InfluenzaPhase 3NCT00976027
Multi-Year Study of Fluzone High-Dose Influenza Vaccine Compared With Fluzone® Vaccine in Adults Aged 65 Years and Older
A Phase 3 study testing Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine High Dose and Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in people with Influenza, run by Sanofi at 98 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of Fluzone High Dose vaccine and that of Fluzone® vaccine in the elderly. Primary objective: To measure the efficacy of the vaccine, defined as the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza caused by viral types/subtypes that are antigenically similar to those… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Influenza
- What is being tested?
- Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine High Dose and Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 9,172 participants
- Where
- 98 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2009to Apr 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged ≥ 65 years on the day of vaccination
- Informed consent form signed and dated.
- Able to attend all scheduled visits and to comply with all trial procedures.
Who cannot join
- Participation in another interventional clinical trial investigating a vaccine, drug, medical device, herbal supplement, or a medical procedure in the 4 weeks preceding the trial vaccination or planned participation in another clinical trial investigating a vaccine, drug, medical device, herbal supplement, or a medical procedure during each year of participation in the study trial.
- Vaccination against influenza in the 6 months preceding the trial vaccination.
- Systemic hypersensitivity to eggs, chicken proteins, or any of the vaccine components, or a history of a life-threatening reaction to Fluzone vaccine or to a vaccine containing any of the same substances.
- Personal history of Guillain-Barré syndrome.
- Dementia or any other cognitive condition at a stage that could interfere with following the trial procedures.
- Thrombocytopenia, bleeding disorder, or anticoagulation therapy contraindicating intramuscular (IM) vaccination.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Known or suspected human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or Hepatitis C seropositivity.
- Alcohol abuse or drug addiction that could interfere with the subject's ability to comply with trial procedures.
- Subject deprived of freedom by an administrative or court order, or in an emergency setting, or hospitalized without his/her consent.
- Bedridden subjects.
Trial locations and contacts
98 sites in 2 countries.
98 sites in 2 countries
United States96 sites
Study site
Akron, Ohio, 44311
Study site
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621
Study site
Arkansas City, Kansas, 67005
Study site
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209
Study site
Bristol, Tennessee, 37620
Study site
Brockton, Massachusetts, 02301
Study site
Cary, North Carolina, 27518
Study site
Celebration, Florida, 34747
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209
Study site
Chaska, Minnesota, 55318
Study site
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Study site
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Study site
Clearwater, Florida, 33761
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122
Study site
Clinton, South Carolina, 29325
Study site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907
Study site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909
Study site
Columbia, Maryland, 21042
Study site
Columbus, Ohio, 43201
Study site
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Study site
Columbus, Ohio, 43213
Study site
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134
Study site
Corvallis, Oregon, 97330
Study site
Crystal River, Florida, 34429
Study site
Cutler Bay, Florida, 33189
Study site
Deerfield Beach, Florida, 33442
Study site
Downingtown, Pennsylvania, 19335
Study site
Dubuque, Iowa, 52002
Study site
Edina, Minnesota, 55435
Study site
Elkridge, Maryland, 21075
Study site
Erie, Pennsylvania, 16506
Study site
Fargo, North Dakota, 58104
Study site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76107
Study site
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Study site
Fredericksburg, Virginia, 22401
Study site
Galveston, Texas, 77555
Study site
Glendale, Arizona, 85308
Study site
Goose Creek, South Carolina, 29445
Study site
Greenbelt, Maryland, 20770
Study site
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
Study site
Haverhill, Massachusetts, 01830
Study site
Hickory, North Carolina, 28601
Study site
High Point, North Carolina, 27262
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77074
Study site
Inverness, Florida, 34452
Study site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32205
Study site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216
Study site
Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania, 15025
Study site
Lakewood, Washington, 98499
Study site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89104
Study site
Lenexa, Kansas, 66219
Study site
Lexena, Kansas, 66215
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90057
Study site
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449
Study site
Melbourne, Florida, 32935
Study site
Mesa, Arizona, 85203
Study site
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33126
Study site
Milford, Connecticut, 06460
Study site
Missoula, Montana, 59808
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212
Study site
Newton, Kansas, 67114
Study site
Norman, Oklahoma, 73069
Study site
Oceanside, California, 92056
Study site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68134
Study site
Overland Park, Kansas, 66212
Study site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33026
Study site
Penndel, Pennsylvania, 19047
