AzTrials
AzTrials

Metastatic Colorectal CancerPhase 3NCT01001377

ASPECCT: A Study of Panitumumab Efficacy and Safety Compared to Cetuximab in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Cetuximab and Panitumumab in people with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, run by Amgen at 152 sites in 29 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of panitumumab versus cetuximab on overall survival (OS) for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) among patients with wild-type Kirsten rat Sarcoma-2 virus (KRAS) tumors. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
What is being tested?
Cetuximab and Panitumumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,010 participants
Where
152 sitesin 29 countries
Study dates
2 Feb 2010to 7 Mar 2017
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum, metastatic disease
  • Wild-type KRAS tumor status
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1 or 2
  • Must have failed a prior regimen containing irinotecan for metastatic disease and a prior regimen containing oxaliplatin for metastatic disease
  • Must have previously received a thymidylate synthase inhibitor (eg, fluorouracil, capecitabine, raltitrexed, or fluorouracil-uracil) at any point for treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC)
  • Adequate hematologic, renal, hepatic and metabolic function

Who cannot join

  • Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment
  • Prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibody therapy (eg, panitumumab or cetuximab) or treatment with small molecule EGFr inhibitors (eg, gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib)
  • Antitumor therapy (eg, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy, antibody therapy, radiotherapy), or investigational agent or therapy ≤ 30 days before randomization.
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease
  • Active infection requiring systemic treatment or any uncontrolled infection ≤14 days prior to randomization

Trial locations and contacts

152 sites in 29 countries.

