AzTrials
AzTrials

Macular DegenerationPhase 4MERLOTNCT01006538

Macular EpiRetinal Brachytherapy Versus Lucentis® Only Treatment (MERLOT)

A Phase 4 study testing Epimacular Brachytherapy and Ranibizumab in people with Macular Degeneration, run by King's College Hospital NHS Trust at 24 sites in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Wet age-related macular degeneration is the most common cause of blind registration in the United Kingdom (UK). Standard treatment involves regular eye injections of a drug called ranibizumab (Lucentis). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Macular Degeneration
What is being tested?
Epimacular Brachytherapy and Ranibizumab
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
363 participants
Where
24 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Nov 2009to Dec 2016
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects with subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation associated with wet age-related macular degeneration. Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation (RAP) lesions not directly involving the fovea must be associated with contiguous foveal leakage demonstrated on fundus examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT), or fluorescein angiography;
  • Subjects must have received anti-VEGF induction treatment, defined as the first three months of anti-VEGF therapy. Following this induction period, subjects must have received at least 4 additional injections of Lucentis® in no more than 12 months preceding enrolment, or 2 additional injections of Lucentis® in no more than 6 months preceding enrolment, given on an as needed basis;
  • At the time subjects commenced anti-VEGF therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration they were aged 50 years or older and met the NICE treatment criteria for Lucentis® therapy, as outlined in the Final Appraisal Determination (FAD). This states that all of the following circumstances must apply in the eye to be treated:
  • the best-corrected visual acuity is between 6/12 and 6/96 (24 to 69 ETDRS letters)
  • there is no permanent structural damage to the central fovea
  • the lesion size is less than or equal to 12 disc areas in greatest linear dimension
  • there is evidence of recent presumed disease progression (blood vessel growth, as indicated by fluorescein angiography, or recent visual acuity changes)

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have not been treated in accordance with NICE guidance;
  • Visual acuity worse than 6/96 at the time of study enrolment;
  • Subjects with prior or concurrent subfoveal CNV therapy with agents, surgery or devices (other than Macugen®, Avastin®, or Lucentis®) including thermal laser photocoagulation (with or without photographic evidence), photodynamic therapy, intravitreal or subretinal steroids, and transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT);
  • Subfoveal scarring;
  • Subjects with active concomitant disease in the study eye, including uveitis, presence of pigment epithelial tears or rips, acute ocular or periocular infection;
  • Subjects who have been previously diagnosed with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Subjects who do not have a documented diagnosis, but have retinal findings consistent with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus;
Show all 23Show fewer
  • Subjects with advanced glaucoma (greater than 0.8 cup:disk) or intraocular pressure ≥ 30 mmHg in the study eye;
  • Previous glaucoma filtering surgery in the study eye;
  • Subjects with inadequate pupillary dilation or significant media opacities in the study eye, including cataract, which may interfere with visual acuity or the evaluation of the posterior segment;
  • Current vitreous haemorrhage in the study eye;
  • History of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment or macular hole in the study eye;
  • Subjects who present with CNV due to causes other than AMD, including subjects with known or suspected idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (IPCV), ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, angioid streaks, multifocal choroiditis, choroidal rupture, or pathologic myopia (spherical equivalent ≥ 8 Dioptre or axial length ≥ 25mm);
  • Subjects who have undergone any intraocular surgery in the study eye within 12 weeks prior to the screening visit, with the exception of cataract surgery as discussed in the Exclusion Criteria #14
  • Previous cataract surgery within 2 months prior to enrolment into the study;
  • Subjects with known serious allergies to fluorescein dye used in angiography;
  • Subjects with known sensitivity or allergy to Lucentis®;
  • Subjects who underwent previous radiation therapy to the eye, head or neck;
  • Subjects with an intravitreal device or drug in the study eye;
  • Subjects with any other condition, which in the judgment of the investigator would prevent the subject from completing the study (e.g. documented diagnosis of dementia or serious mental illness);
  • Current participation in another drug or device clinical trial, or participation in such a clinical trial within the last year;
  • History of use of drugs with known retinal toxicity, including: chloroquine (Aralen - an anti-malarial drug), hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil), phenothiazines, chlorpromazine (Thorazine), thioridazine (Mellaril), fluphenazine (Prolixin), perphenazine (Trilafon), and trifluoperazine (Stelazine);
  • Subjects who are unwilling or unable to return for scheduled treatment and follow-up examinations for three years;
  • Women must be post-menopausal more than 1 year unless surgically sterilised

Trial locations and contacts

24 sites in 1 country.

