AzTrials
AzTrials

Glioblastoma MultiformePhase 2NCT00967330

A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) and Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide Radiochemistry in Patients With Glioblastoma

A Phase 2 study testing bevacizumab [Avastin], irinotecan and temozolomide in people with Glioblastoma Multiforme, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 24 sites in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This 2 arm study will compare the effect of Avastin + irinotecan versus temozolomide, in combination with conventional involved field radiotherapy, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a non-methylated MGMT promoter. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Glioblastoma Multiforme
What is being tested?
bevacizumab [Avastin], irinotecan and temozolomide
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
182 participants
Where
24 sitesGermany
Study dates
Jun 2010to Sep 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • adult patients, 18-70 years of age;
  • glioblastoma, confirmed histologically;
  • no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy for glioblastoma;
  • non-methylated MGMT promoter in the tumor.

Who cannot join

  • prior systemic treatment for glioblastoma multiforme;
  • prior treatment with Avastin;
  • significant cardiovascular disease;
  • other active malignant disease.

Trial locations and contacts

24 sites in 1 country.

24 sites in 1 country

Germany24 sites
  • Study site

    Aachen, 52074

  • Study site

    Berlin, 13353

  • Study site

    Bochum, 44892

  • Study site

    Bonn, 53127

  • Study site

    Chemnitz, 09113

  • Study site

    Cologne, 50937

  • Study site

    Dresden, 01307

  • Study site

    Düsseldorf, 40225

  • Study site

    Erfurt, 99089

  • Study site

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Study site

    Frankfurt am Main, 60528

  • Study site

    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106

  • Study site

    Göttingen, 37075

  • Study site

    Idar-Oberstein, 55743

  • Study site

    Kiel, 24105

  • Study site

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Study site

    Mannheim, 68167

  • Study site

    Marburg, 35043

  • Study site

    München, 81377

  • Study site

    München, 81675

  • Study site

    Münster, 48149

  • Study site

    Regensburg, 93053

  • Study site

    Tübingen, 72076

  • Study site

    Ulm, 89081

Other trials in Germany

About this study

This 2 arm study will compare the effect of Avastin + irinotecan versus temozolomide, in combination with conventional involved field radiotherapy, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a non-methylated MGMT promoter. Patients will be randomized 3:1 to receive Avastin 10mg/kg iv every 2 weeks + irinotecan 125mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks, or temozolomide 75mg/m2 po daily during radiotherapy followed by 6 cycles of temozolomide 150-200mg/m2 po daily on days 1-5 of each 4 week cycle. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Being tested
bevacizumab [Avastin], irinotecan, temozolomide
Medical subject headings
Glioblastoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • bevacizumab [Avastin]Drug

    10mg/kg iv every 2 weeks

  • irinotecanDrug

    125mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks

  • temozolomideDrug

    75mg/m2 po daily during radiotherapy, followed by 150-200mg/m2/day po on days 1-5 of each 6x4 week cycle of adjuvant therapy

Study groups in NCT00967330
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: bevacizumab [Avastin]; Drug: irinotecan
2Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: temozolomide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Without Disease Progression or Death at 6 Months

    Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to objective tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever came first. Progression was defined as 25 percent (%) increase in size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor on gadolinium contrast agent magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-MRI) scans, or neurologically worse, and steroids stable or increased. Percentage of participants achieving PFS without disease progression or death was reported.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to objective tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever came first. Progression was defined as 25% increase in size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor on Gd-MRI scans, or neurologically worse, and steroids stable or increased. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: From baseline to the end of the study (up to 4.5 years)

  2. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: From baseline until death (up to 4.5 years)

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued

    Discontinuation was defined as the percentage of participants who permanently discontinued treatment in either treatment arm. Percentage of participant with individual discontinuation reason are reported. CNS: central nervous system; CTCAE: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events . Other reason refers to any other reason than the specified ones.

    Measured: From baseline until death (up to 4.5 years)

  4. Number of Participants With A Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) and With A BOR of CR or Partial Response (PR)

    BOR was defined as the best response observed for a participant during assessment. Number of participants who had BOR as CR and number of participants who had BOR as CR or PR were reported. Complete response was defined as disappearance of all enhancing tumor on consecutive Gd-MRI scans at least 1 month apart, off steroids, and neurologically stable or improved. Partial response was defined as 50% reduction in size of enhancing tumor on consecutive Gd-MRI scans at least 1 month apart, steroids stable or reduced, and neurologically stable or improved.

