AzTrials
AzTrials

Performance of a Hospitalist-run WardNCT00997646

Performance of a Hospitalist-run Ward: a Prospective Observational Study

An observational study of Performance of a Hospitalist-run Ward, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To realize performance of a new system - hospitalist-run ward in Taiwan. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Performance of a Hospitalist-run Ward
How many people
500 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
Oct 2009to Oct 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The patients who was admitted to a hospitalist-run ward

Who may be able to join

  • age more than 18 years
  • admitted from Emergency department

Who cannot join

  • without informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Chin-Chung Shu, MD contact

8860972653087

stree139@yahoo.com.tw

Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 100

    Chin--Chung Shu, MD, 886-0972653087

    Chin-Chung Shu, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

To realize performance of a new system - hospitalist-run ward in Taiwan.

Read the detailed description

The emergency department (ED) of National Taiwan University hospital manages a large amount of patients load in Taipei metropolitan. The short-stay unit in our ED is a pool for those needing observation or following management. However, the length of ED stay seems to be longer than those reported in western literature. It might be caused by limited facility availability of our ward. Actually, the bed vacancy of our ward is not only reserved for patients from ED but also for those from outpatients or other hospitals. A full ward for taking over the patients from ED only might be a solution in the future. However, internists and surgeons who care most of hospitalized patients are currently believed not a career priority because of their high risk and loading but relative low payment by National Health insurance in Taiwan. Under the deficiency of residents for patient-care, a system of hospitalist-run ward should be established.

The role of hospitalist, an in-patient physician, has been discussed since 1996. The pros and cons were debated controversially. The disadvantage is that the continuity of patient care will be interrupted by primary care physician. In addition, discharged summary are usually not completed in following clinic. On the other hand, the hospitalists need less cost than internists in recent studies but the quality and safety was considered similar. Actually, it is widely accepted that hospitalist can do an efficient job of handling inpatient admissions. The field has also continued to grow worldwide in recent decades. A hospitalist-run ward becomes more frequent for common but relatively low risk diseases including exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, ischemic stoke, cellulitis and congestive heart failure. Of course, some disease entities need longer length of hospital stay in nature.

We are thus interested in the efficiency of a hospitalist-run ward in Taiwan. Therefore, we set up a hospitalist-run ward for taking over the patients who needed hospitalization from our ED and observe the performance of the ward and the outcome of the in-patients.

Keywords
Performance, hospitalist, ward, hospitalization

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00997646
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients in hospitalist-run wardPatients was admitted from ER to a hospitalist-run ward.
Patients in conventional wardPatients was admitted from ER to a non hospitalist-run ward.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cost and quality of this hospitalization

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Mortality and morbidity of this hospitalization

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Oct 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2009
  3. Primary completionOct 2011 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2011 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00997646
Sponsor's protocol ID
200910008R
Status last verified
Oct 2009
First submitted
15 Oct 2009
Last updated
19 Oct 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Performance of a Hospitalist-run Ward, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Chin-Chung Shu, MD (8860972653087, stree139@yahoo.com.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cost and quality of this hospitalization (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in