Hernia, InguinalNCT00960011
Comparative Study on Self-adhesive Mesh for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
A study testing PROGRIP and POLYPROPYLENE in people with Hernia, Inguinal, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Tension-less mesh repair is the most common procedure for inguinal hernia. Conventional heavy weight polypropylene meshes have been reported to stimulate inflammatory reaction and this is responsible for mesh shrinkage and postoperative chronic groin pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hernia, Inguinal
- What is being tested?
- PROGRIP and POLYPROPYLENE
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Jun 2009to May 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age above 18 and below 80
- Male or female patients
- Unilateral inguinal hernia
- First occurrence hernia
Who cannot join
- Inguino-scrotal hernia
- Recurrent inguinal hernia
- Incarcerated hernia
- Bilateral inguinal hernia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomized Study of Self Gripping Semi-resorbable Mesh (PROGRIP) With Polypropylene Mesh in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair - the 6 Years Result
Tension-less mesh repair is the most common procedure for inguinal hernia. Conventional heavy weight polypropylene meshes have been reported to stimulate inflammatory reaction and this is responsible for mesh shrinkage and postoperative chronic groin pain. Moreover, the fixation of the mesh with sutures is a tedious procedure and accounts for the majority of the operating time. A self gripping semi-absorbable mesh has been developed for anterior tension free inguinal hernia repair. It has the benefit of light weight property and does not require sutures for fixation. This study aims to compare the outcome of this self-gripping light weight mesh with the conventional heavy weight polypropylene mesh in inguinal hernia repair.
Read the detailed description
Tension free mesh repair is the most common procedure for inguinal hernia repair. Conventional heavy weight polypropylene meshes have been reported to stimulate inflammatory reaction and this is responsible for mesh shrinkage when scar tissues are formed. In addition, the mesh requires fixation with sutures and there has been postulation that the fixation technique is related to postoperative chronic groin pain. Therefore, some authors have recommended the use of light-weight meshes and to limit the extent of fixation or to use non-compressive absorbable devices. In order to reduce the complications, a new self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh has been developed for anterior tension-free inguinal hernia repair.
The aim of this study is to compare the difference in operating time for open inguinal hernia repair with conventional prolene mesh and ProgripTM, which is a light-weight mesh with self-adhesive mechanism.
Methodology: Patients present with first episode of inguinal hernia are included into the study. Those with a sizable defect (>3cm defect), bilateral, inguino-scrotal hernia, irreducible, recurrence are excluded from study. Informed consents are signed before procedures and details of randomization are explained. Operations are performed by or under the supervision of specialist surgeons. Standardized inguinal dissection are performed. Randomization is carried out immediately before placement of mesh and after adequate inguinal dissection. PI / co-investigator phone to research assistant and ask for randomization result generated by computer. Total operative time, time from mesh placement to wound closure, blood loss, intra-operative complications, hospital stay, post-operative pain and analgesic used are documented.
Post-operative follow-up: Follow-up on day 14, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year post-op. Pain score, paraesthesia , chronic discomfort / pain, recurrence, seroma formation, testicular atrophy are documented. Thereafter, yearly follow-up is performed at clinic or by telephone to document the recurrence and chronic pain.
Parietene ProGrip™ (PP1208DR/ PP1208DL) Manufacturer: Sofradim Production Material: Monofilaments of polypropylene and polylactic acid (PLA) Color: Clear (undyed) Weight: 80g/m2 (before PLA resorbtion), 40g/m2 (after PLA resorbtion) Poresize: 1.7mm x 1mm
Material detailed description:
Parietene ProGrip™ is the first bio-component mesh comprised of monofilament polyester and a resorbable polylactic acid (PLA) gripping system which perfects true tension-free repair. The microhools cover the entire underside of the material allow complete anchoring of the mesh on the tissue. Self-gripping features also allows a strong and solid self-anchoring fixation and therefore making the hernia sac to fit perfectly to groin anatomy and move less underneath the prosthesis. Therefore, less suture is required and so operative time can be saved. Also less chance of nerve entrapment may cause low postoperative pain.
Surgipro Mesh (SPMM-35) Material: Monofilaments of polypropylene Color: Clear (undyed) Measurement: 15cmx15cm Thickness: 0.57mm
Description:
SURGIPRO Mesh is a non-absorbable, inert, sterile, porous surgical mesh knitted from mono-filament fibers of polypropylene polymer. The mesh exhibits high burst strength and tensile strength. The mesh is knitted in such fashion as to interconnect each mono-filament fiber and provide bi-dimensional elasticity while allowing the mesh to be cut to shape without unraveling.
