Metastatic Colorectal CancerPhase 3NCT01001377
ASPECCT: A Study of Panitumumab Efficacy and Safety Compared to Cetuximab in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Cetuximab and Panitumumab in people with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, run by Amgen at 152 sites in 29 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of panitumumab versus cetuximab on overall survival (OS) for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) among patients with wild-type Kirsten rat Sarcoma-2 virus (KRAS) tumors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Cetuximab and Panitumumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,010 participants
- Where
- 152 sitesin 29 countries
- Study dates
- 2 Feb 2010to 7 Mar 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum, metastatic disease
- Wild-type KRAS tumor status
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1 or 2
- Must have failed a prior regimen containing irinotecan for metastatic disease and a prior regimen containing oxaliplatin for metastatic disease
- Must have previously received a thymidylate synthase inhibitor (eg, fluorouracil, capecitabine, raltitrexed, or fluorouracil-uracil) at any point for treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC)
- Adequate hematologic, renal, hepatic and metabolic function
Who cannot join
- Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment
- Prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibody therapy (eg, panitumumab or cetuximab) or treatment with small molecule EGFr inhibitors (eg, gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib)
- Antitumor therapy (eg, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy, antibody therapy, radiotherapy), or investigational agent or therapy ≤ 30 days before randomization.
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease
- Active infection requiring systemic treatment or any uncontrolled infection ≤14 days prior to randomization
Trial locations and contacts
152 sites in 29 countries.
152 sites in 29 countries
China21 sites
Research Site
Beijing, 100021
Research Site
Beijing, 100071
Research Site
Beijing, 100142
Research Site
Changchun, Jilin, 130012
Research Site
Changsha, Hunan, 410013
Research Site
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041
Research Site
Chongqing, Sichuan, 400038
Research Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060
Research Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180
Research Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510280
Research Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 515515
Research Site
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009
Research Site
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310016
Research Site
Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150040
Research Site
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002
Research Site
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200092
Research Site
Shanghai, 200003
Research Site
Shanghai, 200032
Research Site
Shanghai, 200080
Research Site
Tianjin, 300060
Research Site
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061
Australia11 sites
Research Site
Ballarat, Victoria, 3350
Research Site
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Research Site
Epping, Victoria, 3076
Research Site
Footscray, Victoria, 3011
Research Site
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
Research Site
Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170
Research Site
Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Research Site
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065
Research Site
Wahroonga, New South Wales, 2076
Research Site
Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500
Research Site
Woodville South, South Australia, 5011
India11 sites
Research Site
Ahilyanagar, Maharashtra, 413 736
Research Site
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 018
Research Site
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 024
Research Site
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 034
Research Site
Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302 013
Research Site
Kochi, Kerala, 682 304
Research Site
Kolkata, West Bengal, 700 016
Research Site
Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440 012
Research Site
Nashik, Maharashtra, 422 004
Research Site
Nashik, Maharashtra, 422 005
Research Site
Pune, Maharashtra, 411 004
United Kingdom11 sites
Research Site
Belfast, BT9 7AB
Research Site
Bristol, BS2 8ED
Research Site
Cardiff, CF14 2TL
Research Site
Guildford, GU2 7XX
Research Site
Leicester, LE1 5WW
Research Site
London, SW17 0QT
Research Site
Maidstone, ME16 9QQ
Research Site
Manchester, M20 4BX
Research Site
Oxford, OX3 7LJ
Research Site
Sutton, SM2 5PT
Research Site
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP
Italy10 sites
Research Site
Ancona, 60131
Research Site
Cesena, 47023
Research Site
Cremona, 26100
Research Site
Faenza RA, 48018
Research Site
Genova, 16132
Research Site
Lugo, 48022
Research Site
Meldola FC, 47014
Research Site
Ravenna, 48100
