Secondary HyperparathyroidismPhase 2NCT00990704
Paricalcitol Compared to Maxacalcitol in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
A Phase 2 study testing paricalcitol and maxacalcitol in people with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Hemodialysis, run by Abbott at 14 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
This study is a exploratory comparison of the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol injection with maxacalcitol injection in chronic kidney disease participants receiving hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Secondary Hyperparathyroidism, Hemodialysis
- What is being tested?
- paricalcitol and maxacalcitol
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 47 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- Oct 2009to May 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with iPTH >=300 pg/mL, adjusted calcium >=8.4 to <10.2 mg/dL, and phosphorus <=6.5 mg/dL
- Patients receiving dialysis 3 times weekly for at least 3 months before informed consent was obtained and scheduled to receive the same hemodialysis during the study period
- Patients using dialysate with constant concentration of calcium for 4 weeks before informed consent was obtained and receiving phosphate binder with constant dose regimen for 2 weeks before informed consent was obtained
Who cannot join
- Patients taking drugs that affect iPTH, calcium, or bone metabolism
- Patients with a history of allergic reaction or significant sensitivity to vitamin D
- Patients who received parathyroidectomy or ethanol infusion within 1 year before informed consent was obtained
- Patients with malignancy or with clinically significant hepatic disease (liver function tests more than 3 times the upper limit of normal) or with refractory hepatic disease
- Patients with cardiovascular disease designated as New York Heart Association Class III or IV or with any of the following cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases within 6 months before informed consent was obtained:
- Acute coronary syndrome (myocardial infarction or unstable angina) or acute cerebral vascular disease (cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage)
Show all 15Show fewer
- Coronary arterial revascularization (such as coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty)
- Cerebral arterial revascularization (such as cerebral aneurysm clipping, cerebral aneurysm embolization, carotid artery endarterectomy)
- Arteriosclerosis obliterans with rest pain (Fontaine classification III or more severe)
- Patients with severe hypertension (defined as mean resting blood pressure taken with the patient in a supine position before dialysis and at 6 dialyses sessions before informed consent was obtained: systolic >= 180 mmHg and diastolic >= 110 mmHg)
- Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (defined as mean glycosylated hemoglobin >=8% for 3 months before informed consent was obtained)
- Patients with a history of drug or alcohol abuse within 6 months before informed consent was obtained
- Patients who require chronic use of cytochrome P450 (CYP3A) inhibitors or inducers
- Patients who are taking products that contain aluminum 2 weeks before informed consent was obtained
- Patients who have taken paricalcitol in the past
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
Japan14 sites
Site Ref # / Investigator 53794
Anjo
Site Ref # / Investigator 53787
Chiba
Site Ref # / Investigator 53786
Kumagaya
Site Ref # / Investigator 53792
Matsumoto
Site Ref # / Investigator 53784
Mito
Site Ref # / Investigator 53796
Nagasaki
Site Ref # / Investigator 53795
Osaka
Site Ref # / Investigator 21561
Sapporo
Site Ref # / Investigator 53789
Tokyo
Site Ref # / Investigator 53790
Tokyo
Site Ref # / Investigator 53793
Toyohashi
Site Ref # / Investigator 53785
Tsuchiura
Site Ref # / Investigator 53788
Yachiyo
Site Ref # / Investigator 53791
Yokosuka
About this study
Official title: Phase II, Open Study, Exploratory Examination of Efficacy and Safety of Paricalcitol Injection and Maxacalcitol Injection in Chronic Kidney Disease Subjects Receiving Hemodialysis With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
This study is a exploratory comparison of the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol injection with maxacalcitol injection in chronic kidney disease participants receiving hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism.
