Cervical NeoplasmsPhase 2NCT00950261
Efficacy Study for Postoperative Chemoradiation Using Triweekly Cisplatin in Cervical Cancer Patients
A Phase 2 study testing tri-weekly cisplatin in people with Cervical Neoplasms, run by Korea Cancer Center Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The standard postoperative treatment for patients with cervical cancer who had high-risk factors is chemoradiation. Generally, weekly cisplatin or 5FU+cisplatin every 3 week have been used as chemotherapy regimens of chemoradiation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- tri-weekly cisplatin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Jan 2009to May 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- cervical cancer
- underwent radical hysterectomy
- non-small cell type
- FIGO stage 1B - 2A
- have one or more risk factors (lymph node involvement, resection margin involvement, parametrial involvement)
- GOG performance status 0 - 2
Who cannot join
- Previous history of chemotherapy or radiation
- History of other cancer
- Hypersensitivity to platinum agents
- Pregnancy
- Serious medical disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site
Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences
Seoul, 139-706
About this study
Official title: Phase II Clinical Trial for Adjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy in Post-operative Cervical Cancer Patients
The standard postoperative treatment for patients with cervical cancer who had high-risk factors is chemoradiation. Generally, weekly cisplatin or 5FU+cisplatin every 3 week have been used as chemotherapy regimens of chemoradiation. Based on their experience, the investigators hypothesized that tri-weekly cisplatin could be superior to weekly cisplatin. Therefore, the investigators are going to perform the efficacy study of postoperative, tri-weekly cisplatin chemoradiation for patients with cervical cancer.
Read the detailed description
Cervical carcinoma is one of the most common gynecologic cancers worldwide. The prognosis of cervical cancer is favorable, with around 80-90% 5-year survival rate in early stage disease. However, advanced disease carries a poor prognosis.
The standard postoperative treatment for patients with cervical cancer who had high-risk factors is chemoradiation. Based on the results of five randomized clinical trials, which consistently showed improved survival in patients treated with cisplatin-based CRT, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the United States announced that 'Strong consideration should be given to the incorporation of concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy with RT in women who require radiation therapy for treatment of cervical cancer' in 1999.
Although recently reported meta-analysis studies also demonstrated improved local control rates and survival with cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent to radiation therapy (RT), the optimal cisplatin dose and dosing schedule are still undetermined. Among the previous five randomized clinical trials, two trials performed by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) used weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 while the other three trials used tri-weekly cisplatin at a dosage range of 50 mg/m2 to 75 mg/m2 combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).
Despite the diversity in cisplatin dose and dosing schedules, weekly cisplatin at a dose of 40 mg/m2 concurrent to RT is widely accepted as the standard regimen of CRT because of its convenience, equal effectiveness, and favorable toxicity in comparison to other 5-FU combined regimens.
However, as a result of the GOG 165 study, which was closed prematurely because an interim analysis found that patients in the 5-FU treatment group were not likely to achieve a better outcome, the role of 5-FU (previously popularly included in clinical trials) as a radiosensitizer became subject to debate. Furthermore, a clinical trial performed by the NCI in Canada comparing pelvic RT alone with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 concurrent to RT failed to show improvement of progression free and 5-year survival. While the authors suggested several possible reasons for why their study failed to demonstrate a survival benefit with concurrent weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 chemotherapy, other investigators have tried to find another optimal dose and dosing schedule for cisplatin administration.
In light of the results of the previous clinical trial that indicated 5-FU may not be an active radiosensitizer, weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and tri-weekly cisplatin 75 mg/m2 remain the most popular cisplatin doses and dosing schedules. However, despite the possible advantages of tri-weekly cisplatin 75 mg/m2, which offer an increased peak concentration of cisplatin and cisplatin administration during brachytherapy, no clinical trials have efficacy of tri-weekly cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent to RT.
Therefore, the investigators are going to perform the efficacy study of postoperative, tri-weekly cisplatin chemoradiation for patients with cervical cancer.
- Conditions
- Cervical Neoplasms
- Being tested
- tri-weekly cisplatin
- Keywords
- Cervical neoplasms, Cisplatin, Concurrent Chemoradiation
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tri-weekly cisplatinRadiation
cisplatin 75mg/m2 every 3 weeks, intravenous, 3 cycles
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| tri-weekly cisplatin | Experimental | Patients in this arm will postoperatively receive cisplatin 75mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks, 3 cycles with radiation Receives: Radiation: tri-weekly cisplatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
disease-free survival
Measured: 2 year
Secondary outcomes (4)
overall survival
Measured: 2 year
disease-free survival
Measured: 5 year
overall survival
Measured: 5 year
all kinds of toxicity
Measured: during treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2009
- Primary completionMay 2012
- Study completionMay 2012
Why it stopped: A competing trial has been initiated.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cervical NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Korea Cancer Center Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sang-Young Ryu, Korea Cancer Center Hospital
- Investigators
- Sang-Young Ryu, MD, Principal investigator, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00950261
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KCCH GY 1002
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 30 Jul 2009
- Last updated
- 13 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II Clinical Trial for Adjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy in Post-operative Cervical Cancer Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00950261
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KCCH GY 1002
- Conditions
- Cervical Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Cervical neoplasms, Cisplatin, Concurrent Chemoradiation
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: A competing trial has been initiated.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Korea Cancer Center HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2009
- Primary completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The standard postoperative treatment for patients with cervical cancer who had high-risk factors is chemoradiation. Generally, weekly cisplatin or 5FU+cisplatin every 3 week have been used as chemotherapy regimens of chemoradiation. Based on their experience, the investigators hypothesized that tri-weekly cisplatin could be superior to weekly cisplatin. Therefore, the investigators are going to perform the efficacy study of postoperative, tri-weekly cisplatin chemoradiation for patients with cervical cancer.
