Chronic Renal FailurePhase 3NICORENNCT01011699
Nicotinamide Versus Sevelamer Hydrochloride on Phosphatemia Control on Chronic Hemodialysed Patients
A Phase 3 study testing nicotinamide, sevelamer and cinacalcet in people with Chronic Renal Failure and Hemodialysis, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens at 18 sites in France.
Trial summary
The comparison between nicotinamide and sevelamer aims to demonstrate, in chronic hemodialysed patients, the non-inferiority of nicotinamide in terms of control of the phosphatemia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Renal Failure, Hemodialysis
- What is being tested?
- nicotinamide, sevelamer and cinacalcet
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 176 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Jan 2010to Jun 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women or men over 18 years
- Chronic hemodialysis (since more than 3 months)
- Hyperphosphatemia controlled with only CaCO3
- PO4 > 1,60 mmol/l, PCa < 2,37 mmol/l
- patient able to understand and sign informed consent form
Who cannot join
- PTH < 60 ou > 800 pg/ml (PTX)
- Aluminium intoxication (aluminium level in blood > 0,5 µmol/l)
- Score of aortic calcifications ≥ 20 (max 24)
- Characterized intolerance with Renagel and/or Nicobion
- Pregnant woman
- Autoimmune disease
Show all 13Show fewer
- Patient known to have a bad drug compliance
- Blood tests abnormality (thrombopenia <150 000, serum albumin <30g)
- Hepatic tests abnormality
- Transplant probably within 6 months
- Patient who will need transplantation within 6 month
- Patients receiving chemotherapy
- Patients having a loss of dry weight of 3 kg in 3 months or 6 kg in 6 months.
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 1 country.
18 sites in 1 country
France18 sites
Centre Hospital-Universitaire d'Amiens
Amiens, Picardie, 80054
Centre Hospitalier Général
Beauvais, Oise, 60000
Clinique du Bois Bernard
Bois-Bernard, Pas de calais, 62320
Centre Hospitalier
Boulogne-sur-Mer, Pas de calais, 62200
Centre Hospitalier
Cambrai, Cambrai, 59407
Clinique Saint Côme
Compiègne, Oise, 60200
Centre Hospitalier Général
Creil, Oise, 60100
Association pour le Développement de l'Hémodialyse
Hénin-Beaumont, Hauts-de-France, 62110
Polyclinique de la Louvière
Lille, Nord, 59000
CHRU
Lille, Nord, 59037
ALURAD
Limoges, Limousin, 87042
Centre Hospitalier
Lisieux, Calvados, 14100
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
Reims, Marne, 51092
Association Régionale Promotion Dialyse à domicile (ARPDD)
Reims, Marne
Hôpital Victor Provo
Roubaix, Nord, 59056
Clinique de l'Europe
Rouen, Seine maritime, 76040
Centre Hospitalier Général
Soissons, Aisne, 02009
Centre Hospitalier Général
Valenciennes, Nord, 59322
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Nicotinamide and Sevelamer Hydrochloride on Phosphatemia Control on Chronic Hemodialysed Patients
The comparison between nicotinamide and sevelamer aims to demonstrate, in chronic hemodialysed patients, the non-inferiority of nicotinamide in terms of control of the phosphatemia. Secondary objectives is to compare the two treatments in terms of efficiency in other biological parameters, vascular calcification and bone mass loss and on the clinical and biological tolerance and finally to explore the roles of metabolites of nicotinamide.
Read the detailed description
This is a multicenter randomized open study with 2 treatment arms (nicotinamide / Sevelamer).
Laboratories who will dose biochemical parameters and PTH, ignore which treatment is received by patients.
The team which will measure bone density and the radiologist or rheumatologist who will appreciate centrally calcification and deformity of the vertebrae, ignore which treatment is received by patients.
Therefore it's a Randomized Prospective Blinded Outcome Endpoint.
