Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3NCT00977106
TORPEDO Study: A Study on Rapid Effect of Tocilizumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis With an Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) or Anti-TNF
A Phase 3 study testing tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 22 sites in France.
Trial summary
This study will assess the onset and maintenance of effect of tocilizumab on relief in patients with active moderate or severe rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to DMARDs or anti-TNF. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 103 participants
- Where
- 22 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Jun 2009to Oct 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients >/= 18 years of age
- active moderate or severe rheumatoid arthritis of <10 years duration with inadequate response to methotrexate or anti-TNF
- on methotrexate treatment for at least 10 weeks, at least 8 weeks on stable dose
- patients receiving oral corticosteroids and/or NSAIDs should be at stable dose for 4 weeks
Who cannot join
- rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA, or significant systemic involvement secondary to RA
- functional class IV by ACR classification
- history of inflammatory joint disease other than RA
- previous treatment with cell-depleting therapies, abatacept or rituximab
- active current or history of recurrent infection, or any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with iv antibiotics <4 weeks or oral antibiotics <2 weeks prior to screening
Trial locations and contacts
22 sites in 1 country.
22 sites in 1 country
France22 sites
Study site
Amiens, 80054
Study site
Amiens, 80094
Study site
Bayonne, 64109
Study site
Bois-Guillaume, 76233
Study site
Bordeaux, 33076
Study site
Brest, 29609
Study site
Cahors, 46005
Study site
Chambray-lès-Tours, 37171
Study site
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003
Study site
Échirolles, 38434
Study site
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925
Study site
Limoges, 87042
Study site
Lyon, 69437
Study site
Metz, 57077
Study site
Nantes, 44035
Study site
Orléans, 45000
Study site
Paris, 75651
Study site
Paris, 75679
Study site
Paris, 75877
Study site
Rennes, 35203
Study site
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42277
Study site
Toulouse, 31059
About this study
Official title: Comparative Double Blind Placebo Controlled Clinical Study on Tocilizumab Rapid Efficacy on Patients Relief in rheumatoïd Arthritis With an Inadequate Response to DMARDs or Anti TNF :TORPEDO
This study will assess the onset and maintenance of effect of tocilizumab on relief in patients with active moderate or severe rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to DMARDs or anti-TNF. For the first, double-blind, part of the study patients will be randomized to receive an iv infusion of either 8mg/kg tocilizumab or placebo. After 4 weeks this will be followed by 11 months treatment with tocilizumab 8mg/kg iv infusion every 4 weeks. Methotrexate or DMARD therapy will be continued throughout study treatment. Target sample size is >100.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]Drug
single iv infusion 8 mg/kg
placeboDrug
single iv infusion
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]Drug
iv infusion 8mg/kg every 4 weeks for 11 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: placebo |
| 3 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 4
HAQ-DI includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0 (equals)=without difficulties; 1= with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3. Relevant clinical improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 0.22 points in HAQ-DI.
