Glioblastoma MultiformePhase 2NCT00967330
A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) and Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide Radiochemistry in Patients With Glioblastoma
A Phase 2 study testing bevacizumab [Avastin], irinotecan and temozolomide in people with Glioblastoma Multiforme, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 24 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
This 2 arm study will compare the effect of Avastin + irinotecan versus temozolomide, in combination with conventional involved field radiotherapy, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a non-methylated MGMT promoter. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Glioblastoma Multiforme
- What is being tested?
- bevacizumab [Avastin], irinotecan and temozolomide
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 182 participants
- Where
- 24 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Jun 2010to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients, 18-70 years of age;
- glioblastoma, confirmed histologically;
- no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy for glioblastoma;
- non-methylated MGMT promoter in the tumor.
Who cannot join
- prior systemic treatment for glioblastoma multiforme;
- prior treatment with Avastin;
- significant cardiovascular disease;
- other active malignant disease.
Trial locations and contacts
24 sites in 1 country.
24 sites in 1 country
Germany24 sites
Study site
Aachen, 52074
Study site
Berlin, 13353
Study site
Bochum, 44892
Study site
Bonn, 53127
Study site
Chemnitz, 09113
Study site
Cologne, 50937
Study site
Dresden, 01307
Study site
Düsseldorf, 40225
Study site
Erfurt, 99089
Study site
Erlangen, 91054
Study site
Frankfurt am Main, 60528
Study site
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Study site
Göttingen, 37075
Study site
Idar-Oberstein, 55743
Study site
Kiel, 24105
Study site
Leipzig, 04103
Study site
Mannheim, 68167
Study site
Marburg, 35043
Study site
München, 81377
Study site
München, 81675
Study site
Münster, 48149
Study site
Regensburg, 93053
Study site
Tübingen, 72076
Study site
Ulm, 89081
About this study
This 2 arm study will compare the effect of Avastin + irinotecan versus temozolomide, in combination with conventional involved field radiotherapy, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a non-methylated MGMT promoter. Patients will be randomized 3:1 to receive Avastin 10mg/kg iv every 2 weeks + irinotecan 125mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks, or temozolomide 75mg/m2 po daily during radiotherapy followed by 6 cycles of temozolomide 150-200mg/m2 po daily on days 1-5 of each 4 week cycle. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
- Conditions
- Glioblastoma Multiforme
- Being tested
- bevacizumab [Avastin], irinotecan, temozolomide
- Medical subject headings
- Glioblastoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
bevacizumab [Avastin]Drug
10mg/kg iv every 2 weeks
irinotecanDrug
125mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks
temozolomideDrug
75mg/m2 po daily during radiotherapy, followed by 150-200mg/m2/day po on days 1-5 of each 6x4 week cycle of adjuvant therapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: bevacizumab [Avastin]; Drug: irinotecan |
| 2 | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: temozolomide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Without Disease Progression or Death at 6 Months
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to objective tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever came first. Progression was defined as 25 percent (%) increase in size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor on gadolinium contrast agent magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-MRI) scans, or neurologically worse, and steroids stable or increased. Percentage of participants achieving PFS without disease progression or death was reported.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (11)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to objective tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever came first. Progression was defined as 25% increase in size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor on Gd-MRI scans, or neurologically worse, and steroids stable or increased. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From baseline to the end of the study (up to 4.5 years)
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From baseline until death (up to 4.5 years)
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued
Discontinuation was defined as the percentage of participants who permanently discontinued treatment in either treatment arm. Percentage of participant with individual discontinuation reason are reported. CNS: central nervous system; CTCAE: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events . Other reason refers to any other reason than the specified ones.
Measured: From baseline until death (up to 4.5 years)
Number of Participants With A Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) and With A BOR of CR or Partial Response (PR)
BOR was defined as the best response observed for a participant during assessment. Number of participants who had BOR as CR and number of participants who had BOR as CR or PR were reported. Complete response was defined as disappearance of all enhancing tumor on consecutive Gd-MRI scans at least 1 month apart, off steroids, and neurologically stable or improved. Partial response was defined as 50% reduction in size of enhancing tumor on consecutive Gd-MRI scans at least 1 month apart, steroids stable or reduced, and neurologically stable or improved.