152 sites in 29 countries

China21 sites
  • Research Site

    Beijing, 100021

  • Research Site

    Beijing, 100071

  • Research Site

    Beijing, 100142

  • Research Site

    Changchun, Jilin, 130012

  • Research Site

    Changsha, Hunan, 410013

  • Research Site

    Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041

  • Research Site

    Chongqing, Sichuan, 400038

  • Research Site

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060

  • Research Site

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180

  • Research Site

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510280

  • Research Site

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 515515

  • Research Site

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009

  • Research Site

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310016

  • Research Site

    Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150040

  • Research Site

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002

  • Research Site

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200092

  • Research Site

    Shanghai, 200003

  • Research Site

    Shanghai, 200032

  • Research Site

    Shanghai, 200080

  • Research Site

    Tianjin, 300060

  • Research Site

    Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061

Other trials in China

Australia11 sites
  • Research Site

    Ballarat, Victoria, 3350

  • Research Site

    Box Hill, Victoria, 3128

  • Research Site

    Epping, Victoria, 3076

  • Research Site

    Footscray, Victoria, 3011

  • Research Site

    Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084

  • Research Site

    Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170

  • Research Site

    Parkville, Victoria, 3050

  • Research Site

    St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065

  • Research Site

    Wahroonga, New South Wales, 2076

  • Research Site

    Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500

  • Research Site

    Woodville South, South Australia, 5011

Other trials in Australia

India11 sites
  • Research Site

    Ahilyanagar, Maharashtra, 413 736

  • Research Site

    Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 018

  • Research Site

    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 024

  • Research Site

    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 034

  • Research Site

    Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302 013

  • Research Site

    Kochi, Kerala, 682 304

  • Research Site

    Kolkata, West Bengal, 700 016

  • Research Site

    Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440 012

  • Research Site

    Nashik, Maharashtra, 422 004

  • Research Site

    Nashik, Maharashtra, 422 005

  • Research Site

    Pune, Maharashtra, 411 004

Other trials in India

United Kingdom11 sites
  • Research Site

    Belfast, BT9 7AB

  • Research Site

    Bristol, BS2 8ED

  • Research Site

    Cardiff, CF14 2TL

  • Research Site

    Guildford, GU2 7XX

  • Research Site

    Leicester, LE1 5WW

  • Research Site

    London, SW17 0QT

  • Research Site

    Maidstone, ME16 9QQ

  • Research Site

    Manchester, M20 4BX

  • Research Site

    Oxford, OX3 7LJ

  • Research Site

    Sutton, SM2 5PT

  • Research Site

    Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP

Other trials in United Kingdom

Italy10 sites
  • Research Site

    Ancona, 60131

  • Research Site

    Cesena, 47023

  • Research Site

    Cremona, 26100

  • Research Site

    Faenza RA, 48018

  • Research Site

    Genova, 16132

  • Research Site

    Lugo, 48022

  • Research Site

    Meldola FC, 47014

  • Research Site

    Ravenna, 48100

  • Research Site

    Rimini, 47900

  • Research Site

    Torino, 10126

Other trials in Italy

Poland8 sites
  • Research Site

    Elblag, 82-300

  • Research Site

    Gdansk, 80-219

  • Research Site

    Jelenia Góra, 58-506

  • Research Site

    Poznan, 61-485

  • Research Site

    Szczecin, 71-730

  • Research Site

    Warsaw, 02-097

  • Research Site

    Warsaw, 02-507

  • Research Site

    Warsaw, 02-781

Other trials in Poland

Czechia6 sites
  • Research Site

    Hořovice, 268 31

  • Research Site

    Nová Ves pod Pleší, 262 04

  • Research Site

    Olomouc, 775 20

  • Research Site

    Prague, 100 34

  • Research Site

    Příbram, 261 01

  • Research Site

    Znojmo, 669 02

Other trials in Czechia

South Korea6 sites
  • Research Site

    Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 410-769

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 110-744

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 120-752

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 135-710

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 136-705

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 138-736

Other trials in South Korea

Sweden6 sites
  • Research Site

    Gothenburg, 416 85

  • Research Site

    Linköping, 581 85

  • Research Site

    Lund, 221 85

  • Research Site

    Uppsala, 751 85

  • Research Site

    Västerås, 721 89

  • Research Site

    Vaxjo, 351 85

Other trials in Sweden

United States5 sites
  • Research Site

    Boynton Beach, Florida, 33426

  • Research Site

    Ogden, Utah, 84403

  • Research Site

    Stockton, California, 95204

  • Research Site

    Temple, Texas, 76508

  • Research Site

    Wichita, Kansas, 67214

Other trials in United States

France5 sites
  • Research Site

    Besançon, 25030

  • Research Site

    Montbéliard, 25200

  • Research Site

    Saint-Brieuc, 22015

  • Research Site

    Saint-Herblain, 44800

  • Research Site

    Villejuif, 94805

Other trials in France

Israel5 sites
  • Research Site

    Beersheba, 64239

  • Research Site

    Jerusalem, 91031

  • Research Site

    Kfar Saba, 44281

  • Research Site

    Ramat Gan, 52621

  • Research Site

    Rehovot, 76100

Other trials in Israel

Russia5 sites
  • Research Site

    Moscow, 115478

  • Research Site

    Moscow, 117997

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197022

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197758

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 198255

Other trials in Russia

South Africa5 sites
  • Research Site

    Groenkloof, Gauteng, 0181

  • Research Site

    Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2199

  • Research Site

    Johannesburg, 2193

  • Research Site

    Kraaifontein, Western Cape, 7570

  • Research Site

    Port Elizabeth, 6045

Other trials in South Africa

Taiwan5 sites
  • Research Site

    Keelung, 20401

  • Research Site

    Putzu City, Chiayi, 61363

  • Research Site

    Tainan, 70403

  • Research Site

    Taipei, 11031

  • Research Site

    Taoyuan, 33305

Other trials in Taiwan

Malaysia4 sites
  • Research Site

    Kota Bharu, Kelantan, 16150

  • Research Site

    Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, 88996

  • Research Site

    Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 56000

  • Research Site

    Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 59100

Other trials in Malaysia

Latvia3 sites
  • Research Site

    Daugavpils, 5417

  • Research Site

    Riga, 1002

  • Research Site

    Riga, 1079

Other trials in Latvia

Peru3 sites
  • Research Site

    Lima, 13

  • Research Site

    Lima, 34

  • Research Site

    Lima, Lima 27

Other trials in Peru

Philippines3 sites
  • Research Site

    Cebu City, 6000

  • Research Site

    Manila, 1000

  • Research Site

