AzTrials
AzTrials

SchizophreniaNCT00963924

D-cycloserine Augmentation of Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia

A study testing D-cycloserine and Cognitive Remediation in people with Schizophrenia, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study seeks to examine the effects of D-cycloserine augmentation on cognitive remediation for patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. We will test the hypotheses that D-cycloserine will significantly improve cognitive performance, negative symptoms, and measures of functioning compared to placebo when combined… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Schizophrenia
What is being tested?
D-cycloserine and Cognitive Remediation
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
54 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2009to Jun 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female
  • Age 18-65 years
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, depressed type
  • Stable dose of antipsychotic for at least 4 weeks
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Able to complete a cognitive battery
  • Able to perform the cognitive remediation exercises

Who cannot join

  • Current treatment with clozapine
  • Dementia
  • Seizure disorder
  • Unstable medical illness
  • Renal insufficiency measured as eGFR >60mg/dL/min
  • Active substance abuse: positive urine toxic screen
  • Pregnancy, nursing, or unwilling to use appropriate birth control measures during participation if female and fertile.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Placebo-controlled Trial of D-cycloserine Augmentation of Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia

This study seeks to examine the effects of D-cycloserine augmentation on cognitive remediation for patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. We will test the hypotheses that D-cycloserine will significantly improve cognitive performance, negative symptoms, and measures of functioning compared to placebo when combined with eight weeks of cognitive remediation. We expect that these effects will persist when assessed at six-month follow up.

Read the detailed description

D-cycloserine has been shown to enhance learning in animal models and, in a previous trial, once-weekly D-cycloserine improved negative symptoms in schizophrenia subjects. We set out to test whether DCS combined with cognitive remediation would improve learning of a practiced auditory discrimination task and whether gains would generalize to unpracticed cognitive tasks.

The proposed study consists of an 8-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial of D-cycloserine augmentation of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia outpatients. The primary outcome measure is change in performance on the MATRICS cognitive battery composite score after 8 weeks. Secondary outcome measures include a measure of processing speed assessed after weeks 1, 2, 4 \& 8, and changes in negative symptoms and measures of functioning after 4 and 8 weeks. In addition, all outcome measures will be repeated at 6 months to assess persistence of benefit.

Hypotheses:

  1. D-cycloserine will significantly improve cognitive performance as measured by the composite score on the MATRICS battery compared to placebo after 8 weeks of cognitive remediation.
  2. D-cycloserine will significantly improve negative symptoms as measured by the SANS compared to placebo after 8 weeks when combined with cognitive remediation.
  3. D-cycloserine will significantly improve measures of functioning (GAS, QoL and CGI) at 8 weeks compared to placebo when combined with cognitive remediation.
  4. D-cycloserine effects on cognition, negative symptoms and functioning will persist compared to placebo when assessed at 6-month follow-up.
Conditions
Schizophrenia
Being tested
D-cycloserine, Placebo, Cognitive Remediation
Keywords
Cognitive Impairment, Neuroplasticity, D-cycloserine, NMDA, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Mental Disorders, Psychotic Disorders, Antitubercular Agents, Schizophrenia and Disorders with Psychotic Features, Schizoaffective Disorder
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia, Cognitive Dysfunction, Mental Disorders, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • D-cycloserineDrug

    Also called Cycloserine

    50 mg by mouth one hour before first cognitive remediation session each week for eight weeks.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo by mouth one hour before first cognitive remediation session each week for eight weeks.

  • Cognitive RemediationBehavioural

    Also called Brain Fitness Program

    40 one-hour daily sessions of cognitive remediation (Brain Fitness Program) over eight weeks.

Study groups in NCT00963924
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
D-cycloserineExperimentalParticipants will receive D-cycloserine weekly, one hour before the first cognitive remediation session of the week, for eight weeks.
Receives: Drug: D-cycloserine; Behavioral: Cognitive Remediation
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive placebo weekly, one hour before the first cognitive remediation session of the week, for eight weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Behavioral: Cognitive Remediation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS)

    Change of a composite score from baseline to week 8 on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS). The MATRICS consists of 10 cognitive tasks that are used to calculate scores in 7 cognitive domains: speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The raw scores on each cognitive task are transformed on a normative scale into t-scores, and then these scores are combined to calculate the domain scores. The composite score is calculated by averaging all domain t-scores to come up with one overall cognitive composite t-score. For all scores on the assessment, the higher the score the better the performance on the task.

