Malignant MelanomaPhase 2NCT00949702
A Study of Vemurafenib in Previously Treated Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 2 study testing vemurafenib in people with Malignant Melanoma, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 15 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This open-label single arm study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Vemurafenib in previously treated patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients will receive oral Vemurafenib [RG7204; PLEXXIKON: PLX4032] at a dose of 960 mg b.i.d. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Malignant Melanoma
- What is being tested?
- vemurafenib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 132 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2009to 3 Jun 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients >/=18 years of age
- histologically confirmed metastatic melanoma (Stage IV, AJCC)
- patients must have completed and failed at least one prior standard of care regimen (e.g. DTIC, temozolomide, etc.)
- BRAF V600E positive mutation (by Roche CoDx BRAF mutation assay)
- measurable disease by RECIST criteria
- negative pregnancy test and, for fertile men and women, effective contraception during treatment and for 6 months after completion
Who cannot join
- active CNS metastases on CT/MRI within 28 days prior to enrollment
- history of or known carcinomatous meningitis
- previous treatment with BRAF (sorafenib allowed) or MEK inhibitor
- cardiac dysrhythmias >2 NCI CTCAE or treatment with drugs with dysrhythmic potential
- uncontrolled hypertension(>150/100mmHg) despite optimal medical therapy
- infectious disease including HIV, HBV and HCV
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 2 countries.
15 sites in 2 countries
United States12 sites
Massachusetts General Hospital;Hematology/ Oncology
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Dana Farber Cancer Inst. ; Dept. of Medical Oncology
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Texas Oncology-Baylor Sammons Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
University of Colorado
Denver, Colorado, 80262
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
UCLA - School of Medicine; Division of Hematology/Oncology
Los Angeles, California, 90095-6984
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Ctr
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
New York University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10036
Hospital of the Uni of Pennsylvania; Section of Hematology/Oncology
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-4283
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Australia3 sites
Peter Maccallum Cancer Institute; Medical Oncology
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000
Calvary Mater Newcastle; Melanoma Clinic
Newcastle, New South Wales, 2298
Westmead Hospital; Medical Oncology and Pallative Care
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145
About this study
Official title: An Open-label Multicenter Study on the Efficacy of Continuous Oral Dosing of Vemurafenib on Tumour Response in Previously Treated Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
This open-label single arm study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Vemurafenib in previously treated patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients will receive oral Vemurafenib [RG7204; PLEXXIKON: PLX4032] at a dose of 960 mg b.i.d. continuously until disease progression or withdrawal from study and will be assessed at regular intervals for tumour response and tolerability. Target sample size is <100 patients.
- Conditions
- Malignant Melanoma
- Being tested
- vemurafenib
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
vemurafenibDrug
960 mg b.i.d. continuous oral dosing
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single arm | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: vemurafenib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Best Overall Response (BOR) Assessed by an Independent Review Committee Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
BOR was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Patients who never received study treatment and treated patients without any post-baseline tumor assessments were considered as non-responders. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions, and no new lesion. Any pathological lymph nodes must have had reduction in the short axis to <10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, no progression in non-target lesion, and no new lesion.
Measured: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Secondary outcomes (11)
Best Overall Response (BOR) Assessed by the Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
BOR was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Patients who never received study treatment and treated patients without any post-baseline tumor assessments were considered as non-responders. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions, and no new lesion. Any pathological lymph nodes must have had reduction in the short axis to <10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, no progression in non-target lesion, and no new lesion.
Measured: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Duration of Response Assessed by an Independent Review Committee Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
Duration of response was defined as the time interval between the date of the earliest qualifying response and the date of disease progression (PD) or death, only for those patients whose best overall response was complete response or partial response. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to Nadir (smallest sum of diameters on-study), unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesion. For patients who were alive without progression, duration of response was censored on the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment.
Measured: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Time to Response Assessed by an Independent Review Committee Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
Time to response was defined as the interval between the date of the first treatment and the date of the first documentation of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), whichever occurred first.