Measured: Week 4
Secondary outcomes (51)
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Participants were asked to rate their assessment of disease activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0 to 100 millimeters (mm), where 0 represented no symptoms and 100 represented severe symptoms. Participants were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Open Treatment Period
Participants were asked to rate their assessment of disease activity using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no symptoms and 100 represented severe symptoms. Participants were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Physicians were asked to assess disease activity of the participants using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no symptoms and 100 represented severe symptoms. Physicians were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Open Treatment Period
Physicians were asked to assess disease activity of the participants using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no symptoms and 100 represented severe symptoms. Physicians were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Patient Global Assessment of Pain During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Participants were asked to rate their assessment of pain using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no pain and 100 represented intolerable pain. Participants were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
Patient Global Assessment of Pain During the Open Treatment Period
Participants were asked to rate their assessment of pain using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no pain and 100 represented intolerable pain. Participants were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Synovitis Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Assessed Using B-Mode Ultrasound
Synovitis was assessed by ultrasonography (B-mode ultrasound and Power Doppler) and scored from "0" to "3", for each of 40 joints (5 metacarpal phalangeal [MCP; left and right] joints, 5 proximal interphalangeal [PIP; left and right] joints, left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 metatarsal phalangeal [MTP; left and right] joints); synovitis scores were calculated by adding the sum of scores for each joint for a total score ranging from 0 to 120. A score of 0 indicated no damage and a score of 120 indicated most severe damage. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Synovitis Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Assessed Using Power Doppler Ultrasound
Synovitis was assessed by ultrasonography (B-mode ultrasound and Power Doppler) and scored from "0" to "3", for each of 40 joints (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right] joints, left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints); synovitis scores were calculated by adding the sum of scores for each joint for a total score ranging from 0 to 120 (higher score=more severe disease). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Synovitis Score During the Open Treatment Period Assessed Using B-Mode Ultrasound
Synovitis was assessed by ultrasonography (B-mode ultrasound and Power Doppler) and scored from "0" to "3", for each of 40 joints (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right] joints, left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints); synovitis scores were calculated by adding the sum of scores for each joint for a total score ranging from 0 to 120 (higher score=more severe disease). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Relative change was the percentage (%) change from baseline.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, and 48
Percent Change From Baseline in Synovitis Score During the Open Treatment Period Assessed Using Power Doppler Ultrasound
Synovitis was assessed by ultrasonography (B-mode ultrasound and Power Doppler) and scored from "0" to "3", for each of 40 joints (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right] joints, left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints); synovitis scores were calculated by adding the sum of scores for each joint for a total score ranging from 0 to 120 (higher score=more severe disease). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Relative change was the percentage change from baseline.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, and 48
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate is a biological marker of inflammation, measured in mm per hour (mm/hr). A reduction in ESR indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Double-Blind Treatment
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate is a biological marker of inflammation. A negative change indicates improvement.
Measured: Weeks 1 and 4
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Open Treatment Period
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate is a biological marker of inflammation, measured in mm/hr. A reduction in ESR indicates improvement. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
C-Reactive Protein During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
C-Reactive protein (CRP) is a biological marker of inflammation and is measured in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). A reduction in CRP indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
C-Reactive protein (CRP) is a biological marker of inflammation. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Measured: Weeks 1 and 4
C- Reactive Protein During the Open Treatment Period
C-reactive protein is a biological marker of inflammation and is measured in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Serum Amyloid A Component During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Serum Amyloid A (SAA) component is a biological marker of inflammation and is measured in mg/L. A reduction in SAA indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Amyloid A Component During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Serum Amyloid A (SAA) component is a biological marker of inflammation. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Weeks 1 and 4
Serum Amyloid A Component During the Open Treatment Period
Serum Amyloid A (SAA) component is a biological marker of inflammation measured in mg/L. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Beta 2 Microglobulin Levels During the Open Treatment Period
Beta 2 Microglobulin is a biological marker of inflammation measured in micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Beta 2 Microglobulin Levels During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Beta 2 Microglobulin is a biological marker of inflammation measured in micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Beta 2 Microglobulin Levels During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Beta 2 Microglobulin is a biological marker of inflammation. If baseline value was equal to 0, it was replaced by 0.1 to calculate the change from baseline.
Measured: Weeks 1 and 4
Bone Mineral Density
To describe bone mineral density (BMD), standardized values were calculated for lumbar spine, hip, femoral neck, and trochanter, taking into account the type of Dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA) used. All DXA at baseline were taken into account (done from before screening to Week 8). DXA at end of study were taken into account if they were done after at least 6 infusions of tocilizumab. Values were measured in milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm^2).
