Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4NCT01002716
Cell Immunity Response to Vaccination Against Influenza in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 4 study testing Agrippal S1 (Influenza vaccination) in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
The efficacy of vaccination against influenza in patients with rheumatoid arthritis has been assessed using humoral response. However, the cellular immunity is another important pathway of response to vaccination. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Agrippal S1 (Influenza vaccination)
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- Oct 2009to Apr 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Rheumatoid arthritis
Who cannot join
- Allergy to egg
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Tel Aviv Medical Center
Tel Aviv, 64239
Ayelet Brill, 97236974837, ayeletb@tasmc.health.gov.il
Dan Caspi, M.D
About this study
The efficacy of vaccination against influenza in patients with rheumatoid arthritis has been assessed using humoral response. However, the cellular immunity is another important pathway of response to vaccination. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the degree of cellular immunity response to influenza vaccination. Patient with rheumatoid arthritis and healthy controls will participate in this study , will undergo a clinical evaluation the day of vaccination and 4 weeks after. The humoral and cell immunity response will be assessed the day of vaccination and 4 weeks later
Read the detailed description
Sixty patients with RA and 30 healthy , aged matched controls will participate in the study.
After signing informed consent, all subjects will be vaccinated with the inactivated split virion vaccine which will be recommended by the WHO next fall.
Patients will be evaluated at weel 0 and 6 weeks later. Clinical evaluation will be based on the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) which includes number of swollen and tender joints, visual global evaluation of the physician , ESR and CRP Blood with be collected on the day of vaccination and 6 weeks later.
Preparation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells Blood samples will be obtained prior to and 4 weeks after vaccination. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) will be isolated by centrifugation of heparinized blood on a Lymphoprep gradient (Nycomed, Oslo, Norway). Cells will be washed twice in tissue culture medium RPMI (RPMI1640-Hepes with Glutamax-I, GIBCO BRL, NY, USA) and resuspended to a concentration of 2 106/ml in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (GIBCO BRL, NY, USA).
ELISPOT assay The 96-well PVDF (polyvinylidene difluoride, Millipore Corp., MA, USA) plates will be prewet with 70% EtOH, then coated with 100 l/well of anti-human IFN- monoclonal antibody (mAb) 1-D1K , diluted to 15 g/ml in sterile filtered phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) . The plates will be kept overnight at 4°C. A total of 100 000 PBMC plus 5 l/well (1 g/ml) peptides will be added to each well in duplicate for each condition and incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. After incubation the plates will be washed with PBS then 100 l of biotinylated mAb (7-B6-1-biotin, Mabtech AB), diluted in filtered PBS with 0.5% FBS to the concentration 1 g/ml were added to each well. The plates will be incubated 2 h at room temperature, washed with PBS and then incubated with 100 l/well of streptavidine-alkaline phosphatase (Mabtech AB) diluted 1-1000 in PBS with 0.5% FBS for 1 h at room temperature. After washing, cells will be developed by adding 100 l/well of colorimetric substrate (BCIP/NBT-plus, Mabtech AB) and then counted in an ELISPOT reader. Each spot was produced by a single IFN- secreting T-cell-spot-forming cell (SFC). All tests were performed in duplicate and the mean values were calculated. A response will be considered to be positive when the number of spots in the wells with peptide-stimulated cells, after subtraction of the background (wells without peptide stimulation), will be at least two-fold greater than the number of background spots14 and more than 20/106 SFC.
Detection of intracellular cytokine production by flow cytometry The intracellular staining method will be used for identifying the phenotype of INF- producing T cells activated by peptide stimulation. The staining will be performed using the protocol described by Rauser et al.15 PBMC were stimulated for 6 h with 1 g/ml influenza peptides. Brefeldin A (10 g/ml, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) will be added for the last 4 h of the incubation. A positive control will be obtained by stimulating the cells with 0.5 g/ml PMA (Phorbol 12-myrestate 13-acetate) and 1 g/ml Ionomycin (both from Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). The cells will be permeabilized and stained with fluorochrome-labeled anti-CD3, anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 and anti-IFN- antibodies (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). Samples will be analyzed by flow cytometry using FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson). The positive limit for this test was 0.05% of IFN producing T cells.