Measured: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by an Independent Review Committee Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
PFS was defined the time interval between the date of the first treatment and the date of progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Deaths that occurred in patients without disease progression were considered to be a PFS event on the date of death. Patients who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to the data cutoff date.
Measured: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of the first treatment to the date of death, regardless of the cause of death. For patients who were alive at the time of analysis, overall survival was censored at the last date the patient was known to be alive prior to the data cutoff date.
Measured: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Improvement in Physical Symptoms (Improvement in Physician's Assessment of Global Performance Status and Oxygen Saturation Requirements, and Decrease in Total Dose and Frequency of Narcotic Pain Analgesics) During Treatment in Comparison to Baseline
Three parameters were measured. (1) Improvement in the Physician's Assessment of Global Performance status on a 7-point scale (1=very much better to 7=very much worse). (2) Improvement in oxygen saturation requirements, defined as a clinically meaningful increase in oxygen saturation requirement (from a baseline value < 95% to ≥ 95% saturation using a pulse oximeter). (3) A decrease in total dose and frequency of narcotic pain analgesics. The percentage of patients showing improvement (1 and 2) or a decrease (3) are reported.
Measured: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Vemurafenib on Day 15 of Cycle 1
Blood samples for assessing the concentration of vemurafenib in plasma were drawn before the morning dose and at 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by non-compartmental analysis (Win Non-Lin).
Measured: Pre-dose to 8 hours post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1
Vemurafenib Plasma Level Area Under the Curve From 0 to 8 Hours (AUC0-8h) on Day 15 of Cycle 1
Blood samples for assessing the concentration of vemurafenib in plasma were drawn before the morning dose and at 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by non-compartmental analysis (Win Non-Lin). AUC0-8h was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Measured: Pre-dose to 8 hours post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1
Vemurafenib Plasma Levels at Various Treatment Cycles
Blood samples for assessing the concentration of vemurafenib in plasma were drawn before the morning dose and 4 hours post-dose at Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Each Cycle was 3 weeks in duration.
Measured: Pre-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 to 4 hours post-dose Cycle 10 Day 1
Time-matched Change From Baseline in the Study Specific Corrected QT Interval (QTcP)
Three electrocardiograms (ECG) were obtained pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose at Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 and again pre-dose and 4 hours post-dose at various Cycles throughout treatment. Five baseline triplicate ECGs were obtained before the start of treatment at the same time points used during treatment. Reported is the largest mean time-matched QTcP change from baseline. QTcP=QT/(60/heart rate)^β (β=mean [calculated separately for males and females] log-transformed QT versus log-transformed RR regression slopes using all available pre-treatment (baseline) ECG values.
Measured: Pre-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 to pre-dose Cycle 6 Day 1
Percentage of Patients With Adverse Event
The intensity of adverse events was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0 (CTCAE) on a 5-point scale (Grade 1 to 5: Mild, Moderate, Severe, Life-threatening, and Death).
Measured: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Study start30 Sep 2009
- Primary completion27 Sep 2010
- Study completion3 Jun 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Malignant MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00949702
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NP22657
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 28 Jul 2009
- Last updated
- 25 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Ascierto PA, Ribas A, Larkin J, McArthur GA, Lewis KD, Hauschild A, Flaherty KT, McKenna E, Zhu Q, Mun Y, Dreno B. Impact of initial treatment and prognostic factors on postprogression survival in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma treated with dacarbazine or vemurafenib +/- cobimetinib: a pooled analysis of four clinical trials. J Transl Med. 2020 Aug 3;18(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02458-x.
