AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatocellular CarcinomasARMCENVINNCT01008657

Multipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Extra Nodular Versus Intranodular Technique

A study testing Radiofrequency ablation in people with Hepatocellular Carcinomas, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary purpose of the trial is to demonstrate that at least a 40% drop of recurrence rate can be achieve in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with no touch multipolar radiofrequency ablation technique compared to those treated with usual intranodular multipolar technique. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hepatocellular Carcinomas
What is being tested?
Radiofrequency ablation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
216 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
9 Feb 2010to 6 Oct 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults > 18 years old, holder of up to 3 nodules less than 4 cm in diameter
  • Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma according to American Society of Liver Study non invasive criteria or based on histological proof
  • Non invasive diagnosis of cirrhosis according to French Haute Authority of illness guideline or based on histological proof
  • No previous treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Multidisciplinary decision of treatment by radiofrequency ablation

Who cannot join

  • Adult patient under guardianship or trusteeship, homeless
  • Patient with potentially short term life-threatening serious co-infection (apart from viral B or C, or VIH co-infection)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Patient for whom regular follow-up is impossible whatever the cause
  • Contra indication to general anaesthesia
  • Technical impossibility to perform the procedure under ultrasound guidance
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Boundary of the tumor located at less than 1 cm distance from colonic wall or main biliary tract (main right or left bill ducts and common bill duct)
  • Tumor invisible with ultrasound
  • Lack of safe percutaneous course which can be planned
  • Tumor in which more than four biopsies pass were previously performed (cumulated during one or several previous biopsies sessions)
  • Contra indication to perform CT or MRI with contrast medium (GADOLINITE or iodinate) intravenous injection
  • Child-Pugh B or C cirrhosis (apart from the transitory liver failures in the setting of acute hepatitis related to alcohol abuse)
  • Total detachment of the anterior face of the liver from internal abdominal wall due to abundant ascites.
  • Prothrombin activity < 50 %
  • Platelet count <40 .10 3/ml
  • Platelet dysfunction or congenital impaired blood coagulating

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Radiology Department

    Bondy, 93140

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Multipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Classical Intranodular Technique Versus Extra Nodular Technique So-called "No Touch" Technique: A Prospective Randomized Trial

The primary purpose of the trial is to demonstrate that at least a 40% drop of recurrence rate can be achieve in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with no touch multipolar radiofrequency ablation technique compared to those treated with usual intranodular multipolar technique.

Read the detailed description

206 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(s) including up to three nodules measuring up to four cm in diameter, will be randomized in two therapeutic legs: multipolar no touch radiofrequency versus multipolar intra nodular radiofrequency. Patients previously treated for hepatocellular carcinoma will not be enrolled in the study. Diagnostic of hepatocellular carcinoma will be based on American Society of Liver Diseases guide line. Early response to the treatment will be assessed one month after the radiofrequency ablation procedures (up to three in case of incomplete necrosis) with dynamic contrast medium enhanced CT or MRI liver examinations. For the follow up dynamic contrast medium enhanced CT or MRI liver examinations will be performed every three months.

The trial will last for 73 months including 45 months for the recruitment of patients. The main criteria of judgement will be the 2-years recurrence rate.

Being tested
Radiofrequency ablation
Keywords
Radiofrequency-Extranodular-Multipolar ablation, Recurrence
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Radiofrequency ablationProcedure or surgery

    Also called radiofrequency extranodular or intanodular ablation

    Percutaneous multipolar radiofrequency ablation.

Study groups in NCT01008657
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
extranodular "no touch" multipolar RFAExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Radiofrequency ablation
intranodular multipolar RFAActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Radiofrequency ablation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 2 years global (local+distant) recurrence rate

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. 2 years local recurrence rate

    Measured: 2 years

  2. 2 years distant recurrence rate

    Measured: 2 years

  3. Primary treatment effectiveness (assessed 1 month after completion of treatment course which can include up to 3 radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures performed monthly)

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study start9 Feb 2010
  3. Primary completion6 Oct 2016
  4. Study completion6 Oct 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
216 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01008657
Sponsor's protocol ID
P071213
Acronym
ARMCENVIN
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
5 Nov 2009
Last updated
29 Aug 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Chen MS, Li JQ, Zheng Y, Guo RP, Liang HH, Zhang YQ, Lin XJ, Lau WY. A prospective randomized trial comparing percutaneous local ablative therapy and partial hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2006 Mar;243(3):321-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000201480.65519.b8.