- Conditions
- Secondary Hyperparathyroidism, Hemodialysis
- Being tested
- paricalcitol, maxacalcitol
- Keywords
- Secondary hyperparathyroidism, Hemodialysis, paricalcitol, maxacalcitol
- Medical subject headings
- Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
paricalcitolDrug
Also called ABT-358, Zemplar
Intravenous administration 3 times a week immediately before completion of dialysis
maxacalcitolDrug
Intravenous administration 3 times a week immediately before completion of dialysis
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Paricalcitol | Experimental | 2 mcg adjusted by +/- 1 mcg, up to a maximum of 7 mcg, administered 3 times per week through intravenous catheter immediately before completion of dialysis Receives: Drug: paricalcitol |
| Maxacalcitol | Active comparator | 5 or 10 mcg adjusted by +/- 2.5 mcg, up to a maximum of 20 mcg, administered 3 times per week through intravenous catheter immediately before completion of dialysis Receives: Drug: maxacalcitol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Percentage of Participants With a >=50% Reduction in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) From Baseline Compared to the Average iPTH Obtained in the Last 3 Weeks.
Measured: Baseline and the last 3 weeks (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)
Secondary outcomes (7)
The Percentage of Participants With iPTH Within Target Range of 60-180 pg/mL, Based on the Average iPTH Obtained in the Last 3 Weeks
Measured: During the last 3 weeks (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)
Mean iPTH at Each Visit
Measured: Screening (up to 2 weeks before Baseline) to Week 13
Mean Change in iPTH From Baseline to the Average iPTH Obtained in the Last 3 Weeks
Measured: Baseline and the last 3 weeks (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)
Percentage of Participants With a >= 50% Reduction in iPTH From Baseline to the Average iPTH Obtained in the Last 3 Weeks and Without Hypercalcemia During Treatment
Hypercalcemia was defined as at least 1 corrected calcium > 11.5 mg/dL or at least 2 consecutive corrected calcium >= 11.0 mg/dL.
Measured: Baseline and the last 3 weeks (Weeks 11, 12, and 13) for iPTH and anytime during the 12-week treatment period for hypercalcemia
Percentage of Participants With iPTH Within the Target Range of 60-180 pg/mL Based on the Average iPTH Obtained in the Last 3 Weeks of the Study and Without Hypercalcemia Anytime During Treatment
Hypercalcemia was defined as at least 1 corrected calcium > 11.5 mg/dL or at least 2 consecutive corrected calcium >= 11.0 mg/dL.
Measured: Baseline and the last 3 weeks (Weeks 11, 12, and 13) for iPTH and anytime during the 12-week treatment period for hypercalcemia
Number of Occurrences of iPTH Control, Defined as >=50% Reduction in iPTH From Baseline
Measured: Over the 12-week treatment period
Number of Occurrences of iPTH Control, Defined as Within the Target Range of 60-180 pg/mL of iPTH
Measured: Over the 12-week treatment period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2009
- Primary completionMay 2010
- Study completionMay 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Secondary HyperparathyroidismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 47 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Moriaki Kubo, Study director, Abbott Japan Co.,Ltd
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00990704
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M11-609
- Status last verified
- Jun 2011
- First submitted
- 5 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 11 Jul 2011
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jul 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II, Open Study, Exploratory Examination of Efficacy and Safety of Paricalcitol Injection and Maxacalcitol Injection in Chronic Kidney Disease Subjects Receiving Hemodialysis With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00990704
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M11-609
- Conditions
- Secondary Hyperparathyroidism, Hemodialysis
- Keywords
- Secondary hyperparathyroidism, Hemodialysis, paricalcitol, maxacalcitol
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 47 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbottIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2009
- Primary completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Jun 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a exploratory comparison of the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol injection with maxacalcitol injection in chronic kidney disease participants receiving hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Paricalcitol | Experimental | Drug: paricalcitol2 mcg adjusted by +/- 1 mcg, up to a maximum of 7 mcg, administered 3 times per week through intravenous catheter immediately before completion of dialysis |
| Maxacalcitol | Active comparator | Drug: maxacalcitol5 or 10 mcg adjusted by +/- 2.5 mcg, up to a maximum of 20 mcg, administered 3 times per week through intravenous catheter immediately before completion of dialysis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with iPTH >=300 pg/mL, adjusted calcium >=8.4 to <10.2 mg/dL, and phosphorus <=6.5 mg/dL