Study site
Peoria, Illinois, 61602
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85028
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85050
Study site
Pinellas Park, Florida, 33781
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15241
Study site
Portland, Oregon, 97203
Study site
Prairie Village, Kansas, 66206
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Study site
Ridgefield, Connecticut, 06877
Study site
Rochester, New York, 14642
Study site
Sacramento, California, 95831
Study site
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
Study site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Study site
Santa Rosa, California, 95405
Study site
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
Study site
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251
Study site
South Bend, Indiana, 46601
Study site
South Miami, Florida, 33143
Study site
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Study site
Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281
Study site
Tempe, Arizona, 85283
Study site
Upper Saint Clair, Pennsylvania, 15241
Study site
Wichita, Kansas, 67205
Study site
Williamsburg, Virginia, 23185
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
About this study
Official title: Multi-Year Efficacy Study of Fluzone High-Dose Trivalent Vaccine Compared With Fluzone® Vaccine In Adults ≥ 65 Years of Age
The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of Fluzone High Dose vaccine and that of Fluzone® vaccine in the elderly.
Primary objective:
Read more
To measure the efficacy of the vaccine, defined as the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza caused by viral types/subtypes that are antigenically similar to those contained in the respective annual vaccine formulations.
Secondary objectives:
- To compare the clinical efficacy of Fluzone High Dose vaccine with that of Fluzone® vaccine in elderly adults, with respect to laboratory-confirmed influenza illness caused by any type or subtype of influenza virus.
- To compare the clinical efficacy of Fluzone High Dose vaccine with that of Fluzone® vaccine in elderly adults, in preventing culture-confirmed influenza illness caused by viral types/subtypes antigenically similar to those contained in the respective annual vaccine formulations.
Read the detailed description
The occurrence of influenza-like illness (ILI) will be determined in elderly participants vaccinated with either Fluzone High Dose or Fluzone® vaccine.
The presence of influenza virus in the respiratory tract of vaccinated individuals with ILI will be confirmed by two methods.
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Being tested
- Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine High Dose, Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine
- Keywords
- Influenza, Respiratory Tract Infections, Influenza-like illness, Elderly, Fluzone®, Efficacy
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human, Respiratory Tract Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine High DoseBiological
Also called Fluzone® High Dose
0.5 mL, Intramuscular
Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccineBiological
Also called Fluzone®
0.5 mL, Intramuscular
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fluzone® High Dose Group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine High Dose |
| Fluzone® Group | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy of Fluzone High Dose Relative to Fluzone in the Prevention of Laboratory Confirmed Influenza Caused by Viral Types and Subtypes That Are Antigenically Similar to Those Contained in the Respective Annual Vaccine Formulations.
The presence (and specific identification) of influenza virus in the respiratory tract of vaccinated individuals with influenza like illness (ILI) was confirmed by tissue culture (for infectious virus) and molecular techniques (polymerase chain reaction based assays), with results reported for cases cause by any viral type or subtype.
Measured: Day 0 (pre-vaccination) up to Year 1 post-vaccination
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2009 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2009
- Primary completionMay 2011
- Study completionApr 2012
Why it stopped: No safety concerns, study terminated due to lack of primary endpoint cases in 2009-2010 Flu season (coincided with H1N1 Pandemic) Subjects followed per-protocol
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for InfluenzaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 9,172 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Sanofi Pasteur Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00976027
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FIM07
- Other IDs
- UTN: U1111-1111-4478
- Status last verified
- Jul 2012
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2009
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Aug 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multi-Year Efficacy Study of Fluzone High-Dose Trivalent Vaccine Compared With Fluzone® Vaccine In Adults ≥ 65 Years of Age
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00976027
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FIM07
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Keywords
- Influenza, Respiratory Tract Infections, Influenza-like illness, Elderly, Fluzone®, Efficacy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: No safety concerns, study terminated due to lack of primary endpoint cases in 2009-2010 Flu season (coincided with H1N1 Pandemic) Subjects followed per-protocol
- Enrolment
- 9,172 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2009
- Primary completion
- May 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jul 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of Fluzone High Dose vaccine and that of Fluzone® vaccine in the elderly.
