Sealing the ArteriotomyNCT00963690
Evaluation of the CloSys Closure System as an Adjunct to Standard Compression
A study testing CloSys Hemostatic Device (HD) and Standard compression in people with Sealing the Arteriotomy, run by CloSys Corporation at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CloSys Hemostatic Device designed to stop bleeding after an interventional procedure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sealing the Arteriotomy
- What is being tested?
- CloSys Hemostatic Device (HD) and Standard compression
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2009to 30 May 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
General Inclusion Criteria
All answers must be YES to be eligible for the study:
- Subject is ≥ 18 years of age;
- Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent;
- Subject is able to ambulate pre-procedure without difficulty;
- Subject is able to remain supine for an extended period of time;
- Subject is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the study protocol, including all follow-up visit evaluations;
General Exclusion Criteria
All answers must be NO to be eligible for the study:
- Subject has a systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 160 mmHg despite medical therapy;
- Subject has a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 100 mmHg despite medical therapy;
- Subject has received thrombolytic therapy, such as streptokinase, urokinase, retavase, tenecteplase, or tPA, within 24 hours of the scheduled procedure;
- Subject is lactating;
- Subject has a life expectancy of less than one (1) year;
- The percutaneous intervention was an emergent procedure;
- Subject has a known coagulopathy disorder, including, but not limited to, hemophilia, sickle cell disease, or von Willebrand disease;
- Subject has a known diagnosis of an auto-immune disease;
- Subject has a known or suspected diagnosis of vasculitis;
- Subject currently has an infection of any kind;
- Subject does not have either a posterior Tibialis (PT) or dorsalis pedis (DP) pulse by doppler in ipsilateral extremity;
- Subject has critical limb ischemia and/or severe peripheral vascular disease as identified by rest pain and/or gangrene;
- Rutherford category five (5) or six (6);
- Subject is currently or within the last thirty (30) days participating in another investigational drug or device study;
- Subject is unavailable for follow-up;
- Subject has known allergy or previous intolerance to Protamine Sulfate;
- Subject has known allergy to shellfish;
- Subject has had a previous closure device in the ipsilateral side within the last ninety (90) days;
- Prior intervention or surgical procedure to the access site within the last six (6) months;
- Subject has a planned intervention or surgical procedure prior to completion of the thirty (30) day follow-up visit;
- Subject has received a low molecular weight (LMWH) heparin, such as, Enoxaparin sodium (Lovenox, Xaparin and Clexane) within the past twelve (12) hours;
- Body mass index (BMI) > 45 or < 20;
- The investigator determines the subject is otherwise not an appropriate subject for the study; 5.3.2.1 Laboratory Values Exclusion Criteria
All answers must be NO to be eligible for the study:
Within seven (7) days prior to interventional procedure or according to standard of care for percutaneous interventional procedures requiring contrast and angiography:
- Subject is known to be, or suspected to be, pregnant (verified with a urine/blood pregnancy test);
- Subject's pre-procedural platelet count < 100,000 103/ul;
- Subject's hematocrit < 28%;
- Subject's hemoglobin < 10 g/dL;
- Subject's serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 mg/dL;
- Prothrombin Time (PT) is not within normal limits;
- Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) is not within normal limits;
- For subjects taking warfarin (Coumadin): The subject on warfarin within 30 days has an INR ≥ 1.8 at the time of procedure; post - Interventional Procedure Inclusion Criteria
All answers must be YES to be eligible for the study:
- Subject has undergone a percutaneous interventional procedure utilizing a femoral arterial access;
- Heparin is administered for anti-coagulation during the procedure;
- Subject has an ACT ≥ 225 seconds and < 350 seconds;
- Subject's arterial introducer sheath is 5 Fr, 6 Fr or 7 Fr;
- Subject's arterial introducer sheath has an overall length of ≤ 15.0 cm;
- Subject's SBP < 160 mmHg;
- Subject's DBP < 100mmHg;
- Subject's physical, mental, and clinical status is stable and allows for ambulation assessment four (4) hours following removal of introducer sheath; 5.3.4 Post - Interventional Procedure Exclusion Criteria
All answers must be NO to be eligible for the study:
5.3.4.1 General Exclusion Criteria
- Subject experienced cardiogenic shock before, during, or immediately after the interventional procedure;
- Subject has bleeding around the sheath prior to sheath removal;
- Subject has a pseudoaneurysm before sheath removal;
- Subject has a palpable hematoma before sheath removal;
- Subject has evidence of a retroperitoneal bleed prior to sheath removal;
- Subject experienced double wall punctures during vascular access;
- Subject experienced multiple arterial punctures (> 1) during vascular access;