24 sites in 1 country

United Kingdom24 sites
  • Royal Bournemouth Hospital

    Bournemouth, Dorset, BH7 7DW

  • Sussex Eye Hospital

    Brighton, East Sussex, BN2 5BF

  • Bristol Eye Hospital

    Bristol, BS1 2LX

  • Essex County Hospital

    Colchester, Essex, CO3 3SP

  • Darlington Memorial Hospital

    Darlington, DL3 6HX

  • Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital

    Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW

  • Hull and East Yorks Hospital

    Hull, East Yorkshire, HU3 2JZ

  • St James University Hospital

    Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 7TF

  • Royal Liverpool Hospital

    Liverpool, Merseyside, L7 8XP

  • King's College Hospital

    London, SE5 9RS

  • Maidstone Hospital

    Maidstone, Kent, ME16 9QQ

  • Manchester Royal Eye Hospital

    Manchester, Greater Manchester, M13 9WH

  • James Cook Hospital

    Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire, TS4 3BW

  • Royal Victoria Infirmary

    Newcastle, Tyne and Wear, NE1 4LP

  • Plymouth Royal Eye Infirmary

    Plymouth, Devon, PL4 6PL

  • Queen Alexandra Hospital

    Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO6 3LY

  • Royal Hallamshire Hospital

    Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2JF

  • Southampton Hospital

    Shirley, Southampton, SO16 6YD

  • Sunderland Eye Infimary

    Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, SR2 9HP

  • Torbay Hospital

    Torquay, Devon, TQ2 7AA

  • Arrowe Park Hospital

    Upton, Merseyside, CH49 5PE

  • Warwick Hospital Eye Unit

    Warwick, Warwickshire, CV34 5BW

  • Southend Hospital

    Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, SS0 0RY

  • Ashford William Harvey Hospital

    Willesborough, Kent, TN24 0LZ

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Epimacular Brachytherapy Versus Ranibizumab Monotherapy for the Treatment of Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularisation Associated With Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration in Patients Who Have Commenced Anti-VEGF Therapy

Wet age-related macular degeneration is the most common cause of blind registration in the United Kingdom (UK). Standard treatment involves regular eye injections of a drug called ranibizumab (Lucentis). For most patients, ranibizumab maintains their vision but the effect of the drug is temporary, and they therefore require monthly hospital visits and typically six injections into the eye every year, probably for life.

This study tests a new surgical device that delivers a focal dose of radiation (epimacular brachytherapy) to the macula (the part inside the back of the eye that gives fine central vision), to try and reduce or eliminate the need for ongoing, regular eye injections. The trial compares epimacular brachytherapy to ongoing standard treatment with ranibizumab.

Read more

Whereas most studies of this new surgical device target patients who have not yet commenced any treatment, this study targets those who are requiring frequent eye injections, as there are limited surgical resources and these resources are best directed to those who have not fully responded to ranibizumab therapy, or whose response is shortlived. These patients have the most to gain from a device that may reduce their burden of treatment. The findings in untreated disease cannot be extrapolated to this discrete subset of patients, hence the need for a study that targets refractory disease.

It is hypothesised that epimacular brachytherapy will reduce the frequency of Lucentis® (ranibizumab) re-treatment that patients require, whilst maintaining visual acuity.

Read the detailed description

The eye is designed like a camera, with a lens at the front and a film at the back. Using this analogy, the retina is the film in the camera. In the center of the retina is the macula, the region that absorbs focused light from the lens and creates an image of the outside world that is then transmitted to the brain.

The commonest cause of irreversible blindness in developed nations is age related macular degeneration (AMD). There are two types, 'dry' and 'wet' AMD. Wet AMD is also called neovascular AMD: It is the most damaging type and can blind people in a matter of weeks. Neovascular AMD is due to the growth of blood vessels under the retina, similar to a wound healing process. The blood vessels grow in two patterns, classic (15%) and occult (85%); these can be visualized with fluorescein angiography, a commonly used technique that photographs the macula after a fluorescent dye is injected into the arm. In most research on AMD, vision is assessed using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) vision chart, with results quantified in numbers of letters read correctly, from 0 (very poor vision) to 100 (very good vision).

A new treatment has recently been licensed in the UK called ranibizumab (trade name, Lucentis). This is an antibody that reduces the effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a chemical that mediates new blood vessel growth. This drug is injected into the eye at regular intervals (up to 12 a year, and typically 6 a year). Patients receiving 12 ranibizumab injections per year have a greater than 90% chance of maintaining their vision over 12 months (1-2). Another drug called bevacizumab (Avastin) has been used off label (without a licence) in the UK, USA and other countries, and this also targets VEGF. In non-randomized trials it showed similar results to ranibizumab, and is currently being assessed in head-to-head trials with ranibizumab in the UK and the USA.