Measured: 4 week after radiotherapy (RT) (up to Week 4), >4 Week after RT (up to Week 8) and Month 6
Percentage of Participants With Response on FLAIR Imaging
FLAIR lesions were determined as "stable", "progressive" or "decreased". FLAIR lesions was determined as "progressive" only if they were not be attributed to causes apart from tumor infiltration (sequelae of radiation therapy, demyelination, ischemia, infection, seizures, or other treatment effects). Percentage of participants are based on ITT population.
Dis.=Discontinuation.
Measured: At screening, Baseline, Month 6 and Therapy Discontinuation (Up to 4.5 years)
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 incorporates: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); 9 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for Global Qol/functional scales=better level of functioning or a higher score for symptom scale=greater degree of symptoms. The change in global health status was determined to be the difference in values at baseline and each specific visit. The term ''baseline'' refers to the time of randomization to the maintenance phase.
Measured: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Change From Baseline for EORTC QLQ Brain Neoplasm 20 (BN20) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
EORTC QLQ-BN20 consisted of 20 items assessing visual disorders, motor dysfunction, communication deficit, various disease symptoms (e.g. headaches and seizures), treatment toxicities (e.g. hair loss) and future uncertainty. All of the 20 items are rated on a 4 point Likert scale from 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit and 4=very much, and were linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Measured: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Change From Baseline for Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
The MMSE briefly measures orientation to time and place, immediate recall, short-term verbal memory, calculation, language and construct ability. Each area tested had a designated point value, the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function.
Measured: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Change From Baseline for Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Score at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
KPS is an 11-level score (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100) which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. Deterioration in KPS was defined as decrease of 20 or more points in KPS score.
Measured: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Percentage of Participants Who Received Corticosteroid for Glioblastoma
Participants used corticosteroids for the glioblastoma condition. Corticosteroids included dexamethasone, methylprednisone, fortecortin, hydrocortisone, urbason, and prednisolone.
Measured: From baseline to Month 6
Time to Treatment Failure
Measured: From baseline until end of study (up to 4.5 years)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2010
- Primary completionSep 2014
- Study completionSep 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Glioblastoma MultiformeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 182 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00967330
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML21965
- Other IDs
- 2009-010390-21, 2009
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 16 Jun 2009
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Schafer N, Proescholdt M, Steinbach JP, Weyerbrock A, Hau P, Grauer O, Goldbrunner R, Friedrich F, Rohde V, Ringel F, Schlegel U, Sabel M, Ronellenfitsch MW, Uhl M, Grau S, Hanel M, Schnell O, Krex D, Vajkoczy P, Tabatabai G, Mack F, Schaub C, Tzaridis T, Niessen M, Kebir S, Leutgeb B, Urbach H, Belka C, Stummer W, Glas M, Herrlinger U. Quality of life in the GLARIUS trial randomizing bevacizumab/irinotecan versus temozolomide in newly diagnosed, MGMT-nonmethylated glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2018 Jun 18;20(7):975-985. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox204.
PubMed 29121274Herrlinger U, Schafer N, Steinbach JP, Weyerbrock A, Hau P, Goldbrunner R, Friedrich F, Rohde V, Ringel F, Schlegel U, Sabel M, Ronellenfitsch MW, Uhl M, Maciaczyk J, Grau S, Schnell O, Hanel M, Krex D, Vajkoczy P, Gerlach R, Kortmann RD, Mehdorn M, Tuttenberg J, Mayer-Steinacker R, Fietkau R, Brehmer S, Mack F, Stuplich M, Kebir S, Kohnen R, Dunkl E, Leutgeb B, Proescholdt M, Pietsch T, Urbach H, Belka C, Stummer W, Glas M. Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide in Newly Diagnosed O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Nonmethylated Glioblastoma: The Randomized GLARIUS Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 10;34(14):1611-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4691. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
PubMed 26976423
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Nov 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) and Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide Radiochemistry in Patients With Glioblastoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00967330
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML21965
- Conditions
- Glioblastoma Multiforme
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 182 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2010
- Primary completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Nov 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This 2 arm study will compare the effect of Avastin + irinotecan versus temozolomide, in combination with conventional involved field radiotherapy, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a non-methylated MGMT promoter. Patients will be randomized 3:1 to receive Avastin 10mg/kg iv every 2 weeks + irinotecan 125mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks, or temozolomide 75mg/m2 po daily during radiotherapy followed by 6 cycles of temozolomide 150-200mg/m2 po daily on days 1-5 of each 4 week cycle. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: bevacizumab [Avastin], Drug: irinotecan |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: temozolomide |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- adult patients, 18-70 years of age;
- glioblastoma, confirmed histologically;
- no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy for glioblastoma;
- non-methylated MGMT promoter in the tumor.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- prior systemic treatment for glioblastoma multiforme;
- prior treatment with Avastin;
- significant cardiovascular disease;
- other active malignant disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| bevacizumab [Avastin]10mg/kg iv every 2 weeks | Drug | 1 |
| irinotecan125mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks | Drug | 1 |
| temozolomide75mg/m2 po daily during radiotherapy, followed by 150-200mg/m2/day po on days 1-5 of each 6x4 week cycle of adjuvant therapy | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Without Disease Progression or Death at 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to objective tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever came first. Progression was defined as 25 percent (%) increase in size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor on gadolinium contrast agent magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-MRI) scans, or neurologically worse, and steroids stable or increased. Percentage of participants achieving PFS without disease progression or death was reported.
