AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthy Women Giving Birth to Singleton InfantsNCT00952640

Making Maternal Post-partum Vitamin A Supplementation Effective: The Role of Timing and Inflammation

A study testing vitamin A in people with Healthy Women Giving Birth to Singleton Infants, run by Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement at 1 site in Vietnam.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Vitamin A is of utmost importance for health and survival of children. A recent series in The Lancet on maternal and child health put vitamin A deficiency at the top of most important micronutrient deficiencies, responsible for more than 600.000 child deaths/year worldwide. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, women only
What is being tested?
vitamin A
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
400 participants
Where
1 siteVietnam
Study dates
Jun 2010to Oct 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy women giving birth to a singleton infant.

Who cannot join

  • Women giving birth to infants weighing < 1500 gram (very low birth weight infant) will be excluded.
  • Also excluded will be twin pregnancy, because of different growth patterns of the infants and congenital abnormalities interfering with normal growth.
  • Furthermore, women indicating that they are planning not to breast feed their baby will be excluded, as well as women who experience delivery complications which result in prolonged (> 3 days) hospital stay.
  • Complications such as eclampsia or excessive blood loss will be registered, but will not be a reason for exclusion per se.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Vietnam1 site
  • National Institute of Nutrition

    Hanoi

Other trials in Vietnam

About this study

Official title: Making Maternal Post-partum Vitamin A Supplementation Effective: The Role of Timing and Inflammation.

Background:

Vitamin A is of utmost importance for health and survival of children. A recent series in The Lancet on maternal and child health put vitamin A deficiency at the top of most important micronutrient deficiencies, responsible for more than 600.000 child deaths/year worldwide. Vitamin A status of mothers and infants is closely linked. Hence, a mother with vitamin A deficiency cannot give enough vitamin A to her fetus to build stores during the last months of pregnancy, and will also have insufficient amounts of vitamin A in her breast milk, resulting in a high risk for vitamin A deficiency in her newborn infant. The World Health Organization (WHO) has implemented several strategies to fight vitamin A deficiency in mothers and children. One of these is to give women after delivery a high dose vitamin A supplement, to improve vitamin A status of mother and, via breast milk, her infant. Surprisingly however, several recent studies investigating the effect of a high dose vitamin A supplement for mothers directly after birth found no effect on vitamin A status in infants 6 months of age. In contrast, earlier studies in Bangladesh and Indonesia, in which women received a high dose vitamin A supplement somewhere in the first 6 weeks after delivery, reported a large impact on vitamin A status in the infants at 6 mo of age. The WHO recommendation on post-partum vitamin A supplementation was based on these earlier studies from Bangladesh and Indonesia. The more recent studies suggest however that this intervention is not effective, and that millions of women currently receive a high dose vitamin A supplement without clear benefits for vitamin A status in either the women or their children.

Read more

The human body reacts to infection or injury with an inflammatory response, which kicks off with the acute phase response. The acute phase response helps the body to fight the infection. It is characterized by many altered physiological processes, including changed availability of vitamins and minerals. Recently, we found that delivery in itself causes a major acute phase response. We have formed the hypothesis that the acute phase response initiated by delivery prevents the high dose vitamin A supplement given to the mother directly after delivery from being absorbed and from being available for breast milk. If this is true, the current WHO recommendation to give the vitamin A within the first 6 weeks post-partum should be changed to giving the vitamin A 4 - 6 weeks post-partum instead, to allow the acute phase response induced by delivery to fade.

Objective(s) and Hypothesis(es):

The main objective is to improve the effectiveness of the current WHO policy of vitamin A supplementation after delivery to improve vitamin A status and health of mothers and their infants.

Methodology:

In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, 400 women will receive a high dose of vitamin A (200.000 IU) within 6 weeks of delivery, as recommended by WHO. Half of the women will receive the vitamin A directly after delivery (within 3 days, current practice), whereas the other women will receive the vitamin A 6 weeks after delivery. To guarantee blinding, women will receive a placebo capsule if they are not receiving a vitamin A capsule.

Main outcomes will be maternal and infant vitamin A status 6 months post-partum and the time-course of the acute phase response, to establish the optimal time after delivery for the initiation of the vitamin A supplementation.