    Measured: 4 week after radiotherapy (RT) (up to Week 4), >4 Week after RT (up to Week 8) and Month 6

  5. Percentage of Participants With Response on FLAIR Imaging

    FLAIR lesions were determined as "stable", "progressive" or "decreased". FLAIR lesions was determined as "progressive" only if they were not be attributed to causes apart from tumor infiltration (sequelae of radiation therapy, demyelination, ischemia, infection, seizures, or other treatment effects). Percentage of participants are based on ITT population.

    Dis.=Discontinuation.

    Measured: At screening, Baseline, Month 6 and Therapy Discontinuation (Up to 4.5 years)

  6. Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 incorporates: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); 9 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for Global Qol/functional scales=better level of functioning or a higher score for symptom scale=greater degree of symptoms. The change in global health status was determined to be the difference in values at baseline and each specific visit. The term ''baseline'' refers to the time of randomization to the maintenance phase.

    Measured: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

  7. Change From Baseline for EORTC QLQ Brain Neoplasm 20 (BN20) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

    EORTC QLQ-BN20 consisted of 20 items assessing visual disorders, motor dysfunction, communication deficit, various disease symptoms (e.g. headaches and seizures), treatment toxicities (e.g. hair loss) and future uncertainty. All of the 20 items are rated on a 4 point Likert scale from 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit and 4=very much, and were linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

  8. Change From Baseline for Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

    The MMSE briefly measures orientation to time and place, immediate recall, short-term verbal memory, calculation, language and construct ability. Each area tested had a designated point value, the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function.

    Measured: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

  9. Change From Baseline for Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Score at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

    KPS is an 11-level score (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100) which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. Deterioration in KPS was defined as decrease of 20 or more points in KPS score.

    Measured: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

  10. Percentage of Participants Who Received Corticosteroid for Glioblastoma

    Participants used corticosteroids for the glioblastoma condition. Corticosteroids included dexamethasone, methylprednisone, fortecortin, hydrocortisone, urbason, and prednisolone.

    Measured: From baseline to Month 6

  11. Time to Treatment Failure

    Measured: From baseline until end of study (up to 4.5 years)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Aug 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2010
  3. Primary completionSep 2014
  4. Study completionSep 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
182 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00967330
Sponsor's protocol ID
ML21965
Other IDs
2009-010390-21, 2009
Status last verified
Oct 2015
First submitted
16 Jun 2009
Last updated
20 Nov 2015

Publications

  • Schafer N, Proescholdt M, Steinbach JP, Weyerbrock A, Hau P, Grauer O, Goldbrunner R, Friedrich F, Rohde V, Ringel F, Schlegel U, Sabel M, Ronellenfitsch MW, Uhl M, Grau S, Hanel M, Schnell O, Krex D, Vajkoczy P, Tabatabai G, Mack F, Schaub C, Tzaridis T, Niessen M, Kebir S, Leutgeb B, Urbach H, Belka C, Stummer W, Glas M, Herrlinger U. Quality of life in the GLARIUS trial randomizing bevacizumab/irinotecan versus temozolomide in newly diagnosed, MGMT-nonmethylated glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2018 Jun 18;20(7):975-985. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox204.

    PubMed 29121274
  • Herrlinger U, Schafer N, Steinbach JP, Weyerbrock A, Hau P, Goldbrunner R, Friedrich F, Rohde V, Ringel F, Schlegel U, Sabel M, Ronellenfitsch MW, Uhl M, Maciaczyk J, Grau S, Schnell O, Hanel M, Krex D, Vajkoczy P, Gerlach R, Kortmann RD, Mehdorn M, Tuttenberg J, Mayer-Steinacker R, Fietkau R, Brehmer S, Mack F, Stuplich M, Kebir S, Kohnen R, Dunkl E, Leutgeb B, Proescholdt M, Pietsch T, Urbach H, Belka C, Stummer W, Glas M. Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide in Newly Diagnosed O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Nonmethylated Glioblastoma: The Randomized GLARIUS Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 10;34(14):1611-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4691. Epub 2016 Mar 14.

    PubMed 26976423

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing bevacizumab [Avastin], irinotecan and temozolomide in people with Glioblastoma Multiforme, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 24 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 24 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Nov 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Without Disease Progression or Death at 6 Months (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00967330, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in