AzTrials
AzTrials

Hernia, InguinalNCT00960011

Comparative Study on Self-adhesive Mesh for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair

A study testing PROGRIP and POLYPROPYLENE in people with Hernia, Inguinal, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Tension-less mesh repair is the most common procedure for inguinal hernia. Conventional heavy weight polypropylene meshes have been reported to stimulate inflammatory reaction and this is responsible for mesh shrinkage and postoperative chronic groin pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Hernia, Inguinal
What is being tested?
PROGRIP and POLYPROPYLENE
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
58 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jun 2009to May 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age above 18 and below 80
  • Male or female patients
  • Unilateral inguinal hernia
  • First occurrence hernia

Who cannot join

  • Inguino-scrotal hernia
  • Recurrent inguinal hernia
  • Incarcerated hernia
  • Bilateral inguinal hernia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong

    Hong Kong

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Randomized Study of Self Gripping Semi-resorbable Mesh (PROGRIP) With Polypropylene Mesh in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair - the 6 Years Result

Tension-less mesh repair is the most common procedure for inguinal hernia. Conventional heavy weight polypropylene meshes have been reported to stimulate inflammatory reaction and this is responsible for mesh shrinkage and postoperative chronic groin pain. Moreover, the fixation of the mesh with sutures is a tedious procedure and accounts for the majority of the operating time. A self gripping semi-absorbable mesh has been developed for anterior tension free inguinal hernia repair. It has the benefit of light weight property and does not require sutures for fixation. This study aims to compare the outcome of this self-gripping light weight mesh with the conventional heavy weight polypropylene mesh in inguinal hernia repair.

Read the detailed description

Tension free mesh repair is the most common procedure for inguinal hernia repair. Conventional heavy weight polypropylene meshes have been reported to stimulate inflammatory reaction and this is responsible for mesh shrinkage when scar tissues are formed. In addition, the mesh requires fixation with sutures and there has been postulation that the fixation technique is related to postoperative chronic groin pain. Therefore, some authors have recommended the use of light-weight meshes and to limit the extent of fixation or to use non-compressive absorbable devices. In order to reduce the complications, a new self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh has been developed for anterior tension-free inguinal hernia repair.

The aim of this study is to compare the difference in operating time for open inguinal hernia repair with conventional prolene mesh and ProgripTM, which is a light-weight mesh with self-adhesive mechanism.

Methodology: Patients present with first episode of inguinal hernia are included into the study. Those with a sizable defect (>3cm defect), bilateral, inguino-scrotal hernia, irreducible, recurrence are excluded from study. Informed consents are signed before procedures and details of randomization are explained. Operations are performed by or under the supervision of specialist surgeons. Standardized inguinal dissection are performed. Randomization is carried out immediately before placement of mesh and after adequate inguinal dissection. PI / co-investigator phone to research assistant and ask for randomization result generated by computer. Total operative time, time from mesh placement to wound closure, blood loss, intra-operative complications, hospital stay, post-operative pain and analgesic used are documented.

Post-operative follow-up: Follow-up on day 14, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year post-op. Pain score, paraesthesia , chronic discomfort / pain, recurrence, seroma formation, testicular atrophy are documented. Thereafter, yearly follow-up is performed at clinic or by telephone to document the recurrence and chronic pain.

Parietene ProGrip™ (PP1208DR/ PP1208DL) Manufacturer: Sofradim Production Material: Monofilaments of polypropylene and polylactic acid (PLA) Color: Clear (undyed) Weight: 80g/m2 (before PLA resorbtion), 40g/m2 (after PLA resorbtion) Poresize: 1.7mm x 1mm

Material detailed description:

Parietene ProGrip™ is the first bio-component mesh comprised of monofilament polyester and a resorbable polylactic acid (PLA) gripping system which perfects true tension-free repair. The microhools cover the entire underside of the material allow complete anchoring of the mesh on the tissue. Self-gripping features also allows a strong and solid self-anchoring fixation and therefore making the hernia sac to fit perfectly to groin anatomy and move less underneath the prosthesis. Therefore, less suture is required and so operative time can be saved. Also less chance of nerve entrapment may cause low postoperative pain.

Surgipro Mesh (SPMM-35) Material: Monofilaments of polypropylene Color: Clear (undyed) Measurement: 15cmx15cm Thickness: 0.57mm

Description:

SURGIPRO Mesh is a non-absorbable, inert, sterile, porous surgical mesh knitted from mono-filament fibers of polypropylene polymer. The mesh exhibits high burst strength and tensile strength. The mesh is knitted in such fashion as to interconnect each mono-filament fiber and provide bi-dimensional elasticity while allowing the mesh to be cut to shape without unraveling.

Actions:

SURGIPRO Mesh is a porous, non-absorbable mesh used to repair or reinforce fascial defects following surgery or trauma and serves to provide additional support to such wounds during and following the wound healing period. Animal studies have shown that the polypropylene mono-filament fibers from which SURGIPRO Mesh is manufactured elicit a minimal acute inflammatory reaction in tissue, which is then followed by gradual encapsulation by fibrous tissue. In-growth of this fibrous tissue is permitted by the porosity of the knitted mesh structure. The mesh remains soft and pliable and the non-absorbable polypropylene fibers comprising the mesh resists loss of tensile strength in vivo.