    PubMed 16495695
  • Kotoh K, Enjoji M, Arimura E, Morizono S, Kohjima M, Sakai H, Nakamuta M. Scattered and rapid intrahepatic recurrences after radio frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov 21;11(43):6828-32. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i43.6828.

    PubMed 16425391
  • Seror O, N'Kontchou G, Tin-Tin-Htar M, Barrucand C, Ganne N, Coderc E, Trinchet JC, Sellier N, Beaugrand M. Radiofrequency ablation with internally cooled versus perfused electrodes for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 May;19(5):718-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.01.007. Epub 2008 Mar 17.

    PubMed 18440461
  • Harrison LE, Koneru B, Baramipour P, Fisher A, Barone A, Wilson D, Dela Torre A, Cho KC, Contractor D, Korogodsky M. Locoregional recurrences are frequent after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Nov;197(5):759-64. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00750-6.

    PubMed 14585410
  • Mazzaferro V, Battiston C, Perrone S, Pulvirenti A, Regalia E, Romito R, Sarli D, Schiavo M, Garbagnati F, Marchiano A, Spreafico C, Camerini T, Mariani L, Miceli R, Andreola S. Radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation: a prospective study. Ann Surg. 2004 Nov;240(5):900-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000143301.56154.95.

    PubMed 15492574
  • Kotoh K, Morizono S, Kohjima M, Enjoji M, Sakai H, Nakamuta M. Evaluation of liver parenchymal pressure and portal endothelium damage during radio frequency ablation in an in vivo porcine model. Liver Int. 2005 Dec;25(6):1217-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01167.x.

    PubMed 16343075
  • Kotoh K, Nakamuta M, Morizono S, Kohjima M, Arimura E, Fukushima M, Enjoji M, Sakai H, Nawata H. A multi-step, incremental expansion method for radio frequency ablation: optimization of the procedure to prevent increases in intra-tumor pressure and to reduce the ablation time. Liver Int. 2005 Jun;25(3):542-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01051.x.

    PubMed 15910491
  • Nakamuta M, Kohjima M, Morizono S, Yoshimoto T, Miyagi Y, Sakai H, Enjoji M, Kotoh K. Comparison of tissue pressure and ablation time between the LeVeen and cool-tip needle methods. Comp Hepatol. 2006 Dec 21;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1476-5926-5-10.

    PubMed 17181870
  • Okusaka T, Okada S, Ueno H, Ikeda M, Shimada K, Yamamoto J, Kosuge T, Yamasaki S, Fukushima N, Sakamoto M. Satellite lesions in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma with reference to clinicopathologic features. Cancer. 2002 Nov 1;95(9):1931-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10892.

    PubMed 12404287
  • Pawlik TM, Delman KA, Vauthey JN, Nagorney DM, Ng IO, Ikai I, Yamaoka Y, Belghiti J, Lauwers GY, Poon RT, Abdalla EK. Tumor size predicts vascular invasion and histologic grade: Implications for selection of surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2005 Sep;11(9):1086-92. doi: 10.1002/lt.20472.

    PubMed 16123959
  • Shi M, Guo RP, Lin XJ, Zhang YQ, Chen MS, Zhang CQ, Lau WY, Li JQ. Partial hepatectomy with wide versus narrow resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007 Jan;245(1):36-43. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000231758.07868.71.

    PubMed 17197963
  • Seror O, N'Kontchou G, Ibraheem M, Ajavon Y, Barrucand C, Ganne N, Coderc E, Trinchet JC, Beaugrand M, Sellier N. Large (>or=5.0-cm) HCCs: multipolar RF ablation with three internally cooled bipolar electrodes--initial experience in 26 patients. Radiology. 2008 Jul;248(1):288-96. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2481071101. Epub 2008 May 15.

    PubMed 18483229
  • Wong IH, Yeo W, Leung T, Lau WY, Johnson PJ. Circulating tumor cell mRNAs in peripheral blood from hepatocellular carcinoma patients under radiotherapy, surgical resection or chemotherapy: a quantitative evaluation. Cancer Lett. 2001 Jun 26;167(2):183-91. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(01)00455-4.

    PubMed 11369140

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Radiofrequency ablation in people with Hepatocellular Carcinomas, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

2 years global (local+distant) recurrence rate (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01008657, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in