AzTrials
AzTrials

InflammationSTAR-VaS2NCT00967252

Impact of Chronic Statin Use During Surgery on Inflammation and Infection Rates

An observational study of Inflammation and Infection, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Despite improvements in perioperative care, non-cardiac surgery remains associated with significant and costly complications. Analysis of perioperative deaths in the United Kingdom suggests that roughly 80% are directly attributable to infectious and cardiovascular complications. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Inflammation, Infection, Endothelial Function
What is being tested?
Atorvastatin
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Nov 2008to Jul 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients undergoing elective non-cardiac high-risk surgery as defined by the POISE criteria

Who may be able to join

  • over 45 years of age
  • able to have a baseline brachial ultrasound test before their day of surgery
  • elective high-risk surgery defined by use of the POISE criteria

Who cannot join

  • lack of informed consent
  • pregnant
  • contraindication to the brachial artery ultrasound test protocol (i.e. contraindication to 0.4 mg sublingual nitroglycerin)
  • enrolled in another conflicting study
  • previously enrolled in STAR-VaS or STAR-VaS2

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • The Ottawa Hospital

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y4E9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: An Observational Trial of Perioperative Atorvastatin on Inflammatory and Endothelial Function in Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery (STAR-VaS 2)

Despite improvements in perioperative care, non-cardiac surgery remains associated with significant and costly complications. Analysis of perioperative deaths in the United Kingdom suggests that roughly 80% are directly attributable to infectious and cardiovascular complications. The best available evidence suggests that medical optimization is the preferred strategy to reduce cardiac risks but there has been no novel strategy to reduce nosocomial infection rates in over 20 years.

Emerging evidence in both the non-operative and operative setting suggest that statin drugs may prevent both infectious and cardiac events. The mechanism(s) of action are not entirely clear but appear to independent of lipid lowering effects and are often referred to as pleiotropic effects. Two key elements of the pleiotropic effects of statins appear to be their anti-inflammatory properties and improved endothelial vascular reactivity. The statin dose required to maximize these effects is unknown. A large observational trial suggests a contradictory dose effect with higher doses associated with reduced infectious complications and lower doses associated with fewer cardiac complications. Doctors therefore still have many unanswered questions about the use of statins in the perioperative setting. Should they be routinely started on all or only certain surgical patients? What dose of statin should be used? If a patient is already on a statin, should their dose be altered perioperatively? The latter question is particularly relevant in light of the marked increase in statin use. Recruitment logs for an ongoing trial demonstrate that over 70% of patients undergoing high-risk surgery were taking a statin but at markedly variable doses. This population presents an ideal opportunity to determine if there is a dose response relationship between statins and pleiotropic effects. We therefore propose an observational study that will determine anti-inflammatory and endothelial effects in high-risk surgical patients on varying doses of a perioperative statin drug.

Read more

Atorvastatin diminishes the rise in C-reactive protein (CRP), measured 48 hours after elective vascular surgery, in a dose dependent fashion.

Secondary Hypotheses:

Atorvastatin reduces endothelial dysfunction after elective vascular surgery, as measured by brachial artery ultrasound, in a dose dependent fashion.

Read the detailed description

It is estimated that approximately 1.7 million surgical procedures are performed each year in Canada. Unfortunately, perioperative complications are not an uncommon occurrence and have substantial morbidity, mortality and costs associated with them. To date, the best strategies to reduce nosocomial infections are aseptic practices, timely prophylactic antibiotics and good surgical technique. Despite these strategies, it is estimated that at least 1 in 5 major vascular surgical patients will have some type of nosocomial infection within 30 days of their procedure. The direct and indirect mortality of infections in this population is difficult to estimate but nosocomial infections are estimated to contribute to at least 15% of the mortality in hospitalized patients.

The primary manner in which infections contribute to patient mortality is by progression to sepsis. Sepsis is the tenth leading cause of death in Canadians and worldwide is increasing in incidence and severity. The associated mortality of sepsis varies by population and infection source but is usually between 30-60%. Despite significant improvements in the management of sepsis in the last 5 years, there is still no generally effective preventive medication or strategy. Although cardiovascular complications, including myocardial infarction and heart failure, are less common at 15% of major vascular patients, they have a staggering mortality of around 30-50%. Clearly, strategies or therapies to reduce these complications could have profound benefits. The questions are therefore whether statin drugs reduce sepsis, cardiovascular complications, or both and, if they do, how might they do so.

Understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis and acute coronary syndromes in the non-operative setting has led to tremendous advancements in the management. In sepsis, an excessive, inappropriate and misguided response in the host defense response is likely responsible. Massive cytokine release exacerbates endothelium dysfunction that then impacts coagulation, thrombolysis, inflammation, tissue repair and tissue growth. If not corrected, the endothelial cells either die directly or through the triggering of apoptosis. This then leads to multiorgan dysfunction and ultimately death. How sepsis ultimately impairs and damages endothelial cell function is likely multifactoral. Impairment of endothelial nitric oxide synthetase occurs that causes impaired perfusion and inappropriate microvasculature coagulation.

