Performance of a Hospitalist-run WardNCT00997646
Performance of a Hospitalist-run Ward: a Prospective Observational Study
An observational study of Performance of a Hospitalist-run Ward, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
To realize performance of a new system - hospitalist-run ward in Taiwan. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Performance of a Hospitalist-run Ward
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- Oct 2009to Oct 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The patients who was admitted to a hospitalist-run ward
Who may be able to join
- age more than 18 years
- admitted from Emergency department
Who cannot join
- without informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 100
Chin--Chung Shu, MD, 886-0972653087
Chin-Chung Shu, MD
About this study
To realize performance of a new system - hospitalist-run ward in Taiwan.
Read the detailed description
The emergency department (ED) of National Taiwan University hospital manages a large amount of patients load in Taipei metropolitan. The short-stay unit in our ED is a pool for those needing observation or following management. However, the length of ED stay seems to be longer than those reported in western literature. It might be caused by limited facility availability of our ward. Actually, the bed vacancy of our ward is not only reserved for patients from ED but also for those from outpatients or other hospitals. A full ward for taking over the patients from ED only might be a solution in the future. However, internists and surgeons who care most of hospitalized patients are currently believed not a career priority because of their high risk and loading but relative low payment by National Health insurance in Taiwan. Under the deficiency of residents for patient-care, a system of hospitalist-run ward should be established.
The role of hospitalist, an in-patient physician, has been discussed since 1996. The pros and cons were debated controversially. The disadvantage is that the continuity of patient care will be interrupted by primary care physician. In addition, discharged summary are usually not completed in following clinic. On the other hand, the hospitalists need less cost than internists in recent studies but the quality and safety was considered similar. Actually, it is widely accepted that hospitalist can do an efficient job of handling inpatient admissions. The field has also continued to grow worldwide in recent decades. A hospitalist-run ward becomes more frequent for common but relatively low risk diseases including exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, ischemic stoke, cellulitis and congestive heart failure. Of course, some disease entities need longer length of hospital stay in nature.
We are thus interested in the efficiency of a hospitalist-run ward in Taiwan. Therefore, we set up a hospitalist-run ward for taking over the patients who needed hospitalization from our ED and observe the performance of the ward and the outcome of the in-patients.
- Conditions
- Performance of a Hospitalist-run Ward
- Keywords
- Performance, hospitalist, ward, hospitalization
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients in hospitalist-run ward | Patients was admitted from ER to a hospitalist-run ward. | |
| Patients in conventional ward | Patients was admitted from ER to a non hospitalist-run ward. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cost and quality of this hospitalization
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Mortality and morbidity of this hospitalization
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2009
- Primary completionOct 2011 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2011 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Performance of a Hospitalist-run WardStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00997646
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 200910008R
- Status last verified
- Oct 2009
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Performance of a Hospitalist-run Ward: a Prospective Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00997646
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 200910008R
- Conditions
- Performance of a Hospitalist-run Ward
- Keywords
- Performance, hospitalist, ward, hospitalization
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2009
- Primary completion
- Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2011 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To realize performance of a new system - hospitalist-run ward in Taiwan.
Detailed description
The emergency department (ED) of National Taiwan University hospital manages a large amount of patients load in Taipei metropolitan. The short-stay unit in our ED is a pool for those needing observation or following management. However, the length of ED stay seems to be longer than those reported in western literature. It might be caused by limited facility availability of our ward. Actually, the bed vacancy of our ward is not only reserved for patients from ED but also for those from outpatients or other hospitals. A full ward for taking over the patients from ED only might be a solution in the future. However, internists and surgeons who care most of hospitalized patients are currently believed not a career priority because of their high risk and loading but relative low payment by National Health insurance in Taiwan. Under the deficiency of residents for patient-care, a system of hospitalist-run ward should be established.
The role of hospitalist, an in-patient physician, has been discussed since 1996. The pros and cons were debated controversially. The disadvantage is that the continuity of patient care will be interrupted by primary care physician. In addition, discharged summary are usually not completed in following clinic. On the other hand, the hospitalists need less cost than internists in recent studies but the quality and safety was considered similar. Actually, it is widely accepted that hospitalist can do an efficient job of handling inpatient admissions. The field has also continued to grow worldwide in recent decades. A hospitalist-run ward becomes more frequent for common but relatively low risk diseases including exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, ischemic stoke, cellulitis and congestive heart failure. Of course, some disease entities need longer length of hospital stay in nature.
We are thus interested in the efficiency of a hospitalist-run ward in Taiwan. Therefore, we set up a hospitalist-run ward for taking over the patients who needed hospitalization from our ED and observe the performance of the ward and the outcome of the in-patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients in hospitalist-run ward | – | –Patients was admitted from ER to a hospitalist-run ward. |
| Patients in conventional ward | – | –Patients was admitted from ER to a non hospitalist-run ward. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The patients who was admitted to a hospitalist-run ward
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- age more than 18 years
- admitted from Emergency department
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- without informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Cost and quality of this hospitalization
Time frame: 2 years
1 secondary outcome
Mortality and morbidity of this hospitalization
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2009.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Performance of a Hospitalist-run Ward, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Chin-Chung Shu, MD (8860972653087, stree139@yahoo.com.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cost and quality of this hospitalization (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2009.