Research Site
Rimini, 47900
Research Site
Torino, 10126
Poland8 sites
Research Site
Elblag, 82-300
Research Site
Gdansk, 80-219
Research Site
Jelenia Góra, 58-506
Research Site
Poznan, 61-485
Research Site
Szczecin, 71-730
Research Site
Warsaw, 02-097
Research Site
Warsaw, 02-507
Research Site
Warsaw, 02-781
Czechia6 sites
Research Site
Hořovice, 268 31
Research Site
Nová Ves pod Pleší, 262 04
Research Site
Olomouc, 775 20
Research Site
Prague, 100 34
Research Site
Příbram, 261 01
Research Site
Znojmo, 669 02
South Korea6 sites
Research Site
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 410-769
Research Site
Seoul, 110-744
Research Site
Seoul, 120-752
Research Site
Seoul, 135-710
Research Site
Seoul, 136-705
Research Site
Seoul, 138-736
Sweden6 sites
Research Site
Gothenburg, 416 85
Research Site
Linköping, 581 85
Research Site
Lund, 221 85
Research Site
Uppsala, 751 85
Research Site
Västerås, 721 89
Research Site
Vaxjo, 351 85
United States5 sites
Research Site
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33426
Research Site
Ogden, Utah, 84403
Research Site
Stockton, California, 95204
Research Site
Temple, Texas, 76508
Research Site
Wichita, Kansas, 67214
France5 sites
Research Site
Besançon, 25030
Research Site
Montbéliard, 25200
Research Site
Saint-Brieuc, 22015
Research Site
Saint-Herblain, 44800
Research Site
Villejuif, 94805
Israel5 sites
Research Site
Beersheba, 64239
Research Site
Jerusalem, 91031
Research Site
Kfar Saba, 44281
Research Site
Ramat Gan, 52621
Research Site
Rehovot, 76100
Russia5 sites
Research Site
Moscow, 115478
Research Site
Moscow, 117997
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 197022
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 197758
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 198255
South Africa5 sites
Research Site
Groenkloof, Gauteng, 0181
Research Site
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2199
Research Site
Johannesburg, 2193
Research Site
Kraaifontein, Western Cape, 7570
Research Site
Port Elizabeth, 6045
Taiwan5 sites
Research Site
Keelung, 20401
Research Site
Putzu City, Chiayi, 61363
Research Site
Tainan, 70403
Research Site
Taipei, 11031
Research Site
Taoyuan, 33305
Malaysia4 sites
Research Site
Kota Bharu, Kelantan, 16150
Research Site
Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, 88996
Research Site
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 56000
Research Site
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 59100
Latvia3 sites
Research Site
Daugavpils, 5417
Research Site
Riga, 1002
Research Site
Riga, 1079
Peru3 sites
Research Site
Lima, 13
Research Site
Lima, 34
Research Site
Lima, Lima 27
Philippines3 sites
Research Site
Cebu City, 6000
Research Site
Manila, 1000
Research Site
Quezon City, 1102
Slovakia3 sites
Research Site
Bardejov, 085 01
Research Site
Bratislava, 831 01
Research Site
Nitra, 950 01
Canada2 sites
Research Site
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Research Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9
Singapore2 sites
Research Site
Singapore, 119228
Research Site
Singapore, 308433
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Panitumumab and Cetuximab in Subjects With Previously Treated, Wild-type KRAS, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of panitumumab versus cetuximab on overall survival (OS) for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) among patients with wild-type Kirsten rat Sarcoma-2 virus (KRAS) tumors.
- Conditions
- Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Cetuximab, Panitumumab
- Keywords
- Panitumumab, Vectibix, Colon Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Rectal Cancer, Cetuximab, Erbitux, Metastatic
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms, Rectal Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CetuximabDrug
Also called Erbitux
Administered by intravenous infusion
PanitumumabDrug
Also called Vectibix
Administered by intravenous infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cetuximab | Active comparator | Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2 as an initial dose, followed by 250 mg/m^2 intravenously (IV) every 7 days.
Participants were treated until disease progression, intolerability, withdrawal of consent, or death. Receives: Drug: Cetuximab |
| Panitumumab | Experimental | Panitumumab 6 mg/kg IV every 14 days. Participants were treated until disease progression, intolerability, withdrawal of consent, or death. Receives: Drug: Panitumumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival
Overall survival is the time from the date of randomization until the date of death. Participants who had not died by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last contact date.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (11)
Progression-free Survival
Progression free survival (PFS) is the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression per the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death. Participants alive and not meeting criteria for progression by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.
Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study based on all target lesions recorded since the treatment started (the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm), or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or any new lesions.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Objective Response
Objective response is either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1. All participants that did not meet the criteria for an objective response by the analysis cut-off date were considered non-responders. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm, and disappearance of all non-target lesions, and no new lesions. PR: Disappearance of all target lesions, persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease, or, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions with no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and no new lesions.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Duration of Response
Duration of response (DOR), calculated only for those participants with an objective response, is the time from first objective response to disease progression per the RECIST v1.1 or death. Participants not meeting criteria for progression or who died by the analysis data cutoff date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Time to Response
Time to response (TTR), calculated for those participants with an objective response, is defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of first objective response.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Time to Treatment Failure
Time to treatment failure (TTF) is the time from randomization date to date that the decision was made to end the treatment period for any reason; participants who remained in the treatment period at the time of analysis were censored at the date of the last on-study assessment.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Change From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index Score
The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a generic measure of health outcome. The health state index measures the following 5 health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension contains 3 levels of response to reflect degree of problems participants have experienced: no problem (1), some problem (2) and extreme problems (3). The health states for each respondent are converted into a single index number using a specified set of weights. Resulting scores can range from 1.0 and -0.594. A higher score indicates a more preferred health status with 1.0 representing perfect health and 0 representing death. Negative scores are possible and represent health states regarded as less preferable than death (0). Repeated measures mixed model includes treatment, geographic region, ECOG score, assessment week, and treatment by assessment week interaction as fixed effects, and participants a random effect.
Measured: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
Change From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a generic measure of health outcome. The VAS asks respondents to rate their present health status on a 0 - 100 scale, with 0 labeled as "Worst imaginable health state" and 100 labeled as "Best imaginable health state." The VAS score is determined by observing the point at which the participant's hand drawn line intersects the scale.
Measured: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colorectal Symptom Index (NCCN FCSI ) Symptoms Score
The FCSI consists of 9 questions comprising the most important symptoms associated with colorectal cancer, including energy, pain, weight, diarrhea, nausea, swelling or cramps in the stomach area, appetite, ability to enjoy life, and overall quality of life. The 9 questions are combined in three algorithms to provide information for 3 domains: colorectal cancer symptoms, physical well-being, and functional well-being. Each of the 9 items are scored from "0" to "4" representing "Not at All" through to "Very Much True". The raw score for all items is transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the average for each of the 3 subscales is calculated; high scores illustrate an improved state (e.g. able to enjoy life more).
Measured: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
Change From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Physical Well-being Scale Score
The FCSI consists of 9 questions comprising the most important symptoms associated with colorectal cancer, including energy, pain, weight, diarrhea, nausea, swelling or cramps in the stomach area, appetite, ability to enjoy life, and overall quality of life. The 9 questions are combined in three algorithms to provide information for 3 domains: colorectal cancer symptoms, physical well-being, and functional well-being. Each of the 9 items are scored from "0" to "4" representing "Not at All" through to "Very Much True". The raw score for all items is transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the average for each of the 3 subscales is calculated; high scores illustrate an improved state (e.g. able to enjoy life more).
Measured: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
Change From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Functional Well-being Scale Score
The FCSI consists of 9 questions comprising the most important symptoms associated with colorectal cancer, including energy, pain, weight, diarrhea, nausea, swelling or cramps in the stomach area, appetite, ability to enjoy life, and overall quality of life. The 9 questions are combined in three algorithms to provide information for 3 domains: colorectal cancer symptoms, physical well-being, and functional well-being. Each of the 9 items are scored from "0" to "4" representing "Not at All" through to "Very Much True". The raw score for all items is transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the average for each of the 3 subscales is calculated; high scores illustrate an improved state (e.g. able to enjoy life more).
