Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4NCT00996203
A Study of Tocilizumab Added to DMARDs in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to DMARDs.
A Phase 4 study testing tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] and DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 28 sites in Russia.
Trial summary
This open-label single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab added to traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to DMARDs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] and DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 201 participants
- Where
- 28 sitesRussia
- Study dates
- 31 Oct 2009to 14 Feb 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis of >/=6 months duration
- inadequate clinical response to current non-biologic DMARDs
- current DMARDs must be at stable dose for 8 weeks prior to study entry
- oral corticosteroids (</=10mg/day prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs must be at stable dose for >/=4 weeks prior to screening
Who cannot join
- rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA
- history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA
- previous treatment with any biologic DMARD
- functional class IV as defined by the ACR classification
- intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to screening
Trial locations and contacts
28 sites in 1 country.
28 sites in 1 country
Russia28 sites
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital; Rheumatology
Chelyabinsk, 454076
Republican clinical hospital of Karachai-Cherkess; Rheumatologic Department
Cherkess, 369000
Irkutsk Regional Consulting and Diagnostic Clinical Center; Regional Center of Reumatolodic Deasise
Irkutsk, 664047
Republican Clinicodiagnostic Center
Izhevsk, 426009
Kaliningrad Regional Clinical Hospital; Rheumatologic Department
Kaliningrad, 236016
War Veterans Regional Clinical Hospital;Therapy Department
Kemerovo, 650099
Kirov Regional Clinical Hospital; Reumatology Department
Kirov, 610028
GUZ Regional clinical hospital # 1
Krasnodar, 350086
GMU Kursk regional clinical hospital
Kursk, 305007
FSBI "Scientific Research Institute of Rheumatology" of russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Moscow, 115522
FSBI "FSCC of particularized sorts of medical care and medical technologies of FMBA"
Moscow, 115682
FGU Central Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic Administration President RF
Moscow, 121359
Head Clinical Hospital of Internal Affair Ministry of Russia
Moscow, 123060
Vladimirskiy Regional Scientific Research Inst.
Moscow, 129110
SIH Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. Semashko
Nizhny Novgorod, 603126
Republican Hospital Named After V.A. Baranov
Petrozavodsk, 185019
Rostov State Medical University; Cardiorheumatology Department
Rostov-on-Don, 344022
Clinical hospital #1
Smolensk, 214001
Surgut Region Clinical Hospital
Surgut, 628408
Glpu Tjumen Regional Clinical Hospital #1
Tyumen, 625023
Republican clinical hospital named after G.G. Kuvatov
Ufa, 450005
State Institution of Healthcare Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Ulyanovsk, 432063
GUZ "Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital"; Cardioreumatological
Velikiy Novgorod, 173008
Budget Institution of Healthcare of Voronezh Region "Voronezh Regional Clinical Hospital #1"
Voronezh, 394066
Voronezh Regional Clinical Hospital #1
Voronezh, 394066
SHI Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Hospital
Yaroslavl, 150062
Municipal Autonomous Institution of Healthcare "City Clinical Hospital #40"
Yekaterinburg, 620102
Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital # 1; Rheumatology Dept
Yekaterinburg, 620102
About this study
Official title: Local Open-label Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Quality of Life in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to DMARDs When Adding Tocilizumab (TCZ)
This open-label single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab added to traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to DMARDs. Patients will receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 24 weeks, in addition to their current non-biologic DMARDs at stable doses. Anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks, and the target sample size is 200.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs)
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]Drug
8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks
DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs)Drug
stable doses at investigator's prescription
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]; Drug: DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score
HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0 (equals)=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3. Withdrawal Visit is the final visit prior to the withdrawal of the subject from the study.
Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 and Withdrawal Visit
Percentage of Participants With an HAQ Score Decrease of 20 Percent (%), 50%, and 70% During Tocilizumab Treatment
HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Change in HAQ Score at Week 24
HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Secondary outcomes (13)
Pain Score as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Participant's global assessment of pain was assessed using a 100-millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=pain absent and 100=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain.
Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score
EQ-5D questionnaire assess 5 domains of quality of life including mobility, self-care, habitual daily activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each of five domains was assessed by 3 levels depending on severity of a problem and scored using the following: 1=no disturbances, 2=moderate disturbances, 3=severe disturbances. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Change in EQ-5D Score at Week 24 From Baseline
EQ-5D questionnaire assess 5 domains of quality of life including mobility, self-care, habitual daily activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each of five domains was assessed by 3 levels depending on severity of a problem and scored using the following: 1=no disturbances, 2=moderate disturbances, 3=severe disturbances. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. Minimum clinically significant change in EQ-5D corresponds to the parameter differences before and after treatment = 0.10. Graduations of assessment of the therapy efficacy by EQ-5D are: Difference (Δ) EQ-5D less than (<)0.10 points: none; 0.10 less than or equal to (≤)Δ EQ-5D ≤0.24: minimal effect; 0.24≤ Δ EQ-5D <0.31: satisfactory effect; Δ EQ-5D greater than or equal to (≥)0.31 points: pronounced effect.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
General Health Score as Assessed by EQ-5D VAS
Participant-reported general health quality was assessed using an EQ-5D 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=worst health state and 100=the best health state. The participants were asked to mark the line that corresponded to assessment of general health quality.
Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response on Health Quality Assessment of EQ-5D
Participant-reported general health quality was assessed using an EQ-5D 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=worst health state and 100=the best health state. The participants were asked to mark the line that corresponded to assessment of general health quality. Positive response was defined as an increase of EQ-5D score by 0.1 or more i.e. it is a clinically significant increase.
Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Change in General Health Assessed by VAS
Participant-reported general health quality was assessed using an EQ-5D 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=worst health state and 100=the best health state. The participants were asked to mark the line that corresponded to assessment of general health quality.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.
Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Change in DAS28 Score From Baseline to Week 24
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Patients With Varied Disease Activity Assessed Using DAS28 During Tocilizumab Treatment
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR mm/hour, and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Disease activity: 0=remission (DAS28 less than [<] 2.6), I=low (DAS28 less than or equal to [≤]2.6 to <3.2), II=moderate (DAS28=3.2 to 5.1), III=high (DAS28 greater than [>]5.1).
Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR50), and 70% (ACR70) Response
ACR20/50/70 response: ≥20%, ≥50%, or ≥70% improvement, respectively, in swollen/tender joint count (66 joints assessed for swelling and 68 joints assessed for tenderness) and in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and acute phase response: C-reactive protein (CRP) or ESR.
Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28
The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as no effect, good effect, and moderate effect, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good effect: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 score ≤3.2; moderate effect: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 score 3.2 to 5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <1.2 with DAS28 score <3.2; no effect: change from baseline ≤0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 score >5.1.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
C-Reactive Protein
CRP (milligrams/Liter) is a mediator of inflammation, acute phase protein.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
ESR (mm/hr) is used to determine the acute phase response.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study start31 Oct 2009
- Primary completion14 Feb 2011
- Study completion14 Feb 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 201 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00996203
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML22665
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 29 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Local Open-label Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Quality of Life in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to DMARDs When Adding Tocilizumab (TCZ)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00996203
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML22665
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 201 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 31 Oct 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Feb 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Feb 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Jul 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This open-label single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab added to traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to DMARDs. Patients will receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 24 weeks, in addition to their current non-biologic DMARDs at stable doses. Anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks, and the target sample size is 200.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], Drug: DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis of >/=6 months duration
- inadequate clinical response to current non-biologic DMARDs
- current DMARDs must be at stable dose for 8 weeks prior to study entry
- oral corticosteroids (</=10mg/day prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs must be at stable dose for >/=4 weeks prior to screening
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA
- history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA
- previous treatment with any biologic DMARD
- functional class IV as defined by the ACR classification
- intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to screening
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks | Drug | 1 |
| DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs)stable doses at investigator's prescription | Drug | 1 |
Primary outcome
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 and Withdrawal Visit
HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0 (equals)=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3. Withdrawal Visit is the final visit prior to the withdrawal of the subject from the study.
Percentage of Participants With an HAQ Score Decrease of 20 Percent (%), 50%, and 70% During Tocilizumab Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3.
Change in HAQ Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3.
13 secondary outcomes
Pain Score as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Change in EQ-5D Score at Week 24 From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
General Health Score as Assessed by EQ-5D VAS
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response on Health Quality Assessment of EQ-5D
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Change in General Health Assessed by VAS
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Change in DAS28 Score From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Patients With Varied Disease Activity Assessed Using DAS28 During Tocilizumab Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR50), and 70% (ACR70) Response
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
C-Reactive Protein
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Mar 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
28 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] and DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 28 sites in Russia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 28 sites in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Jul 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score (time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 and Withdrawal Visit). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2018.