LaborSOFTNCT00959920
Bladder Drainage During Labor: A Randomized Controlled Study of Obstetric Foley Therapy
A study testing Indwelling catheter and Intermittent straight catheterization in people with Labor, run by Loyola University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to compare two clinically-relevant bladder drainage techniques. This is a randomized controlled trial with a single primary outcome of time to delivery. The results will inform clinical decisions about method of catheterization during labor. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Labor
- What is being tested?
- Indwelling catheter and Intermittent straight catheterization
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 139 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2009to Dec 2009
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women who present to either Loyola University Medical Center or Loyola at Gottlieb Hospital in active labor or for induction of labor with a singleton pregnancy and who are anticipated to undergo vaginal delivery during the current admission
Who cannot join
- Women who are undergoing a scheduled cesarean delivery
- Women with a contraindication to either of the 2 study interventions
- Multi-fetal gestations
- Current or planned tocolysis
- Women who are on magnesium prophylaxis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Loyola University Health System
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
About this study
Official title: Study of Obstetric Foley Therapy (SOFT Trial)
The goal of this study is to compare two clinically-relevant bladder drainage techniques. This is a randomized controlled trial with a single primary outcome of time to delivery. The results will inform clinical decisions about method of catheterization during labor.
Read the detailed description
Urinary catheterization is a common practice during labor following placement of an epidural for pain control, as this form of anesthesia is known to inhibit normal bladder emptying. There is insufficient evidence to guide clinicians in selection of an indwelling catheter versus intermittent straight catheterization during the course of labor.
The goal of this randomized control trial is to compare two clinically-relevant bladder drainage techniques.
- Conditions
- Labor
- Being tested
- Indwelling catheter, Intermittent straight catheterization
- Keywords
- Indwelling bladder catheter, Intermittent straight catheterization, Labor and Delivery, Time to delivery during labor
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Indwelling catheterProcedure or surgery
Indwelling bladder catheter will remain in place until time of delivery.
Intermittent straight catheterizationProcedure or surgery
intermittent straight catheterization will be performed on an as needed basis until time of delivery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Indwelling foley catheter | Active comparator | Insertion of an indwelling foley catheter when bladder emptying is necessary. The indwelling catheter will remain in place until the time of delivery. Receives: Procedure: Indwelling catheter |
| Intermittent straight catheterization | Active comparator | Intermittent straight catheterization will be performed as needed during labor. Receives: Procedure: Intermittent straight catheterization |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Delivery (by Any Route)
Time to delivery defined as IV placement to delivery of infant.
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (1)
Difference in Cost Between the Two Interventions
Cost of the intermittent vs. foley catheterization procedures was measured and reported in mean dollars.
Measured: End of study.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2009
- Primary completionDec 2009
- Study completionDec 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LaborStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 139 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Loyola University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sarita Massey, MD, Principal investigator, Loyola University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00959920
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201539
- Acronym
- SOFT
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 14 Aug 2009
- Last updated
- 19 May 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rivard C, Awad M, Liebermann M, Dejong M, Massey SM, Sinacore J, Brubaker L. Bladder drainage during labor: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012 Aug;38(8):1046-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01837.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
PubMed 22540248
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study of Obstetric Foley Therapy (SOFT Trial)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00959920
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SOFT / 201539
- Conditions
- Labor
- Keywords
- Indwelling bladder catheter, Intermittent straight catheterization, Labor and Delivery, Time to delivery during labor
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 139 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Loyola UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2009
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 May 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to compare two clinically-relevant bladder drainage techniques. This is a randomized controlled trial with a single primary outcome of time to delivery. The results will inform clinical decisions about method of catheterization during labor.
Detailed description
Urinary catheterization is a common practice during labor following placement of an epidural for pain control, as this form of anesthesia is known to inhibit normal bladder emptying. There is insufficient evidence to guide clinicians in selection of an indwelling catheter versus intermittent straight catheterization during the course of labor.
The goal of this randomized control trial is to compare two clinically-relevant bladder drainage techniques.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Indwelling foley catheter | Active comparator | Procedure: Indwelling catheterInsertion of an indwelling foley catheter when bladder emptying is necessary. The indwelling catheter will remain in place until the time of delivery. |
| Intermittent straight catheterization | Active comparator | Procedure: Intermittent straight catheterizationIntermittent straight catheterization will be performed as needed during labor. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women who present to either Loyola University Medical Center or Loyola at Gottlieb Hospital in active labor or for induction of labor with a singleton pregnancy and who are anticipated to undergo vaginal delivery during the current admission
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Women who are undergoing a scheduled cesarean delivery
- Women with a contraindication to either of the 2 study interventions
- Multi-fetal gestations
- Current or planned tocolysis
- Women who are on magnesium prophylaxis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Indwelling catheterIndwelling bladder catheter will remain in place until time of delivery. | Procedure or surgery | Indwelling foley catheter |
| Intermittent straight catheterizationintermittent straight catheterization will be performed on an as needed basis until time of delivery. | Procedure or surgery | Intermittent straight catheterization |
Primary outcome
Time to Delivery (by Any Route)
Time frame: 1 day
Time to delivery defined as IV placement to delivery of infant.
1 secondary outcome
Difference in Cost Between the Two Interventions
Time frame: End of study.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 May 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22540248Rivard C, Awad M, Liebermann M, Dejong M, Massey SM, Sinacore J, Brubaker L. Bladder drainage during labor: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012 Aug;38(8):1046-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01837.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Labor
Active, not recruiting
MEST : A School- Based Health Literacy Intervention Trial
Health Literacy, Adolescent Health
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Study of Fatigue, Itching and Daily Activities in People With Primary Biliary Cholangitis Starting Elafibranor
Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC)
Recruiting
Trial of Social Work Services in Fracture Clinic Setting
Orthopaedic Fractures, Socioeconomic Factors
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study Testing How Well the Drug Extract of Ginkgo Biloba Leaves Tablets Works for People With Memory or Thinking Problems After a Stroke When Added to Standard Treatment
Ischemic Stroke Hospitalized, Impairment, Cognitive
Recruiting
The Ophthalmic Artery Doppler Evaluation Prior to Labor Induction and Adverse Intrapartum Fetal Outcomes
Ophthalmic Artery, Labor and Delivery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sarita Massey, MD principal investigator
Loyola University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Indwelling catheter and Intermittent straight catheterization in people with Labor, run by Loyola University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 May 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Delivery (by Any Route) (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00959920, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2017.