PubMed 32746839Frederick DT, Salas Fragomeni RA, Schalck A, Ferreiro-Neira I, Hoff T, Cooper ZA, Haq R, Panka DJ, Kwong LN, Davies MA, Cusack JC, Flaherty KT, Fisher DE, Mier JW, Wargo JA, Sullivan RJ. Clinical profiling of BCL-2 family members in the setting of BRAF inhibition offers a rationale for targeting de novo resistance using BH3 mimetics. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 1;9(7):e101286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101286. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24983357Lacouture ME, Duvic M, Hauschild A, Prieto VG, Robert C, Schadendorf D, Kim CC, McCormack CJ, Myskowski PL, Spleiss O, Trunzer K, Su F, Nelson B, Nolop KB, Grippo JF, Lee RJ, Klimek MJ, Troy JL, Joe AK. Analysis of dermatologic events in vemurafenib-treated patients with melanoma. Oncologist. 2013;18(3):314-22. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0333. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
PubMed 23457002Sosman JA, Kim KB, Schuchter L, Gonzalez R, Pavlick AC, Weber JS, McArthur GA, Hutson TE, Moschos SJ, Flaherty KT, Hersey P, Kefford R, Lawrence D, Puzanov I, Lewis KD, Amaravadi RK, Chmielowski B, Lawrence HJ, Shyr Y, Ye F, Li J, Nolop KB, Lee RJ, Joe AK, Ribas A. Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):707-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112302.
PubMed 22356324Su F, Viros A, Milagre C, Trunzer K, Bollag G, Spleiss O, Reis-Filho JS, Kong X, Koya RC, Flaherty KT, Chapman PB, Kim MJ, Hayward R, Martin M, Yang H, Wang Q, Hilton H, Hang JS, Noe J, Lambros M, Geyer F, Dhomen N, Niculescu-Duvaz I, Zambon A, Niculescu-Duvaz D, Preece N, Robert L, Otte NJ, Mok S, Kee D, Ma Y, Zhang C, Habets G, Burton EA, Wong B, Nguyen H, Kockx M, Andries L, Lestini B, Nolop KB, Lee RJ, Joe AK, Troy JL, Gonzalez R, Hutson TE, Puzanov I, Chmielowski B, Springer CJ, McArthur GA, Sosman JA, Lo RS, Ribas A, Marais R. RAS mutations in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 19;366(3):207-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105358.
PubMed 22256804
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-label Multicenter Study on the Efficacy of Continuous Oral Dosing of Vemurafenib on Tumour Response in Previously Treated Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00949702
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NP22657
- Conditions
- Malignant Melanoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Sep 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Jun 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Dec 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This open-label single arm study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Vemurafenib in previously treated patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients will receive oral Vemurafenib [RG7204; PLEXXIKON: PLX4032] at a dose of 960 mg b.i.d. continuously until disease progression or withdrawal from study and will be assessed at regular intervals for tumour response and tolerability. Target sample size is <100 patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single arm | Experimental | Drug: vemurafenib |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- adult patients >/=18 years of age
- histologically confirmed metastatic melanoma (Stage IV, AJCC)
- patients must have completed and failed at least one prior standard of care regimen (e.g. DTIC, temozolomide, etc.)
- BRAF V600E positive mutation (by Roche CoDx BRAF mutation assay)
- measurable disease by RECIST criteria
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- active CNS metastases on CT/MRI within 28 days prior to enrollment
- history of or known carcinomatous meningitis
- previous treatment with BRAF (sorafenib allowed) or MEK inhibitor
- cardiac dysrhythmias >2 NCI CTCAE or treatment with drugs with dysrhythmic potential
- uncontrolled hypertension(>150/100mmHg) despite optimal medical therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| vemurafenib960 mg b.i.d. continuous oral dosing | Drug | Single arm |
Primary outcome
Best Overall Response (BOR) Assessed by an Independent Review Committee Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
Time frame: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
BOR was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Patients who never received study treatment and treated patients without any post-baseline tumor assessments were considered as non-responders. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions, and no new lesion. Any pathological lymph nodes must have had reduction in the short axis to <10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, no progression in non-target lesion, and no new lesion.