Being tested
PROGRIP, POLYPROPYLENE
Keywords
Inguinal hernia, mesh, progrip
Medical subject headings
Hernia, Inguinal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PROGRIPDevice

    Also called PROGRIP MESH

    Use of PROGRIP mesh for open inguinal hernia repair

  • POLYPROPYLENEDevice

    Also called Polypropylene mesh

    Use of Polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair

Study groups in NCT00960011
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PROGRIPExperimentalUse of PROGRIP mesh for open inguinal hernia repair
Receives: Device: PROGRIP
POLYPROPYLENEActive comparatorUse of Polypropylene mesh for open inguinal hernia repair
Receives: Device: POLYPROPYLENE

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Operating Time From Skin Incision to Wound Closure

    It measures the total operating time of 2 groups, measured from time started the skin incision to time finishing wound closure in terms of minutes.

    Measured: Intra-operative record

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Mesh Placement Time, Total Operative Time

    Time from mesh place to end of operation, and total time of operation

    Measured: Intra-operative record

  2. Seroma Formation at First Follow-up

    Seroma formation at first follow-up, go by clinical

    Measured: 1 week after operation

  3. Overall Recurrence at 6 Years

    Overall recurrence at 6 years, including all recurrence

    Measured: 6 years after operation

  4. Chronic Pain at 6 Years

    Patient with persistent chronic pain sensation at 6 years after operation. It described as painful sensation feeling around the operated site which is persistent and causing disturbance to daily normal life and attracted patients' attention.

    Measured: 6 years after operation

  5. Patient With Testicular Atrophy From Post-op to 6 Years After Operation

    Patient with testicular atrophy from post-op to 6 years after operation, by clinical examination

    Measured: 6 years after operations

  6. Patient With Palpable Mesh at 6 Years After Operation

    Patient with clinical palpable mesh at 6 years after operation

    Measured: 6 years after operation

  7. Patient With Chronic Discomfort at 6 Years After Operation

    Patient with persistent chronic discomfort at 6 years after operation. It described as an unpleasant feeling around the operated site which is persistent and causing disturbance to daily normal life and attracted patients' attention. It is differentiate from pain sensation.

    Measured: 6 years after operation

  8. Pain or Discomfort Affecting Daily Activities at 6 Years After Operation

    pain or discomfort which affecting daily activities at 6 years after operation

    Measured: 6 years after operation

  9. Total Number of Analgesic Used

    Total Number of Analgesic Used: Tablets

    Measured: 1 week after operation

  10. Wound Pain at Rest at 1 Week After Operation

    Visual Analogue Score for measurement of wound pain at rest 1 week after operation

    Measured: 1 week after operation

  11. Wound Pain on Coughing at 1 Week After Operation

    wound pain on coughingt at 1 week after operation (Visual Analogue Score). It was in the form of 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is maximal pain they experienced in their life. The higher the value, the more painful it is.

    Measured: 1 week after operation

  12. Post-operative Stay

    Post-operative stay (number of hours)

    Measured: 1 week after operation

  13. Days go Outdoor

    Post-op number of days that patient can go outdoor

    Measured: 1 week after operation

  14. Number of Participants Whose Response Was YES is Reported

    Patient will be asked by assessor in out-patient clinic about satisfaction about the whole arrangement of operation. We did not intend to grade the satisfaction but simply ask whether they are satisfied. Will be either YES or NO answer.

    Measured: 1 week after operation

  15. Size of Mesh (Longitudinal)

    Longitudinal size of mesh (in mm).

    Measured: intra-operative record

  16. Size of Mesh (Vertical)

    Vertical size of mesh (in mm).

    Measured: intra-operative record

  17. Wound Size

    Size of main wound

    Measured: intra-operative record

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Aug 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2009
  3. Primary completionMay 2010
  4. Study completionMay 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
58 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00960011
Sponsor's protocol ID
HERN-PROGRIP-01
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
13 Aug 2009
Last updated
15 Apr 2020
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: upon email communication for identity verification

Publications

  • Chastan P. Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia. 2009 Apr;13(2):137-42. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0451-4. Epub 2008 Nov 13.

    PubMed 19005611
  • Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H, Heikkinen TJ. Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 2006 Sep;93(9):1056-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5403.

    PubMed 16862613
  • Helbling C, Schlumpf R. Sutureless Lichtenstein: first results of a prospective randomised clinical trial. Hernia. 2003 Jun;7(2):80-4. doi: 10.1007/s10029-002-0114-9. Epub 2003 Jan 30.

    PubMed 12820029
  • Fan JKM, Yip J, Foo DCC, Lo OSH, Law WL. Randomized trial comparing self gripping semi re-absorbable mesh (PROGRIP) with polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernioplasty: the 6 years result. Hernia. 2017 Feb;21(1):9-16. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1545-z. Epub 2016 Nov 26.

    PubMed 27889845

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PROGRIP and POLYPROPYLENE in people with Hernia, Inguinal, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Apr 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Operating Time From Skin Incision to Wound Closure (time frame: Intra-operative record). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00960011, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in