Measured: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Serious adverse events include any event that is fatal, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other significant medical hazard. Treatment-related AEs are those the investigator considered as a reasonable possibility to have been caused by study drug.
Measured: From the day of the first dose of study therapy through 30 days since the last dose. Maximum time on study treatment was 130 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study start2 Feb 2010
- Primary completion5 Feb 2013
- Study completion7 Mar 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Metastatic Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,010 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01001377
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20080763
- Other IDs
- ASPECCT, 2009-010715-32, 2009
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 22 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Price T, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, Suresh AS, Thomas A, Tjulandin S, Guan X, Peeters M. Final results and outcomes by prior bevacizumab exposure, skin toxicity, and hypomagnesaemia from ASPECCT: randomized phase 3 non-inferiority study of panitumumab versus cetuximab in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Nov;68:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
PubMed 27716478Price TJ, Peeters M, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, Suresh AS, Thomas A, Tjulandin S, Zhang K, Murugappan S, Sidhu R. Panitumumab versus cetuximab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (ASPECCT): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014 May;15(6):569-79. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70118-4. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
PubMed 24739896Kim TW, Peeters M, Thomas A, Gibbs P, Hool K, Zhang J, Ang AL, Bach BA, Price T. Impact of Emergent Circulating Tumor DNA RAS Mutation in Panitumumab-Treated Chemoresistant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Nov 15;24(22):5602-5609. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3377. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
PubMed 29898991Peeters M, Price T, Boedigheimer M, Kim TW, Ruff P, Gibbs P, Thomas A, Demonty G, Hool K, Ang A. Evaluation of Emergent Mutations in Circulating Cell-Free DNA and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Panitumumab in the ASPECCT Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Feb 15;25(4):1216-1225. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2072. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
PubMed 30487126Price T, Ang A, Boedigheimer M, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, Satya Suresh A, Thomas A, Tjulandin S, Peeters M. Frequency of S492R mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor: analysis of plasma DNA from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab or cetuximab monotherapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2020 Oct 2;21(10):891-898. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2020.1798695. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
PubMed 33026965Taniguchi H, Yamanaka T, Sakai D, Muro K, Yamazaki K, Nakata S, Kimura H, Ruff P, Kim TW, Peeters M, Price T. Efficacy of Panitumumab and Cetuximab in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Previously Treated with Bevacizumab; a Combined Analysis of Individual Patient Data from ASPECCT and WJOG6510G. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 28;12(7):1715. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071715.
PubMed 32605298Graham CN, Maglinte GA, Schwartzberg LS, Price TJ, Knox HN, Hechmati G, Hjelmgren J, Barber B, Fakih MG. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy. Clin Ther. 2016 Jun;38(6):1376-1391. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.023. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
PubMed 27085587
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Panitumumab and Cetuximab in Subjects With Previously Treated, Wild-type KRAS, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01001377
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20080763
- Conditions
- Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- Keywords
- Panitumumab, Vectibix, Colon Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Rectal Cancer, Cetuximab, Erbitux, Metastatic
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,010 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 2 Feb 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Feb 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Mar 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Mar 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of panitumumab versus cetuximab on overall survival (OS) for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) among patients with wild-type Kirsten rat Sarcoma-2 virus (KRAS) tumors.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cetuximab | Active comparator | Drug: CetuximabCetuximab 400 mg/m^2 as an initial dose, followed by 250 mg/m^2 intravenously (IV) every 7 days. Participants were treated until disease progression, intolerability, withdrawal of consent, or death. |
| Panitumumab | Experimental | Drug: PanitumumabPanitumumab 6 mg/kg IV every 14 days. Participants were treated until disease progression, intolerability, withdrawal of consent, or death. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum, metastatic disease
- Wild-type KRAS tumor status
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1 or 2
- Must have failed a prior regimen containing irinotecan for metastatic disease and a prior regimen containing oxaliplatin for metastatic disease
- Must have previously received a thymidylate synthase inhibitor (eg, fluorouracil, capecitabine, raltitrexed, or fluorouracil-uracil) at any point for treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment
- Prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibody therapy (eg, panitumumab or cetuximab) or treatment with small molecule EGFr inhibitors (eg, gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib)
- Antitumor therapy (eg, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy, antibody therapy, radiotherapy), or investigational agent or therapy ≤ 30 days before randomization.