- Subject has ipsilateral venous sheaths;
- Subject had intraprocedural therapeutic thrombolysis;
- Subject received bivalirudin(Angiomax®) before, during, or after the intervention;
- Subject received Protamine Sulfate IV to reverse heparin received during procedure;
- Subject has a suspected bacterial contamination of the access site;
- Arterial access was obtained in or near a vascular graft;
- Subject's percutaneous intervention was for the treatment of an acute myocardial infarction (MI);
Angiographic Eligibility Criteria Angiographic Inclusion Criteria
All answers must be YES to be eligible for the trial:
- Arterial access was obtained above the femoral bifurcation;
- Arterial access was obtained below the inguinal ligament; Angiographic Exclusion Criteria
All answers must be NO to be eligible for the trial:
- Common femoral artery > 50% narrowing due to calcification or plaque;
- Arteriovenous fistula present;
- Other complication noted on femoral angiogram.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Cardiovascular Institute of the South
Lafayette, Louisiana, 70506
Rex Healthcare - Rex Heart and Vascular Research
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
About this study
Official title: CloSys Hemostatic Device U.S. Multi-Center Clinical Investigation
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CloSys Hemostatic Device designed to stop bleeding after an interventional procedure.
Read the detailed description
To analyze the time to hemostasis (time to stop bleeding), time to ambulation (time to walk) and adverse events.
- Conditions
- Sealing the Arteriotomy
- Being tested
- CloSys Hemostatic Device (HD), Standard compression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CloSys Hemostatic Device (HD)Device
Deploy CloSys HD to achieve hemostasis
Standard compressionProcedure or surgery
Use standard compression to achieve hemostasis
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CloSys HD with standard compression | Experimental | CloSys Arm Receives: Device: CloSys Hemostatic Device (HD); Procedure: Standard compression |
| Standard compression alone | Active comparator | Manual compression arm Receives: Procedure: Standard compression |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to hemostasis
Measured: 1 Hour
Time to ambulation
Measured: 6 Hours
Secondary outcomes (1)
Adverse events
Measured: Within 30 days after procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2009
- Primary completion30 Apr 2013
- Study completion30 May 2013
Why it stopped: Lack of funding
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Sealing the ArteriotomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- CloSys Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Eminence Clinical Research, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- George Adams, MD, Principal investigator, Rex Healthcare
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00963690
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CL-0100-01
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 12 Aug 2009
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CloSys Hemostatic Device U.S. Multi-Center Clinical Investigation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00963690
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CL-0100-01
- Conditions
- Sealing the Arteriotomy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Lack of funding
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CloSys CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Eminence Clinical Research, Inc.
- Study start
- Aug 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CloSys Hemostatic Device designed to stop bleeding after an interventional procedure.
Detailed description
To analyze the time to hemostasis (time to stop bleeding), time to ambulation (time to walk) and adverse events.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CloSys HD with standard compression | Experimental | Device: CloSys Hemostatic Device (HD), Procedure: Standard compressionCloSys Arm |
| Standard compression alone | Active comparator | Procedure: Standard compressionManual compression arm |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CloSys Hemostatic Device (HD)Deploy CloSys HD to achieve hemostasis | Device | CloSys HD with standard compression |
| Standard compressionUse standard compression to achieve hemostasis | Procedure or surgery | CloSys HD with standard compression, Standard compression alone |
Primary outcome
Time to hemostasis
Time frame: 1 Hour
Time to ambulation
Time frame: 6 Hours
1 secondary outcome
Adverse events
Time frame: Within 30 days after procedure
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Lack of funding). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2017.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
George Adams, MD principal investigator
Rex Healthcare
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CloSys Hemostatic Device (HD) and Standard compression in people with Sealing the Arteriotomy, run by CloSys Corporation at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Lack of funding). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to hemostasis (time frame: 1 Hour). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2017.