Actions:
SURGIPRO Mesh is a porous, non-absorbable mesh used to repair or reinforce fascial defects following surgery or trauma and serves to provide additional support to such wounds during and following the wound healing period. Animal studies have shown that the polypropylene mono-filament fibers from which SURGIPRO Mesh is manufactured elicit a minimal acute inflammatory reaction in tissue, which is then followed by gradual encapsulation by fibrous tissue. In-growth of this fibrous tissue is permitted by the porosity of the knitted mesh structure. The mesh remains soft and pliable and the non-absorbable polypropylene fibers comprising the mesh resists loss of tensile strength in vivo.
- Conditions
- Hernia, Inguinal
- Being tested
- PROGRIP, POLYPROPYLENE
- Keywords
- Inguinal hernia, mesh, progrip
- Medical subject headings
- Hernia, Inguinal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PROGRIPDevice
Also called PROGRIP MESH
Use of PROGRIP mesh for open inguinal hernia repair
POLYPROPYLENEDevice
Also called Polypropylene mesh
Use of Polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PROGRIP | Experimental | Use of PROGRIP mesh for open inguinal hernia repair Receives: Device: PROGRIP |
| POLYPROPYLENE | Active comparator | Use of Polypropylene mesh for open inguinal hernia repair Receives: Device: POLYPROPYLENE |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Operating Time From Skin Incision to Wound Closure
It measures the total operating time of 2 groups, measured from time started the skin incision to time finishing wound closure in terms of minutes.
Measured: Intra-operative record
Secondary outcomes (17)
Mesh Placement Time, Total Operative Time
Time from mesh place to end of operation, and total time of operation
Measured: Intra-operative record
Seroma Formation at First Follow-up
Seroma formation at first follow-up, go by clinical
Measured: 1 week after operation
Overall Recurrence at 6 Years
Overall recurrence at 6 years, including all recurrence
Measured: 6 years after operation
Chronic Pain at 6 Years
Patient with persistent chronic pain sensation at 6 years after operation. It described as painful sensation feeling around the operated site which is persistent and causing disturbance to daily normal life and attracted patients' attention.
Measured: 6 years after operation
Patient With Testicular Atrophy From Post-op to 6 Years After Operation
Patient with testicular atrophy from post-op to 6 years after operation, by clinical examination
Measured: 6 years after operations
Patient With Palpable Mesh at 6 Years After Operation
Patient with clinical palpable mesh at 6 years after operation
Measured: 6 years after operation
Patient With Chronic Discomfort at 6 Years After Operation
Patient with persistent chronic discomfort at 6 years after operation. It described as an unpleasant feeling around the operated site which is persistent and causing disturbance to daily normal life and attracted patients' attention. It is differentiate from pain sensation.
Measured: 6 years after operation
Pain or Discomfort Affecting Daily Activities at 6 Years After Operation
pain or discomfort which affecting daily activities at 6 years after operation
Measured: 6 years after operation
Total Number of Analgesic Used
Total Number of Analgesic Used: Tablets
Measured: 1 week after operation
Wound Pain at Rest at 1 Week After Operation
Visual Analogue Score for measurement of wound pain at rest 1 week after operation
Measured: 1 week after operation
Wound Pain on Coughing at 1 Week After Operation
wound pain on coughingt at 1 week after operation (Visual Analogue Score). It was in the form of 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is maximal pain they experienced in their life. The higher the value, the more painful it is.
Measured: 1 week after operation
Post-operative Stay
Post-operative stay (number of hours)
Measured: 1 week after operation
Days go Outdoor
Post-op number of days that patient can go outdoor
Measured: 1 week after operation
Number of Participants Whose Response Was YES is Reported
Patient will be asked by assessor in out-patient clinic about satisfaction about the whole arrangement of operation. We did not intend to grade the satisfaction but simply ask whether they are satisfied. Will be either YES or NO answer.
Measured: 1 week after operation
Size of Mesh (Longitudinal)
Longitudinal size of mesh (in mm).
Measured: intra-operative record
Size of Mesh (Vertical)
Vertical size of mesh (in mm).
Measured: intra-operative record
Wound Size
Size of main wound
Measured: intra-operative record
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2009
- Primary completionMay 2010
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hernia, InguinalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Hong KongThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Tung Wah Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Joe King-Man Fan, The University of Hong Kong
- Investigators
- Joe KM Fan, MBBS MS FRCS, Principal investigator, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00960011
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HERN-PROGRIP-01
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 13 Aug 2009
- Last updated
- 15 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: upon email communication for identity verification
Publications
Chastan P. Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia. 2009 Apr;13(2):137-42. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0451-4. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
PubMed 19005611Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H, Heikkinen TJ. Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 2006 Sep;93(9):1056-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5403.