11 secondary outcomes
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From baseline to the end of the study (up to 4.5 years)
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From baseline until death (up to 4.5 years)
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued
Time frame: From baseline until death (up to 4.5 years)
Number of Participants With A Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) and With A BOR of CR or Partial Response (PR)
Time frame: 4 week after radiotherapy (RT) (up to Week 4), >4 Week after RT (up to Week 8) and Month 6
Percentage of Participants With Response on FLAIR Imaging
Time frame: At screening, Baseline, Month 6 and Therapy Discontinuation (Up to 4.5 years)
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Change From Baseline for EORTC QLQ Brain Neoplasm 20 (BN20) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Change From Baseline for Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Change From Baseline for Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Score at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Percentage of Participants Who Received Corticosteroid for Glioblastoma
Time frame: From baseline to Month 6
Time to Treatment Failure
Time frame: From baseline until end of study (up to 4.5 years)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Nov 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29121274Schafer N, Proescholdt M, Steinbach JP, Weyerbrock A, Hau P, Grauer O, Goldbrunner R, Friedrich F, Rohde V, Ringel F, Schlegel U, Sabel M, Ronellenfitsch MW, Uhl M, Grau S, Hanel M, Schnell O, Krex D, Vajkoczy P, Tabatabai G, Mack F, Schaub C, Tzaridis T, Niessen M, Kebir S, Leutgeb B, Urbach H, Belka C, Stummer W, Glas M, Herrlinger U. Quality of life in the GLARIUS trial randomizing bevacizumab/irinotecan versus temozolomide in newly diagnosed, MGMT-nonmethylated glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2018 Jun 18;20(7):975-985. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox204.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26976423Herrlinger U, Schafer N, Steinbach JP, Weyerbrock A, Hau P, Goldbrunner R, Friedrich F, Rohde V, Ringel F, Schlegel U, Sabel M, Ronellenfitsch MW, Uhl M, Maciaczyk J, Grau S, Schnell O, Hanel M, Krex D, Vajkoczy P, Gerlach R, Kortmann RD, Mehdorn M, Tuttenberg J, Mayer-Steinacker R, Fietkau R, Brehmer S, Mack F, Stuplich M, Kebir S, Kohnen R, Dunkl E, Leutgeb B, Proescholdt M, Pietsch T, Urbach H, Belka C, Stummer W, Glas M. Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide in Newly Diagnosed O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Nonmethylated Glioblastoma: The Randomized GLARIUS Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 10;34(14):1611-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4691. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
Related trials for Glioblastoma Multiforme
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
EF-41/KEYNOTE D58: Phase 3 Study of Optune Concomitant With Temozolomide Plus Pembrolizumab in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Beginning Radiation Immediately With GammaTile at GBM Excision Versus Standard of Care
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Testing the Addition of an Anti-cancer Drug, Selinexor, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Temozolomide) for Brain Tumors That Have Returned After Previous Treatment
Recurrent Glioblastoma, IDH-Wildtype, Recurrent MGMT-Methylated Glioblastoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Oral Gallium Maltolate for the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
PLX038 in Primary Central Nervous System Tumors Containing MYC or MYCN Amplifications
Glioma, Medulloblastoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
24 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing bevacizumab [Avastin], irinotecan and temozolomide in people with Glioblastoma Multiforme, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 24 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 24 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Nov 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Without Disease Progression or Death at 6 Months (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00967330, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2015.