In a strikingly similar manner to sepsis, key elements to acute coronary syndromes again appear to be inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Rupture of coronary plaques and thrombosis are central. Although perioperative myocardial events are traditionally said to be supply-demand problems, this theory is in dispute and evidence suggests that perioperative problems are very similar to non-operative events. Elevated levels of various inflammatory markers, particularly C-Reactive Protein, are associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Similarly, the vascular endothelium is responsible for regulating vasomotor tone, thrombosis, platelet and leukocyte interactions. Dysfunction of the endothelium is also believed to be a central component of the development of coronary complications. Although endothelial dysfunction has not been extensively investigated in the perioperative setting, pathophysiologic similarities make it probable that perioperative endothelial dysfunction contributes to the occurrence of perioperative myocardial events. Thus, strategies designed to control perioperative inflammation, as well as to improve endothelial function and stabilize coronary plaque have the potential to reduce both perioperative coronary and infectious events.

Although studies in both animals and humans strongly suggest that statins may both prevent and treat sepsis, no prospective randomized trials in humans have been conducted to demonstrate these effects. Although some statins have been demonstrated to directly attenuate replication and infectivity of microorganisms, the evidence primarily suggests that if statins are indeed protective it will likely be due to their anti-inflammatory and favorable endothelial effects. Improvement of endothelial function by statins has been suggested to prevent cardiac events by stabilizing coronary plaques and may even contribute to plaque regression. Statins restore endothelial production of endogenous nitric oxide synthetase thus improving organ perfusion and microvasculature thrombosis that is impaired in the setting of sepsis.

The goals of the proposed trial, STAR VaS II are therefore twofold: First, it will help determine if statin blunts the adverse perioperative changes in inflammation and endothelial function in a dose-dependent fashion. Second, it will determine if patients chronically on lower than maximal statin dose should have their dose increased in the perioperative period. We will evaluate the influence of varying doses of statins on perioperative inflammation, as assessed by C-reactive protein, and endothelial function as assessed by brachial artery ultrasound. If atorvastatin, chronically administered before surgery, improves inflammatory changes or endothelial function in a dose dependent fashion, then it is plausible that patients chronically on lower statin doses should have their dose increased in the perioperative period. If however patients on lower doses experienced similar benefit, as those on higher doses, then conceivably the recommended perioperative dose could be lower thereby theoretically further improving the risk-benefit ratio for a statin drug. All patients will be assessed for infections as defined by the CDC.

Being tested
Atorvastatin, Control
Keywords
surgery, inflammation, infection, statins
Medical subject headings
Inflammation, Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AtorvastatinDrug

    Also called lipitor

    Atorvastatin 10 mg daily or equivalent dose in another statin

  • AtorvastatinDrug

    Also called lipitor

    Atorvastatin 20 mg daily or equivalent dose in another statin

  • AtorvastatinDrug

    Also called lipitor

    Atorvastatin 40 mg daily or equivalent dose in another statin

  • AtorvastatinDrug

    Also called lipitor

    Atorvastatin 80 mg daily or equivalent dose in another statin

  • ControlOther

    No statin being taken

Study groups in NCT00967252
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
atorvastatin 10 mg or equivalent dosePatients already taking atorvastatin 10 mg or equivalent dose in another statin who is undergoing high risk surgery
Receives: Drug: Atorvastatin
atorvastatin 20 mg or equivalent dosePatients already taking atorvastatin 20 mg or equivalent dose in another statin who is undergoing high risk surgery
Receives: Drug: Atorvastatin
atorvastatin 40 mg or equivalent dosePatients already taking atorvastatin 40 mg or equivalent dose in another statin who is undergoing high risk surgery
Receives: Drug: Atorvastatin
atorvastatin 80 mg or equivalent dosePatients already taking atorvastatin 80 mg or equivalent dose in another statin who is undergoing high risk surgery
Receives: Drug: Atorvastatin
non-statin groupPatients who are not taking or cannot take a statin drug who is undergoing high risk surgery
Receives: Other: Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. C-reactive protein levels

    Measured: 48 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. brachial artery reactivity (assessed by ultrasound)

    Measured: preoperative compared to 24 hours postoperatively

  2. Infection

    Measured: 30 postoperative days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Aug 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2008
  3. Primary completionJul 2011
  4. Study completionJul 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00967252
Sponsor's protocol ID
2008526-01H
Acronym
STAR-VaS2
Status last verified
Jul 2011
First submitted
26 Aug 2009
Last updated
21 Jul 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Inflammation and Infection, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

C-reactive protein levels (time frame: 48 hours postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in