PubMed 16862613Helbling C, Schlumpf R. Sutureless Lichtenstein: first results of a prospective randomised clinical trial. Hernia. 2003 Jun;7(2):80-4. doi: 10.1007/s10029-002-0114-9. Epub 2003 Jan 30.
PubMed 12820029Fan JKM, Yip J, Foo DCC, Lo OSH, Law WL. Randomized trial comparing self gripping semi re-absorbable mesh (PROGRIP) with polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernioplasty: the 6 years result. Hernia. 2017 Feb;21(1):9-16. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1545-z. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
PubMed 27889845
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Study of Self Gripping Semi-resorbable Mesh (PROGRIP) With Polypropylene Mesh in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair - the 6 Years Result
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00960011
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HERN-PROGRIP-01
- Conditions
- Hernia, Inguinal
- Keywords
- Inguinal hernia, mesh, progrip
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Tung Wah Hospital
- Study start
- Jun 2009
- Primary completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Apr 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Tension-less mesh repair is the most common procedure for inguinal hernia. Conventional heavy weight polypropylene meshes have been reported to stimulate inflammatory reaction and this is responsible for mesh shrinkage and postoperative chronic groin pain. Moreover, the fixation of the mesh with sutures is a tedious procedure and accounts for the majority of the operating time. A self gripping semi-absorbable mesh has been developed for anterior tension free inguinal hernia repair. It has the benefit of light weight property and does not require sutures for fixation. This study aims to compare the outcome of this self-gripping light weight mesh with the conventional heavy weight polypropylene mesh in inguinal hernia repair.
Detailed description
Tension free mesh repair is the most common procedure for inguinal hernia repair. Conventional heavy weight polypropylene meshes have been reported to stimulate inflammatory reaction and this is responsible for mesh shrinkage when scar tissues are formed. In addition, the mesh requires fixation with sutures and there has been postulation that the fixation technique is related to postoperative chronic groin pain. Therefore, some authors have recommended the use of light-weight meshes and to limit the extent of fixation or to use non-compressive absorbable devices. In order to reduce the complications, a new self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh has been developed for anterior tension-free inguinal hernia repair.
The aim of this study is to compare the difference in operating time for open inguinal hernia repair with conventional prolene mesh and ProgripTM, which is a light-weight mesh with self-adhesive mechanism.
Methodology: Patients present with first episode of inguinal hernia are included into the study. Those with a sizable defect (>3cm defect), bilateral, inguino-scrotal hernia, irreducible, recurrence are excluded from study. Informed consents are signed before procedures and details of randomization are explained. Operations are performed by or under the supervision of specialist surgeons. Standardized inguinal dissection are performed. Randomization is carried out immediately before placement of mesh and after adequate inguinal dissection. PI / co-investigator phone to research assistant and ask for randomization result generated by computer. Total operative time, time from mesh placement to wound closure, blood loss, intra-operative complications, hospital stay, post-operative pain and analgesic used are documented.
Post-operative follow-up: Follow-up on day 14, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year post-op. Pain score, paraesthesia , chronic discomfort / pain, recurrence, seroma formation, testicular atrophy are documented. Thereafter, yearly follow-up is performed at clinic or by telephone to document the recurrence and chronic pain.
Parietene ProGrip™ (PP1208DR/ PP1208DL) Manufacturer: Sofradim Production Material: Monofilaments of polypropylene and polylactic acid (PLA) Color: Clear (undyed) Weight: 80g/m2 (before PLA resorbtion), 40g/m2 (after PLA resorbtion) Poresize: 1.7mm x 1mm
Material detailed description:
Parietene ProGrip™ is the first bio-component mesh comprised of monofilament polyester and a resorbable polylactic acid (PLA) gripping system which perfects true tension-free repair. The microhools cover the entire underside of the material allow complete anchoring of the mesh on the tissue. Self-gripping features also allows a strong and solid self-anchoring fixation and therefore making the hernia sac to fit perfectly to groin anatomy and move less underneath the prosthesis. Therefore, less suture is required and so operative time can be saved. Also less chance of nerve entrapment may cause low postoperative pain.
Surgipro Mesh (SPMM-35) Material: Monofilaments of polypropylene Color: Clear (undyed) Measurement: 15cmx15cm Thickness: 0.57mm
Description:
SURGIPRO Mesh is a non-absorbable, inert, sterile, porous surgical mesh knitted from mono-filament fibers of polypropylene polymer. The mesh exhibits high burst strength and tensile strength. The mesh is knitted in such fashion as to interconnect each mono-filament fiber and provide bi-dimensional elasticity while allowing the mesh to be cut to shape without unraveling.