Pre-recruitment period (3 to 6 months) with basic medication
- Repletion of vitamin D (p 25 OHD between 30 and 50 ng / ml) (if required by supplementation Dedrogyl weekly by the dialysis nurse)
- Bath dialysis to 1.50 mmol / l calcium (1.75 mmol / l if hemodiafiltration), 32 mmol bicarbonate and 0.5 mmol / l magnesium - Support to provide a dietary protein intake with 1.2 g / kg / d and assessment of contributions of Ca and PO4
- Use of CaCO3 taken with meals rich in phosphorus (morning, noon and evening) without
- In case of hyperkalemia, Calcium Sorbisterit® will preferably be used instead of KAYEXALATE®. This process exposes the worsening effect of hyperphosphatemia increasing calcium malabsorption and therefore the negative calcium balance in renal failure.
- Statin therapy, fibrate or ezetimibe if necessary, but with stable dose
This treatment will be monitored on the following parameters:
- Biochemical weekly Predialytic (midweek): creatinine, urea, PO4, Ca, protein, Na, K, bicarbonate, glucose, uric acid
- Additional monthly balance: PTH intact, Mg, albumin, CRP
- Each 4 months update: lipid profile (fasting or not, but always at the same time, 25 OH D, complete blood count (CBC), AST-ALT, total alkaline phosphatase, gamma-GT, PKC, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) )
Recruitment (180 patients):
- Obtaining informed consent
- Perform a bone density by DXA third of the radius (cortical bone), radius ultradistal (trabecular bone), femoral neck bone (mixed), whole body and lumbar spine profile radiography.
- Lumbar and dorsal radiography (frontal and profile) for research and vertebral measurement of aortic calcification by the Framingham score) + pelvis radiography (frontal) and 2 hands radiography (frontal) searching vascular calcification, Looser's streaks and subperiosteal resorption.
- Freezing at -80 ° C (4 tubes of 1 ml of serum)for centralized analysis:PTH, 25 OHD, CTX, PAO. All samples will be sent for laboratory analysis of Biochemistry University Hospital of Amiens at the end of the study.
For this, 10 ml of blood will be collected with a dry tube then centrifuged 15 minutes, 4000-5000 rpm at room temperature within 30 minutes after collection. Then, aliquot 1ml into 4 polypropylene tubes being careful not to take the fibrin.
- Freezing at -80 ° C in a tube of 2.5 ml of plasma to be assayed later the metabolites of nicotinamide. These samples will only be achieved if patients accept and mark the second part of the consent. The tubes are then stored in the biological resource center, CHU Amiens for further research and for an indefinite period.
The nicotinamide metabolites measured in this study will annex the Met2PY (N-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide), the Met4PY (N-methyl-4-pyridone-3-carboxamide) and NAD (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide).
6 ml of EDTA whole blood will be collected, then centrifuged 15 minutes, 4000-5000 rpm at room temperature within 30 minutes after collection. Then, 2.5 ml aliquot in 1 polypropylene tube.
- Then a heparinized blood sample of 2.5 ml will be frozen at -80 °C for determination of nicotinamide. All samples will be sent for analysis at CERBA at the end of the study.
Randomization will be done by the minimization technic with stratification factors: center, duration of dialysis and taking lipid lowering therapy. Randomization will be performed remotely via a website.
Follow-up of one year:
- Period titration nicotinamide or sevelamer to control serum phosphorus in 4 weeks, with stable doses of CaCO3
- Increased nicotinamide 500 mg up to 4 tablets: 0-1-0, 0-1-1, 1-1-1, 1-2-1
- Increased sevelamer 800 mg up to 12 tablets: 0-2-2 ; 2-4-4 ; 4-4-4 ; 2-5-5
- Maintenance period of 5 months with assessment of maintenance doses of Renagel (sevelamer) or Nicobion (nicotinamide) or during the last 3 months.
- After these 6 months:
- Freezing -80 ° C, 4 tubes of 1 ml of serum centralized reviews PTH, 25 OHD, CTX, PAO (as mentioned above).
- Freezing -80 ° C in a tube of 2.5 ml of plasma to be assayed later the metabolites of nicotinamide (as mentioned above).