Primary objective:
To measure the efficacy of the vaccine, defined as the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza caused by viral types/subtypes that are antigenically similar to those contained in the respective annual vaccine formulations.
Secondary objectives:
- To compare the clinical efficacy of Fluzone High Dose vaccine with that of Fluzone® vaccine in elderly adults, with respect to laboratory-confirmed influenza illness caused by any type or subtype of influenza virus.
- To compare the clinical efficacy of Fluzone High Dose vaccine with that of Fluzone® vaccine in elderly adults, in preventing culture-confirmed influenza illness caused by viral types/subtypes antigenically similar to those contained in the respective annual vaccine formulations.
Detailed description
The occurrence of influenza-like illness (ILI) will be determined in elderly participants vaccinated with either Fluzone High Dose or Fluzone® vaccine.
The presence of influenza virus in the respiratory tract of vaccinated individuals with ILI will be confirmed by two methods.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fluzone® High Dose Group | Experimental | Biological: Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine High Dose |
| Fluzone® Group | Active comparator | Biological: Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Aged ≥ 65 years on the day of vaccination
- Informed consent form signed and dated.
- Able to attend all scheduled visits and to comply with all trial procedures.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Participation in another interventional clinical trial investigating a vaccine, drug, medical device, herbal supplement, or a medical procedure in the 4 weeks preceding the trial vaccination or planned participation in another clinical trial investigating a vaccine, drug, medical device, herbal supplement, or a medical procedure during each year of participation in the study trial.
- Vaccination against influenza in the 6 months preceding the trial vaccination.
- Systemic hypersensitivity to eggs, chicken proteins, or any of the vaccine components, or a history of a life-threatening reaction to Fluzone vaccine or to a vaccine containing any of the same substances.
- Personal history of Guillain-Barré syndrome.
- Dementia or any other cognitive condition at a stage that could interfere with following the trial procedures.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine High DoseAlso: Fluzone® High Dose0.5 mL, Intramuscular | Biological | Fluzone® High Dose Group |
| Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccineAlso: Fluzone®0.5 mL, Intramuscular | Biological | Fluzone® Group |
Primary outcome
Efficacy of Fluzone High Dose Relative to Fluzone in the Prevention of Laboratory Confirmed Influenza Caused by Viral Types and Subtypes That Are Antigenically Similar to Those Contained in the Respective Annual Vaccine Formulations.
Time frame: Day 0 (pre-vaccination) up to Year 1 post-vaccination
The presence (and specific identification) of influenza virus in the respiratory tract of vaccinated individuals with influenza like illness (ILI) was confirmed by tissue culture (for infectious virus) and molecular techniques (polymerase chain reaction based assays), with results reported for cases cause by any viral type or subtype.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Aug 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Influenza
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
RecruitingPhase 2
BPL-1357 Against H1N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
Influenza, Human
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of Chimeric Hemagglutinin mRNA Vaccine Candidates
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 1
pH1N1 Blinded Challenge Study
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-1406/CD388 for Prevention of Influenza (MK-1406-005/CD388.SQ.3.06)
Influenza
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Sanofi Pasteur Inc.
98 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine High Dose and Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in people with Influenza, run by Sanofi at 98 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 98 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jul 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy of Fluzone High Dose Relative to Fluzone in the Prevention of Laboratory Confirmed Influenza Caused by Viral Types and Subtypes That Are Antigenically Similar to Those Contained in the Respective Annual Vaccine Formulations. (time frame: Day 0 (pre-vaccination) up to Year 1 post-vaccination). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2012.