AzTrials
AzTrials

AgingNCT00981734

Hiking Improves the Functional Autonomy

A study testing Hiking in people with Aging, run by Universidade Camilo Castelo Branco at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an experimental research study. The subjects were randomized into two groups: Experimental group (EG; n=58, age: 67 ± 6 old) and Control group (CG; n=40; age: 70 ± 6 old). All were physically active without strictly obeying in regularity of the program of physical activity. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Aging
What is being tested?
Hiking
How many people
98 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Sep 2008to Feb 2009
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Registered in a program of family health (PFH),
  • Age above 60 years,
  • Hypertension,
  • Not be trainee of physical activity and those who were at clinical conditions that composed the research.

Who cannot join

  • Old women with any kind of infirmity that could interferes in study or that becomes a factor of prevention of the tests that were designed for functional anatomy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Rubens Cesar Lucena da Cunha

    Juazeiro do Norte, Ceará, 63040-320

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Effects of a Hiking Study About the Functional Autonomy Levels in Old Women Analyzed by the Family Health Program

This is an experimental research study. The subjects were randomized into two groups: Experimental group (EG; n=58, age: 67 ± 6 old) and Control group (CG; n=40; age: 70 ± 6 old). All were physically active without strictly obeying in regularity of the program of physical activity.

The functional autonomy was evaluated by the amount of tests of Group Development of Latin American Maturity (GDLAM). It consists of hiking ten meters (C10m); standing up from the sitting position (SSP); to stand up from the ventral decubitus position (SSPVD); to stand up from a chair and be able to walk around your home (SCWH); and to be able to wear and remove a t-shirt (DTS). These tests have showed similar results in indice of GDLAM (IG). The intervention took place three times a week, with intensity that has varied between fifty five to seventy five per cent of the frequency maximum from heart.

Read the detailed description

In the physical evaluation, the participants were asked that they bathe with clothes (swimsuit, trunks) to measure the body composition, stature and IMC. All of the results were recorded in elaborated cards by the researcher.

The participants were physically evaluated through systemic observation during 16 weeks. The first collection of data occurred in the first week of April and the second collection occurred in the first week of August, 2009 during the morning.

A weighing machine with the unit of Filizola registered to INMETRO (precision of 100 grams) was used to evaluate body composition. Stature was measured through the use of a Estadiometer registered to INMETRO (precision of 1 mm). In order to evaluate the functional autonomy, GDLAM (Group Development of Latin American Maturity) created by Dantas and Vale, was used. It consists of hiking ten meters (C10m); standing up from the sitting position (SSP); to stand up from the ventral decubitus position (SSPVD); to stand up from a chair and be able to walk around your home (SCWH); and to be able to wear and remove a t-shirt (DTS). Everybody was measured in seconds and consists of a score called the General Indice of the GDLAM (IG).

The results of reference for classification of the functional autonomy level were the same for IG and its components and GDLAM. The intervention took place three times per week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) from 5 PM to 5:45 PM. Intensity varied between 50% and 75% of the frequency maximum from heart (FMH) obtained by the equation: FMH = 220 - age. The FMH was controlled by the standardization of the heart frequency (HF) from the carotid at six seconds and then multiplied by ten. This HF WAS measured by the participants themselves. They received training and orientations to learn the right method.

All the participants had their HF measured by monitors, at least one time per session. Therefore after the self-standardization, with the aim to confirm the identified results by the older women. The moment of standardization of the HF varied due to the voice of the responsible teacher or asked by the monitor close to the old woman.

The sessions were spread out in the subsequent ways:

  • Warm up: Duration five to ten minutes of articular exercises of upper body, neck, trunk and lower body.
  • Development: twenty to thirty minutes of hiking in a natural method.
  • To came back to calmness: three to five minutes of sitting elongated and/or laying down: neck, upper and lower body and trunk; using the changed method by segment. The activity of intervention was oriented at a controlled environment as the surface (plain and does not glide) and markation of the walked distances (field jogging does not count - 260 meters) where the training was controlled by the time of hiking, according to Norms of the American College Sport of Medicine and of the fifth Brazilian Norm of arterial Hypertension, that has the requirement of a minimum frequency of three times per week with the duration of twenty and thirty minutes; adequate to have a good mean to physiological adaptations in etary group.

Statistic Evaluation:

Descriptive Statistics were used with average, error-standard, median, standard deviation, minimum and maximum and absolute delt. The normality of the sample was evaluated by the test by Shapiro-Wilk (GC) and by Kolmogorov Smirnov (GE). To analyze the answer variables, comparisons were made between groups, t-student test couplet or by Wilcoxon, when appropriate (homogeneous or heterogenous distributions of the data, respectively). To make evaluations between groups the parametric test by ANOVA was used in two ways, followed by Post Hoc de Scheffe. The study used the level of p < 0.05 to test the statistical significance. The results were evaluated by Excel and the Statistical Package for the Social Science® (SPSS), version 14.0.

Conditions
Aging
Being tested
Hiking
Keywords
Aging, functionality, life style, To have more than sixty years

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HikingOther

    Also called Funcionality, life style.

    Three times by a week, thirty minutes, controlling heart frequency between fifty five per cent and seventy five per cent.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 10 meters

    Measured: seconds

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. meters

    Measured: seconds

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Sep 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2008
  3. Primary completionJan 2009
  4. Study completionFeb 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
98 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00981734
Sponsor's protocol ID
0042/2008
Status last verified
Sep 2009
First submitted
14 Sep 2009
Last updated
22 Sep 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hiking in people with Aging, run by Universidade Camilo Castelo Branco at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

10 meters (time frame: seconds). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2009; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 4 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in