InflammationSTAR-VaS2NCT00967252
Impact of Chronic Statin Use During Surgery on Inflammation and Infection Rates
An observational study of Inflammation and Infection, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Despite improvements in perioperative care, non-cardiac surgery remains associated with significant and costly complications. Analysis of perioperative deaths in the United Kingdom suggests that roughly 80% are directly attributable to infectious and cardiovascular complications. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Inflammation, Infection, Endothelial Function
- What is being tested?
- Atorvastatin
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Nov 2008to Jul 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients undergoing elective non-cardiac high-risk surgery as defined by the POISE criteria
Who may be able to join
- over 45 years of age
- able to have a baseline brachial ultrasound test before their day of surgery
- elective high-risk surgery defined by use of the POISE criteria
Who cannot join
- lack of informed consent
- pregnant
- contraindication to the brachial artery ultrasound test protocol (i.e. contraindication to 0.4 mg sublingual nitroglycerin)
- enrolled in another conflicting study
- previously enrolled in STAR-VaS or STAR-VaS2
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: An Observational Trial of Perioperative Atorvastatin on Inflammatory and Endothelial Function in Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery (STAR-VaS 2)
Despite improvements in perioperative care, non-cardiac surgery remains associated with significant and costly complications. Analysis of perioperative deaths in the United Kingdom suggests that roughly 80% are directly attributable to infectious and cardiovascular complications. The best available evidence suggests that medical optimization is the preferred strategy to reduce cardiac risks but there has been no novel strategy to reduce nosocomial infection rates in over 20 years.
Emerging evidence in both the non-operative and operative setting suggest that statin drugs may prevent both infectious and cardiac events. The mechanism(s) of action are not entirely clear but appear to independent of lipid lowering effects and are often referred to as pleiotropic effects. Two key elements of the pleiotropic effects of statins appear to be their anti-inflammatory properties and improved endothelial vascular reactivity. The statin dose required to maximize these effects is unknown. A large observational trial suggests a contradictory dose effect with higher doses associated with reduced infectious complications and lower doses associated with fewer cardiac complications. Doctors therefore still have many unanswered questions about the use of statins in the perioperative setting. Should they be routinely started on all or only certain surgical patients? What dose of statin should be used? If a patient is already on a statin, should their dose be altered perioperatively? The latter question is particularly relevant in light of the marked increase in statin use. Recruitment logs for an ongoing trial demonstrate that over 70% of patients undergoing high-risk surgery were taking a statin but at markedly variable doses. This population presents an ideal opportunity to determine if there is a dose response relationship between statins and pleiotropic effects. We therefore propose an observational study that will determine anti-inflammatory and endothelial effects in high-risk surgical patients on varying doses of a perioperative statin drug.
Read more
Atorvastatin diminishes the rise in C-reactive protein (CRP), measured 48 hours after elective vascular surgery, in a dose dependent fashion.
Secondary Hypotheses:
Atorvastatin reduces endothelial dysfunction after elective vascular surgery, as measured by brachial artery ultrasound, in a dose dependent fashion.
Read the detailed description
It is estimated that approximately 1.7 million surgical procedures are performed each year in Canada. Unfortunately, perioperative complications are not an uncommon occurrence and have substantial morbidity, mortality and costs associated with them. To date, the best strategies to reduce nosocomial infections are aseptic practices, timely prophylactic antibiotics and good surgical technique. Despite these strategies, it is estimated that at least 1 in 5 major vascular surgical patients will have some type of nosocomial infection within 30 days of their procedure. The direct and indirect mortality of infections in this population is difficult to estimate but nosocomial infections are estimated to contribute to at least 15% of the mortality in hospitalized patients.
The primary manner in which infections contribute to patient mortality is by progression to sepsis. Sepsis is the tenth leading cause of death in Canadians and worldwide is increasing in incidence and severity. The associated mortality of sepsis varies by population and infection source but is usually between 30-60%. Despite significant improvements in the management of sepsis in the last 5 years, there is still no generally effective preventive medication or strategy. Although cardiovascular complications, including myocardial infarction and heart failure, are less common at 15% of major vascular patients, they have a staggering mortality of around 30-50%. Clearly, strategies or therapies to reduce these complications could have profound benefits. The questions are therefore whether statin drugs reduce sepsis, cardiovascular complications, or both and, if they do, how might they do so.
Understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis and acute coronary syndromes in the non-operative setting has led to tremendous advancements in the management. In sepsis, an excessive, inappropriate and misguided response in the host defense response is likely responsible. Massive cytokine release exacerbates endothelium dysfunction that then impacts coagulation, thrombolysis, inflammation, tissue repair and tissue growth. If not corrected, the endothelial cells either die directly or through the triggering of apoptosis. This then leads to multiorgan dysfunction and ultimately death. How sepsis ultimately impairs and damages endothelial cell function is likely multifactoral. Impairment of endothelial nitric oxide synthetase occurs that causes impaired perfusion and inappropriate microvasculature coagulation.