- Freezing -80 ° C with a heparinized blood sample of 2.5 ml for determination of nicotinamide (as mentioned above).
- Second randomization via a website, patients with intact PTH> 300 pg / ml after 6 months of Nicobion ® and Renagel ®. Randomization 75-150 pg / ml or 150-300 mg / ml will be made by the minimization technic with stratification factors: the center and the type of Hypophosphatemia PTH will be reduced by introducing cinacalcet ® by increments of 30 mg every 3 weeks to 180 mg / day (given with meals 24 hours before the next dialysis). Increase of Cinacalcet ® will be stopped when PTH is <250 pg / ml for arm 150-300pg/ml or <125 per arm 75-150 pg / ml.
Once corrected calcemia <2.25 mmol / l, doses of CaCO3 will be increased; if the maximum tolerable of CaCO3 on the tract map does not prevent hypocalcemia (<2.10 mmol / l), the calcium bath will be increased to 1.75 mmol / l CaCO3 decreased and, if necessary adjustment of nicotinamide / Sevelamer to maintain PO4 between 1.30 and 1.60 mmol / l.
- During the first 6 months of administration of sevelamer, weekly, monthly and quarterly reports will be done. Regarding PTH assay will be performed, every 3 weeks during the titration of cinacalcet.
- A lumbar and dorsal radiography (frontal and profile), a pelvis radiography (face) and 2 hands radiography (front) will be conducted at the end of follow-up period.
- Bone densitometry will be performed at the end of the study (same camera - same site).
- Case report form: tolerance, serious adverse events, compliance, cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, PAO, stroke, arteritis, vascular intervention),deaths and fractures during the follow-up study.
- Freezing -80 ° C to 4 tubes of 1 ml of serum centralized reviews PTH, 25 OHD, CTX, PAO at the end of the study (as mentioned above).
- Freezing -80 ° C in a tube of 2.5 ml of plasma to be assayed later the metabolites of nicotinamide at the end of the study (as mentioned above).
- Freezing at -80 ° C with a heparinized blood sample of 2.5 ml for determination of nicotinamide at the end of the study (as mentioned above).
Analytical Methodology
- Conditions
- Chronic Renal Failure, Hemodialysis
- Being tested
- nicotinamide, sevelamer, cinacalcet
- Keywords
- nicotinamide, sevelamer hydrochloride, phosphatemia, cinacalcet, dyslipidemia, vascular calcification, bone mass loss
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Failure, Chronic, Dyslipidemias, Vascular Calcification
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
nicotinamideDrug
Also called Nicobion, ATC class A11HA01
Titration phase of nicotinamide (Nicobion) with the aim of phosphatemia control in 4 weeks with stable dose of calcic carbonate;
Increase of nicotinamide dose of Nicobion 500mg (nicotinamide 500mg), up to 4 tablets daily, as follows:
0 morning, 1 noon, 0 evening (first week), then, 0 morning, 1 noon, 1 evening (second week), then, 1 morning, 1 noon, 1 evening (third week), then, 1 morning, 2 noon, 1 evening (fourth week).
sevelamerDrug
Also called Renagel, ATC class V03AE02
Titration phase with sevelamer (Renagel) with the aim of phosphatemia control before 4 weeks of treatment, with stable dose of calcic carbonate.
Increase of sevelamer dose up to 12 tablets, as follows:
0 morning, 2 noon, 2 evening (first week), then, 0 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (second week), then, 2 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (third week), then, 4 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (fourth week).
cinacalcetDrug
Also called Mimpara, ATC class H05BX01
After 6 months of treatment, patient screening on PTH level:
For patients with PTH > 300pg/ml, introduction of cinacalcet by level of 30 mg every 3 weeks, up to 180mg daily (administered during the meal and before next dialysis) Cinacalcet increase will be stopped once PTH < 250 pg/ml. Calcic carbonate dose will be increase once calcemia will be < 2.25 mmol/l. If maximum tolerated dose is not sufficient to prevent hypocalcemia < 2.10 mmol/l calcium of dialysis bath wille be increased up to 1.75 mmol/l and calcic carbonate will be decreased.