Actions:
SURGIPRO Mesh is a porous, non-absorbable mesh used to repair or reinforce fascial defects following surgery or trauma and serves to provide additional support to such wounds during and following the wound healing period. Animal studies have shown that the polypropylene mono-filament fibers from which SURGIPRO Mesh is manufactured elicit a minimal acute inflammatory reaction in tissue, which is then followed by gradual encapsulation by fibrous tissue. In-growth of this fibrous tissue is permitted by the porosity of the knitted mesh structure. The mesh remains soft and pliable and the non-absorbable polypropylene fibers comprising the mesh resists loss of tensile strength in vivo.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PROGRIP | Experimental | Device: PROGRIPUse of PROGRIP mesh for open inguinal hernia repair |
| POLYPROPYLENE | Active comparator | Device: POLYPROPYLENEUse of Polypropylene mesh for open inguinal hernia repair |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age above 18 and below 80
- Male or female patients
- Unilateral inguinal hernia
- First occurrence hernia
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Inguino-scrotal hernia
- Recurrent inguinal hernia
- Incarcerated hernia
- Bilateral inguinal hernia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PROGRIPAlso: PROGRIP MESHUse of PROGRIP mesh for open inguinal hernia repair | Device | PROGRIP |
| POLYPROPYLENEAlso: Polypropylene meshUse of Polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair | Device | POLYPROPYLENE |
Primary outcome
Operating Time From Skin Incision to Wound Closure
Time frame: Intra-operative record
It measures the total operating time of 2 groups, measured from time started the skin incision to time finishing wound closure in terms of minutes.
17 secondary outcomes
Mesh Placement Time, Total Operative Time
Time frame: Intra-operative record
Seroma Formation at First Follow-up
Time frame: 1 week after operation
Overall Recurrence at 6 Years
Time frame: 6 years after operation
Chronic Pain at 6 Years
Time frame: 6 years after operation
Patient With Testicular Atrophy From Post-op to 6 Years After Operation
Time frame: 6 years after operations
Patient With Palpable Mesh at 6 Years After Operation
Time frame: 6 years after operation
Patient With Chronic Discomfort at 6 Years After Operation
Time frame: 6 years after operation
Pain or Discomfort Affecting Daily Activities at 6 Years After Operation
Time frame: 6 years after operation
Total Number of Analgesic Used
Time frame: 1 week after operation
Wound Pain at Rest at 1 Week After Operation
Time frame: 1 week after operation
Wound Pain on Coughing at 1 Week After Operation
Time frame: 1 week after operation
Post-operative Stay
Time frame: 1 week after operation
Days go Outdoor
Time frame: 1 week after operation
Number of Participants Whose Response Was YES is Reported
Time frame: 1 week after operation
Size of Mesh (Longitudinal)
Time frame: intra-operative record
Size of Mesh (Vertical)
Time frame: intra-operative record
Wound Size
Time frame: intra-operative record
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Apr 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19005611Chastan P. Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia. 2009 Apr;13(2):137-42. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0451-4. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
- Background: PubMed 16862613Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H, Heikkinen TJ. Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 2006 Sep;93(9):1056-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5403.
- Background: PubMed 12820029Helbling C, Schlumpf R. Sutureless Lichtenstein: first results of a prospective randomised clinical trial. Hernia. 2003 Jun;7(2):80-4. doi: 10.1007/s10029-002-0114-9. Epub 2003 Jan 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27889845Fan JKM, Yip J, Foo DCC, Lo OSH, Law WL. Randomized trial comparing self gripping semi re-absorbable mesh (PROGRIP) with polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernioplasty: the 6 years result. Hernia. 2017 Feb;21(1):9-16. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1545-z. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. upon email communication for identity verification
Related trials for Hernia, Inguinal
Active, not recruiting
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of a New Laparoscopic Non-mesh Hernia Needle Set Designed for Indirect Inguinal Hernia
Inguinal Hernia, Without Mention of Obstruction or Gangrene
Recruiting
Desarda Tissue Technique vs Lichtenstein Technique for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia Unilateral, Complications of Surgical Procedures or Medical Care
Active, not recruiting
Urinary Catheterization Versus No Catheterization in Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernias
Recruiting
Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques for Indirect Inguinal Hernia Repair
Indirect Inguinal Hernia
Recruiting
Permanent Versus Slowly Dissolving Stitches for Non-Mesh (Shouldice) Groin Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joe KM Fan, MBBS MS FRCS principal investigator
Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PROGRIP and POLYPROPYLENE in people with Hernia, Inguinal, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Apr 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Operating Time From Skin Incision to Wound Closure (time frame: Intra-operative record). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00960011, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2020.