Proliferation of specific CD4+ and CD8+ Cellular response will be evaluated by simultaneously analyzing proliferation of specific T CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes upon stimulation with antigens of the three virus strains present in the vaccine and production of activation Th1 cytokines by the same cells.
Briefly, to simultaneously analyze proliferation and cytokine production by influenza specific T cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells will be obtained at T0 and T1 from each donor, stained with the fluorescent nuclear dye carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE; Molecular Probes) and cultured in duplicate in the presence of peptides of HA from each of the virus strains contained in the influenza virus vaccine used in the study or control peptide for 72 h. At the end of incubation cultures will be stopped with brefeldin, cells resuspended, stained with fluorochrome-conjugated anti-CD8 and anti-interferon-γ (IFN-γ) monoclonal antibodies (Becton\&Dickinson) and analyzed by mean of a six colour flow-cytometer (FACSCanto-Becton\&Dickinson) and FACS DIVA software . As at every cell division the nuclear fluorescence is halved, proliferating cells fall in the left quadrants of the cytogram, the more divisions the less fluorescence. IFN-γ producing cells fall in the upper quadrants of the cytograms. Cells that upon specific influenza peptide or control peptide stimulation both proliferate and actively produce IFN-γ (Th1 cytokine) fall in the upper left quadrant of the cytogram. They were measured as frequency (proliferating and IFN-γ-producing cells/total T CD4+ or CD8+ lymphocytes).
Haemagglutination inhibition test The immunogenicity of the vaccine was tested by Haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test.
Influenza virus has two important surface glycoproteins: the haemagglutinin (HA) and the neuraminidase (NA). Antigenic classification and subtyping of influenza viruses is based on these two glycoproteins. HA plays a key role in virus cell entry by binding to cell surface receptors, which are found also on red blood cells of certain species. Binding to red cells results in haemagglutination, which can be observed as a carpet of agglutinated red cells at the bottom of a tube or microtitre well. In the HI test, antibody directed against the viral haemagglutinins block the virus from binding to the blood cells and thus inhibits the haemagglutination reaction.
The pre- and post immunization HI antibodies were tested at the Central Virology Laboratory of the Israeli Ministry of Health using the HI test according to a standard WHO procedure 16. Sera were separated, code labeled, and stored at -20°C until tested. Sera were treated with receptor destroying enzyme cholera filtrate to remove non-specific inhibitors, and with Turkey red blood cells to remove non-specific agglutinins. The treated sera were tested by HI test against the three antigens included in the vaccine: A/California (CAL), B/Shangai (SHAN) and A/New Caledonia (NC). The working dilution (test dose) of each antigen contained four haemagglutinin units in 25 µl of antigen. Test doses were diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and added to serial dilution of antiserum. The haemagglutinin inhibition titer was determined as the highest dilution of serum that completely inhibits haemagglutination of red blood cells.
The titer of an antiserum not showing any inhibition was recorded as <10. Humoral response was defined as either a fourfold or more rise in titer, or a rise from a non-protective baseline level of <1/40 to 1/40 in HI antibodies four weeks after vaccination 17,18. Geometric mean titers of antibody were calculated to assess the immunity of the whole group.
