AzTrials
AzTrials

SchizophreniaPhase 2NCT01009060

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK239512 in Schizophrenia

A Phase 2 study testing GSK239512 in people with Schizophrenia, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 15 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to evaluate the cognitive enhancing effects and tolerability of GSK239512 compared to placebo in patients with schizophrenia Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Schizophrenia
What is being tested?
GSK239512
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
50 participants
Where
15 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Dec 2009to 10 Aug 2011
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of Schizophrenia
  • No acute exacerbation of symptoms requiring hospital admission or step up care in the previous six months.
  • Not on any symptomatic treatment for cognition

Who cannot join

  • Poses a significant homicidal or suicidal risk or evidence of previous homicidal or suicidal risk.
  • Co-morbid psychiatric or significant physical illness
  • Alcohol or drug abuse or dependence.

Trial locations and contacts

15 sites in 1 country.

15 sites in 1 country

United States15 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Butner, North Carolina, 27509

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Catonsville, Maryland, 21228

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Garden Grove, California, 92845

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46222

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, 02130

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90073

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mount Laurel, New Jersey, 08054

  • GSK Investigational Site

    National City, California, 91950

  • GSK Investigational Site

    New York, New York, 10016

  • GSK Investigational Site

    New York, New York, 10032

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sacramento, California, 95817

  • GSK Investigational Site

    San Diego, California, 92102

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Torrance, California, 90502

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomised Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Cognitive Enhancing Effect of GSK239512 in Stable Patients With Schizophrenia

This study aims to evaluate the cognitive enhancing effects and tolerability of GSK239512 compared to placebo in patients with schizophrenia

Read the detailed description

This is a 7-week, Phase II, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group design study in male and female subjects with schizophrenia who are stabilised on antipsychotic medication. Subjects will be randomised to receive either GSK239512 or placebo for 7 weeks. They will undergo weekly review of safety, tolerability and cognitive performance measures.

Conditions
Schizophrenia
Being tested
GSK239512, Placebo
Keywords
H3 Antagonist, Schizophrenia, double blind, Histamine, randomised, placebo controlled, Cognition
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GSK239512Drug

    Histamine H3 Antagonist

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo to match GSK239512

Study groups in NCT01009060
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GSK239512ExperimentalRepeat dose.
Receives: Drug: GSK239512
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorRepeat dose. Placebo to match GSK239512
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Composite Score of CSSB Following Dosing With GSK239512

    The CSSB is a computerized battery with following domains (score range): Verbal memory (0-75), working memory (0-28), motor speed (0-100), verbal fluency, attention and speed of information processing (0-110) and executive functions with higher score representing better performance. Two Baseline CSSB testing were conducted; the first on the day prior to commencing dosing (Day -1) and the other test pre-dose on Day 1: the average of the two tests was used as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at a given time minus score at Baseline. For each individual task from the CSSB, the Baseline was calculated as the mean of the second screening assessment and the Day 1 pre-dose assessment. A composite score was calculated by averaging all the measures, and then calculating a z-score of the composite. Higher the composite score, better is the performance. Z-score is the measure of standard deviation away from the mean score.

    Measured: Baseline and up to Week 7

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Change From Baseline in Composite Score of Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) at Week 7

    MCCB measures functioning across various cognitive domains and is comprised of ten tests that assess seven cognitive domains (speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition). Its measurements are based on timed paper-and-pencil, computerized, and orally-administered tests, as well as spatial tests using geometric cubes. MCCB composite T scores are between 40 and 60 (normal range) and < 40 (below normal range). Higher scores indicate better performance. The Baseline was calculated as the mean of the second screening assessment and the Day 1 pre-dose assessment. If either measurement meant to be used in the mean was missing, then the Baseline value was the non-missing assessment. If both were missing, then Baseline was considered missing and the task was excluded from the analysis. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at a given time post Baseline minus score at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 7

  2. Change From Baseline in Individual Cognitive Domain Scores in CSSB at Week 7

    The CSSB is a computerized battery with following domains (score range): Verbal memory (0-75), working memory (0-28), motor speed (0-100), verbal fluency, attention and speed of information processing (0-110) and executive functions with higher score representing better performance. Two Baseline CSSB testing were conducted; the first on the day prior to commencing dosing (Day -1) and the other test pre-dose on Day 1: the average of the two tests was used as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at a given time minus score at Baseline. For each individual task from the CSSB, the Baseline was calculated as the mean of the second screening assessment and the Day 1 pre-dose assessment. A composite score was calculated by averaging all the measures, and then calculating a z-score of the composite. Higher the composite score, better is the performance. Z-score is the measure of standard deviation away from the mean score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 7

  3. Change From Baseline in Individual Cognitive Domain Scores in MCCB at Week 7

    MCCB measures functioning across various cognitive domains and is comprised of ten tests that assess seven cognitive domains (speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition) Its measurements are based on timed paper-and-pencil, computerized, and orally-administered tests, as well as spatial tests using geometric cubes. MCCB composite T scores are between 40 and 60 (normal range) and < 40 (below normal range). Higher scores indicate better performance. The Baseline was calculated as the mean of the second screening assessment and the Day 1 pre-dose assessment. If either measurement meant to be used in the mean was missing, then the Baseline value was the non-missing assessment. If both were missing, then Baseline was considered missing and the task was excluded from the analysis. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at a given time post Baseline minus score at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 7

  4. Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) at Week 7

    BPRS is the clinician rating of psychiatric symptoms; higher score indicates higher severity; 18-items scored 1-7; lower score is 18 and highest score is 126. The Baseline was calculated as the mean of the second screening assessment and the Day 1 pre-dose assessment. If either measurement meant to be used in the mean was missing, then the Baseline value was the non-missing assessment. If both were missing, then Baseline was considered missing and the task was excluded from the analysis. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at a given time post Baseline minus score at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 7