Secondary outcomes will be the morbidity of the infants during the first 6 months of life and growth performance of the infants at 6 mo of age.

Potential Impact:

The results of this study will enable WHO to improve the effectiveness of the current WHO recommendations concerning post-partum vitamin A supplementation. If our hypothesis is true, postponing the timing of the post-partum vitamin A supplement from directly after delivery to 6 week post-partum, will significantly increased the availability of the supplement for the mother. This will increase the vitamin A status of both mother and infant. Moreover, there are several significant implications for global health policies, with important consequences for infant survival worldwide by reducing morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases during the first 6 months of life. Results of the study will also have important consequences for other micronutrient health programs, such as vitamin A supplementation for children above 6 months of age and iron supplementation in areas with endemic malaria, as these are also subject to the effects of the acute phase response

Read the detailed description

Background. Undernutrition causes over 3.5 million child deaths a year, with vitamin A deficiency alone responsible for almost 0.6 million child deaths per year1. Vitamin A supplementation of children above 6 months of age has been shown to reduce overall mortality by 23%. The effect of vitamin A supplementation in newborns on morbidity and mortality is less clear, with three studies in India, Indonesia and Nepal showing reductions in neonatal mortality of 22%, 64% and 15% respectively, but with 2 other trials in Africa reporting no effect. In view of the expected health benefits of improved vitamin A status of infants, WHO currently recommends that women should receive a high dose (200.000 IU ) of vitamin A within the first 6 weeks postpartum, in order to improve maternal vitamin A status, the vitamin A content of breast milk, and thereby the vitamin A status of their infants. However, several recent trials in which women received 200.000 IU vitamin A directly post-partum, reported no improvement in vitamin A status of either mother or her infant at 6 mo of age, not even after doubling the dose to 400.000 IU. In these studies vitamin A was given within a week of delivery, the current typical practice even though WHO actually states a window of 6 weeks after delivery. In contrast, 2 earlier studies in Bangladesh and Indonesia reported a large impact of post-partum maternal supplementation on vitamin A status in infants at 6 mo of age. In these studies, women received a high dose vitamin A supplement not directly post-partum, but somewhere in the first 6 weeks after delivery. The WHO recommendation on maternal post-partum vitamin A supplementation was based on the effects observed in these earlier studies, but the more recent studies suggest now that this intervention is not effective, and that millions of women are receiving a high dose vitamin A supplement without clear benefits for vitamin A status of either the women or their children. The difference in timing between the earlier studies and the recent studies of giving the vitamin A may hold the key, and we believe we have identified the biological reason why timing of the supplementation could be of the utmost importance: the inflammatory response to delivery.

Delivery induces a considerable physiological inflammatory response, with a distinct acute phase response, of the same magnitude as seen for instance in pulmonary tuberculosis patients. We believe that the lack of effect of the current practice of giving a high dose vitamin A supplement directly post-partum is due to the acute phase response induced by the delivery, and that the intervention would be successful if the supplementation was given after the acute phase response has faded away after 3 - 6 weeks. There is currently no data available on the vitamin A bioavailability in lactating women, but a study in Zambian pre-school children investigated the effectiveness of a high dose vitamin A supplementation campaign in children, and showed that this was only successful in children without inflammation. Children who had signs of inflammation had no increase in vitamin A status. Inflammation and the accompanying acute phase response are also known to affect the availability of other micronutrients besides vitamin A, such as iron and zinc.

Objective(s) and Hypothesis(es):

Hypothesis The acute phase response (APR) induced by delivery reduces vitamin A bioavailability, and interferes with current maternal post-partum high dose vitamin A supplementation programs worldwide.

Objective 1 To determine the effects of the acute phase response on vitamin A bioavailability.

Objective 2 To determine the time course of the acute phase response after delivery.

Overall goal To improve the effectiveness of the current WHO recommendation of post-partum maternal high dose vitamin A supplementation by determining the optimal timing for supplementation in relation to the post-partum APR.

