Hepatocellular CarcinomasARMCENVINNCT01008657
Multipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Extra Nodular Versus Intranodular Technique
A study testing Radiofrequency ablation in people with Hepatocellular Carcinomas, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The primary purpose of the trial is to demonstrate that at least a 40% drop of recurrence rate can be achieve in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with no touch multipolar radiofrequency ablation technique compared to those treated with usual intranodular multipolar technique. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinomas
- What is being tested?
- Radiofrequency ablation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 216 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 9 Feb 2010to 6 Oct 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults > 18 years old, holder of up to 3 nodules less than 4 cm in diameter
- Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma according to American Society of Liver Study non invasive criteria or based on histological proof
- Non invasive diagnosis of cirrhosis according to French Haute Authority of illness guideline or based on histological proof
- No previous treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma
- Multidisciplinary decision of treatment by radiofrequency ablation
Who cannot join
- Adult patient under guardianship or trusteeship, homeless
- Patient with potentially short term life-threatening serious co-infection (apart from viral B or C, or VIH co-infection)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
- Patient for whom regular follow-up is impossible whatever the cause
- Contra indication to general anaesthesia
- Technical impossibility to perform the procedure under ultrasound guidance
Show all 16Show fewer
- Boundary of the tumor located at less than 1 cm distance from colonic wall or main biliary tract (main right or left bill ducts and common bill duct)
- Tumor invisible with ultrasound
- Lack of safe percutaneous course which can be planned
- Tumor in which more than four biopsies pass were previously performed (cumulated during one or several previous biopsies sessions)
- Contra indication to perform CT or MRI with contrast medium (GADOLINITE or iodinate) intravenous injection
- Child-Pugh B or C cirrhosis (apart from the transitory liver failures in the setting of acute hepatitis related to alcohol abuse)
- Total detachment of the anterior face of the liver from internal abdominal wall due to abundant ascites.
- Prothrombin activity < 50 %
- Platelet count <40 .10 3/ml
- Platelet dysfunction or congenital impaired blood coagulating
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Multipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Classical Intranodular Technique Versus Extra Nodular Technique So-called "No Touch" Technique: A Prospective Randomized Trial
The primary purpose of the trial is to demonstrate that at least a 40% drop of recurrence rate can be achieve in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with no touch multipolar radiofrequency ablation technique compared to those treated with usual intranodular multipolar technique.
Read the detailed description
206 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(s) including up to three nodules measuring up to four cm in diameter, will be randomized in two therapeutic legs: multipolar no touch radiofrequency versus multipolar intra nodular radiofrequency. Patients previously treated for hepatocellular carcinoma will not be enrolled in the study. Diagnostic of hepatocellular carcinoma will be based on American Society of Liver Diseases guide line. Early response to the treatment will be assessed one month after the radiofrequency ablation procedures (up to three in case of incomplete necrosis) with dynamic contrast medium enhanced CT or MRI liver examinations. For the follow up dynamic contrast medium enhanced CT or MRI liver examinations will be performed every three months.
The trial will last for 73 months including 45 months for the recruitment of patients. The main criteria of judgement will be the 2-years recurrence rate.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinomas
- Being tested
- Radiofrequency ablation
- Keywords
- Radiofrequency-Extranodular-Multipolar ablation, Recurrence
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Radiofrequency ablationProcedure or surgery
Also called radiofrequency extranodular or intanodular ablation
Percutaneous multipolar radiofrequency ablation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| extranodular "no touch" multipolar RFA | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: Radiofrequency ablation |
| intranodular multipolar RFA | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Radiofrequency ablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
2 years global (local+distant) recurrence rate
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
2 years local recurrence rate
Measured: 2 years
2 years distant recurrence rate
Measured: 2 years
Primary treatment effectiveness (assessed 1 month after completion of treatment course which can include up to 3 radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures performed monthly)
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Study start9 Feb 2010
- Primary completion6 Oct 2016
- Study completion6 Oct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular CarcinomasStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Olivier Seror, professor, Principal investigator, Radiology Department, CHU-Jean Verdier
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01008657
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P071213
- Acronym
- ARMCENVIN
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 5 Nov 2009
- Last updated
- 29 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Chen MS, Li JQ, Zheng Y, Guo RP, Liang HH, Zhang YQ, Lin XJ, Lau WY. A prospective randomized trial comparing percutaneous local ablative therapy and partial hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2006 Mar;243(3):321-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000201480.65519.b8.