In a strikingly similar manner to sepsis, key elements to acute coronary syndromes again appear to be inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Rupture of coronary plaques and thrombosis are central. Although perioperative myocardial events are traditionally said to be supply-demand problems, this theory is in dispute and evidence suggests that perioperative problems are very similar to non-operative events. Elevated levels of various inflammatory markers, particularly C-Reactive Protein, are associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Similarly, the vascular endothelium is responsible for regulating vasomotor tone, thrombosis, platelet and leukocyte interactions. Dysfunction of the endothelium is also believed to be a central component of the development of coronary complications. Although endothelial dysfunction has not been extensively investigated in the perioperative setting, pathophysiologic similarities make it probable that perioperative endothelial dysfunction contributes to the occurrence of perioperative myocardial events. Thus, strategies designed to control perioperative inflammation, as well as to improve endothelial function and stabilize coronary plaque have the potential to reduce both perioperative coronary and infectious events.
Although studies in both animals and humans strongly suggest that statins may both prevent and treat sepsis, no prospective randomized trials in humans have been conducted to demonstrate these effects. Although some statins have been demonstrated to directly attenuate replication and infectivity of microorganisms, the evidence primarily suggests that if statins are indeed protective it will likely be due to their anti-inflammatory and favorable endothelial effects. Improvement of endothelial function by statins has been suggested to prevent cardiac events by stabilizing coronary plaques and may even contribute to plaque regression. Statins restore endothelial production of endogenous nitric oxide synthetase thus improving organ perfusion and microvasculature thrombosis that is impaired in the setting of sepsis.
The goals of the proposed trial, STAR VaS II are therefore twofold: First, it will help determine if statin blunts the adverse perioperative changes in inflammation and endothelial function in a dose-dependent fashion. Second, it will determine if patients chronically on lower than maximal statin dose should have their dose increased in the perioperative period. We will evaluate the influence of varying doses of statins on perioperative inflammation, as assessed by C-reactive protein, and endothelial function as assessed by brachial artery ultrasound. If atorvastatin, chronically administered before surgery, improves inflammatory changes or endothelial function in a dose dependent fashion, then it is plausible that patients chronically on lower statin doses should have their dose increased in the perioperative period. If however patients on lower doses experienced similar benefit, as those on higher doses, then conceivably the recommended perioperative dose could be lower thereby theoretically further improving the risk-benefit ratio for a statin drug. All patients will be assessed for infections as defined by the CDC.
- Conditions
- Inflammation, Infection, Endothelial Function
- Being tested
- Atorvastatin, Control
- Keywords
- surgery, inflammation, infection, statins
- Medical subject headings
- Inflammation, Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AtorvastatinDrug
Also called lipitor
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily or equivalent dose in another statin
AtorvastatinDrug
Also called lipitor
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily or equivalent dose in another statin
AtorvastatinDrug
Also called lipitor
Atorvastatin 40 mg daily or equivalent dose in another statin
AtorvastatinDrug
Also called lipitor
Atorvastatin 80 mg daily or equivalent dose in another statin
ControlOther
No statin being taken
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| atorvastatin 10 mg or equivalent dose | Patients already taking atorvastatin 10 mg or equivalent dose in another statin who is undergoing high risk surgery Receives: Drug: Atorvastatin | |
| atorvastatin 20 mg or equivalent dose | Patients already taking atorvastatin 20 mg or equivalent dose in another statin who is undergoing high risk surgery Receives: Drug: Atorvastatin | |
| atorvastatin 40 mg or equivalent dose | Patients already taking atorvastatin 40 mg or equivalent dose in another statin who is undergoing high risk surgery Receives: Drug: Atorvastatin | |
| atorvastatin 80 mg or equivalent dose | Patients already taking atorvastatin 80 mg or equivalent dose in another statin who is undergoing high risk surgery Receives: Drug: Atorvastatin | |
| non-statin group | Patients who are not taking or cannot take a statin drug who is undergoing high risk surgery Receives: Other: Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
C-reactive protein levels
Measured: 48 hours postoperatively
Secondary outcomes (2)
brachial artery reactivity (assessed by ultrasound)
Measured: preoperative compared to 24 hours postoperatively
Infection
Measured: 30 postoperative days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2008
- Primary completionJul 2011
- Study completionJul 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for InflammationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- David T Neilipovitz, MD, Principal investigator, The Ottawa HospitalGreg L Bryson, MD, Principal investigator, The Ottawa Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00967252
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2008526-01H
- Acronym
- STAR-VaS2
- Status last verified
- Jul 2011
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2009
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Observational Trial of Perioperative Atorvastatin on Inflammatory and Endothelial Function in Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery (STAR-VaS 2)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00967252
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STAR-VaS2 / 2008526-01H
- Conditions
- Inflammation, Infection, Endothelial Function
- Keywords
- surgery, inflammation, infection, statins
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2008
- Primary completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Despite improvements in perioperative care, non-cardiac surgery remains associated with significant and costly complications. Analysis of perioperative deaths in the United Kingdom suggests that roughly 80% are directly attributable to infectious and cardiovascular complications. The best available evidence suggests that medical optimization is the preferred strategy to reduce cardiac risks but there has been no novel strategy to reduce nosocomial infection rates in over 20 years.
