AzTrials
AzTrials

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeNCT00957021

Triathlon® Posteriorly Stabilized (PS) Total Knee System - Outcomes Study

A study testing Triathlon® PS Total Knee System in people with Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, run by Stryker Orthopaedics at 11 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes (range of motion, pain, function, radiographic stability, and health related quality of life) of patients receiving the Triathlon® Posterior Stabilized (PS) Total Knee System. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
What is being tested?
Triathlon® PS Total Knee System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
409 participants
Where
11 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2005to Jan 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The subject is a male or non-pregnant female 21-80 years of age at the time of enrollment.
  • The subject requires a primary cemented total knee replacement.
  • The subject has a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA), traumatic arthritis (TA), or avascular necrosis (AVN).
  • The subject has intact collateral ligaments.
  • The subject has signed the IRB approved, study specific Informed Patient Consent Form.
  • The subject is willing and able to comply with postoperative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations and rehabilitation.

Who cannot join

  • The subject has inflammatory arthritis.
  • The subject is morbidly obese, BMI > 40.
  • The subject has a history of total or unicompartmental reconstruction of the affected joint.
  • The subject has had a high tibial osteotomy or femoral osteotomy.
  • The subject has a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency that would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device.
  • The subject has a systemic or metabolic disorder leading to progressive bone deterioration.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • The subject is immunologically suppressed, or receiving chronic steroids (>30 days duration).
  • The subject's bone stock is compromised by disease or infection and cannot provide adequate support and/or fixation to the prosthesis.
  • The subject has had a knee fusion at the affected joint.
  • The subject has an active or suspected latent infection in or about the knee joint.
  • The subject is a prisoner.

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 1 country.

11 sites in 1 country

United States11 sites
  • New England Baptist Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02120

  • Pro-Sports Orthopaedics, Inc. / New England Baptist Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02445

  • University of Virginia

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903

  • Wellington Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45255

  • Hughston Clinic PA

    Columbus, Georgia, 31908

  • Specialty Orthopaedics

    Harrison, New York, 10528

  • Kelsey-Seybold Clinic

    Houston, Texas, 77025

  • Ireland Hip and Knee Surgery

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260

  • New Hampshire Orthopaedic Surgery, PA

    Manchester, New Hampshire, 03103

  • Tri County Orthopedic Surgeons, Inc.

    Massillon, Ohio, 44646

  • St. Cloud Orthopaedic Associates

    Sartell, Minnesota, 56377

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Post-market, Multi-center Study of the Outcomes of the Triathlon® Posteriorly Stabilized (PS) Total Knee System

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes (range of motion, pain, function, radiographic stability, and health related quality of life) of patients receiving the Triathlon® Posterior Stabilized (PS) Total Knee System. These outcomes will be evaluated using pre-operative scores and comparing them to post-operative scores in addition to being compared with cases who received the Scorpio® PS implant.

Read the detailed description

The Triathlon® Posteriorly Stabilized (PS) Total Knee System components are for use in cemented total knee arthroplasty for painful, disabling joint disease of the knee resulting from non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis or avascular necrosis) or rheumatoid arthritis (excluded from this study according to protocol).

The components are designed to improve range of motion (ROM) and stability. This study serves to demonstrate that subjects have reduced pain, increased ROM and improved stability following implantation with the Triathlon® PS Total Knee System.

Being tested
Triathlon® PS Total Knee System
Keywords
Knee

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemDevice

    Triathlon® PS Total Knee system

Study groups in NCT00957021
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemOtherTriathlon® PS Total Knee System
Receives: Device: Triathlon® PS Total Knee System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Range of Motion

    The primary outcome of this study is to compare active range of motion values for the Triathlon PS Total Knee System.

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Patient Outcome Knee Society Score

    The Knee Society Scores (KSS) at 1, 2, and 5-year visits will be compared. Additionally, comparison of scores at each post-surgery visit with baseline will be tested to see if any improvement is seen at each time point. The Knee Society Clinical Rating System is comprised of two distinct sub-scores: one for pain, ROM and joint stability, and one for functional parameters. Sub-scores range from a potential minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 100 points. Although the specific scores are not distinguished as "excellent," "good," "fair," or "poor," a higher value represents a better outcome.

    Measured: 1,2 and 5 years

  2. Patient Outcome SF-36

    The SF-36 score at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5-year visits will be compared at each post-surgery visit with baseline to see if any improvement is seen for each time point.The SF-36 includes a physical component and a mental component and is completed by the participant. Physical component and mental component scores were calculated on a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Low values represented a poor health state and high values represented a good health state.

    Measured: 1,2,3,4 and 5 years

  3. Patient Outcome WOMAC

    The Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5-year visits will be compared between groups, when data is available. Additionally, comparison of scores at each post-surgery visit with baseline will be tested to see if any improvement is seen for each time point. The WOMAC collects information specific to osteoarthritis outcomes. The questionnaire uses a visual analog scale for pain, measuring factors of general pain, stiffness, and physical findings. Pain is scored from 0 to 100 for each set of factors, with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating extreme pain. Total WOMAC scores range from 0 to 300. Lower values represent better outcomes.

    Data for the WOMAC is only available at the 5 year interval due to typographical errors noted on earlier interval forms rendering them invalid for comparison.

    Measured: 5 years

  4. Patient Outcome Lower-Extremity Activity Scale

    The Lower-Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) score at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5-year intervals will be compared at each post-surgery visit with baseline to see if any improvement is seen for each time point.The LEAS is completed by the participant to assess activity level. Activity levels were ordered in terms of intensity from 1 to 18, with 18 indicating the highest activity level. A level of 1 indicated that the subject was confined to bed all day while a level of 18 indicated that the subject was up and about at will inside and outside of the house, and also participated in vigorous physical activity, such as competitive level sports, on a daily basis.

    Measured: 1,2,3,4 and 5 years

  5. Radiographic Outcome

    Radiographic success/failure at 1, 2, and 5-year visits will be assessed. Radiographic failure is defined as a score of 10 or greater according to the Knee Society Roentgenographic Scoring System, regardless of symptoms. A migrating or shifting prosthesis with or without the disappearance of radiolucent lines is also a failure regardless of score.

    Measured: 1,2 and 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Aug 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2005
  3. Primary completionMar 2011
  4. Study completionJan 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
409 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00957021
Sponsor's protocol ID
55
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
10 Aug 2009
Last updated
25 Jan 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Triathlon® PS Total Knee System in people with Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, run by Stryker Orthopaedics at 11 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Dec 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Range of Motion (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jan 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in