Peritoneal CarcinomatosisNCT00997633
Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) to Predict Peritoneal Chemotherapy
An observational study of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
SPECT was performed in 51 patients after cytoreductive surgery in combination with intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The detected volume was compared to the number of subsequent sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy courses that could be performed without further surgical intervention. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 74 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- How many people
- 51 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- May 1991to Aug 2004
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 74 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients who had undergone cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (SPIC) at the Dept of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital in the time period between May 1991 and August 2004.
Who may be able to join
- Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy
- Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) before the second course of treatment
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography for Prediction of Treatment Results in Sequential Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy at Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
SPECT was performed in 51 patients after cytoreductive surgery in combination with intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The detected volume was compared to the number of subsequent sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy courses that could be performed without further surgical intervention. SPECT data was found to predict feasibility of sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
- Conditions
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- Keywords
- Intraperitoneal volume, peritoneal carcinomatosis, cytoreductive surgery, SPECT, intraperitoneal chemotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Peritoneal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Peritoneal carcinomatosis | Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Detected volume measured by SPECT compared to the number of subsequent sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy courses
Secondary outcomes (1)
The relationship between SPECT, feasibility of SPIC (intraperitoneal chemotherapy), and clinical variables
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study startMay 1991
- Primary completionAug 2004
- Study completionAug 2004
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Peritoneal CarcinomatosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Uppsala University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Haile Mahteme, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Dept of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00997633
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SPECT IK1991:5
- Status last verified
- Oct 2009
- First submitted
- 16 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography for Prediction of Treatment Results in Sequential Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy at Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00997633
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPECT IK1991:5
- Conditions
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- Keywords
- Intraperitoneal volume, peritoneal carcinomatosis, cytoreductive surgery, SPECT, intraperitoneal chemotherapy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Uppsala UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 1991
- Primary completion
- Aug 2004 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2004 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
SPECT was performed in 51 patients after cytoreductive surgery in combination with intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The detected volume was compared to the number of subsequent sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy courses that could be performed without further surgical intervention. SPECT data was found to predict feasibility of sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Peritoneal carcinomatosis | – | –Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 74 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients who had undergone cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (SPIC) at the Dept of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital in the time period between May 1991 and August 2004.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy
- Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) before the second course of treatment
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Detected volume measured by SPECT compared to the number of subsequent sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy courses
1 secondary outcome
The relationship between SPECT, feasibility of SPIC (intraperitoneal chemotherapy), and clinical variables
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2009.
Related trials for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
RecruitingPhase 1
Individual Response to Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Peritoneal Mesothelioma or Atypical Mesothelial Proliferation or From Ovarian, Colorectal, or Appendiceal Histologies
Peritoneal Mesothelioma, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Combined Systemic and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Synchronous Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
Synchronous Gastric Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Gastroesophageal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Determining the Biodistribution of an Imaging Tracer (68Ga-FAPi-46) in Patients With Solid Tumors or Hematologic Cancers
Anal Carcinoma, Bladder Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of Mesothelin-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy in People With Esophagogastric Cancer or Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma
Mesothelin Positive, Mesothelin-Expressing Tumors
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Paclitaxel for the Treatment of Gastric or Gastroesophageal Cancer
Clinical Stage IV Gastric Cancer AJCC v8, Clinical Stage IV Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Haile Mahteme, MD PhD principal investigator
Dept of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Detected volume measured by SPECT compared to the number of subsequent sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy courses. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2009.