Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4NCT00993668
Assessing the Use of Certolizumab Pegol in Adult Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on the Antibody Response When Receiving Influenza Virus and Pneumococcal Vaccines
A Phase 4 study testing Certolizumab pegol in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by UCB Pharma at 41 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this trial is to assess the affect of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) treatment on antibody response to T cell-independent and T cell-dependent immunizations using pneumococcal and influenza vaccines, respectively. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Certolizumab pegol
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 224 participants
- Where
- 41 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2009to Feb 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must be at least 18 years old at the screening visit
- Subjects must be able to understand the information provided to them and to give written informed consent, and be able and willing to comply with the study requirements
- Female subjects must be either postmenopausal for at least 1 year, surgically incapable of childbearing, or effectively practicing an acceptable method of contraception (either oral/parenteral/implantable hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine device or barrier and spermicide. Abstinence only is not an acceptable method. Subjects must agree to use adequate contraception during the study and for 10 weeks after the last dose of CZP. Male subjects must agree to ensure they or their female partner(s) use adequate contraception during the study and for 10 weeks after the subject receives their last dose of CZP
- Subjects must have a diagnosis of adult-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) of at least 6-months duration as defined by the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria
- Subjects must have active RA disease as defined by: ≥ 4 tender joints (28 joint count) at Screening and Week 0; and ≥ 4 swollen joints (28 joint count) at Screening and Week 0
Who cannot join
- Subjects who have a diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis (eg., psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis)
- Subjects who have a history of an infected joint prosthesis at any time with that prosthesis still in situ
- Subjects must be free of defined prohibited medication and biological therapy
- Subjects who have received any experimental nonbiological therapy, within or outside of a clinical trial in the 3 months prior to Week 0
- Subjects who have received any experimental biological agent in the past 3 months or within 5 half-lives prior to Week 0 (whichever is longer)
- Subjects who have received previous treatment with biological response modifier therapy for RA that resulted in a severe hypersensitivity reaction or an anaphylactic reaction.
Show all 27Show fewer
- Subjects with a history of pneumococcal or influenza infection in the last 3 months
- Subjects with a history of pneumococcal vaccination in the last 5 years
- Subjects with a history of influenza vaccination within the last 6 months
- Female subjects who are breast-feeding, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the trial or within 3 months following last dose of study drug
- Subjects with a history of chronic or recurrent infections (more than 3 episodes requiring antibiotics/antivirals during the preceding year), recent serious or life-threatening infection within 6 months (including herpes zoster), or any current sign or symptom that may indicate an infection
- Subjects who have had a splenectomy
- Subjects who have had a hypersensitivity reaction to previous pneumococcal or influenza vaccination
- Subjects who have a known hypersensitivity to eggs and egg products or to other components of the vaccine
- Subjects with a history of Guillain-Barre syndrome
- Subjects with a history of tuberculosis, active tuberculosis, positive chest x-ray for tuberculosis, or positive purified protein derivative (PPD) skin test (defined as induration of ≥5 mm). Subjects who are not candidates for PPD testing due to prior severe reaction to the PPD test or a history of PPD positivity must undergo an Elispot test instead for tuberculosis evaluation. Subjects testing positive via the PPD or having an indeterminate or positive Elispot test, or for which latent tuberculosis cannot be ruled out, may be enrolled in the study provided that they are treated (eg., isoniazid for 9 months) and that their treatment has been initiated at least 4 weeks prior to the first administration of CZP
- Subjects at high risk of infection (eg., presence of leg ulcers or an indwelling urinary catheter, persistent or recurrent chest infections, bedridden or wheelchair bound subjects)
- Subjects with a history of a lymphoproliferative disorder including lymphoma or signs and symptoms suggestive of lymphoproliferative disease
- Subjects with known concurrent acute or chronic viral hepatitis B or C or positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs-Ag) or hepatitis C virus antibody (HCV-Ab)
- Subjects with known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
- Subjects receiving any live or attenuated vaccination within 12 weeks prior to Week 0
- Concurrent malignancy or a history of malignancy (other than carcinoma of the cervix or basal cell carcinoma successfully treated more than 5 years prior to screening)
- Subjects with Class III or Class IV congestive heart failure according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) 1964 classification criteria
- Subjects with a history of, or suspected, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (eg., multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis)
- Subjects with a current or recent history of severe, progressive, and/or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological or cerebral disease
- Subjects with any other condition (eg., clinically significant laboratory values) which in the Investigator's judgement would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study
- Subjects with a history of an adverse reaction to polyethylene glycol (PEG)
Trial locations and contacts
41 sites in 1 country.
