (MPAA) over the transfer of learning towards tasks of perception and production of the word
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2009
- Primary completionNov 2010
- Study completionNov 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Children With Cochlear ImplantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stephane Roman, Principal investigator, Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00947778
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2009-05
- Other IDs
- 2009-A00343-54
- Status last verified
- Feb 2014
- First submitted
- 27 Jul 2009
- Last updated
- 7 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Roman S, Rochette F, Triglia JM, Schon D, Bigand E. Auditory training improves auditory performance in cochlear implanted children. Hear Res. 2016 Jul;337:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 27.
PubMed 27240480
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Analysis of Language and Auditory Abilities in Cochlear Implanted Children: Assessment by an Auditory Learning Programmed Method
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00947778
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2009-05
- Conditions
- Children With Cochlear Implant
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2009
- Primary completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The cochlear implant appears today as one of the best technique so as to lead the congenital deaf children to speak. However the results in terms of accurate access to language remain partial. These results are usually due to the children own factors (social, educational and handicap ones), one which any action has a limited effect.
Besides, there are external factors on which one can rely : " treatments ". For instance, an early cochlear implant on a child is the main stream to a better access to speak properly later. Another essential point to tackle is the early re-education training which remains essential to the treatment. Yet, there is a gap to fill between the theory and the main assistance in the auditory education practice.
The main objective of this survey is to evaluate the efficiency of this auditory teaching programme (MPAA) over the 4 tested skills (identification, discrimination, the analysis of sounds scenes and its memory) among the pre-speaking cochlear implanted congenital deaf children aged from 4 to 10.
This study will be divided into two phases separated by 3 sessions of evaluation tests.
The first session T1 will occur in the two groups (experimentation on G1 and control on G2), then the first training session will start in group G1.
The second session T2 will occur in the two groups, then the first training session will start in group G2.
The third session T3 will occur in the 2 groups at the end of the experiment.
By training the 4 perceptible operations with different auditory stimulations (speech, music, sounds and electro-acoustic sounds), we are looking for better performance in the trained skills as well as a teaching transfer on other linguistic abilities (phonetics discrimination and speech).
Detailed description
The cochlear implant appears today as one of the best technique so as to lead the congenital deaf children to speak. However the results in terms of accurate access to language remain partial. These results are usually due to the children own factors (social, educational and handicap ones), one which any action has a limited effect.
Besides, there are external factors on which one can rely : " treatments ". For instance, an early cochlear implant on a child is the main stream to a better access to speak properly later. Another essential point to tackle is the early re-education training which remains essential to the treatment. Yet, there is a gap to fill between the theory and the main assistance in the auditory education practice.
Researches on auditory cognitive sciences make the distinctions between different operation treatments ranged from the identification of sounds sources to the discrimination of specific acoustic parameters to the analysis of auditory scenes and the memorization of its sources. (Mc Adams and Bigand, 1994).Each operation implies a specific treatment.
Yet, these operations are not systematically followed by a re-education treatment among deaf children even if one is to know that it has a positive impact on the linguistic skills.
They can be trained by a large range of non linguistic stimuli as these specific stimuli belong to the fundamental auditory cognition, their development lead to benefits on the treatment of all the auditory stimuli. Music is part and parcel of the chosen stimuli, as many critics have proved that music was a source of transfer effect for visual and spatial skills for instance (Giomi-Costa, 2003) A synthesis of these researches has been at the source of the so called " method of programmed auditory skills " whose purpose was to develop the complete auditory skills abilities. This complete teaching programme has been integrated in a playful context for children that allows to control the action, the gesture and the game as well as the sounds atmosphere. This teaching programme is controlled by a computer with a large number of different sounds and which is linked to the playful sphere.
The main objective of this survey is to evaluate the efficiency of this auditory teaching programme (MPAA) over the 4 tested skills (identification, discrimination, the analysis of sounds scenes and its memory) among the pre-speaking cochlear implanted congenital deaf children aged from 4 to 10.
This study will take place in the CHU de La Timone in Marseilles in the ENT children department and is at the heart of a cooperation with Dr Emmanuel Bigand team in Dijon (LEAD CNRS, UMR 5022 à Dijon). The cochlear implant children department in Marseilles gathers a group of more than 70 implanted children aged from 4 to 10 that is in adequacy with the parameters for the method to evaluate.
Two groups of 21 cochlear implant children will be included in this study.
This study will be divided into two phases separated by 3 sessions of evaluation tests.
The first session T1 will occur in the two groups (experimentation on G1 and control on G2), then the first training session will start in group G1.
The second session T2 will occur in the two groups, then the first training session will start in group G2.
The third session T3 will occur in the 2 groups at the end of the experiment.
By training the 4 perceptible operations with different auditory stimulations (speech, music, sounds and electro-acoustic sounds), we are looking for better performance in the trained skills as well as a teaching transfer on other linguistic abilities (phonetics discrimination and speech).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| session of training 1 | Active comparator | –Arm from which members will perform their training session after the first session of evaluation |
| Session of training 2 | Active comparator | Other: 3 sessions of evaluation tests, Other: 1 training sessionArm from which members will perform their training session after the second session of evaluation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 10 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- children with congenital deaf to speak
- children with cochlear implant Nucleus
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- children unable to understand orders in the oral or in the language of signs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3 sessions of evaluation tests3 sessions of evaluation tests, each session during 15 days | Other | Session of training 2 |
| 1 training session20 sessions of 30 minutes by week during 24 semaines | Other | Session of training 2 |
Primary outcome
to evaluate the efficiency of this auditory teaching programme (MPAA) over the 4 tested skills (identification, discrimination, the analysis of sounds scenes and its memory) among the pre-speaking cochlear implanted congenital deaf children.
Time frame: 18 months
1 secondary outcome
to evaluate the efficiency of this auditory teaching programme (MPAA) over the transfer of learning towards tasks of perception and production of the word
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 27240480Roman S, Rochette F, Triglia JM, Schon D, Bigand E. Auditory training improves auditory performance in cochlear implanted children. Hear Res. 2016 Jul;337:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 27.
Related trials for Children With Cochlear Implant
RecruitingObservational study
Alpha-Tectorin, Interleukin-10 and Thiol-Disulfide Homeostasis in Children With Congenital Hearing Loss
Congenital Hearing Loss, Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Active, not recruiting
Investigation to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Cochlear Implantation in Children and Adults With Unilateral Hearing Loss/Single-sided Deafness
Hearing Loss, Unilateral, Deafness, Unilateral
RecruitingObservational study
Feasibility and Reliability of Integrating Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Threshold (eSRT) Measurement in a Pediatric Cochlear Implant Programming Center
Hearing Loss in Children With Unilateral or Bilateral Cochlear Implants
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of DB-OTO, an Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV) Based Gene Therapy, in Children/Infants, Adolescents and Adults With Hearing Loss Due to Otoferlin Mutations
Congenital Hearing Loss Secondary to Biallelic Mutations of the Otoferlin Gene (OTOF)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Investigating the Neural Oscillatory Features for Limited Access to Oral Language in Deaf Children With Early Bilateral Cochlear Implantation
Congenital Hearing Loss, Bilateral Cochlear Implants
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephane Roman principal investigator
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 3 sessions of evaluation tests and 1 training session in people with Children With Cochlear Implant, run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
to evaluate the efficiency of this auditory teaching programme (MPAA) over the 4 tested skills (identification, discrimination, the analysis of sounds scenes and its memory) among the pre-speaking cochlear implanted congenital deaf children. (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00947778, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2026.