    Measured: Baseline vs. Week 8

  2. Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS)

    The total scores from baseline and week 8 on the scale for the assessment of negative symptoms (SANS) total score. Total SANS scores range from 0-100. The SANS is comprised of 5 subscores: Affective Flattening or Blunting (score range 0-35), Alogia (score range 0-20), Avolition-Apathy (score range 0-15), Anhedonia-Asociality (score range 0-20), and Attention (0-10). For each scale, the higher the score the more prominent the negative symptoms were. The total score was computed by adding all the sub-scale total scores. Scores are reported for baseline and week 8.

    Measured: Baseline vs. Week 8

  3. Auditory Discrimination Task: Interstimulus Interval (ISI)

    The auditory discrimination task involved trials in which the subject differentiated between rapidly-presented frequency-modulated sweeps separated by a short interstimulus interval (ISI). In this task, sustained successful performance is more difficult with shorter stimulus presentations and ISIs (which were equal within a trial). Thus, our dependent measure was the shortest stimulus duration/ISI, in ms, for trials in which subjects were able to perform the task at 85% accuracy, referred to as ISI for simplicity. The shorter the score the better the performance on the task. Scores are reported for baseline and week 8.

    Measured: Baseline vs. Week 8

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

    The baseline score on the positive symptom sub-scale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Total PANSS positive symptom sub-scale scores range from 7-49. The PANSS positive symptom sub-scale is comprised of 7 items rated on a scale of 1-7: delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. A score of one on each item 1 absent, 2 is minimal, 3 is mild, 4 is moderate, 5 is moderately severe, 6 is severe, and 7 is extreme. The total score was computed by adding all the items on the sub-scale together. The higher a score the more prominent a positive symptom is.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAS)

    The Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAS) measured at baseline. This scale measures social, occupational, and psychological functioning, on a scale of 0-100. The higher the score, the greater a participant's functioning level.

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Heinrich Quality of Life Scale (QoL)

    Baseline scores of the Heinrich Quality of Life Scale, a 21 item scale designed and validated to measure intrapsychic foundations, interpersonal relations, instrumental role, and common objects and activities in patients diagnosed with Schizophrenia. Patients are rated on each of the 21 items on a scale of 0-6. Total scores are computed by adding up the scores of each individual item, with a total score ranging from 0-126. Higher scores reflect higher functioning.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS)

    Baseline scores on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS). Total CDSS scores range from 0-27. The assessment is comprised of 9 questions covering the topics of Depression, Hopelessness, Self Depreciation, Guilty Ideas of Reference, Pathological Guilt, Morning Depression, Early Wakening, Suicide, Observed Depression. Each item is scored on a scale from 0-3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The total score is computed by adding up the individual scores of each item. The higher the score, the more prominent the symptoms of depression are for the participant.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Clinical Global Impression (CGI)

    Considering you total clinical experience with this patient population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?

    1=Normal, not at all, 2=Borderline mentally ill, 3=Mildy ill, 4=Moderately ill, 5=Markedly ill, 6=Severely ill, 7=Among the most extremely ill patients; a higher score indicates worse outcome

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 8, and Month 6 after cognitive remediation completion

  6. Side Effects Checklist (SEC)

    Each side effect is entered as either yes or no for having had any severity of the side effect at each visit.

    Measured: Weeks 0 - 8, and Month 6 after cognitive remediation completion

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Aug 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2009
  3. Primary completionMay 2011
  4. Study completionJun 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
54 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00963924
Sponsor's protocol ID
2008P002237
Other IDs
5P50MH060450, DATR A3-NSC
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
20 Aug 2009
Last updated
6 Feb 2018
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Cain CK, McCue M, Bello I, Creedon T, Tang DI, Laska E, Goff DC. d-Cycloserine augmentation of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2014 Mar;153(1-3):177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

    PubMed 24485587

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing D-cycloserine and Cognitive Remediation in people with Schizophrenia, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Aug 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) (time frame: Baseline vs. Week 8). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00963924, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in