Measured: Baseline and Week 48
Percentage of Participants Treated With Corticosteroids Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48
S-Sclerostin and P-Dkk1 (Wnt Signaling Inhibitor Dickkopf) Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period
S-Sclerostin and P-Dkk1 are biological markers of bone and cartilage metabolism measured as picograms/milliliter (pg/mL). Baseline is the closest value plus or minus (+/-) 1 month around the first tocilizumab infusion. If values before and after the first infusion were eligible, the value before was taken into account.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 48
Serum Procollagen Type II N-Propeptide (s-PIINP), Serum Procollagen Type I N Propeptide (s-PINP), and Serum Carboxy-Terminal Collagen Crosslinks-1 (s-CTX-I) Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period
S-PIIINP, S-CTX-I, and S-PINP are biological markers of bone and cartilage metabolism. Baseline is the closest value +/- 1 month around the first tocilizumab infusion. If values before and after the first infusion were eligible, the value before was taken into account.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, and 48
Serum Osteogenic Growth Peptide (s-OGP) Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period
S-OGP is a biological marker of bone and cartilage metabolism measured as picomoles per liter (pmol/L). Baseline is the closest value +/- 1 month around the first tocilizumab infusion. If values before and after the first infusion were eligible, the value before was taken into account.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 48
Weekly Methotrexate (MTX) Dose
Before entering the study, participants had to be treated with MTX for at least 12 weeks and at a stable dose for at least 8 weeks before the screening visit (10-25 mg per week [mg/week] of oral or parenteral MTX). During the study, treatment with MTX had to be stable during the first month and then could be continued or modified, at the investigator's discretion.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24 and 48
HAQ-DI During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Measured: Screening and Week 4
HAQ-DI During the Open Treatment Period
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness in Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4.
Measured: Day 0, Week 1, and Week 4
Percent Change From Baseline in FACIT-F During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4.
Measured: Week 1 and Week 4
FACIT-F During the Open Treatment Period
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Hemoglobin Concentration During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Hemoglobin concentrations were determined at each visit to evaluate anemia in participants and measured as grams per deciliter (g/dL).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
Hemoglobin Concentration During the Open Treatment Period
Hemoglobin concentrations were determined at each visit to evaluate anemia in participants and measured as g/dL.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48
Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 28-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness. Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 28. Baseline = value at Day 0 if available, value at screening otherwise.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in TJC Based on 28-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness. Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 28.
Measured: Weeks 1 and 4
TJC Based on 28-Joint Count During the Open Treatment Period
Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness and joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0), giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 28. Baseline = Last value available before Day 0 (selection or Day 0) for placebo and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for tocilizumab group.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
TJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Forty joints were assessed for tenderness (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right joints], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints). Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 40. Baseline = value at Day 0 if available, value at screening otherwise.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in TJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Forty joints were assessed for tenderness (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right joints], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints). Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 40.
Measured: Weeks 1 and 4
TJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Open Treatment Period
Forty joints were assessed for tenderness (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right joints], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints). Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 40. Baseline = Last value available before Day 0 (selection or Day 0) for placebo and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for tocilizumab group.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 28-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Twenty-eight joints were assessed for swelling. Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 28. Baseline = value at Day 0 if available, value at screening otherwise.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in SJC Based on 28-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Twenty-eight joints were assessed for swelling. Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 28.
Measured: Weeks 1 and 4
Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 28-Joint Count During the Open Treatment Period
Twenty-eight joints were assessed for swelling (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right joints], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints) . Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 28. Baseline = Last value available before Day 0 (selection or Day 0) for placebo and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for tocilizumab group.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
SJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Forty joints were assessed for swelling (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right joints], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints). Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 40. Baseline = value at Day 0 if available, value at screening otherwise.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in SJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Forty joints were assessed for swelling (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right joints], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints). Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 40.
