HIV InfectionsPhase 3ENCORE1NCT01011413
Safety and Efficacy of Reduced Versus Standard Dose Efavirenz (EFV) Plus Two Nucleotides in Antiretroviral-naïve Adults.
A Phase 3 study testing Efavirenz 600mg and Efavirenz 400mg in people with HIV Infections, run by Kirby Institute at 1 site in Australia.
Trial summary
Clinical data suggests that the standard dose of the anti-HIV medication, efavirenz (EFV), could be reduced without compromising its effectiveness. Lower drug doses could have fewer side effects and would make EFV more affordable. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- Efavirenz 600mg and Efavirenz 400mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 636 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustralia
- Study dates
- Aug 2011to Aug 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HIV-1 positive by licensed diagnostic test
- aged >16 years of age (or minimum age as determined by local regulations or as legal requirements dictate)
- 50 < cluster of differentiation (CD)4 <500 cells/µL
- No prior AIDS-defining illness, using the Center for Diseases Control 1993 Case Definition (except pulmonary tuberculosis)
- HIV RNA ≥1000 copies/mL
- no prior exposure to antiretroviral therapy (ART) (including short course ART for preventing MTCT)
- calculated creatinine clearance (CLCr) more than or equal to 50 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula)
- provision of written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- the following laboratory values:
- absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <500 cells/μL
- hemoglobin <7.0 g/dL
- platelet count <50,000 cells/μL
- alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase >5 x upper limit of normal
- pregnant women or nursing mothers
Show all 10Show fewer
- active opportunistic or malignant disease not under adequate control
- use of immunomodulators within 30 days prior to screening
- use of any prohibited medications
- current alcohol or illicit substance use that might adversely affect study participation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Trial to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Reduced Dose Versus Standard Dose EFV Plus Two Nucleotides (N(t)RTI) in Antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected Adults Over 96 Weeks
Clinical data suggests that the standard dose of the anti-HIV medication, efavirenz (EFV), could be reduced without compromising its effectiveness. Lower drug doses could have fewer side effects and would make EFV more affordable. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness, over 96 weeks, of standard (600mg) versus reduced dose (400mg) EFV in controlling HIV as part of initial combination antiretroviral therapy.
Read the detailed description
In this international, multicenter trial, 630 HIV infected patients who have not received any previous treatment for their HIV-infection will be enrolled. Participants will be randomized equally (1:1) to receive Truvada (tenofovir and emtricitabine) with either the standard or reduced dose of EFV. Neither the study doctor nor the participant will know which treatment the participant is receiving. Physical examinations, laboratory analyses and questionnaires will be performed at the 11 study visits at screening, baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96. The primary aim of this study is to compare between treatment groups the proportion of patients with undetectable HIV viral load (HIV RNA < 200 copies/mL) after 48 weeks. Information on immune function, drug adherence, resistance to antiretrovirals, quality of life, mental state and HIV-related conditions will also be collected. Blood samples will be collected for future testing. Interim analyses will be performed when the first 125 participants in each treatment group reach week 24 and when all participants reach week 24. These interim analyses will provide an early check that the reduced dose of EFV suppresses HIV infection as effectively as the standard dose of EFV. A follow-up analysis will be performed when all participants reach week 96.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Being tested
- Efavirenz 600mg, Efavirenz 400mg
- Keywords
- HIV, Antiretroviral Therapy (ART), Efavirenz (EFV), Dose reduction
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Efavirenz 600mgDrug
Also called Matrix EFV 200mg tablets
3 x EFV 200 milligram (mg) tablets once daily
Efavirenz 400mgDrug
Also called Matrix EFV 200mg tablets, Matrix EFV 200mg matched placebo tablets.
2 x EFV 200 milligram (mg) tablets plus 1x matched EFV placebo tablet once daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 600 milligram (mg) Efavirenz | Active comparator | Eligible patients will be centrally randomised to receive tenofovir (TDF) (300mg qd)/emtricitabine (FTC) (200mg qd) + EFV (600mg qd; 3 x 200mg qd) Receives: Drug: Efavirenz 600mg |
| 400mg Efavirenz | Experimental | Eligible patients will be centrally randomised to receive TDF (300mg qd)/FTC (200mg qd) + EFV (400mg qd; 2 x 200mg + 1 x 200mg placebo qd). Receives: Drug: Efavirenz 400mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <200 Copies/mL 48 Weeks After Randomisation
Percentage of participants in each of the treatment arms with centrally quantified plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load <200 copies/mL 48 weeks after randomisation.
