Wound HealingPhase 3NCT00952120
Comparison of Two Methods of Securing Skin Grafts Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) and Gauze Suction (GSUC)
A Phase 3 study testing GSUC and VAC in people with Wound Healing, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare how well two methods (VAC and G-SUC) of securing skin grafts using negative pressure wound therapy work. Negative pressure wound therapy is a commonly used method of applying suction on wounds to remove fluid from wound and to promote healing. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Wound Healing
- What is being tested?
- GSUC and VAC
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 104 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2009to Jul 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients of any sex, hospitalized at the University of Chicago Medical Center, requiring split thickness skin autografts with wounds that are amenable to placement of an occlusive dressing for negative pressure therapy will be eligible to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women, children under 18 years of age and other patients who are "vulnerable" as defined by the Institutional Review Board will not be eligible for the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Chicago Medical Center, Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Two Methods of Securing Skin Grafts Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: VAC and GSUC
The purpose of this study is to compare how well two methods (VAC and G-SUC) of securing skin grafts using negative pressure wound therapy work. Negative pressure wound therapy is a commonly used method of applying suction on wounds to remove fluid from wound and to promote healing. The VAC system is widely used and consists of a foam dressing and a portable computerized suction pump. The G-SUC method uses commonly available dressing supplies attached to vacuum (suction) pump located on the wall above a hospital bed. The investigators have frequently used both methods over the past 10 years and have not observed any specific negative side effects of either.
Read the detailed description
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study will be conducted. The investigators expect the duration of data collection to be 2 years.
- PATIENT SELECTION Adult patients of any sex, hospitalized at the University of Chicago Medical Center, requiring split thickness skin autografts with wounds that are amenable to placement of an occlusive dressing for negative pressure therapy will be eligible to participate in the study. If both the patient and the primary treating surgeon agree to participate, they will receive informed consent. Pregnant women, children under 18 years of age and other patients who are "vulnerable" as defined by the Institutional Review Board will not be eligible for the study.
- STUDY PROCEDURE
Preoperative Procedures:
Patients with wounds requiring skin grafting will enter the trial upon consent of the patient and the preoperative decision by the surgeon to secure the skin graft with negative pressure therapy. Upon entry, the primary physical therapist will be immediately informed of a study participant and will place either the G-SUC or VAC dressing at the conclusion of the operation. The randomization scheme will be prepared by the study statistician using computer generated random numbers. The surgeon will be blinded to the treatment modality until the primary physical therapist places the randomized therapy.
Intraoperative Procedures:
Wounds will undergo debridement using standard techniques to a healthy, viable wound bed. Split thickness skin grafts harvested from the patient will be obtained between 0.008-0.010 inches using an electric dermatome. In addition to standard methods of achieving hemostasis, Tisseel (Baxter, Deerfield, IL) will be used as an adjunct for the preparation of the wound bed. All grafts will be secured with N-Terface Interpositional Material (Winfield Laboratories, Richardson, TX) and a single layer of Acticoat (Smith and Nephew, Quebec, Canada).
Patients with skin grafts undergoing VAC therapy will be managed with continuous negative pressure delivered by the computerized VAC suction unit at 75-125 mm Hg. The suction will be applied to a standard open cell VAC foam dressing supplied by KCI, Inc and sealed with an occlusive cover.
Patients with skin grafts undergoing G-SUC therapy will be managed with negative pressure delivered by low continuous wall suction at 75-80 mm Hg. The suction will be applied to standard gauze dressing and sealed with an occlusive cover.
Postoperative Procedures:
Patients on either therapy will remain on continuous negative pressure therapy from the conclusion of their surgery until dressing takedown. Patients undergoing VAC therapy will be transported with the computerized VAC suction unit. Maintenance of negative pressure during transport of patients undergoing G-SUC therapy will be accomplished by clamping the connection tubing with hemostats prior to disconnection to wall suction units.
All dressings will be discontinued on post operative day #4 or 5 and graft take will be assessed with two methods in the following manner:
- Areas of non-take will be clearly marked with a pen by a researcher blinded to the treatment modality
- Images of the graft with a ruler for scale will be taken by a digital camera
- The entire graft area will be determined in pixels
- The areas of non-take will be determined in pixels
- The percentage of non-take will then be calculated
- The areas will also be measured and recorded
Image analysis will be conducted by a researcher blinded to the treatment modality. Wound size will also be calculated as per Xakellis \& Frantz method (1997): wound surface area = length x width x 0.783.
If a G-SUC or VAC dressing cannot be maintained because of either persistent fluid or suction leaks, the attending physical therapist will attempt to reinforce the dressing. If after 2 attempts per 24-hour period, the dressing still cannot be maintained, that patient will be considered to have failed negative pressure wound therapy. Patients who fall into this category will be able to crossover into the other treatment arm, but additional data regarding their treatment will not considered in the results of the study.