A dose adjustment is possible with nicotinamide to obtain a phosphatemia between 1.10 and 1.60 mmol/l.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| sevelamer | Active comparator | Titration phase with sevelamer (Renagel) with the aim of phosphatemia control in 4 weeks of treatment, with stable dose of calcic carbonate.
Increase of sevelamer dose up to 12 tablets, as follows:
0 morning, 2 noon, 2 evening (first week), then, 0 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (second week), then, 2 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (third week), then, 4 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (fourth week). Receives: Drug: sevelamer; Drug: cinacalcet |
| nicotinamide | Active comparator | Titration phase with nicotinamide (Nicobion) with the aim of phosphatemia control in 4 weeks of treatment, with stable dose of calcic carbonate.
Increase of nicotinamide dose up to 4 tablets, as follows:
0 morning, 1 noon, 0 evening (first week), then, 0 morning, 1 noon, 1 evening (second week), then, 1 morning, 1 noon, 1 evening (third week), then, 1 morning, 2 noon, 1 evening (fourth week). Receives: Drug: nicotinamide; Drug: cinacalcet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The comparison between nicotinamide and Sevelamer was primarily to demonstrate the noninferiority of nicotinamide in terms of control of the phosphatemia observed during the 4th, 5th and 6th months before to introduce Cinacalcet ®.
Measured: 6th months
Secondary outcomes (6)
To demonstrate noninferiority of nicotinamide in terms of effect on dyslipidemia (evaluated by the ratio LDL / HDL cholesterol), the risk of hypercalcemia (PCa> 2.37 mmol / l) and increase of phospho-calcic product (> 3 , 79 mmol/l).
Measured: 6 th months and one year
To evaluate the difference between nicotinamide and sevelamer on vascular calcification
Measured: one year
To evaluate the difference between nicotinamide and sevelamer on bone mass loss and fracture risk
Measured: one year
Evaluate the percentage of population requiring use of cinacalcet® to control PTH (75-300 pg/ml). Evaluate his benefit on phosphatemia and calcemia control. Prevent the need for surgical PTX, and evaluate the additional cost of treatment by cinacalcet
Measured: 6th months
Evaluate roles of metabolites of nicotinamide (efficacy and side effects) through another study
Measured: 6th months and one year
Compare the cost-effectiveness ratio of these two treatments
Measured: one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2010
- Primary completionJun 2013
- Study completionJun 2013
Why it stopped: Financial problem
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (48)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Renal FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 176 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Albert FOURNIER, Pr, Study director, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensZiad MASSY, Pr, Principal investigator, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01011699
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PHRCIR08-PR-FOURNIER
- Other IDs
- Eudract N°2008-004673-17
- Acronym
- NICOREN
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 10 Nov 2009
- Last updated
- 16 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Goldsmith D, Ritz E, Covic A. Vascular calcification: a stiff challenge for the nephrologist: does preventing bone disease cause arterial disease? Kidney Int. 2004 Oct;66(4):1315-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00895.x.
PubMed 15458425Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998 Dec;9(12 Suppl):S16-23.
PubMed 11443763K/DOQI: (Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) of the National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis suppl 3, october 2003.
Jungers P, Choukroun G, Robino C, Massy ZA, Taupin P, Labrunie M, Man NK, Landais P. Epidemiology of end-stage renal disease in the Ile-de-France area: a prospective study in 1998. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000 Dec;15(12):2000-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/15.12.2000.
PubMed 11096146Kalantar-Zadeh K, Block G, Humphreys MH, Kopple JD. Reverse epidemiology of cardiovascular risk factors in maintenance dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2003 Mar;63(3):793-808. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00803.x.
PubMed 12631061Collins R, Armitage J, Parish S, Sleigh P, Peto R; Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2003 Jun 14;361(9374):2005-16. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13636-7.
PubMed 12814710London GM, Guerin AP, Marchais SJ, Metivier F, Pannier B, Adda H. Arterial media calcification in end-stage renal disease: impact on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003 Sep;18(9):1731-40. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfg414.