One of the drawbacks of ranibizumab therapy is that patients require regular injections into the eye. In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends patient with newly diagnosed wet AMD receive three consecutive monthly injections of ranibizumab, followed by 'as required' therapy based on disease activity. They estimate that patients receive eight injections in the first year, six in the second, and ongoing treatment thereafter. Patients require monthly hospital visits for life and each injection caries a small but cumulative risk of complications such as bleeding inside the eye, infection, detachment of the retina, raised eye pressure, and systemic effects such as stroke. A treatment that produced a more durable reduction in disease activity might reduce these risks, be more cost effective for the health service, and reduce the considerable burden of treatment for patients and their carers, with the prospect of fewer hospital visits. It would also give patients an alternative choice, should they not wish to undergo such regular eye injections.

Radiation has the potential to produce a more durable therapeutic effect, by targeting the proliferating cells that cause visual damage in wet AMD. It is well known that radiation can modify the wound healing process, which is a biological process similar to neovascular AMD. Previous studies with external beam radiation have shown an effect on the progression of macular degeneration. However vision was not improved - possibly due to the type of radiation used, the accuracy of delivery, and collateral damage to neighbouring structures.

Epimacular brachytherapy delivers local, controlled radiation 1-3 mm into the macula, during an operation called a vitrectomy. The proposed device will be CE marked (Conformité Européene - approved for clinical use) and is manufactured by NeoVista Inc, who have completed preliminary trials to assess the safety and feasibility of treating naive (newly diagnosed) neovascular AMD with a single application of brachytherapy. Initial data showed that epiretinal treatment stabilised vision for most patients with neovascular AMD. Phase II trials using the device with two concomitant doses of bevacizumab showed promising results with 91% of patients maintaining vision (losing fewer than 15 ETDRS letters), with an average improvement of 8.9 ETDRS letters (3). The percentage of patients whose visual acuity improved by more than 3 lines (15 letters on the ETDRS scale) was 38%. These results are similar to the large studies of monthly ranibizumab. A mean gain of 8.9 letters is more than twice the visual gain reported in large studies (HORIZON) of 'as required' dosing, as occurs in the UK.

A large, international, randomized, multicentre study of the device, used with two concomitant injections of ranibizumab, is now underway (the CABERNET study). Recruitment is occuring in the hospital of the applicant, and two other UK sites, with more sites to follow. The CABERNET study uses the device in treatment naive disease and was favourably reviewed by the Southwest Research Ethics Committee (07/H0206/50).

Whilst the CABERNET study will provide high quality data in treatment naive disease, it is not possible to rely on this study in relation to previously treated disease. Prior therapy with ranibizumab modifies the disease process, and those that respond poorly to injections differ from the majority, suggesting differences in the underlying disease process. It is therefore necessary to study the subset of patients with refractory disease, if valid clinical conclusions are to be reached. Furthermore, because there is limited vitreoretinal surgical capacity it is logical to offer surgical intervention to patients who have not responded fully to ranibizumab, rather than aim to treat all patients presenting with wet-AMD. To this end, an uncontrolled study (MERITAGE) using the device in refractory, previously treated disease has commenced, having received a favourable opinion from the Southwest Research Ethics Committee (07/H0206/55). The present randomised controlled trial (MERLOT) follows on from the Phase II MERITAGE study. It targets previously treated disease, and patients that are receiving regular ranibizumab, to determine if the device benefits this large subset of patients.

Being tested
Epimacular Brachytherapy, Ranibizumab
Keywords
Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration, Predominantly classic, Minimally classic, Occult with no classic, Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation (RAP) lesions
Medical subject headings
Macular Degeneration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Epimacular BrachytherapyDevice

    Also called Vidion System, EpiRetinal Brachytherapy

    Strontium-90. The device delivers 24 Gray of beta radiation to the choroidal neovascular membrane (CNV) lesion. Each device is calibrated for a set duration.

  • RanibizumabDrug

    Also called Lucentis, Anti-VEGF therapy

    intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab (0.5 mg) administered on a monthly basis as required, using the re-treatment criteria

Study groups in NCT01006538
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm A (treatment)ExperimentalArm A: A single surgical procedure with epimacular brachytherapy using the VIDION® System, with Lucentis® (0.5 mg) administered on a monthly basis as required.
Receives: Device: Epimacular Brachytherapy; Drug: Ranibizumab
Arm B (control):Active comparatorArm B: Lucentis® (0.5 mg) administered on a monthly basis as required, using the re-treatment criteria below.
Receives: Drug: Ranibizumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Change in Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 12

    Manifest refraction and BCVA measurements were performed according to the standard procedure originally developed for Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) and adapted for the Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) protocol. Visual acuity testing was measured at a distance of 4 meters and, for subjects with sufficiently reduced vision, at 1 meter. The ETDRS charts consist of 14 lines, each comprising a series of 5 letters of equal difficulty, with standardized spacing between letters and rows (total 70 letters). Minimum is 0 (no letters read at 1 m) and maximum possible is 100 (70 letters read at 4 m + 30). If visual acuity is so poor that the subject cannot read any of the largest letters at 1 meter count fingers (CF), hand movements (HM) and light perception (PL) are tested.