Primary Endpoint of the study : the proportion of cells producing Interferon gamma in Patients with rheumatoid arthritis and controls Secondary Endpoint: Safety of the vaccine
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Agrippal S1 (Influenza vaccination)
- Keywords
- rheumatoid influenza vaccine cell immunity
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Agrippal S1 (Influenza vaccination)Biological
Also called Agripal S1
Single dose of vaccine
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cell immunity response
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Safety of influenza vaccination
Measured: 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2009
- Primary completionMar 2010 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2010 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- Other government
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01002716
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TASMC-09-OE-0453-CTIL
- Status last verified
- Oct 2009
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 27 Oct 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Oct 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cell Immunity Response to Vaccination Against Influenza in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01002716
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TASMC-09-OE-0453-CTIL
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- rheumatoid influenza vaccine cell immunity
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterOther government
- Study start
- Oct 2009
- Primary completion
- Mar 2010 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2010 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The efficacy of vaccination against influenza in patients with rheumatoid arthritis has been assessed using humoral response. However, the cellular immunity is another important pathway of response to vaccination. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the degree of cellular immunity response to influenza vaccination. Patient with rheumatoid arthritis and healthy controls will participate in this study , will undergo a clinical evaluation the day of vaccination and 4 weeks after. The humoral and cell immunity response will be assessed the day of vaccination and 4 weeks later
Detailed description
Sixty patients with RA and 30 healthy , aged matched controls will participate in the study.
After signing informed consent, all subjects will be vaccinated with the inactivated split virion vaccine which will be recommended by the WHO next fall.
Patients will be evaluated at weel 0 and 6 weeks later. Clinical evaluation will be based on the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) which includes number of swollen and tender joints, visual global evaluation of the physician , ESR and CRP Blood with be collected on the day of vaccination and 6 weeks later.
Preparation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells Blood samples will be obtained prior to and 4 weeks after vaccination. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) will be isolated by centrifugation of heparinized blood on a Lymphoprep gradient (Nycomed, Oslo, Norway). Cells will be washed twice in tissue culture medium RPMI (RPMI1640-Hepes with Glutamax-I, GIBCO BRL, NY, USA) and resuspended to a concentration of 2 106/ml in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (GIBCO BRL, NY, USA).
ELISPOT assay The 96-well PVDF (polyvinylidene difluoride, Millipore Corp., MA, USA) plates will be prewet with 70% EtOH, then coated with 100 l/well of anti-human IFN- monoclonal antibody (mAb) 1-D1K , diluted to 15 g/ml in sterile filtered phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) . The plates will be kept overnight at 4°C. A total of 100 000 PBMC plus 5 l/well (1 g/ml) peptides will be added to each well in duplicate for each condition and incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. After incubation the plates will be washed with PBS then 100 l of biotinylated mAb (7-B6-1-biotin, Mabtech AB), diluted in filtered PBS with 0.5% FBS to the concentration 1 g/ml were added to each well. The plates will be incubated 2 h at room temperature, washed with PBS and then incubated with 100 l/well of streptavidine-alkaline phosphatase (Mabtech AB) diluted 1-1000 in PBS with 0.5% FBS for 1 h at room temperature. After washing, cells will be developed by adding 100 l/well of colorimetric substrate (BCIP/NBT-plus, Mabtech AB) and then counted in an ELISPOT reader. Each spot was produced by a single IFN- secreting T-cell-spot-forming cell (SFC). All tests were performed in duplicate and the mean values were calculated. A response will be considered to be positive when the number of spots in the wells with peptide-stimulated cells, after subtraction of the background (wells without peptide stimulation), will be at least two-fold greater than the number of background spots14 and more than 20/106 SFC.
Detection of intracellular cytokine production by flow cytometry The intracellular staining method will be used for identifying the phenotype of INF- producing T cells activated by peptide stimulation. The staining will be performed using the protocol described by Rauser et al.15 PBMC were stimulated for 6 h with 1 g/ml influenza peptides. Brefeldin A (10 g/ml, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) will be added for the last 4 h of the incubation. A positive control will be obtained by stimulating the cells with 0.5 g/ml PMA (Phorbol 12-myrestate 13-acetate) and 1 g/ml Ionomycin (both from Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). The cells will be permeabilized and stained with fluorochrome-labeled anti-CD3, anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 and anti-IFN- antibodies (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). Samples will be analyzed by flow cytometry using FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson). The positive limit for this test was 0.05% of IFN producing T cells.