- Patients receiving dialysis 3 times weekly for at least 3 months before informed consent was obtained and scheduled to receive the same hemodialysis during the study period
- Patients using dialysate with constant concentration of calcium for 4 weeks before informed consent was obtained and receiving phosphate binder with constant dose regimen for 2 weeks before informed consent was obtained
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Patients taking drugs that affect iPTH, calcium, or bone metabolism
- Patients with a history of allergic reaction or significant sensitivity to vitamin D
- Patients who received parathyroidectomy or ethanol infusion within 1 year before informed consent was obtained
- Patients with malignancy or with clinically significant hepatic disease (liver function tests more than 3 times the upper limit of normal) or with refractory hepatic disease
- Patients with cardiovascular disease designated as New York Heart Association Class III or IV or with any of the following cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases within 6 months before informed consent was obtained:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| paricalcitolAlso: ABT-358, ZemplarIntravenous administration 3 times a week immediately before completion of dialysis | Drug | Paricalcitol |
| maxacalcitolIntravenous administration 3 times a week immediately before completion of dialysis | Drug | Maxacalcitol |
Primary outcome
The Percentage of Participants With a >=50% Reduction in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) From Baseline Compared to the Average iPTH Obtained in the Last 3 Weeks.
Time frame: Baseline and the last 3 weeks (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)
7 secondary outcomes
The Percentage of Participants With iPTH Within Target Range of 60-180 pg/mL, Based on the Average iPTH Obtained in the Last 3 Weeks
Time frame: During the last 3 weeks (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)
Mean iPTH at Each Visit
Time frame: Screening (up to 2 weeks before Baseline) to Week 13
Mean Change in iPTH From Baseline to the Average iPTH Obtained in the Last 3 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline and the last 3 weeks (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)
Percentage of Participants With a >= 50% Reduction in iPTH From Baseline to the Average iPTH Obtained in the Last 3 Weeks and Without Hypercalcemia During Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and the last 3 weeks (Weeks 11, 12, and 13) for iPTH and anytime during the 12-week treatment period for hypercalcemia
Percentage of Participants With iPTH Within the Target Range of 60-180 pg/mL Based on the Average iPTH Obtained in the Last 3 Weeks of the Study and Without Hypercalcemia Anytime During Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and the last 3 weeks (Weeks 11, 12, and 13) for iPTH and anytime during the 12-week treatment period for hypercalcemia
Number of Occurrences of iPTH Control, Defined as >=50% Reduction in iPTH From Baseline
Time frame: Over the 12-week treatment period
Number of Occurrences of iPTH Control, Defined as Within the Target Range of 60-180 pg/mL of iPTH
Time frame: Over the 12-week treatment period
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jul 2011.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of MT1013 for the Treatment of Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
Secondary Hyperparathyroidism, Chronic Kidney Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
REducing Systemic Inflammation With LOw-dose Colchicine to ImproVE Cardiovascular Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pilot Randomized Open-Label Trial
Chronic Kidney Disease Mineral and Bone Disorder, Cognitive Function
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of PLS240 in Pediatric Participants With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Chronic Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Strategies for Proactive Health in People With Kidney Function Decline
Renal Insufficiency,Chronic, Dietary Intake Patterns
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Osteoporosis & Renal Disease: Research in Primary Health Care Services
Osteoporosis, Chronic Kidney Disease Mineral and Bone Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Moriaki Kubo study director
Abbott Japan Co.,Ltd
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing paricalcitol and maxacalcitol in people with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Hemodialysis, run by Abbott at 14 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jun 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Percentage of Participants With a >=50% Reduction in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) From Baseline Compared to the Average iPTH Obtained in the Last 3 Weeks. (time frame: Baseline and the last 3 weeks (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2011.