    Quezon City, 1102

Other trials in Philippines

Slovakia3 sites
  • Research Site

    Bardejov, 085 01

  • Research Site

    Bratislava, 831 01

  • Research Site

    Nitra, 950 01

Other trials in Slovakia

Bulgaria2 sites
  • Research Site

    Sofia, 1527

  • Research Site

    Sofia, 1784

Other trials in Bulgaria

Canada2 sites
  • Research Site

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • Research Site

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9

Other trials in Canada

Hong Kong2 sites
  • Research Site

    Kowloon

  • Research Site

    New Territories

Other trials in Hong Kong

Lithuania2 sites
  • Research Site

    Kaunas, 50009

  • Research Site

    Vilnius, 08660

Other trials in Lithuania

Romania2 sites
  • Research Site

    Bucharest, 022328

  • Research Site

    Sibiu, 550245

Other trials in Romania

Serbia2 sites
  • Research Site

    Kamenitz, 21204

  • Research Site

    Niš, 18000

Other trials in Serbia

Singapore2 sites
  • Research Site

    Singapore, 119228

  • Research Site

    Singapore, 308433

Other trials in Singapore

Belgium1 site
  • Research Site

    Edegem, 2650

Other trials in Belgium

Netherlands1 site
  • Research Site

    Rotterdam, 3000 CA

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Panitumumab and Cetuximab in Subjects With Previously Treated, Wild-type KRAS, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of panitumumab versus cetuximab on overall survival (OS) for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) among patients with wild-type Kirsten rat Sarcoma-2 virus (KRAS) tumors.

Being tested
Cetuximab, Panitumumab
Keywords
Panitumumab, Vectibix, Colon Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Rectal Cancer, Cetuximab, Erbitux, Metastatic
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms, Rectal Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CetuximabDrug

    Also called Erbitux

    Administered by intravenous infusion

  • PanitumumabDrug

    Also called Vectibix

    Administered by intravenous infusion

Study groups in NCT01001377
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CetuximabActive comparatorCetuximab 400 mg/m^2 as an initial dose, followed by 250 mg/m^2 intravenously (IV) every 7 days. Participants were treated until disease progression, intolerability, withdrawal of consent, or death.
Receives: Drug: Cetuximab
PanitumumabExperimentalPanitumumab 6 mg/kg IV every 14 days. Participants were treated until disease progression, intolerability, withdrawal of consent, or death.
Receives: Drug: Panitumumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Survival

    Overall survival is the time from the date of randomization until the date of death. Participants who had not died by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last contact date.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Progression-free Survival

    Progression free survival (PFS) is the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression per the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death. Participants alive and not meeting criteria for progression by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.

    Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study based on all target lesions recorded since the treatment started (the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm), or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or any new lesions.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.

  2. Objective Response

    Objective response is either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1. All participants that did not meet the criteria for an objective response by the analysis cut-off date were considered non-responders. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm, and disappearance of all non-target lesions, and no new lesions. PR: Disappearance of all target lesions, persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease, or, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions with no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and no new lesions.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.

  3. Duration of Response

    Duration of response (DOR), calculated only for those participants with an objective response, is the time from first objective response to disease progression per the RECIST v1.1 or death. Participants not meeting criteria for progression or who died by the analysis data cutoff date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.

  4. Time to Response

    Time to response (TTR), calculated for those participants with an objective response, is defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of first objective response.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.

  5. Time to Treatment Failure

    Time to treatment failure (TTF) is the time from randomization date to date that the decision was made to end the treatment period for any reason; participants who remained in the treatment period at the time of analysis were censored at the date of the last on-study assessment.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.

  6. Change From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index Score

    The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a generic measure of health outcome. The health state index measures the following 5 health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension contains 3 levels of response to reflect degree of problems participants have experienced: no problem (1), some problem (2) and extreme problems (3). The health states for each respondent are converted into a single index number using a specified set of weights. Resulting scores can range from 1.0 and -0.594. A higher score indicates a more preferred health status with 1.0 representing perfect health and 0 representing death. Negative scores are possible and represent health states regarded as less preferable than death (0). Repeated measures mixed model includes treatment, geographic region, ECOG score, assessment week, and treatment by assessment week interaction as fixed effects, and participants a random effect.

    Measured: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.

  7. Change From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a generic measure of health outcome. The VAS asks respondents to rate their present health status on a 0 - 100 scale, with 0 labeled as "Worst imaginable health state" and 100 labeled as "Best imaginable health state." The VAS score is determined by observing the point at which the participant's hand drawn line intersects the scale.

    Measured: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.

  8. Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colorectal Symptom Index (NCCN FCSI ) Symptoms Score

    The FCSI consists of 9 questions comprising the most important symptoms associated with colorectal cancer, including energy, pain, weight, diarrhea, nausea, swelling or cramps in the stomach area, appetite, ability to enjoy life, and overall quality of life. The 9 questions are combined in three algorithms to provide information for 3 domains: colorectal cancer symptoms, physical well-being, and functional well-being. Each of the 9 items are scored from "0" to "4" representing "Not at All" through to "Very Much True". The raw score for all items is transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the average for each of the 3 subscales is calculated; high scores illustrate an improved state (e.g. able to enjoy life more).