PubMed 16495695Kotoh K, Enjoji M, Arimura E, Morizono S, Kohjima M, Sakai H, Nakamuta M. Scattered and rapid intrahepatic recurrences after radio frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov 21;11(43):6828-32. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i43.6828.
PubMed 16425391Seror O, N'Kontchou G, Tin-Tin-Htar M, Barrucand C, Ganne N, Coderc E, Trinchet JC, Sellier N, Beaugrand M. Radiofrequency ablation with internally cooled versus perfused electrodes for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 May;19(5):718-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.01.007. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
PubMed 18440461Harrison LE, Koneru B, Baramipour P, Fisher A, Barone A, Wilson D, Dela Torre A, Cho KC, Contractor D, Korogodsky M. Locoregional recurrences are frequent after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Nov;197(5):759-64. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00750-6.
PubMed 14585410Mazzaferro V, Battiston C, Perrone S, Pulvirenti A, Regalia E, Romito R, Sarli D, Schiavo M, Garbagnati F, Marchiano A, Spreafico C, Camerini T, Mariani L, Miceli R, Andreola S. Radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation: a prospective study. Ann Surg. 2004 Nov;240(5):900-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000143301.56154.95.
PubMed 15492574Kotoh K, Morizono S, Kohjima M, Enjoji M, Sakai H, Nakamuta M. Evaluation of liver parenchymal pressure and portal endothelium damage during radio frequency ablation in an in vivo porcine model. Liver Int. 2005 Dec;25(6):1217-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01167.x.
PubMed 16343075Kotoh K, Nakamuta M, Morizono S, Kohjima M, Arimura E, Fukushima M, Enjoji M, Sakai H, Nawata H. A multi-step, incremental expansion method for radio frequency ablation: optimization of the procedure to prevent increases in intra-tumor pressure and to reduce the ablation time. Liver Int. 2005 Jun;25(3):542-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01051.x.
PubMed 15910491Nakamuta M, Kohjima M, Morizono S, Yoshimoto T, Miyagi Y, Sakai H, Enjoji M, Kotoh K. Comparison of tissue pressure and ablation time between the LeVeen and cool-tip needle methods. Comp Hepatol. 2006 Dec 21;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1476-5926-5-10.
PubMed 17181870Okusaka T, Okada S, Ueno H, Ikeda M, Shimada K, Yamamoto J, Kosuge T, Yamasaki S, Fukushima N, Sakamoto M. Satellite lesions in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma with reference to clinicopathologic features. Cancer. 2002 Nov 1;95(9):1931-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10892.
PubMed 12404287Pawlik TM, Delman KA, Vauthey JN, Nagorney DM, Ng IO, Ikai I, Yamaoka Y, Belghiti J, Lauwers GY, Poon RT, Abdalla EK. Tumor size predicts vascular invasion and histologic grade: Implications for selection of surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2005 Sep;11(9):1086-92. doi: 10.1002/lt.20472.
PubMed 16123959Shi M, Guo RP, Lin XJ, Zhang YQ, Chen MS, Zhang CQ, Lau WY, Li JQ. Partial hepatectomy with wide versus narrow resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007 Jan;245(1):36-43. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000231758.07868.71.
PubMed 17197963Seror O, N'Kontchou G, Ibraheem M, Ajavon Y, Barrucand C, Ganne N, Coderc E, Trinchet JC, Beaugrand M, Sellier N. Large (>or=5.0-cm) HCCs: multipolar RF ablation with three internally cooled bipolar electrodes--initial experience in 26 patients. Radiology. 2008 Jul;248(1):288-96. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2481071101. Epub 2008 May 15.
