AzTrials
AzTrials

MalnutritionNCT00998517

Effectiveness Comparison of Three Supplementary Foods in the Treatment of Moderate Acute Malnutrition

A study testing Soy/peanut fortified spread, Milk fortified corn/soy blend and Supplementary Plumpy® in people with Malnutrition, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in Malawi.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the recovery rates of moderately malnourished Malawian children treated with either milk-enriched corn/soy blend, soy/peanut fortified spread or a commercially produced ready-to-use therapy food. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 59 months
Conditions the study is for
Malnutrition
What is being tested?
Soy/peanut fortified spread, Milk fortified corn/soy blend and Supplementary Plumpy®
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,712 participants
Where
1 siteMalawi
Study dates
Oct 2009to Feb 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 59 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • WHZ <-2 but >-3 without bilateral pedal edema
  • Reside within 7 kilometers of study site.

Who cannot join

  • Not permanent resident in vicinity of study site.
  • Severe chronic illness such as cerebral palsy.
  • History of peanut allergy or anaphylaxis resulting from any food.
  • Receiving other supplementary food or participating in other research.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Malawi1 site
  • University of Malawi College of Medicine

    Blantyre, 03

Other trials in Malawi

About this study

Official title: Comparison of a Novel Fortified Blended Flour to Ready-to-use Supplemental Foods for the Treatment of Moderate Acute Malnutrition in Rural Malawian Children: a Randomized, Investigator-blinded, Clinical Effectiveness Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the recovery rates of moderately malnourished Malawian children treated with either milk-enriched corn/soy blend, soy/peanut fortified spread or a commercially produced ready-to-use therapy food.

Conditions
Malnutrition
Being tested
Soy/peanut fortified spread, Milk fortified corn/soy blend, Supplementary Plumpy®
Keywords
Malnutrition, Supplemental Food, CSB++, Supplementary Plumpy
Medical subject headings
Malnutrition

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Soy/peanut fortified spreadDietary supplement

    75kcal/kg/day

  • Milk fortified corn/soy blendDietary supplement

    75 kcal/kg/day

  • Supplementary Plumpy®Dietary supplement

    75 kcal/kg/day

Study groups in NCT00998517
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Soy/peanut fortified spreadActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Soy/peanut fortified spread
Milk fortified corn/soy blendExperimentalNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Milk fortified corn/soy blend
Supplementary Plumpy®Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Supplementary Plumpy®

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Nutritional Recovery

    Recovery is defined by weight for height Z (WHZ) score of -2 or greater using enrollment length.

    WHZ will be computed using standard WHO growth standards: http://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/en/

    Measured: 12 weeks or upon completion of recovery

  2. Number of Patients With Absence of Bilateral Pedal Pitting Edema

    Measured: 12 weeks or recovery

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Rate of Weight Gain

    This rate will be measured up to the 2nd followup visit (4 weeks) or up to the 1st followup visit (2 weeks) if the child recovered after only 2 weeks

    Measured: 4 weeks

  2. Number of Patients With Adverse Outcomes

    This includes children with allergic or other adverse reactions that could be attributed to their assigned intervention food.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Number of Patients With Fever, Cough, and Diarrhea During the First Two Weeks of Treatment

    Measured: 2 weeks

  4. Remain Well-nourished Through 12 Months Following Successful Treatment for Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM)

    Children who were successfully treated for MAM in the primary portion of the study were followed prospectively with scheduled follow-up visits for 12 months to evaluate whether they remained well-nourished, defined as mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) >= 12.5 cm or weight-for-height Z-score >= -2 throughout the duration of follow-up.

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Rates of Gain in Mid-upper Arm Circumference, and Length

    These rates will be measured up to the 2nd followup visit (4 weeks) or up to the 1st followup visit (2 weeks) if the child recovered after only 2 weeks

    Measured: 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Oct 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2009
  3. Primary completionFeb 2011
  4. Study completionFeb 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
2,712 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00998517
Sponsor's protocol ID
SOYA2009
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
19 Oct 2009
Last updated
12 May 2014

Publications

  • Trehan I, Banerjee S, Murray E, Ryan KN, Thakwalakwa C, Maleta KM, Manary MJ. Extending supplementary feeding for children younger than 5 years with moderate acute malnutrition leads to lower relapse rates. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 Apr;60(4):544-9. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000639.

    PubMed 25419681
  • Chang CY, Trehan I, Wang RJ, Thakwalakwa C, Maleta K, Deitchler M, Manary MJ. Children successfully treated for moderate acute malnutrition remain at risk for malnutrition and death in the subsequent year after recovery. J Nutr. 2013 Feb;143(2):215-20. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.168047. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

    PubMed 23256140
  • LaGrone LN, Trehan I, Meuli GJ, Wang RJ, Thakwalakwa C, Maleta K, Manary MJ. A novel fortified blended flour, corn-soy blend "plus-plus," is not inferior to lipid-based ready-to-use supplementary foods for the treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in Malawian children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Jan;95(1):212-9. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.022525. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

    PubMed 22170366

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Soy/peanut fortified spread, Milk fortified corn/soy blend and Supplementary Plumpy® in people with Malnutrition, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in Malawi.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Malawi. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Nutritional Recovery (time frame: 12 weeks or upon completion of recovery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00998517, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in