AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Coronary SyndromePhase 3NCT00965406

Glucose Insulin Potassium With Intensive Insulin Therapy and (GIK2) Versus GIK Alone

A Phase 3 study testing GIK and intensive insulin therapy in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by University of Monastir at 3 sites in Tunisia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the glucose insulin potassium (GIK) infusion associated with intensive insulin therapy compared to GIK alone and control group in patients presenting to the ED with acute coronary syndrome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Coronary Syndrome
What is being tested?
GIK and intensive insulin therapy
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
772 participants
Where
3 sitesTunisia
Study dates
Aug 2010to Jun 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All patients fulfilling ACS criteria with or without known diabetes.

Who cannot join

  • Patients under 18 years old.
  • Killip II class or SaO2 ≤ 90%.
  • Blood creatinine ≥ 180 µmol/L
  • Potassium serum ≥ 6.5 mmol/L.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Tunisia3 sites
  • Mahdia University Hospital

    Monastir, Mahdia Governorate

  • Monastir University Hospital

    Monastir, 5000

  • Sahloul University Hospital

    Sousse

Other trials in Tunisia

About this study

Official title: Glucose Insulin Potassium With Intensive Insulin Therapy and (GIK2) Versus GIK Alone in the Early Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Randomised Controlled Study

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the glucose insulin potassium (GIK) infusion associated with intensive insulin therapy compared to GIK alone and control group in patients presenting to the ED with acute coronary syndrome.

Read the detailed description

It is well recognised that diabetes is a factor of worse prognosis in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Recently, the relationship between the glucidic metabolism and cardiac ischemia was highlighted whether patients have diabetes or not. Indeed, it was established that hyperglycemia occurring during hospitalization in non diabetic patients, is a powerful risk factor of death.

Stress related hyperglycemia occurs during number of acute pathological situations (AMI, stroke, pancreatitis, hypothermia, hypoxia, cirrhosis, polytrauma, burn, sepsis…. It is due to an excess of hyperglycemia hormones (glucagon, growth hormone, catecholamines and glucosteroids) and of inflammatory mediators (cytokines…). Hyperglycemia has several deleterious effects on the cardiovascular system as it promotes microvascular inflammatory reaction, activation of the coagulation system, and free radical oxygen liberation.

Currently, the idea of controlling glycemia in surgical and medical intensive care patients is widely accepted and maintaining blood sugar level closest to normal by intensive insulin therapy became largely recommended.

Several decades ago, glucose-insulin-potassium infusion (GIK) was proposed to protect acute cardiac ischemia. GIK has been assessed in many previous studies.

The results of these studies are contradictory. According to CREATE-ECLA study which is the largest (including 20201 patients), GIK didn't show a significant beneficial effect in ACS. However, in these trials using GIK alone glycemia was not strictly controlled.

Recently, the importance of tight glycemic control has been highlighted in ICU patients and early post heart surgery. Our hypothesis is that GIK treatment associated to intensive insulin therapy in ACS would be beneficial and superior to GIK alone possibly because intensive insulin therapy would prevent potential deleterious effects of hyperglycemia induced by GIK.

Being tested
GIK and intensive insulin therapy
Keywords
acute coronary syndrome, glucose insulin potassium
Medical subject headings
Acute Coronary Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GIK and intensive insulin therapyDrug

    Also called GIKI2

    GIK infusion (1000 ml of Glucose 10%, 20 UI Insulin, 70 mEq of Potassium) within 24 hours. Intravenous intensive insulin therapy is simultaneously administered according to our protocol in the ED

Study groups in NCT00965406
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
glucose insulin potassium (GIK)Placebo comparatorGlucose + insulin +6 potassium (GIK) infusion (1000 ml of Glucose 10%, 20 UI Insulin, 70 mEq of Potassium) within 24 hours.
Receives: Drug: GIK and intensive insulin therapy
GIK and intensive insulin therapyExperimentalGIK infusion (1000 ml of Glucose 10%, 20 UI Insulin, 70 mEq of Potassium) within 24 hours. Intravenous intensive insulin therapy is simultaneously administered according to our protocol in the ED
Receives: Drug: GIK and intensive insulin therapy
Control groupNo interventionNo intervention and patients were treated with updated international recommendations of acute coronary syndrome.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 30 days mortality, reinfarction, urgent coronary revascularisation, and stroke.

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Severe dysrhythmias, acute left ventricular failure with ejection fraction<45%, serum troponin, PAI level and platelet factor activator (PFA-100) within 24 hours after the start of protocol treatment. Safety: major or minor hypoglycemia

    Measured: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Aug 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2010
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionJun 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
772 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00965406
Sponsor's protocol ID
GIKI2
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
24 Aug 2009
Last updated
2 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Bouida W, Beltaief K, Msolli MA, Bzeouich N, Sekma A, Echeikh M, Mzali M, Boubaker H, Grissa MH, Boukef R, Hassine M, Dridi Z, Belguith A, Najjar F, Khochtali I, Nouira S; GREAT Network. One-Year Outcome of Intensive Insulin Therapy Combined to Glucose-Insulin-Potassium in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Nov 14;6(11):e006674. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006674.

    PubMed 29138181

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing GIK and intensive insulin therapy in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by University of Monastir at 3 sites in Tunisia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Tunisia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

30 days mortality, reinfarction, urgent coronary revascularisation, and stroke. (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00965406, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in