AzTrials
AzTrials

Thoracic Paravertebral BlockNCT01009398

Thoracic Paravertebral Catheters

An observational study of Thoracic Paravertebral Block, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Thoracic operations are known to be painful and requiring an adequate postoperative pain therapy. A well documented technique to achieve postoperative analgesia is the use of paravertebral catheters. Theoretically the thoracic paravertebral block results in an unilateral thoracic anaesthesia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Thoracic Paravertebral Block
What is being tested?
Fluoroscopic examination
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
Nov 2009to Feb 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients who are scheduled for a thoracoscopic intervention with planned placement of paravertebral catheters as their standard postoperative pain treatment strategy are eligible for this prospective observational clinical trial.

Who may be able to join

  • Patient scheduled for thoracoscopic intervention
  • Planned placement of paravertebral catheters

Who cannot join

  • Refusal to participate
  • Age < 18
  • Severe hepatic disfunction (Liver disease Child B or C)
  • known allergies to iodinated contrast material
  • Morbus Waldenström
  • multiple myeloma
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • University Hospital and University of Bern, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy

    Bern, Canton of Bern, 3010

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Radiological Evaluation of Thoracic Paravertebral Catheters: A Prospective Clinical Trial

Thoracic operations are known to be painful and requiring an adequate postoperative pain therapy. A well documented technique to achieve postoperative analgesia is the use of paravertebral catheters. Theoretically the thoracic paravertebral block results in an unilateral thoracic anaesthesia. However, in the daily clinical practice it remains unclear whether catheters are placed correctly into the paravertebral region. The investigators' experiences with paravertebral catheters suggest that there may be many displacements of catheters since the pain control is reduced compared to epidural analgesia.

The aim of this prospective observational clinical trial is to postoperatively evaluate the exact location of paravertebral catheter placed for thoracoscopic interventions by using the classical land-mark puncture technique. After radiological detection of the catheter position, the spread and distribution of contrast dye injected through the catheters will be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

Background

The paravertebral block is a regional anaesthetic technique which can be used for analgesia after thoracic, cardiac, breast surgery, upper abdominal surgery or for pain therapy. Thoracic paravertebral blockade is performed by injecting a local anaesthetic solution into the paravertebral space, which contains the thoracic nerves, their branches and the sympathetic trunk. This space is a wedge-shaped area sandwiched between the heads and necks of the ribs. The posterior wall is formed by the superior costo-transverse ligament, the antero-lateral wall is the parietal pleura with the endothoracic fascia and the medial wall is the lateral surface of the vertebral body and disc. Also medially, there is communication with the epidural space via the intervertebral foramen. It has been shown, that each space communicates inferiorly and superiorly across the heads and necks of the ribs. Thus injecting local anaesthetic in the paravertebral space should results to an analgesia corresponding to a unilateral epidural anaesthesia.

Unilateral multisegmental anaesthesia after single-shot paravertebral injection of local anaesthetics is well established. On the other hand, a variety of different studies on volunteers, patients and cadavers showed conflicting results regarding the vertical spread over several adjacent segments after paravertebral injection leading to the recommendation of some authors to use a multi-injection technique to achieve a multilevel somatic nerve blockade, specially described during breast surgery using paravertebral block alone.

Can we explain these different contradictory reports and recommendations? Available radiologic and anatomic studies show many different patterns of contrast dye spread after single shot paravertebral contrast dye injection. One study even reports different distribution of dye even after several paravertebral single shots of the same operator in the same patient. Some radiological studies report cloud-like contrast dye accumulation without significant cranio-caudal spread. This could be due to the restricted intercostal spread or to subpleural spread or even to injection of the contrast dye into the autochthonic muscles of the back.

The spread of local anesthetics (or contrast dye as substitute) is affected by nuances of differences in the needle placement because of the fine membranes like the endothoracica fascia. This might be the major problem during the insertion of catheters. The final location of catheter tip is hard to predict. Catheters might dissect during the insertion and possibly the difference is only a more medial or more lateral puncture. The placement of catheters into the paravertebral space leading to a clear cranio-caudal spread of local anaesthetics resulting in multisegmental spread of anaesthesia is the goal of a catheter for paravertebral analgesia but it seems not easy to be achieved - despite of an uncontestable clinical benefit of paravertebral catheters for pain relief.

Studies describing the exact emplacement of catheters, distribution of contrast dye and correlation of this distribution with the clinical effect after catheter placement by the classical land-mark based approach as described by Eason and Wyatt are lacking. We therefore aim to describe the different possible emplacements of the catheters, the resulting spread of contrast dye after injection through the catheters as well as the corresponding area of somatic and sympathetic block.

Objective

The aim of prospective observational clinical trial is to evaluate the exact location of paravertebral catheter placed for thoracoscopic interventions using the classic landmark approach by injecting a small amount of contrast dye (1 ml) through the catheter and subsequent fluoroscopic documentation of the catheter tip localisation. Thereafter a larger amount (20 ml) of diluted contrast dye will be injected and its spread will be documented fluoroscopically.

Methods

Once the paravertebral catheter is placed as usual after the end of surgery, 1 ml of contrast dye will be injected through the catheter. After fluoroscopic documentation of the catheter tip, further 10 ml of diluted contrast dye will be injected and its spread again documented fluoroscopically in two planes. All saved pictures, showing the catheter tip position and the contrast dye spread, will be evaluated subsequently by an independent radiologist. After these fluoroscopic examinations a test dose of Bupivacaine 0.25% mixed with Adrenaline 5 mcg/ml of 3ml will be injected through the catheter followed by an injection of 0.3ml/kg of local anaesthetics (Bupivacaine 0.25% mixed with Adrenaline 5 mcg/ml). One hour later a clinical testing of the skin area with somatic and sympathetic block provided through the paravertebral catheters will be performed and the data recorded.

Being tested
Fluoroscopic examination
Keywords
Anesthesia and Analgesia, Regional anesthesia, Thoracic Paravertebral block, Catheter location
Medical subject headings
Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fluoroscopic examinationOther

    Localisation of the paravertebral catheter tip and documentation of the spread of contrast dye injected through the catheters by fluoroscopic examination

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Exact position of the paravertebral catheter

    Measured: immediately

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Spread of contrast dye through the catheters

    Measured: immediately

  2. Correlation of clinical effect of local anaesthetics injected through the catheters and documented spread of contrast dye

    Measured: immediately

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2009
  3. Primary completionDec 2010
  4. Study completionFeb 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01009398
Sponsor's protocol ID
167/09
Status last verified
Feb 2011
First submitted
5 Nov 2009
Last updated
3 Feb 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Eason MJ, Wyatt R. Paravertebral thoracic block-a reappraisal. Anaesthesia. 1979 Jul-Aug;34(7):638-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1979.tb06363.x.

    PubMed 517716
  • Hill SE, Keller RA, Stafford-Smith M, Grichnik K, White WD, D'Amico TA, Newman MF. Efficacy of single-dose, multilevel paravertebral nerve blockade for analgesia after thoracoscopic procedures. Anesthesiology. 2006 May;104(5):1047-53. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200605000-00022.

    PubMed 16645458
  • Luyet C, Eichenberger U, Greif R, Vogt A, Szucs Farkas Z, Moriggl B. Ultrasound-guided paravertebral puncture and placement of catheters in human cadavers: an imaging study. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Apr;102(4):534-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep015. Epub 2009 Feb 24.

    PubMed 19244265

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Thoracic Paravertebral Block, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Exact position of the paravertebral catheter (time frame: immediately). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01009398, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2011.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in