Emerging evidence in both the non-operative and operative setting suggest that statin drugs may prevent both infectious and cardiac events. The mechanism(s) of action are not entirely clear but appear to independent of lipid lowering effects and are often referred to as pleiotropic effects. Two key elements of the pleiotropic effects of statins appear to be their anti-inflammatory properties and improved endothelial vascular reactivity. The statin dose required to maximize these effects is unknown. A large observational trial suggests a contradictory dose effect with higher doses associated with reduced infectious complications and lower doses associated with fewer cardiac complications. Doctors therefore still have many unanswered questions about the use of statins in the perioperative setting. Should they be routinely started on all or only certain surgical patients? What dose of statin should be used? If a patient is already on a statin, should their dose be altered perioperatively? The latter question is particularly relevant in light of the marked increase in statin use. Recruitment logs for an ongoing trial demonstrate that over 70% of patients undergoing high-risk surgery were taking a statin but at markedly variable doses. This population presents an ideal opportunity to determine if there is a dose response relationship between statins and pleiotropic effects. We therefore propose an observational study that will determine anti-inflammatory and endothelial effects in high-risk surgical patients on varying doses of a perioperative statin drug.
Atorvastatin diminishes the rise in C-reactive protein (CRP), measured 48 hours after elective vascular surgery, in a dose dependent fashion.
Secondary Hypotheses:
Atorvastatin reduces endothelial dysfunction after elective vascular surgery, as measured by brachial artery ultrasound, in a dose dependent fashion.
Detailed description
It is estimated that approximately 1.7 million surgical procedures are performed each year in Canada. Unfortunately, perioperative complications are not an uncommon occurrence and have substantial morbidity, mortality and costs associated with them. To date, the best strategies to reduce nosocomial infections are aseptic practices, timely prophylactic antibiotics and good surgical technique. Despite these strategies, it is estimated that at least 1 in 5 major vascular surgical patients will have some type of nosocomial infection within 30 days of their procedure. The direct and indirect mortality of infections in this population is difficult to estimate but nosocomial infections are estimated to contribute to at least 15% of the mortality in hospitalized patients.
The primary manner in which infections contribute to patient mortality is by progression to sepsis. Sepsis is the tenth leading cause of death in Canadians and worldwide is increasing in incidence and severity. The associated mortality of sepsis varies by population and infection source but is usually between 30-60%. Despite significant improvements in the management of sepsis in the last 5 years, there is still no generally effective preventive medication or strategy. Although cardiovascular complications, including myocardial infarction and heart failure, are less common at 15% of major vascular patients, they have a staggering mortality of around 30-50%. Clearly, strategies or therapies to reduce these complications could have profound benefits. The questions are therefore whether statin drugs reduce sepsis, cardiovascular complications, or both and, if they do, how might they do so.
Understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis and acute coronary syndromes in the non-operative setting has led to tremendous advancements in the management. In sepsis, an excessive, inappropriate and misguided response in the host defense response is likely responsible. Massive cytokine release exacerbates endothelium dysfunction that then impacts coagulation, thrombolysis, inflammation, tissue repair and tissue growth. If not corrected, the endothelial cells either die directly or through the triggering of apoptosis. This then leads to multiorgan dysfunction and ultimately death. How sepsis ultimately impairs and damages endothelial cell function is likely multifactoral. Impairment of endothelial nitric oxide synthetase occurs that causes impaired perfusion and inappropriate microvasculature coagulation.