Proliferation of specific CD4+ and CD8+ Cellular response will be evaluated by simultaneously analyzing proliferation of specific T CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes upon stimulation with antigens of the three virus strains present in the vaccine and production of activation Th1 cytokines by the same cells.
Briefly, to simultaneously analyze proliferation and cytokine production by influenza specific T cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells will be obtained at T0 and T1 from each donor, stained with the fluorescent nuclear dye carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE; Molecular Probes) and cultured in duplicate in the presence of peptides of HA from each of the virus strains contained in the influenza virus vaccine used in the study or control peptide for 72 h. At the end of incubation cultures will be stopped with brefeldin, cells resuspended, stained with fluorochrome-conjugated anti-CD8 and anti-interferon-γ (IFN-γ) monoclonal antibodies (Becton\&Dickinson) and analyzed by mean of a six colour flow-cytometer (FACSCanto-Becton\&Dickinson) and FACS DIVA software . As at every cell division the nuclear fluorescence is halved, proliferating cells fall in the left quadrants of the cytogram, the more divisions the less fluorescence. IFN-γ producing cells fall in the upper quadrants of the cytograms. Cells that upon specific influenza peptide or control peptide stimulation both proliferate and actively produce IFN-γ (Th1 cytokine) fall in the upper left quadrant of the cytogram. They were measured as frequency (proliferating and IFN-γ-producing cells/total T CD4+ or CD8+ lymphocytes).
Haemagglutination inhibition test The immunogenicity of the vaccine was tested by Haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test.
Influenza virus has two important surface glycoproteins: the haemagglutinin (HA) and the neuraminidase (NA). Antigenic classification and subtyping of influenza viruses is based on these two glycoproteins. HA plays a key role in virus cell entry by binding to cell surface receptors, which are found also on red blood cells of certain species. Binding to red cells results in haemagglutination, which can be observed as a carpet of agglutinated red cells at the bottom of a tube or microtitre well. In the HI test, antibody directed against the viral haemagglutinins block the virus from binding to the blood cells and thus inhibits the haemagglutination reaction.
The pre- and post immunization HI antibodies were tested at the Central Virology Laboratory of the Israeli Ministry of Health using the HI test according to a standard WHO procedure 16. Sera were separated, code labeled, and stored at -20°C until tested. Sera were treated with receptor destroying enzyme cholera filtrate to remove non-specific inhibitors, and with Turkey red blood cells to remove non-specific agglutinins. The treated sera were tested by HI test against the three antigens included in the vaccine: A/California (CAL), B/Shangai (SHAN) and A/New Caledonia (NC). The working dilution (test dose) of each antigen contained four haemagglutinin units in 25 µl of antigen. Test doses were diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and added to serial dilution of antiserum. The haemagglutinin inhibition titer was determined as the highest dilution of serum that completely inhibits haemagglutination of red blood cells.
The titer of an antiserum not showing any inhibition was recorded as <10. Humoral response was defined as either a fourfold or more rise in titer, or a rise from a non-protective baseline level of <1/40 to 1/40 in HI antibodies four weeks after vaccination 17,18. Geometric mean titers of antibody were calculated to assess the immunity of the whole group.
Primary Endpoint of the study : the proportion of cells producing Interferon gamma in Patients with rheumatoid arthritis and controls Secondary Endpoint: Safety of the vaccine
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Rheumatoid arthritis
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Allergy to egg
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Agrippal S1 (Influenza vaccination)Also: Agripal S1Single dose of vaccine | Biological | – |
Primary outcome
Cell immunity response
Time frame: 4 weeks
1 secondary outcome
Safety of influenza vaccination
Time frame: 4 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Oct 2009.
- Tel Aviv Medical CenterLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Agrippal S1 (Influenza vaccination) in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ori Elkayam, MD (97236973668, orie@tasmc.health.gov.il), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cell immunity response (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2009; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.