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease
- Active infection requiring systemic treatment or any uncontrolled infection ≤14 days prior to randomization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CetuximabAlso: ErbituxAdministered by intravenous infusion | Drug | Cetuximab |
| PanitumumabAlso: VectibixAdministered by intravenous infusion | Drug | Panitumumab |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Overall survival is the time from the date of randomization until the date of death. Participants who had not died by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last contact date.
11 secondary outcomes
Progression-free Survival
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Objective Response
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Duration of Response
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Time to Response
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Time to Treatment Failure
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Change From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index Score
Time frame: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
Change From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colorectal Symptom Index (NCCN FCSI ) Symptoms Score
Time frame: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
Change From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Physical Well-being Scale Score
Time frame: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
Change From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Functional Well-being Scale Score
Time frame: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: From the day of the first dose of study therapy through 30 days since the last dose. Maximum time on study treatment was 130 weeks.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 27716478Price T, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, Suresh AS, Thomas A, Tjulandin S, Guan X, Peeters M. Final results and outcomes by prior bevacizumab exposure, skin toxicity, and hypomagnesaemia from ASPECCT: randomized phase 3 non-inferiority study of panitumumab versus cetuximab in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Nov;68:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
- Background: PubMed 24739896Price TJ, Peeters M, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, Suresh AS, Thomas A, Tjulandin S, Zhang K, Murugappan S, Sidhu R. Panitumumab versus cetuximab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (ASPECCT): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014 May;15(6):569-79. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70118-4. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
- Background: PubMed 29898991Kim TW, Peeters M, Thomas A, Gibbs P, Hool K, Zhang J, Ang AL, Bach BA, Price T. Impact of Emergent Circulating Tumor DNA RAS Mutation in Panitumumab-Treated Chemoresistant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Nov 15;24(22):5602-5609. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3377. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
- Background: PubMed 30487126Peeters M, Price T, Boedigheimer M, Kim TW, Ruff P, Gibbs P, Thomas A, Demonty G, Hool K, Ang A. Evaluation of Emergent Mutations in Circulating Cell-Free DNA and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Panitumumab in the ASPECCT Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Feb 15;25(4):1216-1225. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2072. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
- Background: PubMed 33026965Price T, Ang A, Boedigheimer M, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, Satya Suresh A, Thomas A, Tjulandin S, Peeters M. Frequency of S492R mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor: analysis of plasma DNA from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab or cetuximab monotherapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2020 Oct 2;21(10):891-898. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2020.1798695. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32605298Taniguchi H, Yamanaka T, Sakai D, Muro K, Yamazaki K, Nakata S, Kimura H, Ruff P, Kim TW, Peeters M, Price T. Efficacy of Panitumumab and Cetuximab in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Previously Treated with Bevacizumab; a Combined Analysis of Individual Patient Data from ASPECCT and WJOG6510G. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 28;12(7):1715. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071715.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27085587Graham CN, Maglinte GA, Schwartzberg LS, Price TJ, Knox HN, Hechmati G, Hjelmgren J, Barber B, Fakih MG. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy. Clin Ther. 2016 Jun;38(6):1376-1391. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.023. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
- AmgenTrials clinical trials websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Targeted Therapies in Subpopulations of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (INTRINSIC)
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
SAMe in Prevention of Oxaliplatin-associated Liver Injury
Colorectal Cancer, Liver Metastases
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of ERAS-0015 in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Metastatic Solid Tumors
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase Ib/II Study of GFH276 in Combination With Chemotherapy (± Bevacizumab) or Cetuximab in Patients With RAS-mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
CRC
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
152 sites in 29 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Cetuximab and Panitumumab in people with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, run by Amgen at 152 sites in 29 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 152 sites in China, Australia, India, United Kingdom, Italy and 24 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Mar 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01001377, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2022.