Measured: Weeks 1 and 4
SJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Open Treatment Period
Forty joints were assessed for swelling (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right joints], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints). Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) for a total possible score of 0 to 40. Baseline = Last value available before Day 0 (selection or Day 0) for placebo and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for tocilizumab group.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (≤3.2) = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
DAS28 During the Open Treatment Period
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (≤3.2) = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Disease Activity Score Based on 40-Joints Count (DAS40) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
DAS40 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 40-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
DAS40 During the Open Treatment Period
DAS40 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 40-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS40 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Sep 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2009
- Primary completionOct 2011
- Study completionOct 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00977106
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML22017
- Other IDs
- 2008-008309-23, 2008
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 18 Aug 2009
- Last updated
- 22 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Double Blind Placebo Controlled Clinical Study on Tocilizumab Rapid Efficacy on Patients Relief in rheumatoïd Arthritis With an Inadequate Response to DMARDs or Anti TNF :TORPEDO
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00977106
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML22017
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2009
- Primary completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Sep 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Sep 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will assess the onset and maintenance of effect of tocilizumab on relief in patients with active moderate or severe rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to DMARDs or anti-TNF. For the first, double-blind, part of the study patients will be randomized to receive an iv infusion of either 8mg/kg tocilizumab or placebo. After 4 weeks this will be followed by 11 months treatment with tocilizumab 8mg/kg iv infusion every 4 weeks. Methotrexate or DMARD therapy will be continued throughout study treatment. Target sample size is >100.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Drug: placebo |
| 3 | Experimental | Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- adult patients >/= 18 years of age
- active moderate or severe rheumatoid arthritis of <10 years duration with inadequate response to methotrexate or anti-TNF
- on methotrexate treatment for at least 10 weeks, at least 8 weeks on stable dose
- patients receiving oral corticosteroids and/or NSAIDs should be at stable dose for 4 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA, or significant systemic involvement secondary to RA
- functional class IV by ACR classification
- history of inflammatory joint disease other than RA
- previous treatment with cell-depleting therapies, abatacept or rituximab
- active current or history of recurrent infection, or any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with iv antibiotics <4 weeks or oral antibiotics <2 weeks prior to screening
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]single iv infusion 8 mg/kg | Drug | 1 |
| placebosingle iv infusion | Drug | 2 |
| tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]iv infusion 8mg/kg every 4 weeks for 11 months | Drug | 3 |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
HAQ-DI includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0 (equals)=without difficulties; 1= with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3. Relevant clinical improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 0.22 points in HAQ-DI.
51 secondary outcomes
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Open Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Open Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Patient Global Assessment of Pain During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Patient Global Assessment of Pain During the Open Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Synovitis Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Assessed Using B-Mode Ultrasound
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Synovitis Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Assessed Using Power Doppler Ultrasound
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Synovitis Score During the Open Treatment Period Assessed Using B-Mode Ultrasound
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, and 48
Percent Change From Baseline in Synovitis Score During the Open Treatment Period Assessed Using Power Doppler Ultrasound
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, and 48
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 4
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Open Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
C-Reactive Protein During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 4
C- Reactive Protein During the Open Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Serum Amyloid A Component During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Amyloid A Component During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 4
Serum Amyloid A Component During the Open Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Beta 2 Microglobulin Levels During the Open Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Beta 2 Microglobulin Levels During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Beta 2 Microglobulin Levels During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 4
Bone Mineral Density
Time frame: Baseline and Week 48
Percentage of Participants Treated With Corticosteroids Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48
S-Sclerostin and P-Dkk1 (Wnt Signaling Inhibitor Dickkopf) Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 48
Serum Procollagen Type II N-Propeptide (s-PIINP), Serum Procollagen Type I N Propeptide (s-PINP), and Serum Carboxy-Terminal Collagen Crosslinks-1 (s-CTX-I) Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, and 48
Serum Osteogenic Growth Peptide (s-OGP) Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 48
Weekly Methotrexate (MTX) Dose
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24 and 48
HAQ-DI During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Screening and Week 4
HAQ-DI During the Open Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness in Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Day 0, Week 1, and Week 4
Percent Change From Baseline in FACIT-F During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 4
FACIT-F During the Open Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Hemoglobin Concentration During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
Hemoglobin Concentration During the Open Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48
Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 28-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in TJC Based on 28-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 4
TJC Based on 28-Joint Count During the Open Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
TJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in TJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 4
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Sep 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Clinical Study of MK-1045 in People With Lupus or Rheumatoid Arthritis (MK-1045-004)
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Paraffin Wax Therapy and Dry Cupping on Pain and Wrist Function in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatic Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety of Tofacitinib, an Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor, in Primary Sjogren Disease
Sjogren's Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of AZD0120 in Autoimmune Diseases
Systemic Sclerosis, Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
22 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 22 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 22 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Sep 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 4 (time frame: Week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2014.