AzTrials
AzTrials

ObesityEffectsNCT00962247

Effect of Changing Sedentary Behavior in Youth

A study testing Television reduction device in people with Obesity, run by State University of New York at Buffalo at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary aim is to examine how reduction in sedentary behaviors influences physical activity and energy intake. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Obesity
What is being tested?
Television reduction device
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
61 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2006to Dec 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • above the 85th BMI percentile
  • reside in one primary household
  • engage in at least 18 hours of sedentary behavior a week

Who cannot join

  • none

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University at Buffalo

    Buffalo, New York, 14214

Other trials in United States

About this study

The primary aim is to examine how reduction in sedentary behaviors influences physical activity and energy intake.

Read the detailed description

Many youth find television, videos and computer games to be very reinforcing, and they choose to be sedentary rather than physically active. Sedentary behaviors can influence energy balance and body weight by reducing physical activity and increasing energy intake. Research from our laboratory has shown that reducing sedentary behavior can increase physical activity and decrease energy intake, but there is substantial variability in the response of youth to reductions in sedentary behavior. The present proposal is designed to extend our research and explore theoretical models that may help understand why youth vary in their response to increase physical activity when targeted sedentary behaviors are reduced. We hypothesize that the increase in physical activity when sedentary behaviors are reduced is related to the relative reinforcing value (RRV) of physical activity to sedentary behaviors. The RRV of physical activity is a measure of the motivation to be active in youth, and overweight youth who are inactive find physical activity relatively less reinforcing than less overweight youth. We predict that RRV of physical activity will be positively related to the substitution of total physical activity and physical activity in the moderate to vigorous intensity range for sedentary behaviors when targeted sedentary behaviors are reduced. To test this hypothesis, we will study 60 overweight and at risk for overweight 8-12 year-old youth who differ in the RRV of physical activity to sedentary behavior, with equal numbers of boys and girls, in 3 phases: baseline, and reduce television watching from baseline by 25 percent and 50 percent. Each phase will be implemented for three weeks. Order of experimental phases will be counterbalanced across subjects. It is also predicted that reducing sedentary behavior will reduce energy intake and dietary fat intake, and the reduction in energy intake will be greatest for youth with stronger association between eating with television watching and other targeted sedentary behaviors. Liking and outcome expectancy of physical activity will be studied as additional predictors of substitution of physical activity for reductions in sedentary behaviors. Developing a better understanding of why obese youth increase physical activity or decrease energy intake when sedentary behaviors are reduced is important for the treatment of pediatric obesity.

Conditions
Obesity
Being tested
Television reduction device
Keywords
physical activity, relative reinforcing value, sedentary behavior, obesity
Medical subject headings
Obesity, Motor Activity, Sedentary Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Television reduction deviceDevice

    A TV allowance helps turn off the television when the time limits have been met.

Study groups in NCT00962247
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sedentary; usual, 25% reduced, 50% reducedExperimentalThe initial 3 weeks of the study, children were asked to maintain their usual targeted sedentary behaviors (TV, video game, computer use) measured by a television reduction device (TV Allowance). The following 3 weeks children were asked to reduce their targeted sedentary behaviors (TV, video game, computer use) by 25% from the usual sedentary condition using a television reduction device (TV Allowance). The final 3 weeks of the study, children were asked to reduce their targeted sedentary behaviors (TV, video game, computer use) by 50% from the usual sedentary condition using a television reduction device (TV Allowance)
Receives: Device: Television reduction device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Physical Activity

    Actigraph activity monitors were used to record physical activity over 3 days, in addition to a weekly physical activity diary. Acti-graph counts were used to estimate energy expenditure during waking hours. Counts per minute describes the average rate of counts, with 0 being at rest and higher numbers indicating more vigorous physical activity.

    Measured: 3 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Energy Intake

    Resting metabolic rate was calculated using the activity data from accelerometer (Actigraph) collection. Resting metabolic rate was used to calculate estimated daily energy expenditure. Daily energy expenditure and weight change over the study period was used to estimate energy intake. If weight was stable of the nine weeks, assume energy intake = energy expenditure. A gain of a pound was estimated as equivalent to a positive balance of 3500 calories and a loss of a pound was estimated as equivalent to a negative balance of 3500 calories.

    Measured: 3 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Aug 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2006
  3. Primary completionDec 2008
  4. Study completionDec 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Intervention model
Sequential
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
61 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00962247
Sponsor's protocol ID
HD039778
Other IDs
5R01HD039778
Acronym
Effects
Status last verified
Jun 2019
First submitted
17 Aug 2009
Last updated
19 Jun 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Epstein LH, Roemmich JN, Cavanaugh MD, Paluch RA. The motivation to be sedentary predicts weight change when sedentary behaviors are reduced. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Feb 22;8:13. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-13.

    PubMed 21342518

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Television reduction device in people with Obesity, run by State University of New York at Buffalo at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Physical Activity (time frame: 3 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00962247, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jun 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in