    Measured: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.

  9. Change From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Physical Well-being Scale Score

    The FCSI consists of 9 questions comprising the most important symptoms associated with colorectal cancer, including energy, pain, weight, diarrhea, nausea, swelling or cramps in the stomach area, appetite, ability to enjoy life, and overall quality of life. The 9 questions are combined in three algorithms to provide information for 3 domains: colorectal cancer symptoms, physical well-being, and functional well-being. Each of the 9 items are scored from "0" to "4" representing "Not at All" through to "Very Much True". The raw score for all items is transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the average for each of the 3 subscales is calculated; high scores illustrate an improved state (e.g. able to enjoy life more).

    Measured: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.

  10. Change From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Functional Well-being Scale Score

    The FCSI consists of 9 questions comprising the most important symptoms associated with colorectal cancer, including energy, pain, weight, diarrhea, nausea, swelling or cramps in the stomach area, appetite, ability to enjoy life, and overall quality of life. The 9 questions are combined in three algorithms to provide information for 3 domains: colorectal cancer symptoms, physical well-being, and functional well-being. Each of the 9 items are scored from "0" to "4" representing "Not at All" through to "Very Much True". The raw score for all items is transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the average for each of the 3 subscales is calculated; high scores illustrate an improved state (e.g. able to enjoy life more).

    Measured: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.

  11. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Serious adverse events include any event that is fatal, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other significant medical hazard. Treatment-related AEs are those the investigator considered as a reasonable possibility to have been caused by study drug.

    Measured: From the day of the first dose of study therapy through 30 days since the last dose. Maximum time on study treatment was 130 weeks.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Oct 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study start2 Feb 2010
  3. Primary completion5 Feb 2013
  4. Study completion7 Mar 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,010 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01001377
Sponsor's protocol ID
20080763
Other IDs
ASPECCT, 2009-010715-32, 2009
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
22 Oct 2009
Last updated
21 Sep 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Price T, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, Suresh AS, Thomas A, Tjulandin S, Guan X, Peeters M. Final results and outcomes by prior bevacizumab exposure, skin toxicity, and hypomagnesaemia from ASPECCT: randomized phase 3 non-inferiority study of panitumumab versus cetuximab in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Nov;68:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

    PubMed 27716478
  • Price TJ, Peeters M, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, Suresh AS, Thomas A, Tjulandin S, Zhang K, Murugappan S, Sidhu R. Panitumumab versus cetuximab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (ASPECCT): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014 May;15(6):569-79. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70118-4. Epub 2014 Apr 14.

    PubMed 24739896
  • Kim TW, Peeters M, Thomas A, Gibbs P, Hool K, Zhang J, Ang AL, Bach BA, Price T. Impact of Emergent Circulating Tumor DNA RAS Mutation in Panitumumab-Treated Chemoresistant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Nov 15;24(22):5602-5609. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3377. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

    PubMed 29898991
  • Peeters M, Price T, Boedigheimer M, Kim TW, Ruff P, Gibbs P, Thomas A, Demonty G, Hool K, Ang A. Evaluation of Emergent Mutations in Circulating Cell-Free DNA and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Panitumumab in the ASPECCT Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Feb 15;25(4):1216-1225. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2072. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

    PubMed 30487126
  • Price T, Ang A, Boedigheimer M, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, Satya Suresh A, Thomas A, Tjulandin S, Peeters M. Frequency of S492R mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor: analysis of plasma DNA from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab or cetuximab monotherapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2020 Oct 2;21(10):891-898. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2020.1798695. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

    PubMed 33026965
  • Taniguchi H, Yamanaka T, Sakai D, Muro K, Yamazaki K, Nakata S, Kimura H, Ruff P, Kim TW, Peeters M, Price T. Efficacy of Panitumumab and Cetuximab in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Previously Treated with Bevacizumab; a Combined Analysis of Individual Patient Data from ASPECCT and WJOG6510G. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 28;12(7):1715. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071715.

    PubMed 32605298
  • Graham CN, Maglinte GA, Schwartzberg LS, Price TJ, Knox HN, Hechmati G, Hjelmgren J, Barber B, Fakih MG. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy. Clin Ther. 2016 Jun;38(6):1376-1391. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.023. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

    PubMed 27085587

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Cetuximab and Panitumumab in people with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, run by Amgen at 152 sites in 29 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 152 sites in China, Australia, India, United Kingdom, Italy and 24 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Mar 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Survival (time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01001377, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in