Measured: 48 weeks
Secondary outcomes (9)
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 Copies/mL and <50 Copies/mL at 48 and 96 Weeks After Randomisation
Percentage of participants in each of the two treatment arms with plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL and <50 copies/mL at 48 and 96 weeks after randomisation
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Mean Change From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell Count
Mean change from baseline to week 96 in CD4+ T-cell count/mm3 between the two treatment arms
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Clinical Endpoints: Opportunistic Disease or Death, and Serious Non-AIDS-defining Events and Non-AIDS-related Mortality
Number of participants in each randomised arm diagnosed with a serious non-AIDS defining event, who die from an AIDS-defining event, who die from a non-AIDS-defining event
Measured: up to 2 years
Change From Baseline in Metabolic Endpoints
Change from baseline to week 96 in fasted total cholesterol, high density cholesterol and low density cholesterol, and glucose between randomised treatment arms
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Adherence: Median Scores of Self-reported Adherence to Randomised Study Medications
AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 7-day adherence questionnaire scores. Maximum value is all pills taken every day; minimum value is no pills taken per day. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Measured: 2 years
Change From Baseline in Fasted Insulin Levels
Change from baseline to week 96 in fasted insulin levels
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Change in Selected Serum Biochemical Parameters
Change from baseline to week 96 in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase levels between randomised treatment arms
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Change From Baseline in Estimate Creatinine Clearance
Change from baseline to week 96 in estimate creatinine clearance between randomised treatment arms
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Steady-state Efavirenz Concentrations
Steady-state efavirenz mid-dosing interval plasma concentrations
Measured: Week 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2011
- Primary completionJun 2013
- Study completionAug 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 636 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kirby Institute
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David Cooper, Professor, Principal investigator, Kirby Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01011413
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NCHECR-ENCORE1
- Acronym
- ENCORE1
- Status last verified
- Feb 2020
- First submitted
- 9 Nov 2009
- Last updated
- 21 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
ENCORE1 Study Group. Efficacy of 400 mg efavirenz versus standard 600 mg dose in HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive adults (ENCORE1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014 Apr 26;383(9927):1474-1482. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62187-X. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
PubMed 24522178ENCORE1 Study Group; Carey D, Puls R, Amin J, Losso M, Phanupak P, Foulkes S, Mohapi L, Crabtree-Ramirez B, Jessen H, Kumar S, Winston A, Lee MP, Belloso W, Cooper DA, Emery S. Efficacy and safety of efavirenz 400 mg daily versus 600 mg daily: 96-week data from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority ENCORE1 study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Jul;15(7):793-802. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70060-5. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
PubMed 25877963Winston A, Amin J, Clarke A, Else L, Amara A, Owen A, Barber T, Jessen H, Avihingsanon A, Chetchotisakd P, Khoo S, Cooper DA, Emery S, Puls R; ENCORE Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Substudy Team; ENCORE Cerebrospinal Fluid CSF Substudy Team. Cerebrospinal fluid exposure of efavirenz and its major metabolites when dosed at 400 mg and 600 mg once daily: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Apr 1;60(7):1026-32. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu976. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
PubMed 25501988
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Trial to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Reduced Dose Versus Standard Dose EFV Plus Two Nucleotides (N(t)RTI) in Antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected Adults Over 96 Weeks
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01011413
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ENCORE1 / NCHECR-ENCORE1
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Keywords
- HIV, Antiretroviral Therapy (ART), Efavirenz (EFV), Dose reduction
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 636 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kirby InstituteOther government
- Study start
- Aug 2011
- Primary completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Feb 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Clinical data suggests that the standard dose of the anti-HIV medication, efavirenz (EFV), could be reduced without compromising its effectiveness. Lower drug doses could have fewer side effects and would make EFV more affordable. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness, over 96 weeks, of standard (600mg) versus reduced dose (400mg) EFV in controlling HIV as part of initial combination antiretroviral therapy.