  5. Change From Baseline in Schedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) at Week 7

    The SANS was a tool used to assess five symptom complexes to obtain clinical ratings of negative symptoms in par. with schizophrenia. Complexes include: affective blunting; alogia (impoverished thinking); avolition/apathy; anhedonia/asociality; and disturbance of attention. Assessment was conducted on six-point scale (0=not at all to 5=severe) for a total scoring range of 0-120. Lower scores represent better performance. The Baseline was calculated as the mean of the second screening assessment and the Day 1 pre-dose assessment. If either measurement meant to be used in the mean was missing, then the Baseline value was the non-missing assessment. If both were missing, then Baseline was considered missing and the task was excluded from the analysis. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at a given time post Baseline minus score at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 7

  6. Change From Baseline in University of California and San Diego (UCSD) Performance Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) at Week 7

    The UPSA is a measure of Functional Capacity and assesses skills involved in community tasks. It is composed of five subdomains- comprehension and planning, finance, communication, mobility and house management. When combined, measures functional capacity. The comprehension and planning ranges from 0 to 14, the finance ranges from 0 to 11, the communication ranges from 0 to 12, the mobility ranges from 0 to 9, and the house management ranges from 0 to 4. Then a medication management score of 0 to 37 is added. In total, the Assessment is thus scored on a 0 to 87 scale, with higher scores indicating better performance. The Baseline was calculated as the mean of the second screening assessment and the Day 1 pre-dose assessment. If either was missing, then the Baseline value was the non-missing assessment. If both were missing, then Baseline was considered missing and the task was excluded from the analysis. Change from Baseline was score at a given time post Baseline minus Baseline score

    Measured: Baseline and Week 7

  7. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment.

    Measured: Up to Day 59

  8. Number of Par. With Most Severe On-treatment Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

    Triplicate 12-lead ECGs were obtained at Baseline (screening visit). Single 12-lead ECGs were obtained at each subsequent time point during the study. Abnormal ECG findings were presented for the most severe on-treatment result.

    Measured: Up to Day 59

  9. Number of Par. With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Readings Outside Clinical Concern Range

    Blood pressure readings both systolic and diastolic were collected at pre-dose and then hourly post-dose until 6 hours post-dose or until the par. got discharged. Blood pressure was measured in both standing (Std) and supine (Sup) position. Data with only abnormal values were presented. For SBP the data of concern was <90 or >140 and increase from Baseline (IFB) >=40; <90 or >140 and decrease from Baseline (DFB) >=30. For DBP the data of concern was <50 or >90 and IFB >=30; <50 or >90 and DFB >=20.

    Measured: Up to Day 59

  10. Number of Par. With Heart Rate Measured Value Outside Clinical Concern Range

    Heart rate readings were collected at pre-dose and then hourly post-dose until 6 hours post-dose or until the participant got discharged. It was measured in both supine and standing position. For both Std and Sup positions, heart rate data of concern was <50 or >100 and IFB >=30; <50 or >100 and DFB >=30. Data with only abnormal values were presented.

    Measured: Up to Day 59

  11. Number of Par. With Abnormal Hematology Parameters Values at Any Time on Treatment

    Hematology parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, Lymphocytes, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH), Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV), Monocytes, Platelet count, Red blood cell count (RBC), Reticulocytes, Neutrophils count and White blood cell (WBC) count were presented as values of potential clinical concern at any time on treatment. Only those parameters with any abnormal value are presented.

    Measured: Up to Day 59

  12. Number of Par. With Abnormal Clinical Chemistry Parameters Values at Any Time On-treatment

    Clinical chemistry parameters: Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Calcium, Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Total Bilirubin, Total protein, Urea/ Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were presented as values of potential clinical concern at any time on treatment. Only those parameters with any abnormal value are presented.

    Measured: Up to Day 59

  13. Number of Par. With Abnormal Urinalysis Parameters Values of Potential Clinical Concern

    Samples for urinalysis were collected on Days 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49 and up to Day 59 (follow-up) to assess specific gravity, pH, glucose, protein, blood and ketone by dipstick and microscopic examination (if blood or protein is abnormal).

    Measured: Up to Day 59

  14. Plasma Concentrations of GSK239512 (Cmax) at Steady State After Repeat Dosing on Dose Review Visit at Any Time On-treatment

    One Pharmacokinetic (PK) sample was collected within 15 minutes prior to the start of the CSSB and one PK sample was collected within 15 minutes after completion of the CSSB. 'n' was the number of samples available for analysis.

    Measured: 15 minutes prior to start and 15 minutes after completion of CSSB at Week 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 7

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Dec 2009
  3. Primary completion10 Aug 2011
  4. Study completion10 Aug 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01009060
Sponsor's protocol ID
113147
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
5 Nov 2009
Last updated
8 Nov 2017
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

Publications

  • Jarskog LF, Lowy MT, Grove RA, Keefe RS, Horrigan JP, Ball MP, Breier A, Buchanan RW, Carter CS, Csernansky JG, Goff DC, Green MF, Kantrowitz JT, Keshavan MS, Laurelle M, Lieberman JA, Marder SR, Maruff P, McMahon RP, Seidman LJ, Peykamian MA. A Phase II study of a histamine H(3) receptor antagonist GSK239512 for cognitive impairment in stable schizophrenia subjects on antipsychotic therapy. Schizophr Res. 2015 May;164(1-3):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.01.041. Epub 2015 Feb 24.

    PubMed 25728831

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing GSK239512 in people with Schizophrenia, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 15 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 15 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Sep 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Composite Score of CSSB Following Dosing With GSK239512 (time frame: Baseline and up to Week 7). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01009060, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in