AzTrials
AzTrials

Emergence AgitationNCT00990769

The Effect of Depth of Anesthesia as Measured by Bispectral Index (BIS) on Emergence Agitation in Children

A study testing Depth of anesthesia in people with Emergence Agitation, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether depth of anesthesia has an effect on emergence agitation (EA) in children age 2 - 8 years old. EA is a common problem in pediatric patients who receive general anesthesia with inhaled anesthetics, and the effect of depth of anesthesia on EA has not been studied. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 8 years
Conditions the study is for
Emergence Agitation
What is being tested?
Depth of anesthesia
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2009to Sep 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 8 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children age 2 - 8 (inclusive) undergoing ophthalmologic surgery
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status 1 or 2

Who cannot join

  • Surgery precluding placement of BIS monitor
  • Non-English speaking, until additional language consent forms are approved
  • Previous history of severe emergence agitation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center - Eye Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to determine whether depth of anesthesia has an effect on emergence agitation (EA) in children age 2 - 8 years old. EA is a common problem in pediatric patients who receive general anesthesia with inhaled anesthetics, and the effect of depth of anesthesia on EA has not been studied. The study will randomize 40 children undergoing ophthalmologic surgery under general anesthesia to either light anesthesia (BIS 55-60) or deep anesthesia (BIS 40-45). EA will be measured by the peak Pediatric Assessment of Emergence Delirium (PAED) score in the recovery room, which rates agitation behaviors on a scale of 0 - 20. The hypothesis is that light anesthesia is associated with more EA.

Being tested
Depth of anesthesia
Keywords
Emergence delirium, Bispectral Index, Depth of anesthesia
Medical subject headings
Emergence Delirium

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Depth of anesthesiaOther

    The intervention in this study is the titration of the depth of anesthesia according to the BIS monitor, as maintained by a combination of routine anesthetic agents (nitrous oxide, sevoflurane, and fentanyl).

Study groups in NCT00990769
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High-normal BIS ("Lighter" anesthesia)ExperimentalDepth of anesthesia is titrated to a BIS of 55-60
Receives: Other: Depth of anesthesia
Low-normal BIS ("Deeper" anesthesia)ExperimentalDepth of anesthesia is maintained at a BIS level of 40-45
Receives: Other: Depth of anesthesia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Peak Pediatric Assessment of Emergence Delirium (PAED) Score Within the First 30 Minutes of Reaching the Recovery Room (Post-Anesthesia Care Unit)

    The PAED scale is a validated observational measure of five aspects of child behavior on emergence from anesthesia (caregiver eye contact, purposeful movement, evidence of awareness of surroundings, restlessness, and inconsolability). Ratings are summed to arrive at a total score ranging from 0 - 20, with higher scores indicating greater severity of emergence agitation.

    Measured: Within 30 minutes of arrival in recovery room

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Time to Emergence From Anesthesia

    The time from cessation of anesthesia delivery (Sevoflurane turned off) to extubation.

    Measured: After the completion of surgery

  2. Pain Score: Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC)

    Pain was assessed with the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale. The FLACC scale is an observational measure of child behavior in response to postoperative pain. Five subscales are rated from 0-2 on severity: facial expression, leg position and motion, psychomotor agitation, crying, and inconsolability. Subscale scores are summed to compute a total score ranging from 0-10, with 10 representing the most severe pain. In the post-operative setting, the FLACC scale is validated for cognitively intact children up to age 7 years, and was used for all children in the study.

    Measured: Within 30 minutes of arrival in recovery room

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Oct 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2009
  3. Primary completionSep 2010
  4. Study completionSep 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00990769
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00015531
Status last verified
May 2013
First submitted
5 Oct 2009
Last updated
31 May 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Depth of anesthesia in people with Emergence Agitation, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 May 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Peak Pediatric Assessment of Emergence Delirium (PAED) Score Within the First 30 Minutes of Reaching the Recovery Room (Post-Anesthesia Care Unit) (time frame: Within 30 minutes of arrival in recovery room). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in