In a strikingly similar manner to sepsis, key elements to acute coronary syndromes again appear to be inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Rupture of coronary plaques and thrombosis are central. Although perioperative myocardial events are traditionally said to be supply-demand problems, this theory is in dispute and evidence suggests that perioperative problems are very similar to non-operative events. Elevated levels of various inflammatory markers, particularly C-Reactive Protein, are associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Similarly, the vascular endothelium is responsible for regulating vasomotor tone, thrombosis, platelet and leukocyte interactions. Dysfunction of the endothelium is also believed to be a central component of the development of coronary complications. Although endothelial dysfunction has not been extensively investigated in the perioperative setting, pathophysiologic similarities make it probable that perioperative endothelial dysfunction contributes to the occurrence of perioperative myocardial events. Thus, strategies designed to control perioperative inflammation, as well as to improve endothelial function and stabilize coronary plaque have the potential to reduce both perioperative coronary and infectious events.
Although studies in both animals and humans strongly suggest that statins may both prevent and treat sepsis, no prospective randomized trials in humans have been conducted to demonstrate these effects. Although some statins have been demonstrated to directly attenuate replication and infectivity of microorganisms, the evidence primarily suggests that if statins are indeed protective it will likely be due to their anti-inflammatory and favorable endothelial effects. Improvement of endothelial function by statins has been suggested to prevent cardiac events by stabilizing coronary plaques and may even contribute to plaque regression. Statins restore endothelial production of endogenous nitric oxide synthetase thus improving organ perfusion and microvasculature thrombosis that is impaired in the setting of sepsis.
The goals of the proposed trial, STAR VaS II are therefore twofold: First, it will help determine if statin blunts the adverse perioperative changes in inflammation and endothelial function in a dose-dependent fashion. Second, it will determine if patients chronically on lower than maximal statin dose should have their dose increased in the perioperative period. We will evaluate the influence of varying doses of statins on perioperative inflammation, as assessed by C-reactive protein, and endothelial function as assessed by brachial artery ultrasound. If atorvastatin, chronically administered before surgery, improves inflammatory changes or endothelial function in a dose dependent fashion, then it is plausible that patients chronically on lower statin doses should have their dose increased in the perioperative period. If however patients on lower doses experienced similar benefit, as those on higher doses, then conceivably the recommended perioperative dose could be lower thereby theoretically further improving the risk-benefit ratio for a statin drug. All patients will be assessed for infections as defined by the CDC.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| atorvastatin 10 mg or equivalent dose | – | Drug: AtorvastatinPatients already taking atorvastatin 10 mg or equivalent dose in another statin who is undergoing high risk surgery |
| atorvastatin 20 mg or equivalent dose | – | Drug: AtorvastatinPatients already taking atorvastatin 20 mg or equivalent dose in another statin who is undergoing high risk surgery |
| atorvastatin 40 mg or equivalent dose | – | Drug: AtorvastatinPatients already taking atorvastatin 40 mg or equivalent dose in another statin who is undergoing high risk surgery |
| atorvastatin 80 mg or equivalent dose | – | Drug: AtorvastatinPatients already taking atorvastatin 80 mg or equivalent dose in another statin who is undergoing high risk surgery |
| non-statin group | – | Other: ControlPatients who are not taking or cannot take a statin drug who is undergoing high risk surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients undergoing elective non-cardiac high-risk surgery as defined by the POISE criteria
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- over 45 years of age
- able to have a baseline brachial ultrasound test before their day of surgery
- elective high-risk surgery defined by use of the POISE criteria
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- lack of informed consent
- pregnant
- contraindication to the brachial artery ultrasound test protocol (i.e. contraindication to 0.4 mg sublingual nitroglycerin)
- enrolled in another conflicting study
- previously enrolled in STAR-VaS or STAR-VaS2
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AtorvastatinAlso: lipitorAtorvastatin 10 mg daily or equivalent dose in another statin | Drug | atorvastatin 10 mg or equivalent dose |
| AtorvastatinAlso: lipitorAtorvastatin 20 mg daily or equivalent dose in another statin | Drug | atorvastatin 20 mg or equivalent dose |
| AtorvastatinAlso: lipitorAtorvastatin 40 mg daily or equivalent dose in another statin | Drug | atorvastatin 40 mg or equivalent dose |
| AtorvastatinAlso: lipitorAtorvastatin 80 mg daily or equivalent dose in another statin | Drug | atorvastatin 80 mg or equivalent dose |
| ControlNo statin being taken | Other | non-statin group |
Primary outcome
C-reactive protein levels
Time frame: 48 hours postoperatively
2 secondary outcomes
brachial artery reactivity (assessed by ultrasound)
Time frame: preoperative compared to 24 hours postoperatively
Infection
Time frame: 30 postoperative days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2011.
Related trials for Inflammation
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Extended and Intermittent Infusion of Beta-lactams in Critically Ill Paediatric Patients
Infection, Sepsis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David T Neilipovitz, MD principal investigator
The Ottawa Hospital
Greg L Bryson, MD principal investigator
The Ottawa Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Inflammation and Infection, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
C-reactive protein levels (time frame: 48 hours postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2011.