PubMed 18483229Wong IH, Yeo W, Leung T, Lau WY, Johnson PJ. Circulating tumor cell mRNAs in peripheral blood from hepatocellular carcinoma patients under radiotherapy, surgical resection or chemotherapy: a quantitative evaluation. Cancer Lett. 2001 Jun 26;167(2):183-91. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(01)00455-4.
PubMed 11369140
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Classical Intranodular Technique Versus Extra Nodular Technique So-called "No Touch" Technique: A Prospective Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01008657
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ARMCENVIN / P071213
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinomas
- Keywords
- Radiofrequency-Extranodular-Multipolar ablation, Recurrence
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Feb 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary purpose of the trial is to demonstrate that at least a 40% drop of recurrence rate can be achieve in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with no touch multipolar radiofrequency ablation technique compared to those treated with usual intranodular multipolar technique.
Detailed description
206 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(s) including up to three nodules measuring up to four cm in diameter, will be randomized in two therapeutic legs: multipolar no touch radiofrequency versus multipolar intra nodular radiofrequency. Patients previously treated for hepatocellular carcinoma will not be enrolled in the study. Diagnostic of hepatocellular carcinoma will be based on American Society of Liver Diseases guide line. Early response to the treatment will be assessed one month after the radiofrequency ablation procedures (up to three in case of incomplete necrosis) with dynamic contrast medium enhanced CT or MRI liver examinations. For the follow up dynamic contrast medium enhanced CT or MRI liver examinations will be performed every three months.
The trial will last for 73 months including 45 months for the recruitment of patients. The main criteria of judgement will be the 2-years recurrence rate.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| extranodular "no touch" multipolar RFA | Experimental | Procedure: Radiofrequency ablation |
| intranodular multipolar RFA | Active comparator | Procedure: Radiofrequency ablation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adults > 18 years old, holder of up to 3 nodules less than 4 cm in diameter
- Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma according to American Society of Liver Study non invasive criteria or based on histological proof
- Non invasive diagnosis of cirrhosis according to French Haute Authority of illness guideline or based on histological proof
- No previous treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma
- Multidisciplinary decision of treatment by radiofrequency ablation
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Adult patient under guardianship or trusteeship, homeless
- Patient with potentially short term life-threatening serious co-infection (apart from viral B or C, or VIH co-infection)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
- Patient for whom regular follow-up is impossible whatever the cause
- Contra indication to general anaesthesia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Radiofrequency ablationAlso: radiofrequency extranodular or intanodular ablationPercutaneous multipolar radiofrequency ablation. | Procedure or surgery | extranodular "no touch" multipolar RFA, intranodular multipolar RFA |
Primary outcome
2 years global (local+distant) recurrence rate
Time frame: 2 years
3 secondary outcomes
2 years local recurrence rate
Time frame: 2 years
2 years distant recurrence rate
Time frame: 2 years
Primary treatment effectiveness (assessed 1 month after completion of treatment course which can include up to 3 radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures performed monthly)
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Aug 2017.
- Background: PubMed 16495695Chen MS, Li JQ, Zheng Y, Guo RP, Liang HH, Zhang YQ, Lin XJ, Lau WY. A prospective randomized trial comparing percutaneous local ablative therapy and partial hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2006 Mar;243(3):321-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000201480.65519.b8.
- Background: PubMed 16425391Kotoh K, Enjoji M, Arimura E, Morizono S, Kohjima M, Sakai H, Nakamuta M. Scattered and rapid intrahepatic recurrences after radio frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov 21;11(43):6828-32. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i43.6828.
- Background: PubMed 18440461Seror O, N'Kontchou G, Tin-Tin-Htar M, Barrucand C, Ganne N, Coderc E, Trinchet JC, Sellier N, Beaugrand M. Radiofrequency ablation with internally cooled versus perfused electrodes for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 May;19(5):718-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.01.007. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
- Background: PubMed 14585410Harrison LE, Koneru B, Baramipour P, Fisher A, Barone A, Wilson D, Dela Torre A, Cho KC, Contractor D, Korogodsky M. Locoregional recurrences are frequent after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Nov;197(5):759-64. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00750-6.