Design and Methods:

A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in 400 women, comparing the effects of the recommended dose of 200.000 IU of vitamin A given within the first week post-partum (current practice, 200 women) with the effect when given at 6 weeks post-partum, which is still within the WHO recommended intervention window (200 women). Main outcomes will be maternal and infant vitamin A status 6 months post-partum, breast milk vitamin A concentrations and the time-course of acute phase response, to establish the optimal time after delivery for vitamin A supplementation. Secondary outcomes will be morbidity of the infants during the first 6 months of life and anthropometrical indices of the infants at 6 mo of age.

Potential Impact:

If our hypothesis is true, the current global health strategy of postpartum vitamin A supplementation to improve vitamin A status of mothers and infants can be made effective just by changing the timing. This will have significant implications for global health policies, with important consequences for infant survival worldwide by improving vitamin A status and reducing morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases during the first 6 months of life. Moreover, results of the study will have important consequences for other micronutrient health programs, such as vitamin A supplementation for children above 6 months of age and iron or zinc supplementation programs, as these are also affected by the acute phase response. Overall, the results of this research will contribute to improving child survival worldwide.

Being tested
vitamin A
Keywords
vitamin A, post-partum, infant, acute phase response
Medical subject headings
Acute-Phase Reaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • vitamin ADietary supplement

    high dose vitamin A, 200.000 IU

Study groups in NCT00952640
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
vitamin A directly post-partumActive comparator200.000 IU of vitamin A within 3 days of delivery
Receives: Dietary Supplement: vitamin A
vitamin A delayedExperimental200.000 IU vitamin A 6 weeks post-partum
Receives: Dietary Supplement: vitamin A

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. vitamin A status of lactating women 6 mo post-partum vitamin A status of infants 6 mo of age acute phase proteins concentrations (CRP, AGP) at several time-points during the first 6 mo post-partum

    Measured: several times points during the first 6 mo post-partum (different time points for different indicators)

  2. plasma retinol 6 mo post-partum (women and infants), breast milk retinol (6 weeks, 4 mo and 6 mo post-partum), liver retinol stores of infants 6 mo post-partum acute phase proteins, at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 4 mo and 6 mo post-partum (women)

    Measured: 2 and 6 weeks, 4 mo and 6 mo post-partum

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. morbidity infants during the first 6 mo of life anthropometry at 6 mo post-partum

    Measured: 6 mo of age

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Aug 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2010
  3. Primary completionMay 2012
  4. Study completionOct 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
400 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00952640
Sponsor's protocol ID
VitA_PP
Status last verified
Oct 2012
First submitted
3 Aug 2009
Last updated
11 Oct 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Friis H, Range N, Braendgaard Kristensen C, Kaestel P, Changalucha J, Malenganisho W, Krarup H, Magnussen P, Bengaard Andersen A. Acute- phase response and iron status markers among pulmonary tuberculosis patients: a cross-sectional study in Mwanza, Tanzania. Br J Nutr. 2009 Jul;102(2):310-7. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508162122. Epub 2009 Jan 28.

    PubMed 19175946
  • Ayah RA, Mwaniki DL, Magnussen P, Tedstone AE, Marshall T, Alusala D, Luoba A, Kaestel P, Michaelsen KF, Friis H. The effects of maternal and infant vitamin A supplementation on vitamin A status: a randomised trial in Kenya. Br J Nutr. 2007 Aug;98(2):422-30. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507705019. Epub 2007 Mar 29.

    PubMed 17391562
  • Wieringa FT, Dijkhuizen MA, van der Meer JW. Maternal micronutrient supplementation and child survival. Lancet. 2008 May 24;371(9626):1751-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60758-8. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18502294
  • Dijkhuizen MA, Wieringa FT, West CE, Muhilal. Zinc plus beta-carotene supplementation of pregnant women is superior to beta-carotene supplementation alone in improving vitamin A status in both mothers and infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Nov;80(5):1299-307. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/80.5.1299.

    PubMed 15531679

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing vitamin A in people with Healthy Women Giving Birth to Singleton Infants, run by Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement at 1 site in Vietnam.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

vitamin A status of lactating women 6 mo post-partum vitamin A status of infants 6 mo of age acute phase proteins concentrations (CRP, AGP) at several time-points during the first 6 mo post-partum (time frame: several times points during the first 6 mo post-partum (different time points for different indicators)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00952640, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in