41 sites in 1 country
United States41 sites
Study site
Asheville, North Carolina
Study site
Aventura, Florida
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama
Study site
Brooklyn, New York
Study site
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina
Study site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania
Study site
Erie, Pennsylvania
Study site
Florissant, Missouri
Study site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Study site
Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Study site
Huntsville, Alabama
Study site
Idaho Falls, Idaho
Study site
Kalamazoo, Michigan
Study site
Lansing, Michigan
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Melbourne, Florida
Study site
Meridian, Idaho
Study site
Middleburg Heights, Ohio
Study site
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Study site
Oak Creek, Wisconsin
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Study site
Orange Park, Florida
Study site
Orangeburg, South Carolina
Study site
Palm Desert, California
Study site
Palm Harbor, Florida
Study site
Peoria, Arizona
Study site
Reno, Nevada
Study site
San Antonio, Texas
Study site
Santa Maria, California
Study site
Santa Monica, California
Study site
Scottsdale, Arizona
Study site
Seattle, Washington
Study site
Smithtown, New York
Study site
Syracuse, New York
Study site
Tucson, Arizona
Study site
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Study site
Venice, Florida
Study site
Vero Beach, Florida
Study site
West Reading, Pennsylvania
Study site
Zephyrhills, Florida
About this study
Official title: A Phase 4, Randomized, Single-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity of Pneumococcal and Influenza Vaccines in Adult Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Certolizumab Pegol or Placebo
The purpose of this trial is to assess the affect of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) treatment on antibody response to T cell-independent and T cell-dependent immunizations using pneumococcal and influenza vaccines, respectively.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Placebo, Certolizumab pegol
- Keywords
- influenza, vaccine, pneumococcal vaccine, certolizumab pegol, Cimzia
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Influenza, Human
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboOther
Placebo - Two 0.9% saline subcutaneous (sc) injections at Week 0, Week 2, and Week 4 followed by two sc injections of Open-Label (OL) CZP 200 mg at Weeks 6, 8 and 10, then one sc injection of OL CZP 200 mg every two weeks from Week 12 until last drug administration (up to Week 32).
Certolizumab pegolBiological
Also called Cimzia®
Certolizumab pegol - Two 200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injections at Week 0, Week 2, and Week 4 followed by one sc injection of Open-Label (OL) CZP 200 mg from Week 6 until last drug administration (up to Week 32).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo Receives: Other: Placebo |
| Cimzia | Experimental | Certolizumab pegol Receives: Biological: Certolizumab pegol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Subjects Without Baseline Protective Titers Achieving a ≥ 2-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 3 of 6 Pneumococcal Antigens (6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F) at Week 6.
Measured: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects Without Baseline Protective Titers Achieving a ≥ 4-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens (2009/2010 Composition) at Week 6.
Measured: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Percentage of All Subjects Achieving a ≥ 2-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 3 of 6 Pneumococcal Antigens (6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F) at Week 6.
Measured: End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of All Subjects Achieving a ≥ 4-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens (2009/2010 Composition) at Week 6.
Measured: End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects With no Previous Protective Pneumococcal Antibody Titers at Baseline With Protective Pneumococcal Antibody Titers (≥1.6 µg/ml in ≥ 3 of 6 of the Pneumococcal Antigens) at Week 6.
Measured: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects With no Previous Protective Influenza Antibody Titers at Baseline With Protective Influenza Antibody Titers (≥1:40 in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens) at Week 6.
Measured: Baseline, End of single blind period (week 6)
Percentage of All Subjects With Protective Pneumococcal Antibody Titers (≥1.6 µg/ml in ≥ 3 of 6 of the Pneumococcal Antigens) at Week 6.
Measured: End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of All Subjects With Protective Influenza Antibody Titers (≥1:40 in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens) at Week 6.
Measured: End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects Without Baseline Protective Titers Achieving a ≥ 2-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 3 of 6 Pneumococcal Antigens at Week 6 by Concomitant Methotrexate (MTX) Use.
Measured: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects Without Baseline Protective Titers Achieving a ≥ 4-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens at Week 6 by Concomitant MTX Use.