The cost of VAC rental, supplies and time performing dressing changes will be recorded for the duration of negative pressure wound therapy for each patient.
The attending physical therapist will collect and maintain the database.
Wound Specific Procedures:
Upper Extremity. All skin grafts on mobile structures, such as those crossing joints or directly on muscle, will be splinted to prevent shear. Otherwise, patients will be allowed to move about ad lib.
Lower Extremity. All skin grafts on mobile structures, such as those crossing joints or directly on muscle, will be splinted to prevent shear. Patients will remain on bedrest with leg elevation to prevent lower extremity edema until negative pressure therapy is discontinued.
Chest, Abdomen, Back, Head, Neck. Mobility will be allowed ad lib.
Perineum. Patients will remain on bedrest until discontinuation of negative pressure therapy to prevent shear.
- STUDY RECORDS
Completed case report forms will be confidential and kept in a secured file by the principal investigator.
- RISKS \& BENEFITS TO PATIENTS
The investigators are not aware that there are specific risks associated with negative pressure wound therapy, and the technique has not been associated with specific adverse outcomes at our hospital or in the published literature. Negative pressure wound therapy allows for more rapid and reliable wound healing for many patients. Data from this study may help us to expand the indications for negative pressure wound therapy.
There will be no payment to the subjects.
- Conditions
- Wound Healing
- Being tested
- GSUC, VAC
- Keywords
- Wound healing, Negative pressure wound therapy, Skin graft
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GSUCDevice
Gauze-based wall suction negative pressure wound therapy
VACDevice
Commercially available Wound VAC negative pressure wound therapy device (KCI, Inc.)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| GSUC | Experimental | Gauze-based wall suction negative pressure wound therapy for 4-5 days Receives: Device: GSUC |
| Vacuum-assisted closure | Active comparator | Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) negative pressure wound therapy using commercially available device (KCI, Inc) for 4-5 days Receives: Device: VAC |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Wounds With Complete Skin Graft Take
For each wound, the percentage of the skin graft that took by Day 4 or 5 was calculated. Complete take is defined as 100% take or skin graft incorporation.
Measured: Day 4 or 5
Secondary outcomes (1)
Percentage of Wounds With Total Skin Graft Loss
For each wound, whether there was total skin graft loss by Day 4 or 5 was determined.
Measured: Day 4 or 5
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2009
- Primary completionDec 2011
- Study completionJul 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Wound HealingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ChicagoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Chicago
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lawrence J Gottlieb, MD, Principal investigator, University of Chicago, Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00952120
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16863B
- Status last verified
- Aug 2015
- First submitted
- 31 Jul 2009
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Two Methods of Securing Skin Grafts Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: VAC and GSUC
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00952120
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 16863B
- Conditions
- Wound Healing
- Keywords
- Wound healing, Negative pressure wound therapy, Skin graft
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ChicagoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2009
- Primary completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Sep 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare how well two methods (VAC and G-SUC) of securing skin grafts using negative pressure wound therapy work. Negative pressure wound therapy is a commonly used method of applying suction on wounds to remove fluid from wound and to promote healing. The VAC system is widely used and consists of a foam dressing and a portable computerized suction pump. The G-SUC method uses commonly available dressing supplies attached to vacuum (suction) pump located on the wall above a hospital bed. The investigators have frequently used both methods over the past 10 years and have not observed any specific negative side effects of either.
Detailed description
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study will be conducted. The investigators expect the duration of data collection to be 2 years.
- PATIENT SELECTION Adult patients of any sex, hospitalized at the University of Chicago Medical Center, requiring split thickness skin autografts with wounds that are amenable to placement of an occlusive dressing for negative pressure therapy will be eligible to participate in the study. If both the patient and the primary treating surgeon agree to participate, they will receive informed consent. Pregnant women, children under 18 years of age and other patients who are "vulnerable" as defined by the Institutional Review Board will not be eligible for the study.
- STUDY PROCEDURE
Preoperative Procedures:
Patients with wounds requiring skin grafting will enter the trial upon consent of the patient and the preoperative decision by the surgeon to secure the skin graft with negative pressure therapy. Upon entry, the primary physical therapist will be immediately informed of a study participant and will place either the G-SUC or VAC dressing at the conclusion of the operation. The randomization scheme will be prepared by the study statistician using computer generated random numbers. The surgeon will be blinded to the treatment modality until the primary physical therapist places the randomized therapy.
Intraoperative Procedures:
Wounds will undergo debridement using standard techniques to a healthy, viable wound bed. Split thickness skin grafts harvested from the patient will be obtained between 0.008-0.010 inches using an electric dermatome. In addition to standard methods of achieving hemostasis, Tisseel (Baxter, Deerfield, IL) will be used as an adjunct for the preparation of the wound bed. All grafts will be secured with N-Terface Interpositional Material (Winfield Laboratories, Richardson, TX) and a single layer of Acticoat (Smith and Nephew, Quebec, Canada).
