AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical NeoplasmsPhase 2NCT00950261

Efficacy Study for Postoperative Chemoradiation Using Triweekly Cisplatin in Cervical Cancer Patients

A Phase 2 study testing tri-weekly cisplatin in people with Cervical Neoplasms, run by Korea Cancer Center Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The standard postoperative treatment for patients with cervical cancer who had high-risk factors is chemoradiation. Generally, weekly cisplatin or 5FU+cisplatin every 3 week have been used as chemotherapy regimens of chemoradiation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Neoplasms
What is being tested?
tri-weekly cisplatin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Jan 2009to May 2012
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • cervical cancer
  • underwent radical hysterectomy
  • non-small cell type
  • FIGO stage 1B - 2A
  • have one or more risk factors (lymph node involvement, resection margin involvement, parametrial involvement)
  • GOG performance status 0 - 2

Who cannot join

  • Previous history of chemotherapy or radiation
  • History of other cancer
  • Hypersensitivity to platinum agents
  • Pregnancy
  • Serious medical disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences

    Seoul, 139-706

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Phase II Clinical Trial for Adjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy in Post-operative Cervical Cancer Patients

The standard postoperative treatment for patients with cervical cancer who had high-risk factors is chemoradiation. Generally, weekly cisplatin or 5FU+cisplatin every 3 week have been used as chemotherapy regimens of chemoradiation. Based on their experience, the investigators hypothesized that tri-weekly cisplatin could be superior to weekly cisplatin. Therefore, the investigators are going to perform the efficacy study of postoperative, tri-weekly cisplatin chemoradiation for patients with cervical cancer.

Read the detailed description

Cervical carcinoma is one of the most common gynecologic cancers worldwide. The prognosis of cervical cancer is favorable, with around 80-90% 5-year survival rate in early stage disease. However, advanced disease carries a poor prognosis.

The standard postoperative treatment for patients with cervical cancer who had high-risk factors is chemoradiation. Based on the results of five randomized clinical trials, which consistently showed improved survival in patients treated with cisplatin-based CRT, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the United States announced that 'Strong consideration should be given to the incorporation of concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy with RT in women who require radiation therapy for treatment of cervical cancer' in 1999.

Although recently reported meta-analysis studies also demonstrated improved local control rates and survival with cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent to radiation therapy (RT), the optimal cisplatin dose and dosing schedule are still undetermined. Among the previous five randomized clinical trials, two trials performed by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) used weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 while the other three trials used tri-weekly cisplatin at a dosage range of 50 mg/m2 to 75 mg/m2 combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).

Despite the diversity in cisplatin dose and dosing schedules, weekly cisplatin at a dose of 40 mg/m2 concurrent to RT is widely accepted as the standard regimen of CRT because of its convenience, equal effectiveness, and favorable toxicity in comparison to other 5-FU combined regimens.

However, as a result of the GOG 165 study, which was closed prematurely because an interim analysis found that patients in the 5-FU treatment group were not likely to achieve a better outcome, the role of 5-FU (previously popularly included in clinical trials) as a radiosensitizer became subject to debate. Furthermore, a clinical trial performed by the NCI in Canada comparing pelvic RT alone with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 concurrent to RT failed to show improvement of progression free and 5-year survival. While the authors suggested several possible reasons for why their study failed to demonstrate a survival benefit with concurrent weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 chemotherapy, other investigators have tried to find another optimal dose and dosing schedule for cisplatin administration.

In light of the results of the previous clinical trial that indicated 5-FU may not be an active radiosensitizer, weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and tri-weekly cisplatin 75 mg/m2 remain the most popular cisplatin doses and dosing schedules. However, despite the possible advantages of tri-weekly cisplatin 75 mg/m2, which offer an increased peak concentration of cisplatin and cisplatin administration during brachytherapy, no clinical trials have efficacy of tri-weekly cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent to RT.

Therefore, the investigators are going to perform the efficacy study of postoperative, tri-weekly cisplatin chemoradiation for patients with cervical cancer.

Being tested
tri-weekly cisplatin
Keywords
Cervical neoplasms, Cisplatin, Concurrent Chemoradiation
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tri-weekly cisplatinRadiation

    cisplatin 75mg/m2 every 3 weeks, intravenous, 3 cycles

Study groups in NCT00950261
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
tri-weekly cisplatinExperimentalPatients in this arm will postoperatively receive cisplatin 75mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks, 3 cycles with radiation
Receives: Radiation: tri-weekly cisplatin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. disease-free survival

    Measured: 2 year

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. overall survival

    Measured: 2 year

  2. disease-free survival

    Measured: 5 year

  3. overall survival

    Measured: 5 year

  4. all kinds of toxicity

    Measured: during treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jul 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2009
  3. Primary completionMay 2012
  4. Study completionMay 2012

Why it stopped: A competing trial has been initiated.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00950261
Sponsor's protocol ID
KCCH GY 1002
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
30 Jul 2009
Last updated
13 Aug 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing tri-weekly cisplatin in people with Cervical Neoplasms, run by Korea Cancer Center Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

disease-free survival (time frame: 2 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in