Measured: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2009
- Primary completionJun 2010
- Study completionFeb 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 224 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Pharma
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- UCB Clinical Trial Call Center, Study director, +1-877-822-9493 (UCB)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00993668
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RA0017
- Status last verified
- Jan 2012
- First submitted
- 9 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Kivitz AJ, Schechtman J, Texter M, Fichtner A, de Longueville M, Chartash EK. Vaccine responses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with certolizumab pegol: results from a single-blind randomized phase IV trial. J Rheumatol. 2014 Apr;41(4):648-57. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130945. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
PubMed 24584918
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 4, Randomized, Single-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity of Pneumococcal and Influenza Vaccines in Adult Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Certolizumab Pegol or Placebo
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00993668
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RA0017
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- influenza, vaccine, pneumococcal vaccine, certolizumab pegol, Cimzia
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 224 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UCB PharmaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2009
- Primary completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Jun 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this trial is to assess the affect of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) treatment on antibody response to T cell-independent and T cell-dependent immunizations using pneumococcal and influenza vaccines, respectively.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboPlacebo |
| Cimzia | Experimental | Biological: Certolizumab pegolCertolizumab pegol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects must be at least 18 years old at the screening visit
- Subjects must be able to understand the information provided to them and to give written informed consent, and be able and willing to comply with the study requirements
- Female subjects must be either postmenopausal for at least 1 year, surgically incapable of childbearing, or effectively practicing an acceptable method of contraception (either oral/parenteral/implantable hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine device or barrier and spermicide. Abstinence only is not an acceptable method. Subjects must agree to use adequate contraception during the study and for 10 weeks after the last dose of CZP. Male subjects must agree to ensure they or their female partner(s) use adequate contraception during the study and for 10 weeks after the subject receives their last dose of CZP
- Subjects must have a diagnosis of adult-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) of at least 6-months duration as defined by the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria
- Subjects must have active RA disease as defined by: ≥ 4 tender joints (28 joint count) at Screening and Week 0; and ≥ 4 swollen joints (28 joint count) at Screening and Week 0
Key exclusion criteria (27 listed)
- Subjects who have a diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis (eg., psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis)
- Subjects who have a history of an infected joint prosthesis at any time with that prosthesis still in situ
- Subjects must be free of defined prohibited medication and biological therapy
- Subjects who have received any experimental nonbiological therapy, within or outside of a clinical trial in the 3 months prior to Week 0
- Subjects who have received any experimental biological agent in the past 3 months or within 5 half-lives prior to Week 0 (whichever is longer)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PlaceboPlacebo - Two 0.9% saline subcutaneous (sc) injections at Week 0, Week 2, and Week 4 followed by two sc injections of Open-Label (OL) CZP 200 mg at Weeks 6, 8 and 10, then one sc injection of OL CZP 200 mg every two weeks from Week 12 until last drug administration (up to Week 32). | Other | Placebo |
| Certolizumab pegolAlso: Cimzia®Certolizumab pegol - Two 200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injections at Week 0, Week 2, and Week 4 followed by one sc injection of Open-Label (OL) CZP 200 mg from Week 6 until last drug administration (up to Week 32). | Biological | Cimzia |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Subjects Without Baseline Protective Titers Achieving a ≥ 2-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 3 of 6 Pneumococcal Antigens (6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F) at Week 6.
Time frame: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects Without Baseline Protective Titers Achieving a ≥ 4-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens (2009/2010 Composition) at Week 6.
Time frame: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
8 secondary outcomes
Percentage of All Subjects Achieving a ≥ 2-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 3 of 6 Pneumococcal Antigens (6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F) at Week 6.
Time frame: End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of All Subjects Achieving a ≥ 4-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens (2009/2010 Composition) at Week 6.
Time frame: End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects With no Previous Protective Pneumococcal Antibody Titers at Baseline With Protective Pneumococcal Antibody Titers (≥1.6 µg/ml in ≥ 3 of 6 of the Pneumococcal Antigens) at Week 6.
Time frame: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects With no Previous Protective Influenza Antibody Titers at Baseline With Protective Influenza Antibody Titers (≥1:40 in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens) at Week 6.
Time frame: Baseline, End of single blind period (week 6)
Percentage of All Subjects With Protective Pneumococcal Antibody Titers (≥1.6 µg/ml in ≥ 3 of 6 of the Pneumococcal Antigens) at Week 6.
Time frame: End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of All Subjects With Protective Influenza Antibody Titers (≥1:40 in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens) at Week 6.
Time frame: End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects Without Baseline Protective Titers Achieving a ≥ 2-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 3 of 6 Pneumococcal Antigens at Week 6 by Concomitant Methotrexate (MTX) Use.
Time frame: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects Without Baseline Protective Titers Achieving a ≥ 4-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens at Week 6 by Concomitant MTX Use.
Time frame: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Aug 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24584918Kivitz AJ, Schechtman J, Texter M, Fichtner A, de Longueville M, Chartash EK. Vaccine responses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with certolizumab pegol: results from a single-blind randomized phase IV trial. J Rheumatol. 2014 Apr;41(4):648-57. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130945. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
- FDA Safety Alerts and RecallsLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
UCB Clinical Trial Call Center study director
+1-877-822-9493 (UCB)
41 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Certolizumab pegol in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by UCB Pharma at 41 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 41 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Jun 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Subjects Without Baseline Protective Titers Achieving a ≥ 2-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 3 of 6 Pneumococcal Antigens (6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F) at Week 6. (time frame: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00993668, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2018.