Patients with skin grafts undergoing VAC therapy will be managed with continuous negative pressure delivered by the computerized VAC suction unit at 75-125 mm Hg. The suction will be applied to a standard open cell VAC foam dressing supplied by KCI, Inc and sealed with an occlusive cover.
Patients with skin grafts undergoing G-SUC therapy will be managed with negative pressure delivered by low continuous wall suction at 75-80 mm Hg. The suction will be applied to standard gauze dressing and sealed with an occlusive cover.
Postoperative Procedures:
Patients on either therapy will remain on continuous negative pressure therapy from the conclusion of their surgery until dressing takedown. Patients undergoing VAC therapy will be transported with the computerized VAC suction unit. Maintenance of negative pressure during transport of patients undergoing G-SUC therapy will be accomplished by clamping the connection tubing with hemostats prior to disconnection to wall suction units.
All dressings will be discontinued on post operative day #4 or 5 and graft take will be assessed with two methods in the following manner:
- Areas of non-take will be clearly marked with a pen by a researcher blinded to the treatment modality
- Images of the graft with a ruler for scale will be taken by a digital camera
- The entire graft area will be determined in pixels
- The areas of non-take will be determined in pixels
- The percentage of non-take will then be calculated
- The areas will also be measured and recorded
Image analysis will be conducted by a researcher blinded to the treatment modality. Wound size will also be calculated as per Xakellis \& Frantz method (1997): wound surface area = length x width x 0.783.
If a G-SUC or VAC dressing cannot be maintained because of either persistent fluid or suction leaks, the attending physical therapist will attempt to reinforce the dressing. If after 2 attempts per 24-hour period, the dressing still cannot be maintained, that patient will be considered to have failed negative pressure wound therapy. Patients who fall into this category will be able to crossover into the other treatment arm, but additional data regarding their treatment will not considered in the results of the study.
The cost of VAC rental, supplies and time performing dressing changes will be recorded for the duration of negative pressure wound therapy for each patient.
The attending physical therapist will collect and maintain the database.
Wound Specific Procedures:
Upper Extremity. All skin grafts on mobile structures, such as those crossing joints or directly on muscle, will be splinted to prevent shear. Otherwise, patients will be allowed to move about ad lib.
Lower Extremity. All skin grafts on mobile structures, such as those crossing joints or directly on muscle, will be splinted to prevent shear. Patients will remain on bedrest with leg elevation to prevent lower extremity edema until negative pressure therapy is discontinued.
Chest, Abdomen, Back, Head, Neck. Mobility will be allowed ad lib.
Perineum. Patients will remain on bedrest until discontinuation of negative pressure therapy to prevent shear.
- STUDY RECORDS
Completed case report forms will be confidential and kept in a secured file by the principal investigator.
- RISKS \& BENEFITS TO PATIENTS
The investigators are not aware that there are specific risks associated with negative pressure wound therapy, and the technique has not been associated with specific adverse outcomes at our hospital or in the published literature. Negative pressure wound therapy allows for more rapid and reliable wound healing for many patients. Data from this study may help us to expand the indications for negative pressure wound therapy.
There will be no payment to the subjects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| GSUC | Experimental | Device: GSUCGauze-based wall suction negative pressure wound therapy for 4-5 days |
| Vacuum-assisted closure | Active comparator | Device: VACVacuum-assisted closure (VAC) negative pressure wound therapy using commercially available device (KCI, Inc) for 4-5 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult patients of any sex, hospitalized at the University of Chicago Medical Center, requiring split thickness skin autografts with wounds that are amenable to placement of an occlusive dressing for negative pressure therapy will be eligible to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pregnant women, children under 18 years of age and other patients who are "vulnerable" as defined by the Institutional Review Board will not be eligible for the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GSUCGauze-based wall suction negative pressure wound therapy | Device | GSUC |
| VACCommercially available Wound VAC negative pressure wound therapy device (KCI, Inc.) | Device | Vacuum-assisted closure |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Wounds With Complete Skin Graft Take
Time frame: Day 4 or 5
For each wound, the percentage of the skin graft that took by Day 4 or 5 was calculated. Complete take is defined as 100% take or skin graft incorporation.
1 secondary outcome
Percentage of Wounds With Total Skin Graft Loss
Time frame: Day 4 or 5
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Wound Healing
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Post-Market Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the TriClip™ System
Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR)
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Effect of a Novel Episiotomy Repair Simulator on Midwifery Students' Self-Efficacy and Anxiety
Episiotomy Repair Training
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lawrence J Gottlieb, MD principal investigator
University of Chicago, Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing GSUC and VAC in people with Wound Healing, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Sep 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Wounds With Complete Skin Graft Take (time frame: Day 4 or 5). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2015.