PubMed 12937218Block GA, Klassen PS, Lazarus JM, Ofsthun N, Lowrie EG, Chertow GM. Mineral metabolism, mortality, and morbidity in maintenance hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Aug;15(8):2208-18. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000133041.27682.A2.
PubMed 15284307Shahapuni I, Mansour J, Harbouche L, Maouad B, Benyahia M, Rahmouni K, Oprisiu R, Bonne JF, Monge M, El Esper N, Presne C, Moriniere P, Choukroun G, Fournier A. How do calcimimetics fit into the management of parathyroid hormone, calcium, and phosphate disturbances in dialysis patients? Semin Dial. 2005 May-Jun;18(3):226-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2005.18318.x.
PubMed 15934970Ghazali A, Fardellone P, Pruna A, Atik A, Achard JM, Oprisiu R, Brazier M, Remond A, Moriniere P, Garabedian M, Eastwood J, Fournier A. Is low plasma 25-(OH)vitamin D a major risk factor for hyperparathyroidism and Looser's zones independent of calcitriol? Kidney Int. 1999 Jun;55(6):2169-77. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00480.x.
PubMed 10354266Goldsmith DJ, Covic A, Sambrook PA, Ackrill P. Vascular calcification in long-term haemodialysis patients in a single unit: a retrospective analysis. Nephron. 1997;77(1):37-43. doi: 10.1159/000190244.
PubMed 9380236Teng M, Wolf M, Lowrie E, Ofsthun N, Lazarus JM, Thadhani R. Survival of patients undergoing hemodialysis with paricalcitol or calcitriol therapy. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 31;349(5):446-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022536.
PubMed 12890843Fournier AE, Johnson WJ, Taves DR, Beabout JW, Arnaud CD, Goldsmith RS. Etiology of hyperparathyroidism and bone disease during chronic hemodialysis. I. Association of bone disease with potentially etiologic factors. J Clin Invest. 1971 Mar;50(3):592-8. doi: 10.1172/JCI106529.
PubMed 5101783Argiles A, Kerr PG, Canaud B, Flavier JL, Mion C. Calcium kinetics and the long-term effects of lowering dialysate calcium concentration. Kidney Int. 1993 Mar;43(3):630-40. doi: 10.1038/ki.1993.92.
PubMed 8455362Indridason OS, Quarles LD. Comparison of treatments for mild secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis patients. Durham Renal Osteodystrophy Study Group. Kidney Int. 2000 Jan;57(1):282-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00819.x.
PubMed 10620210
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Nicotinamide and Sevelamer Hydrochloride on Phosphatemia Control on Chronic Hemodialysed Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01011699
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NICOREN / PHRCIR08-PR-FOURNIER
- Conditions
- Chronic Renal Failure, Hemodialysis
- Keywords
- nicotinamide, sevelamer hydrochloride, phosphatemia, cinacalcet, dyslipidemia, vascular calcification, bone mass loss
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Financial problem
- Enrolment
- 176 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2010
- Primary completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The comparison between nicotinamide and sevelamer aims to demonstrate, in chronic hemodialysed patients, the non-inferiority of nicotinamide in terms of control of the phosphatemia. Secondary objectives is to compare the two treatments in terms of efficiency in other biological parameters, vascular calcification and bone mass loss and on the clinical and biological tolerance and finally to explore the roles of metabolites of nicotinamide.
Detailed description
This is a multicenter randomized open study with 2 treatment arms (nicotinamide / Sevelamer).
Laboratories who will dose biochemical parameters and PTH, ignore which treatment is received by patients.
The team which will measure bone density and the radiologist or rheumatologist who will appreciate centrally calcification and deformity of the vertebrae, ignore which treatment is received by patients.
Therefore it's a Randomized Prospective Blinded Outcome Endpoint.