11 secondary outcomes
Best Overall Response (BOR) Assessed by the Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
Time frame: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Duration of Response Assessed by an Independent Review Committee Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
Time frame: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Time to Response Assessed by an Independent Review Committee Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
Time frame: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by an Independent Review Committee Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
Time frame: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Overall Survival
Time frame: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Improvement in Physical Symptoms (Improvement in Physician's Assessment of Global Performance Status and Oxygen Saturation Requirements, and Decrease in Total Dose and Frequency of Narcotic Pain Analgesics) During Treatment in Comparison to Baseline
Time frame: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Vemurafenib on Day 15 of Cycle 1
Time frame: Pre-dose to 8 hours post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1
Vemurafenib Plasma Level Area Under the Curve From 0 to 8 Hours (AUC0-8h) on Day 15 of Cycle 1
Time frame: Pre-dose to 8 hours post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1
Vemurafenib Plasma Levels at Various Treatment Cycles
Time frame: Pre-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 to 4 hours post-dose Cycle 10 Day 1
Time-matched Change From Baseline in the Study Specific Corrected QT Interval (QTcP)
Time frame: Pre-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 to pre-dose Cycle 6 Day 1
Percentage of Patients With Adverse Event
Time frame: From first treatment through September 27, 2010
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jul 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32746839Ascierto PA, Ribas A, Larkin J, McArthur GA, Lewis KD, Hauschild A, Flaherty KT, McKenna E, Zhu Q, Mun Y, Dreno B. Impact of initial treatment and prognostic factors on postprogression survival in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma treated with dacarbazine or vemurafenib +/- cobimetinib: a pooled analysis of four clinical trials. J Transl Med. 2020 Aug 3;18(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02458-x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24983357Frederick DT, Salas Fragomeni RA, Schalck A, Ferreiro-Neira I, Hoff T, Cooper ZA, Haq R, Panka DJ, Kwong LN, Davies MA, Cusack JC, Flaherty KT, Fisher DE, Mier JW, Wargo JA, Sullivan RJ. Clinical profiling of BCL-2 family members in the setting of BRAF inhibition offers a rationale for targeting de novo resistance using BH3 mimetics. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 1;9(7):e101286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101286. eCollection 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23457002Lacouture ME, Duvic M, Hauschild A, Prieto VG, Robert C, Schadendorf D, Kim CC, McCormack CJ, Myskowski PL, Spleiss O, Trunzer K, Su F, Nelson B, Nolop KB, Grippo JF, Lee RJ, Klimek MJ, Troy JL, Joe AK. Analysis of dermatologic events in vemurafenib-treated patients with melanoma. Oncologist. 2013;18(3):314-22. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0333. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22356324Sosman JA, Kim KB, Schuchter L, Gonzalez R, Pavlick AC, Weber JS, McArthur GA, Hutson TE, Moschos SJ, Flaherty KT, Hersey P, Kefford R, Lawrence D, Puzanov I, Lewis KD, Amaravadi RK, Chmielowski B, Lawrence HJ, Shyr Y, Ye F, Li J, Nolop KB, Lee RJ, Joe AK, Ribas A. Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):707-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112302.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22256804Su F, Viros A, Milagre C, Trunzer K, Bollag G, Spleiss O, Reis-Filho JS, Kong X, Koya RC, Flaherty KT, Chapman PB, Kim MJ, Hayward R, Martin M, Yang H, Wang Q, Hilton H, Hang JS, Noe J, Lambros M, Geyer F, Dhomen N, Niculescu-Duvaz I, Zambon A, Niculescu-Duvaz D, Preece N, Robert L, Otte NJ, Mok S, Kee D, Ma Y, Zhang C, Habets G, Burton EA, Wong B, Nguyen H, Kockx M, Andries L, Lestini B, Nolop KB, Lee RJ, Joe AK, Troy JL, Gonzalez R, Hutson TE, Puzanov I, Chmielowski B, Springer CJ, McArthur GA, Sosman JA, Lo RS, Ribas A, Marais R. RAS mutations in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 19;366(3):207-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105358.
Related trials for Malignant Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study Utilizing Immune Recall to Increase Response to Checkpoint Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Dapansutrile Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma
Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
15 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing vemurafenib in people with Malignant Melanoma, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 15 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in United States, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Dec 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Best Overall Response (BOR) Assessed by an Independent Review Committee Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) (time frame: From first treatment through September 27, 2010). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00949702, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.