AzTrials
AzTrials

Degenerative Joint DiseaseNCT01010763

A Study on M2a Magnum Total Hip Arthroplasty

A study testing Total Hip Arthroplasty in people with Degenerative Joint Disease and Avascular Necrosis, run by Zimmer Biomet at 1 site in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study includes the investigation of Metal-ion release and Renal Function analysis in M2a Total Hip Arthroplasty. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
What is being tested?
Total Hip Arthroplasty
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
184 participants
Where
1 siteJapan
Study dates
Nov 2009to 28 Apr 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients suitable for primary Total Hip Replacement
  • Patients aged over 20
  • Patients with limited co-morbidity- ASA I-III
  • Patients must be able to understand instructions and be willing to return for follow-up
  • Patients willing to provide blood and urine samples for metal ion analysis at follow-up

Who cannot join

  • Pre-existing metal implants
  • Infection, sepsis, and osteomyelitis
  • Uncooperative patient or pt with neurologic disorders who are incapable of following directions
  • Osteoporosis
  • Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation
  • osteomalacia
Show all 10Show fewer
  • distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site
  • rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram
  • vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, or neuromuscular disease
  • pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Japan1 site
  • Kansai Rosai Hospital

    Amagasaki, Hyogo Pref., 660-8511

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Controlled Multi-Center Study on M2a Magnum Total Hip Arthroplasty

The purpose of this study includes the investigation of Metal-ion release and Renal Function analysis in M2a Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Read the detailed description

There are no clinical studies conducted on its performance in Asian population. Furthermore clinical data is required to support marketing and validate design of M2A Magnum.

Being tested
Total Hip Arthroplasty
Medical subject headings
Joint Diseases, Osteonecrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Total Hip ArthroplastyDevice

    Degenerated hip is replaced with implantable devices, which include femoral stem, acetabular cup, femoral head and acetabular liner(control group only).

Study groups in NCT01010763
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
M2a MagnumExperimentalTotal HIp Arthroplasty using with the M2a Magnum Large Metal Articulation is an ultra-high performance metal-on-metal articulation with a big ball (greater than or equal to 38mm) in acetabulums as small as 44mm.
Receives: Device: Total Hip Arthroplasty
M2a TaperActive comparatorTotal Hip Arthroplasty using with the M2a Taper Acetabular System consists of a titanium outer shell with cobalt chromium (Co-Cr-Mo) metallic liner, which articulates with with a cobalt chromium (Co-Cr-Mo) modular femoral head.
Receives: Device: Total Hip Arthroplasty

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Range of Motion

    Hip Flexion Angle at 1 year postoperatively

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Metal Ion

    Blood Cobalt Ion Concentration 0 was imputed for the measurement result being below detection limit.

    Measured: 3 month

  2. UCLA Activity Score

    UCLA is physician assessing scoring system to assess patient's activity level. Minimum score is 0 (completely inactive) and maximum score is 9 (Regularly participates in impact sports) with 1 point increments depending on patient's activity level.

    Higher score means higher activity level achieved.

    Measured: 5 year

  3. Radiographic Assessment

    number of participants, whose x-ray shows any signs of radiographic changes (osteolysis, heterotopic ossification and/or radiolucency)

    Measured: 5 year

  4. Harris Hip Score

    Harris Hip Score is physician assessing hip functional scoring system, which includes 4 components (pain, function, deformity and range of motion) with minimum score of 0 \& maximum score of 100.

    Maximum \& Minimum score of each subscale is pain: 0-44, function: 0-47, Deformity: 0-4 and Range of motion: 0-5.

    Current report uses summed score of each patient to compare total Harris Hip Score.

    Higher score means better outcomes.

    Measured: 5 year

  5. Metal Ion

    Blood Cobalt Ion Concentration 0 was imputed for the measurement result being below detection limit.

    Measured: 6 month

  6. Metal Ion

    Blood Cobalt Ion Concentration 0 was imputed for the measurement result being below detection limit.

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Metal Ion

    Blood Cobalt Ion Concentration 0 was imputed for the measurement result being below detection limit.

    Measured: 2 year

  8. Metal Ion

    Blood Cobalt Ion Concentration 0 was imputed for the measurement result being below detection limit.

    Measured: 3 year

  9. Metal Ion

    Blood Cobalt Ion Concentration 0 was imputed for the measurement result being below detection limit.

    Measured: 4 year

  10. Metal Ion

    Blood Cobalt Ion Concentration 0 was imputed for the measurement result being below detection limit.

    Measured: 5 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Nov 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2009
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2017
  4. Study completion28 Apr 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
184 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01010763
Sponsor's protocol ID
INT.CR.RROW2
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
5 Nov 2009
Last updated
21 Jun 2019
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Ando W, Yamamoto K, Atsumi T, Tamaoki S, Oinuma K, Shiratsuchi H, Tokunaga H, Inaba Y, Kobayashi N, Aihara M, Ohzono K. Comparison between component designs with different femoral head size in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; multicenter randomized prospective study. J Orthop. 2015 Jun 10;12(4):228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2015.05.008. eCollection 2015 Dec.

    PubMed 26566324

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Total Hip Arthroplasty in people with Degenerative Joint Disease and Avascular Necrosis, run by Zimmer Biomet at 1 site in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Jun 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Range of Motion (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01010763, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in