AzTrials
AzTrials

OophorectomyNCT01007305

Bilateral Oophorectomy Versus Ovarian Conservation

A study testing Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and Ovarian conservation in people with Oophorectomy and Hysterectomy, run by University of California, San Francisco at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a pilot study to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized, blinded, controlled trial of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO, removal of the ovaries and fallopian tubes) versus ovarian conservation among premenopausal women age 40 years and greater who plan to undergo hysterectomy for a benign… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 55 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Oophorectomy, Hysterectomy
What is being tested?
Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and Ovarian conservation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
May 2009to Apr 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 55 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Plans to undergo hysterectomy for any non-cancerous gynecologic condition, including symptomatic fibroids, abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, or pelvic organ prolapse. Hysterectomy may be done abdominally, vaginally or laparoscopically
  • Premenopausal defined as having at least one menses in the 3 months prior to surgery
  • Age > or = 40 years
  • Speaks English or Spanish

Who cannot join

  • Personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (at least one first degree relative with a diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer) or a known BRCA mutation
  • Known or suspected adnexal mass by physical exam or radiologic imaging study
  • Gynecologist recommends BSO for treatment of pelvic pain and/or endometriosis
  • Known history of coronary heart disease defined as any of the following: prior myocardial infarction, history of angioplasty, history of angina, admission to the hospital for evaluation of chest pain, or use of nitroglycerin to treat angina
  • History of stroke
  • History of osteoporosis

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • University of California, Sans Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94115

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Elective Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy Versus Ovarian Conservation: A Pilot Randomized, Controlled Trial

This is a pilot study to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized, blinded, controlled trial of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO, removal of the ovaries and fallopian tubes) versus ovarian conservation among premenopausal women age 40 years and greater who plan to undergo hysterectomy for a benign gynecologic condition. Subjects will be randomized to BSO or ovarian conservation concomitant with hysterectomy and remain blinded to group assignment. The primary goal of this pilot is to determine the feasibility of recruiting and retaining study participants in anticipation of conducting a larger, multi-centered trial. However, the investigators will also obtain baseline data and follow-up measures at 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Outcomes will be assessed in several domains that the investigators hypothesize may be effected by oophorectomy: cardiovascular health, skeletal health, sexual functioning, and health-related quality-of-life.

Being tested
Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, Ovarian conservation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomyProcedure or surgery

    Removal of both ovaries and fallopian tubes at the time of hysterectomy

  • Ovarian conservationProcedure or surgery

    Both ovaries and fallopian tubes not removed at the time of hysterectomy

Study groups in NCT01007305
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomyExperimentalRemoval of both ovaries and fallopian tubes at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions.
Receives: Procedure: Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy
Ovarian conservationActive comparatorNo ovaries or fallopian tubes removed at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions.
Receives: Procedure: Ovarian conservation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recruitment rate

    Measured: start of study

  2. Flow-mediated diameter of the brachial artery

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months follow-up

  3. Serum bone turnover markers

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months follow-up

  4. Sexual functioning and quality-of-life questionnaires

    Measured: Baseline and 6 month follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Nov 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2009
  3. Primary completionApr 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01007305
Sponsor's protocol ID
BSO 01
Status last verified
Nov 2009
First submitted
3 Nov 2009
Last updated
5 Aug 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and Ovarian conservation in people with Oophorectomy and Hysterectomy, run by University of California, San Francisco at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recruitment rate (time frame: start of study). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in