Detailed description
Cervical carcinoma is one of the most common gynecologic cancers worldwide. The prognosis of cervical cancer is favorable, with around 80-90% 5-year survival rate in early stage disease. However, advanced disease carries a poor prognosis.
The standard postoperative treatment for patients with cervical cancer who had high-risk factors is chemoradiation. Based on the results of five randomized clinical trials, which consistently showed improved survival in patients treated with cisplatin-based CRT, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the United States announced that 'Strong consideration should be given to the incorporation of concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy with RT in women who require radiation therapy for treatment of cervical cancer' in 1999.
Although recently reported meta-analysis studies also demonstrated improved local control rates and survival with cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent to radiation therapy (RT), the optimal cisplatin dose and dosing schedule are still undetermined. Among the previous five randomized clinical trials, two trials performed by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) used weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 while the other three trials used tri-weekly cisplatin at a dosage range of 50 mg/m2 to 75 mg/m2 combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).
Despite the diversity in cisplatin dose and dosing schedules, weekly cisplatin at a dose of 40 mg/m2 concurrent to RT is widely accepted as the standard regimen of CRT because of its convenience, equal effectiveness, and favorable toxicity in comparison to other 5-FU combined regimens.
However, as a result of the GOG 165 study, which was closed prematurely because an interim analysis found that patients in the 5-FU treatment group were not likely to achieve a better outcome, the role of 5-FU (previously popularly included in clinical trials) as a radiosensitizer became subject to debate. Furthermore, a clinical trial performed by the NCI in Canada comparing pelvic RT alone with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 concurrent to RT failed to show improvement of progression free and 5-year survival. While the authors suggested several possible reasons for why their study failed to demonstrate a survival benefit with concurrent weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 chemotherapy, other investigators have tried to find another optimal dose and dosing schedule for cisplatin administration.
In light of the results of the previous clinical trial that indicated 5-FU may not be an active radiosensitizer, weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and tri-weekly cisplatin 75 mg/m2 remain the most popular cisplatin doses and dosing schedules. However, despite the possible advantages of tri-weekly cisplatin 75 mg/m2, which offer an increased peak concentration of cisplatin and cisplatin administration during brachytherapy, no clinical trials have efficacy of tri-weekly cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent to RT.
Therefore, the investigators are going to perform the efficacy study of postoperative, tri-weekly cisplatin chemoradiation for patients with cervical cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| tri-weekly cisplatin | Experimental | Radiation: tri-weekly cisplatinPatients in this arm will postoperatively receive cisplatin 75mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks, 3 cycles with radiation |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- cervical cancer
- underwent radical hysterectomy
- non-small cell type
- FIGO stage 1B - 2A
- have one or more risk factors (lymph node involvement, resection margin involvement, parametrial involvement)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Previous history of chemotherapy or radiation
- History of other cancer
- Hypersensitivity to platinum agents
- Pregnancy
- Serious medical disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tri-weekly cisplatincisplatin 75mg/m2 every 3 weeks, intravenous, 3 cycles | Radiation | tri-weekly cisplatin |
Primary outcome
disease-free survival
Time frame: 2 year
4 secondary outcomes
overall survival
Time frame: 2 year
disease-free survival
Time frame: 5 year
overall survival
Time frame: 5 year
all kinds of toxicity
Time frame: during treatment
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Aug 2018.
Related trials for Cervical Neoplasms
Recruiting
Feasibility Study Comparing One vs Two Probes for TA Among Cervical Cancer Screen Positive WLWH in C1001P-CS5 Rwanda
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), HPV
RecruitingPhase 2
The Role of 68-Gallium-DOTATATE-PET/CT in the Imaging of Metastatic Thyroid Cancer
Metastic Thyroid Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
JNJ-90301900 (NBTXR3) Activated by Radiotherapy With or Without Cetuximab in LA-HNSCC
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of JNJ-90301900 in Combination With Chemoradiation Therapy in Participants With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08098488 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors.
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Esophageal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sang-Young Ryu, MD principal investigator
Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing tri-weekly cisplatin in people with Cervical Neoplasms, run by Korea Cancer Center Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
disease-free survival (time frame: 2 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2018.