Detailed description
In this international, multicenter trial, 630 HIV infected patients who have not received any previous treatment for their HIV-infection will be enrolled. Participants will be randomized equally (1:1) to receive Truvada (tenofovir and emtricitabine) with either the standard or reduced dose of EFV. Neither the study doctor nor the participant will know which treatment the participant is receiving. Physical examinations, laboratory analyses and questionnaires will be performed at the 11 study visits at screening, baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96. The primary aim of this study is to compare between treatment groups the proportion of patients with undetectable HIV viral load (HIV RNA < 200 copies/mL) after 48 weeks. Information on immune function, drug adherence, resistance to antiretrovirals, quality of life, mental state and HIV-related conditions will also be collected. Blood samples will be collected for future testing. Interim analyses will be performed when the first 125 participants in each treatment group reach week 24 and when all participants reach week 24. These interim analyses will provide an early check that the reduced dose of EFV suppresses HIV infection as effectively as the standard dose of EFV. A follow-up analysis will be performed when all participants reach week 96.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 600 milligram (mg) Efavirenz | Active comparator | Drug: Efavirenz 600mgEligible patients will be centrally randomised to receive tenofovir (TDF) (300mg qd)/emtricitabine (FTC) (200mg qd) + EFV (600mg qd; 3 x 200mg qd) |
| 400mg Efavirenz | Experimental | Drug: Efavirenz 400mgEligible patients will be centrally randomised to receive TDF (300mg qd)/FTC (200mg qd) + EFV (400mg qd; 2 x 200mg + 1 x 200mg placebo qd). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- HIV-1 positive by licensed diagnostic test
- aged >16 years of age (or minimum age as determined by local regulations or as legal requirements dictate)
- 50 < cluster of differentiation (CD)4 <500 cells/µL
- No prior AIDS-defining illness, using the Center for Diseases Control 1993 Case Definition (except pulmonary tuberculosis)
- HIV RNA ≥1000 copies/mL
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- the following laboratory values:
- pregnant women or nursing mothers
- active opportunistic or malignant disease not under adequate control
- use of immunomodulators within 30 days prior to screening
- use of any prohibited medications
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Efavirenz 600mgAlso: Matrix EFV 200mg tablets3 x EFV 200 milligram (mg) tablets once daily | Drug | 600 milligram (mg) Efavirenz |
| Efavirenz 400mgAlso: Matrix EFV 200mg tablets, Matrix EFV 200mg matched placebo tablets.2 x EFV 200 milligram (mg) tablets plus 1x matched EFV placebo tablet once daily | Drug | 400mg Efavirenz |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <200 Copies/mL 48 Weeks After Randomisation
Time frame: 48 weeks
Percentage of participants in each of the treatment arms with centrally quantified plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load <200 copies/mL 48 weeks after randomisation.
9 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 Copies/mL and <50 Copies/mL at 48 and 96 Weeks After Randomisation
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Mean Change From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell Count
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Clinical Endpoints: Opportunistic Disease or Death, and Serious Non-AIDS-defining Events and Non-AIDS-related Mortality
Time frame: up to 2 years
Change From Baseline in Metabolic Endpoints
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Adherence: Median Scores of Self-reported Adherence to Randomised Study Medications
Time frame: 2 years
Change From Baseline in Fasted Insulin Levels
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change in Selected Serum Biochemical Parameters
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Change From Baseline in Estimate Creatinine Clearance
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Steady-state Efavirenz Concentrations
Time frame: Week 4
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Feb 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 24522178ENCORE1 Study Group. Efficacy of 400 mg efavirenz versus standard 600 mg dose in HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive adults (ENCORE1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014 Apr 26;383(9927):1474-1482. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62187-X. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 25877963ENCORE1 Study Group; Carey D, Puls R, Amin J, Losso M, Phanupak P, Foulkes S, Mohapi L, Crabtree-Ramirez B, Jessen H, Kumar S, Winston A, Lee MP, Belloso W, Cooper DA, Emery S. Efficacy and safety of efavirenz 400 mg daily versus 600 mg daily: 96-week data from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority ENCORE1 study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Jul;15(7):793-802. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70060-5. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25501988Winston A, Amin J, Clarke A, Else L, Amara A, Owen A, Barber T, Jessen H, Avihingsanon A, Chetchotisakd P, Khoo S, Cooper DA, Emery S, Puls R; ENCORE Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Substudy Team; ENCORE Cerebrospinal Fluid CSF Substudy Team. Cerebrospinal fluid exposure of efavirenz and its major metabolites when dosed at 400 mg and 600 mg once daily: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Apr 1;60(7):1026-32. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu976. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
- Kirby Institute (formerly National Centre for HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research)Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David Cooper, Professor principal investigator
Kirby Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Efavirenz 600mg and Efavirenz 400mg in people with HIV Infections, run by Kirby Institute at 1 site in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Feb 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <200 Copies/mL 48 Weeks After Randomisation (time frame: 48 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01011413, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2020.