AzTrials
AzTrials

HypochondriasisNCT00959452

Follow up of Patients Treated With Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Hypochondria From 1997 to 2007

A study testing Cognitive behavioural therapy in people with Hypochondriasis, run by University of Bergen at 1 site in Norway.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Research has shown that cognitive behavioural therapy is effective in treating hypochondria. However, no studies have examined the long term effect. The investigators have followed 56 patients treated for hypochondria between 1997 and 2001 and the investigators are now doing a 10 year follow-up (Part I). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hypochondriasis
What is being tested?
Cognitive behavioural therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
250 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
Jan 1997to Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Fulfilling ICD-10 criteria for hypochondriacal disorder

Who cannot join

  • Unwillingness to participate
  • Substance abuse
  • Serious psychological (f.inst. psychosis, major depression) or somatic (f.inst. cancer) disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Norway1 site
  • Haraldsplass Deaconal Hospital

    Bergen, 5009

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: Follow up of Patients Treated With Cognitive Behavioural Therapy at Clinic for Hypochondriacs, Haraldsplass Deaconal Hospital, From 1997 to 2007

Research has shown that cognitive behavioural therapy is effective in treating hypochondria. However, no studies have examined the long term effect. The investigators have followed 56 patients treated for hypochondria between 1997 and 2001 and the investigators are now doing a 10 year follow-up (Part I). In another part of the study (Part II) the investigators compare the effect of 16 sessions vs. 5 sessions, with a follow-up period of at least 2 years. The investigators hypothesis is that the initial 1 year improvement will be sustained and that 5 sessions will yield the same results as 16 sessions.

Read the detailed description

The follow-up includes a telephone interview by independent researcher and the patients fill in the following questionnaires:

Whiteley Index (measures health anxiety), VAS-scales for health anxiety, worrying about symptoms and body checking, SF-36 (health related quality of life), Giessen Subjective Complaints List, Spielberger Trait and State Anxiety Scale Beck Depression Inventory, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, General Health Questionnaire (GHQ 28), Somatic Amplification Scale,

Conditions
Hypochondriasis
Being tested
Cognitive behavioural therapy
Keywords
Hypochondria, Cognitive behavioural therapy, Long term follow-up, Psychosomatics, Psychotherapy
Medical subject headings
Hypochondriasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cognitive behavioural therapyBehavioural

    Also called Cognitive therapy

    16 sessions vs 5 sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy

Study groups in NCT00959452
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PsychotherapyExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive behavioural therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Level of health anxiety

    Measured: 10 years follow up

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Health related quality of life

    Measured: 10 years follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Aug 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 1997
  3. Primary completionDec 2010
  4. Study completionDec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
250 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00959452
Sponsor's protocol ID
17242
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
13 Aug 2009
Last updated
7 Dec 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Veddegjaerde KE, Sivertsen B, Wilhelmsen I, Skogen JC. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory analysis of the Whiteley Index. Results from a large population based study in Norway. The Hordaland Health Study (HUSK). J Psychosom Res. 2014 Sep;77(3):213-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jun 28.

    PubMed 25149031
  • Veddegjaerde KF, Sivertsen B, Skogen JC, Smith ORF, Wilhelmsen I. Long-term effect of cognitive-behavioural therapy in patients with Hypochondriacal Disorder. BJPsych Open. 2020 Apr 29;6(3):e42. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.22.

    PubMed 32345417

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cognitive behavioural therapy in people with Hypochondriasis, run by University of Bergen at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Level of health anxiety (time frame: 10 years follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00959452, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in