    The mean change in ETDRS BCVA was calculated from baseline to month 12.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Mean Number of Re-treatment Injections of Lucentis® Per Patient, Per Year.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Percentage of Subjects Losing < 15 ETDRS Letters

    Manifest refraction and BCVA measurements were performed according to the standard procedure originally developed for Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) and adapted for the Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) protocol. Visual acuity testing was measured at a distance of 4 meters and, for subjects with sufficiently reduced vision, at 1 meter. The ETDRS charts consist of 14 lines, each comprising a series of 5 letters of equal difficulty, with standardized spacing between letters and rows (total 70 letters). Minimum is 0 (no letters read at 1 m) and maximum possible is 100 (70 letters read at 4 m + 30). If visual acuity is so poor that the subject cannot read any of the largest letters at 1 meter count fingers (CF), hand movements (HM) and light perception (PL) are tested.

    Participants with worsening in BCVA by less than 15 EDTRS letters at month 12 compared with baseline were considered for this outcome measure.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Percentage of Subjects Gaining ≥ 0 ETDRS Letters

    Manifest refraction and BCVA measurements were performed according to the standard procedure originally developed for Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) and adapted for the Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) protocol. Visual acuity testing was measured at a distance of 4 meters and, for subjects with sufficiently reduced vision, at 1 meter. The ETDRS charts consist of 14 lines, each comprising a series of 5 letters of equal difficulty, with standardized spacing between letters and rows (total 70 letters). Minimum is 0 (no letters read at 1 m) and maximum possible is 100 (70 letters read at 4 m + 30). If visual acuity is so poor that the subject cannot read any of the largest letters at 1 meter count fingers (CF), hand movements (HM) and light perception (PL) are tested.

    Participants with an improvement in BCVA by more than 0 EDTRS letters at month 12 compared with baseline were considered for this outcome measure.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Percentage of Subjects Gaining ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters

    Manifest refraction and BCVA measurements were performed according to the standard procedure originally developed for Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) and adapted for the Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) protocol. Visual acuity testing was measured at a distance of 4 meters and, for subjects with sufficiently reduced vision, at 1 meter. The ETDRS charts consist of 14 lines, each comprising a series of 5 letters of equal difficulty, with standardized spacing between letters and rows (total 70 letters). Minimum is 0 (no letters read at 1 m) and maximum possible is 100 (70 letters read at 4 m + 30). If visual acuity is so poor that the subject cannot read any of the largest letters at 1 meter count fingers (CF), hand movements (HM) and light perception (PL) are tested.

    Participants with an improvement in BCVA by more than 15 EDTRS letters at month 12 compared with baseline were considered for this outcome measure.

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Change in Total Lesion Size by Fluorescein Angiography From Baseline to Month 12

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Change in Total Choroidal Neovascular Membrane (CNV) Size by Fluorescein Angiography From Baseline to Month 12

    Measured: 12 months

  6. Foveal Thickness Measured Using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) From Baseline to Month 12

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Nov 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2009
  3. Primary completionMar 2015
  4. Study completionDec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
363 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01006538
Sponsor's protocol ID
09/HO206/20
Other IDs
2009-012509-20, 2009
Acronym
MERLOT
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
2 Nov 2009
Last updated
7 Dec 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Jackson TL, Soare C, Petrarca C, Simpson A, Neffendorf JE, Petrarca R, Muldrew KA, Peto T, Chakravarthy U, Membrey L, Haynes R, Costen M, Steel DHW, Desai R; MERLOT Study Group. Epimacular brachytherapy for previously treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration: month 36 results of the MERLOT randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;107(7):987-992. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-320620. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

    PubMed 35217515
  • Evans JR, Igwe C, Jackson TL, Chong V. Radiotherapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 26;8(8):CD004004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004004.pub4.

    PubMed 32844399
  • Jackson TL, Soare C, Petrarca C, Simpson A, Neffendorf JE, Petrarca R, Muldrew A, Peto T, Chakravarthy U, Membrey L, Haynes R, Costen M, Steel D, Desai R; MERLOT Study Group. Evaluation of Month-24 Efficacy and Safety of Epimacular Brachytherapy for Previously Treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The MERLOT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug 1;138(8):835-842. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2309.

    PubMed 32644148
  • Jackson TL, Dugel PU, Bebchuk JD, Smith KR, Petrarca R, Slakter JS, Jaffe GJ, Nau JA; CABERNET Study Group. Epimacular brachytherapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (CABERNET): fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2013 Aug;120(8):1597-603. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.074. Epub 2013 Mar 13.

    PubMed 23490325

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Epimacular Brachytherapy and Ranibizumab in people with Macular Degeneration, run by King's College Hospital NHS Trust at 24 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 24 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Change in Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 12 (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01006538, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in