Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingPhase 3NCT00999089
Arrested Versus Beating Heart Techniques in Coronary Revascularisation
A Phase 3 study testing Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass and Pump-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass in people with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, run by Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg at 2 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The individual contribution of the specific injuring mechanisms surgical trauma, extracorporeal circulation, and ischemia/reperfusion to clinical outcome in coronary revascularisation remains to be elucidated. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
- What is being tested?
- Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass and Pump-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 616 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Jan 2003to Sep 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients with double- or triple-vessel coronary artery disease
- patients with left ventricular ejection fraction =< 40% or >= 60%
- elective or urgent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting
Who cannot join
- previous cardiac surgery
- emergency indications
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Germany2 sites
Heart Center Coswig, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery
Coswig, 06869
Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Halle, 06120
About this study
Official title: Arrested Versus Beating Heart Techniques in Coronary Revascularisation: Randomized Clinical Trial in Unselected Patients
The individual contribution of the specific injuring mechanisms surgical trauma, extracorporeal circulation, and ischemia/reperfusion to clinical outcome in coronary revascularisation remains to be elucidated. The effect of these factors is analyzed in this randomized clinical trial by comparing the 3 surgical approaches: Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CCAB), with extracorporeal circulation and cardioplegic arrest; Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (OPCAB), avoids extracorporeal circulation and global myocardial ischemia; and Pump-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (PACAB), with an unloaded and beating heart. The hypothesis addressed by the study is that the surgical invasiveness increases in the order: OPCAB, PACAB, CCAB.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
- Being tested
- Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass, Pump-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass
- Keywords
- Coronary disease, Coronary artery bypass grafting, Cardiopulmonary bypass, Extracorporeal circulation, Cardioplegia, Off pump
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conventional Coronary Artery BypassProcedure or surgery
Coronary artery bypass grafting with extracorporeal circulation and cardioplegic arrest
Off-Pump Coronary Artery BypassProcedure or surgery
Coronary artery bypass grafting without extracorporeal circulation or global myocardial ischemia
Pump-Assisted Coronary Artery BypassProcedure or surgery
Coronary artery bypass grafting with a beating but unloaded heart by using extracorporeal circulation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CCAB | Active comparator | Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Receives: Procedure: Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass |
| OPCAB | Active comparator | Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Receives: Procedure: Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass |
| PACAB | Active comparator | Pump-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Receives: Procedure: Pump-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
All cause mortality
Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24, 48 month
Myocardial infarction
Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24, 48 month
Stroke
Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24, 48 month
Low-output syndrome
Measured: in hospital
duration of ventilation >= 24h
Measured: in hospital
New requirement of hemodialysis
Measured: in hospital
Secondary outcomes (3)
Completeness of revascularization
Measured: in hospital
Re-revascularization of the target vessel (PCI and/or CABG)
Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24, 48 month
Resource use (operative time, duration of stay in the intensive care unit, total hospital stay)
Measured: in hospital
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2003
- Primary completionSep 2006
- Study completionSep 2010 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 616 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medtronic
- Investigators
- Jochen Boergermann, MD, Principal investigator, Martin-Luther-University Halle-WittenbergRolf E Silber, MD, Study chair, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00999089
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3CAB-STUDY
- Status last verified
- Oct 2009
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 21 Oct 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Oct 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Arrested Versus Beating Heart Techniques in Coronary Revascularisation: Randomized Clinical Trial in Unselected Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00999089
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 3CAB-STUDY
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
- Keywords
- Coronary disease, Coronary artery bypass grafting, Cardiopulmonary bypass, Extracorporeal circulation, Cardioplegia, Off pump
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 616 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-WittenbergUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medtronic
- Study start
- Jan 2003
- Primary completion
- Sep 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2010 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The individual contribution of the specific injuring mechanisms surgical trauma, extracorporeal circulation, and ischemia/reperfusion to clinical outcome in coronary revascularisation remains to be elucidated. The effect of these factors is analyzed in this randomized clinical trial by comparing the 3 surgical approaches: Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CCAB), with extracorporeal circulation and cardioplegic arrest; Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (OPCAB), avoids extracorporeal circulation and global myocardial ischemia; and Pump-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (PACAB), with an unloaded and beating heart. The hypothesis addressed by the study is that the surgical invasiveness increases in the order: OPCAB, PACAB, CCAB.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CCAB | Active comparator | Procedure: Conventional Coronary Artery BypassConventional Coronary Artery Bypass |
| OPCAB | Active comparator | Procedure: Off-Pump Coronary Artery BypassOff-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass |
| PACAB | Active comparator | Procedure: Pump-Assisted Coronary Artery BypassPump-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients with double- or triple-vessel coronary artery disease
- patients with left ventricular ejection fraction =< 40% or >= 60%
- elective or urgent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- previous cardiac surgery
- emergency indications
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Coronary Artery BypassCoronary artery bypass grafting with extracorporeal circulation and cardioplegic arrest | Procedure or surgery | CCAB |
| Off-Pump Coronary Artery BypassCoronary artery bypass grafting without extracorporeal circulation or global myocardial ischemia | Procedure or surgery | OPCAB |
| Pump-Assisted Coronary Artery BypassCoronary artery bypass grafting with a beating but unloaded heart by using extracorporeal circulation | Procedure or surgery | PACAB |
Primary outcome
All cause mortality
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24, 48 month
Myocardial infarction
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24, 48 month
Stroke
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24, 48 month
Low-output syndrome
Time frame: in hospital
duration of ventilation >= 24h
Time frame: in hospital
New requirement of hemodialysis
Time frame: in hospital
3 secondary outcomes
Completeness of revascularization
Time frame: in hospital
Re-revascularization of the target vessel (PCI and/or CABG)
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24, 48 month
Resource use (operative time, duration of stay in the intensive care unit, total hospital stay)
Time frame: in hospital
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Oct 2009.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Recruiting
CCTA-Based vs CAG-Based CABG: A Multicenter Pragmatic Non-Inferiority Trial
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Recruiting
Fasciotomy and Predilation for Radial Artery Grafts in CABG
Coronary Artery Bypass, Radial Artery Grafts
RecruitingPhase 3
Comparing High and lOw-dose asPirin With Dual anTIplatelet Therapy for Three Months Using prasUgrel and aSpirin Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. (OPTIMUS-CABG Trial)
Chronic Coronary Syndrome, Stable Coronary Artery Disease CAD
Enrolling by invitation
Feasibility of Physical Prehabilitation for High-Risk Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Via Sternotomy
Prehabilitation, Cardiac Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jochen Boergermann, MD principal investigator
Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg
Rolf E Silber, MD study chair
Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass and Pump-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass in people with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, run by Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg at 2 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
All cause mortality (time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24, 48 month). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2009.