Pre-recruitment period (3 to 6 months) with basic medication
- Repletion of vitamin D (p 25 OHD between 30 and 50 ng / ml) (if required by supplementation Dedrogyl weekly by the dialysis nurse)
- Bath dialysis to 1.50 mmol / l calcium (1.75 mmol / l if hemodiafiltration), 32 mmol bicarbonate and 0.5 mmol / l magnesium - Support to provide a dietary protein intake with 1.2 g / kg / d and assessment of contributions of Ca and PO4
- Use of CaCO3 taken with meals rich in phosphorus (morning, noon and evening) without
- In case of hyperkalemia, Calcium Sorbisterit® will preferably be used instead of KAYEXALATE®. This process exposes the worsening effect of hyperphosphatemia increasing calcium malabsorption and therefore the negative calcium balance in renal failure.
- Statin therapy, fibrate or ezetimibe if necessary, but with stable dose
This treatment will be monitored on the following parameters:
- Biochemical weekly Predialytic (midweek): creatinine, urea, PO4, Ca, protein, Na, K, bicarbonate, glucose, uric acid
- Additional monthly balance: PTH intact, Mg, albumin, CRP
- Each 4 months update: lipid profile (fasting or not, but always at the same time, 25 OH D, complete blood count (CBC), AST-ALT, total alkaline phosphatase, gamma-GT, PKC, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) )
Recruitment (180 patients):
- Obtaining informed consent
- Perform a bone density by DXA third of the radius (cortical bone), radius ultradistal (trabecular bone), femoral neck bone (mixed), whole body and lumbar spine profile radiography.
- Lumbar and dorsal radiography (frontal and profile) for research and vertebral measurement of aortic calcification by the Framingham score) + pelvis radiography (frontal) and 2 hands radiography (frontal) searching vascular calcification, Looser's streaks and subperiosteal resorption.
- Freezing at -80 ° C (4 tubes of 1 ml of serum)for centralized analysis:PTH, 25 OHD, CTX, PAO. All samples will be sent for laboratory analysis of Biochemistry University Hospital of Amiens at the end of the study.
For this, 10 ml of blood will be collected with a dry tube then centrifuged 15 minutes, 4000-5000 rpm at room temperature within 30 minutes after collection. Then, aliquot 1ml into 4 polypropylene tubes being careful not to take the fibrin.
- Freezing at -80 ° C in a tube of 2.5 ml of plasma to be assayed later the metabolites of nicotinamide. These samples will only be achieved if patients accept and mark the second part of the consent. The tubes are then stored in the biological resource center, CHU Amiens for further research and for an indefinite period.
The nicotinamide metabolites measured in this study will annex the Met2PY (N-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide), the Met4PY (N-methyl-4-pyridone-3-carboxamide) and NAD (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide).
6 ml of EDTA whole blood will be collected, then centrifuged 15 minutes, 4000-5000 rpm at room temperature within 30 minutes after collection. Then, 2.5 ml aliquot in 1 polypropylene tube.
- Then a heparinized blood sample of 2.5 ml will be frozen at -80 °C for determination of nicotinamide. All samples will be sent for analysis at CERBA at the end of the study.
Randomization will be done by the minimization technic with stratification factors: center, duration of dialysis and taking lipid lowering therapy. Randomization will be performed remotely via a website.
Follow-up of one year:
- Period titration nicotinamide or sevelamer to control serum phosphorus in 4 weeks, with stable doses of CaCO3
- Increased nicotinamide 500 mg up to 4 tablets: 0-1-0, 0-1-1, 1-1-1, 1-2-1
- Increased sevelamer 800 mg up to 12 tablets: 0-2-2 ; 2-4-4 ; 4-4-4 ; 2-5-5
- Maintenance period of 5 months with assessment of maintenance doses of Renagel (sevelamer) or Nicobion (nicotinamide) or during the last 3 months.
- After these 6 months:
- Freezing -80 ° C, 4 tubes of 1 ml of serum centralized reviews PTH, 25 OHD, CTX, PAO (as mentioned above).
- Freezing -80 ° C in a tube of 2.5 ml of plasma to be assayed later the metabolites of nicotinamide (as mentioned above).
- Freezing -80 ° C with a heparinized blood sample of 2.5 ml for determination of nicotinamide (as mentioned above).