- Background: PubMed 15492574Mazzaferro V, Battiston C, Perrone S, Pulvirenti A, Regalia E, Romito R, Sarli D, Schiavo M, Garbagnati F, Marchiano A, Spreafico C, Camerini T, Mariani L, Miceli R, Andreola S. Radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation: a prospective study. Ann Surg. 2004 Nov;240(5):900-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000143301.56154.95.
- Background: PubMed 16343075Kotoh K, Morizono S, Kohjima M, Enjoji M, Sakai H, Nakamuta M. Evaluation of liver parenchymal pressure and portal endothelium damage during radio frequency ablation in an in vivo porcine model. Liver Int. 2005 Dec;25(6):1217-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01167.x.
- Background: PubMed 15910491Kotoh K, Nakamuta M, Morizono S, Kohjima M, Arimura E, Fukushima M, Enjoji M, Sakai H, Nawata H. A multi-step, incremental expansion method for radio frequency ablation: optimization of the procedure to prevent increases in intra-tumor pressure and to reduce the ablation time. Liver Int. 2005 Jun;25(3):542-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01051.x.
- Background: PubMed 17181870Nakamuta M, Kohjima M, Morizono S, Yoshimoto T, Miyagi Y, Sakai H, Enjoji M, Kotoh K. Comparison of tissue pressure and ablation time between the LeVeen and cool-tip needle methods. Comp Hepatol. 2006 Dec 21;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1476-5926-5-10.
- Background: PubMed 12404287Okusaka T, Okada S, Ueno H, Ikeda M, Shimada K, Yamamoto J, Kosuge T, Yamasaki S, Fukushima N, Sakamoto M. Satellite lesions in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma with reference to clinicopathologic features. Cancer. 2002 Nov 1;95(9):1931-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10892.
- Background: PubMed 16123959Pawlik TM, Delman KA, Vauthey JN, Nagorney DM, Ng IO, Ikai I, Yamaoka Y, Belghiti J, Lauwers GY, Poon RT, Abdalla EK. Tumor size predicts vascular invasion and histologic grade: Implications for selection of surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2005 Sep;11(9):1086-92. doi: 10.1002/lt.20472.
- Background: PubMed 17197963Shi M, Guo RP, Lin XJ, Zhang YQ, Chen MS, Zhang CQ, Lau WY, Li JQ. Partial hepatectomy with wide versus narrow resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007 Jan;245(1):36-43. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000231758.07868.71.
- Background: PubMed 18483229Seror O, N'Kontchou G, Ibraheem M, Ajavon Y, Barrucand C, Ganne N, Coderc E, Trinchet JC, Beaugrand M, Sellier N. Large (>or=5.0-cm) HCCs: multipolar RF ablation with three internally cooled bipolar electrodes--initial experience in 26 patients. Radiology. 2008 Jul;248(1):288-96. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2481071101. Epub 2008 May 15.
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinomas
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Study of VRT106, Combined With Camrelizumab, and Apatinib for Advanced HCC
HCC
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Post Approval Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Multicompartmental Dosimetry Planning.
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
TheraSphere With Durvalumab and Tremelimumab for HCC
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A DNAJB1-PRKACA Fusion Kinase Peptide Vaccine Combined With Glutamine Antagonist DRP-104, Nivolumab, and Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Stage Fibrolamellar Carcinoma (FLC)
Liver Cancer (Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Cancer (FLC))
RecruitingPhase 2
DB-1311 in Combination With BNT327 or DB-1305 in Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors
Solid Tumors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Olivier Seror, professor principal investigator
Radiology Department, CHU-Jean Verdier
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Radiofrequency ablation in people with Hepatocellular Carcinomas, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
2 years global (local+distant) recurrence rate (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01008657, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2017.