AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary EmphysemaPhase 2/3NCT00995852

Unilateral Versus Bilateral Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction A Comparative Case Study

A Phase 2/3 study testing IBV Implantation in people with Pulmonary Emphysema, run by Heidelberg University at 1 site in Germany.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients with bilateral heterogeneous pulmonary emphysema benefit to differing degrees from unilateral ELVR with complete lobe closure in comparison with incomplete bilateral treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Emphysema
What is being tested?
IBV Implantation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Sep 2009to May 2011
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age > 40 inhomogeneous emphysema FEV1 between 20-40% DLCO between 20-40% 6MWT > 150 m

Who cannot join

  • pregnant homogeneous disease FEV1 < 20%

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Thoraxklinik Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, 69126

    Felix JF Herth, MD, +49 6221 396 ext. 1200, Felix.Herth@thoraxklinik-heidelberg.de

    Recruiting

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Unilateral vs. Bilateral IBV Placement

Patients with bilateral heterogeneous pulmonary emphysema benefit to differing degrees from unilateral ELVR with complete lobe closure in comparison with incomplete bilateral treatment.

Read the detailed description

Patient enrolment and data acquisition is to be carried out on a prospective basis. It is planned to enrol a total of 20 patients with bilateral heterogeneous pulmonary emphysema. All patients will undergo treatment at one study centre in Heidelberg. Patients will be considered for both unilateral and bilateral treatment with intrabronchial valves (IBV) on the basis of their emphysema distribution. Patients will be randomised to two treatment arms. 10 patients receive unilateral or bilateral treatment in each case.

Being tested
IBV Implantation
Keywords
Endoscopic lung volume reduction, emphysema, COPD, Patients with bilateral heterogeneous pulmonary emphysema
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Emphysema, Emphysema, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IBV ImplantationDevice

    Also called Spiration IBV

    In severe cases of COPD even optimum treatment involving bronchodilatation with drugs, physical training and possibly oxygen therapy is unable to influence exercise capacity and the perception of dyspnoea to a sufficient extent. Given the assumption that the elastic recoil of the small airways can be improved by a reduction in lung volume and pulmonary function overall by more ergonomic breathing mechanics and diaphragm function, various endoscopic procedures for lung volume reduction are available. Here one of the most advanced techniques is the implantation of intrabronchial valves. The one-way mechanism of this valve allows air to escape from the downstream lung segment without any influx of "new" air during inspiration

  • IBV ImplantationDevice

    Also called Spiration IBV

    In severe cases of COPD even optimum treatment involving bronchodilatation with drugs, physical training and possibly oxygen therapy is unable to influence exercise capacity and the perception of dyspnoea to a sufficient extent. Given the assumption that the elastic recoil of the small airways can be improved by a reduction in lung volume and pulmonary function overall by more ergonomic breathing mechanics and diaphragm function, various endoscopic procedures for lung volume reduction are available. Here one of the most advanced techniques is the implantation of intrabronchial valves. The one-way mechanism of this valve allows air to escape from the downstream lung segment without any influx of "new" air during inspiration

Study groups in NCT00995852
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
bilateralActive comparatorTreatment arm B - incomplete bilateral treatment of in total two lobes (contralateral). The study will only use Intrabronchial Valves™
Receives: Device: IBV Implantation
unilateralActive comparatorTreatment arm A - unilateral treatment with complete closure of the worst lobe of the lungs
Receives: Device: IBV Implantation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Improvement in pulmonary function (FEV1) 6-minute walking test

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Number of major complications(SAE)

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Evaluation of the IBV migration rate

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Average changes in quality of life (SGRQ)

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Average changes in pulmonary function (FEV1, IVC, RV, TLC, RV/TLC)

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Oct 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2009
  3. Primary completionMay 2011 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2011 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00995852
Sponsor's protocol ID
09 2009
Status last verified
Oct 2009
First submitted
14 Oct 2009
Last updated
27 Apr 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Venuta F, Rendina EA, Coloni GF. Endobronchial treatment of emphysema with one-way valves. Thorac Surg Clin. 2009 May;19(2):255-60, x. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2009.04.002.

    PubMed 19662969
  • Chan KM, Martinez FJ, Chang AC. Nonmedical therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009 Jan 15;6(1):137-45. doi: 10.1513/pats.200809-114GO.

    PubMed 19131539
  • Ingenito EP, Wood DE, Utz JP. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in severe emphysema. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008 May 1;5(4):454-60. doi: 10.1513/pats.200707-085ET.

    PubMed 18453355
  • Eberhardt R, Gompelmann D, Schuhmann M, Reinhardt H, Ernst A, Heussel CP, Herth FJF. Complete unilateral vs partial bilateral endoscopic lung volume reduction in patients with bilateral lung emphysema. Chest. 2012 Oct;142(4):900-908. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2886.

    PubMed 22459779

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing IBV Implantation in people with Pulmonary Emphysema, run by Heidelberg University at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Felix JF Herth, MD (+49 6221 396 ext. 1200, Felix.Herth@thoraxklinik-heidelberg.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Improvement in pulmonary function (FEV1) 6-minute walking test (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00995852, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2011.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in