- Second randomization via a website, patients with intact PTH> 300 pg / ml after 6 months of Nicobion ® and Renagel ®. Randomization 75-150 pg / ml or 150-300 mg / ml will be made by the minimization technic with stratification factors: the center and the type of Hypophosphatemia PTH will be reduced by introducing cinacalcet ® by increments of 30 mg every 3 weeks to 180 mg / day (given with meals 24 hours before the next dialysis). Increase of Cinacalcet ® will be stopped when PTH is <250 pg / ml for arm 150-300pg/ml or <125 per arm 75-150 pg / ml.
Once corrected calcemia <2.25 mmol / l, doses of CaCO3 will be increased; if the maximum tolerable of CaCO3 on the tract map does not prevent hypocalcemia (<2.10 mmol / l), the calcium bath will be increased to 1.75 mmol / l CaCO3 decreased and, if necessary adjustment of nicotinamide / Sevelamer to maintain PO4 between 1.30 and 1.60 mmol / l.
- During the first 6 months of administration of sevelamer, weekly, monthly and quarterly reports will be done. Regarding PTH assay will be performed, every 3 weeks during the titration of cinacalcet.
- A lumbar and dorsal radiography (frontal and profile), a pelvis radiography (face) and 2 hands radiography (front) will be conducted at the end of follow-up period.
- Bone densitometry will be performed at the end of the study (same camera - same site).
- Case report form: tolerance, serious adverse events, compliance, cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, PAO, stroke, arteritis, vascular intervention),deaths and fractures during the follow-up study.
- Freezing -80 ° C to 4 tubes of 1 ml of serum centralized reviews PTH, 25 OHD, CTX, PAO at the end of the study (as mentioned above).
- Freezing -80 ° C in a tube of 2.5 ml of plasma to be assayed later the metabolites of nicotinamide at the end of the study (as mentioned above).
- Freezing at -80 ° C with a heparinized blood sample of 2.5 ml for determination of nicotinamide at the end of the study (as mentioned above).
Analytical Methodology
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| sevelamer | Active comparator | Drug: sevelamer, Drug: cinacalcetTitration phase with sevelamer (Renagel) with the aim of phosphatemia control in 4 weeks of treatment, with stable dose of calcic carbonate. Increase of sevelamer dose up to 12 tablets, as follows: 0 morning, 2 noon, 2 evening (first week), then, 0 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (second week), then, 2 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (third week), then, 4 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (fourth week). |
| nicotinamide | Active comparator | Drug: nicotinamide, Drug: cinacalcetTitration phase with nicotinamide (Nicobion) with the aim of phosphatemia control in 4 weeks of treatment, with stable dose of calcic carbonate. Increase of nicotinamide dose up to 4 tablets, as follows: 0 morning, 1 noon, 0 evening (first week), then, 0 morning, 1 noon, 1 evening (second week), then, 1 morning, 1 noon, 1 evening (third week), then, 1 morning, 2 noon, 1 evening (fourth week). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Women or men over 18 years
- Chronic hemodialysis (since more than 3 months)
- Hyperphosphatemia controlled with only CaCO3
- PO4 > 1,60 mmol/l, PCa < 2,37 mmol/l
- patient able to understand and sign informed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- PTH < 60 ou > 800 pg/ml (PTX)
- Aluminium intoxication (aluminium level in blood > 0,5 µmol/l)
- Score of aortic calcifications ≥ 20 (max 24)
- Characterized intolerance with Renagel and/or Nicobion
- Pregnant woman
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| nicotinamideAlso: Nicobion, ATC class A11HA01Titration phase of nicotinamide (Nicobion) with the aim of phosphatemia control in 4 weeks with stable dose of calcic carbonate; Increase of nicotinamide dose of Nicobion 500mg (nicotinamide 500mg), up to 4 tablets daily, as follows: 0 morning, 1 noon, 0 evening (first week), then, 0 morning, 1 noon, 1 evening (second week), then, 1 morning, 1 noon, 1 evening (third week), then, 1 morning, 2 noon, 1 evening (fourth week). | Drug | nicotinamide |
