AzTrials
AzTrials

Arterial StiffnessNCT00970476

Response To Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy In Heart Failure: Role Of Arterial Stiffness

An observational study of Arterial Stiffness, run by Creighton University.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine if arterial stiffness as measured by non-invasive pulse wave velocity can predict the response to resynchronization therapy in heart failure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Arterial Stiffness
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2007to Jul 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients, who are scheduled to undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) at Creighton University Cardiac Center will be included in this study.

Who may be able to join

  • The patients receiving CRT are medically refractory, symptomatic, NYHA class III or IV disease and QRS duration of 130 m sec or greater, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30 percent or less.
  • All individuals are carefully selected after appropriate clinical evaluation as determined by the treating physicians to exclude possible reversible causes of heart failure.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and non-palpable carotid and/or femoral pulses will be excluded due to technical limitations of the procedure used for the measurement of arterial stiffness.

About this study

To determine if arterial stiffness as measured by non-invasive pulse wave velocity can predict the response to resynchronization therapy in heart failure.

Read the detailed description

The patients receiving CRT are medically refractory, symptomatic, NYHA class III or IV disease and QRS duration of 130 m sec or greater, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30 percent or less.

The pulse wave velocity between carotid and femoral (PWVcf) will be recorded in each subject at base line (before and after CRT), at one month (after AV delay optimization) and again at 6 months after CRT. The arterial pulse wave is recorded at a proximal artery, such as the carotid artery, and as well as at a distal artery, such as the femoral artery. The superficial location of the carotid and femoral arteries means that their pulse waveforms are readily measured noninvasively using the M Hz Doppler probe, and between these two sites the pulse wave has to travel through most of the aorta. The time delay between the arrival of a predefined part of the pulse wave, such as the foot, at these 2 points is obtained by gating to the peak of the R-wave of the ECG. The distance traveled by the pulse wave is measured over the body surface and PWV is then calculated as distance/time (m/s).

Clinical evidence of response: Either one or more of the following: 1) Improvement in NYHA functional classification, 2) Improvement in 6 minute walking distance. 3) Change in functional class, exercise tolerance while the heart is getting smaller on CXR. 4) Stabilization of patient CHF even without subjective improvement over 6 months (remaining class III rather than progressive to class IV). Imaging evidence of response: 1) Increase in left ventricular ejection fraction. 2) Reduction of mitral regurgitation. 3) Reduction of LV volume signifying reverse remodeling.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. If arterial stiffness can predict the response to resynchronization therapy in heart failure.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Sep 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2007
  3. Primary completionJul 2012
  4. Study completionJul 2012

Why it stopped: limited enrollment

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00970476
Sponsor's protocol ID
06-14344
Status last verified
Aug 2012
First submitted
1 Sep 2009
Last updated
30 Aug 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Arterial Stiffness, run by Creighton University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Aug 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

If arterial stiffness can predict the response to resynchronization therapy in heart failure. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Aug 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in