| sevelamerAlso: Renagel, ATC class V03AE02Titration phase with sevelamer (Renagel) with the aim of phosphatemia control before 4 weeks of treatment, with stable dose of calcic carbonate. Increase of sevelamer dose up to 12 tablets, as follows: 0 morning, 2 noon, 2 evening (first week), then, 0 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (second week), then, 2 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (third week), then, 4 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (fourth week). | Drug | sevelamer |
| cinacalcetAlso: Mimpara, ATC class H05BX01After 6 months of treatment, patient screening on PTH level: For patients with PTH > 300pg/ml, introduction of cinacalcet by level of 30 mg every 3 weeks, up to 180mg daily (administered during the meal and before next dialysis) Cinacalcet increase will be stopped once PTH < 250 pg/ml. Calcic carbonate dose will be increase once calcemia will be < 2.25 mmol/l. If maximum tolerated dose is not sufficient to prevent hypocalcemia < 2.10 mmol/l calcium of dialysis bath wille be increased up to 1.75 mmol/l and calcic carbonate will be decreased. A dose adjustment is possible with nicotinamide to obtain a phosphatemia between 1.10 and 1.60 mmol/l. | Drug | nicotinamide, sevelamer |
Primary outcome
The comparison between nicotinamide and Sevelamer was primarily to demonstrate the noninferiority of nicotinamide in terms of control of the phosphatemia observed during the 4th, 5th and 6th months before to introduce Cinacalcet ®.
Time frame: 6th months
6 secondary outcomes
To demonstrate noninferiority of nicotinamide in terms of effect on dyslipidemia (evaluated by the ratio LDL / HDL cholesterol), the risk of hypercalcemia (PCa> 2.37 mmol / l) and increase of phospho-calcic product (> 3 , 79 mmol/l).
Time frame: 6 th months and one year
To evaluate the difference between nicotinamide and sevelamer on vascular calcification
Time frame: one year
To evaluate the difference between nicotinamide and sevelamer on bone mass loss and fracture risk
Time frame: one year
Evaluate the percentage of population requiring use of cinacalcet® to control PTH (75-300 pg/ml). Evaluate his benefit on phosphatemia and calcemia control. Prevent the need for surgical PTX, and evaluate the additional cost of treatment by cinacalcet
Time frame: 6th months
Evaluate roles of metabolites of nicotinamide (efficacy and side effects) through another study
Time frame: 6th months and one year
Compare the cost-effectiveness ratio of these two treatments
Time frame: one year
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Financial problem). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2016.
- Background: PubMed 15458425Goldsmith D, Ritz E, Covic A. Vascular calcification: a stiff challenge for the nephrologist: does preventing bone disease cause arterial disease? Kidney Int. 2004 Oct;66(4):1315-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00895.x.
- Background: PubMed 11443763Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998 Dec;9(12 Suppl):S16-23.
- BackgroundK/DOQI: (Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) of the National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis suppl 3, october 2003.
- Background: PubMed 11096146Jungers P, Choukroun G, Robino C, Massy ZA, Taupin P, Labrunie M, Man NK, Landais P. Epidemiology of end-stage renal disease in the Ile-de-France area: a prospective study in 1998. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000 Dec;15(12):2000-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/15.12.2000.
- Background: PubMed 12631061Kalantar-Zadeh K, Block G, Humphreys MH, Kopple JD. Reverse epidemiology of cardiovascular risk factors in maintenance dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2003 Mar;63(3):793-808. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00803.x.
- Background: PubMed 12814710Collins R, Armitage J, Parish S, Sleigh P, Peto R; Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2003 Jun 14;361(9374):2005-16. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13636-7.
- Background: PubMed 12937218London GM, Guerin AP, Marchais SJ, Metivier F, Pannier B, Adda H. Arterial media calcification in end-stage renal disease: impact on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003 Sep;18(9):1731-40. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfg414.
- Background: PubMed 15284307Block GA, Klassen PS, Lazarus JM, Ofsthun N, Lowrie EG, Chertow GM. Mineral metabolism, mortality, and morbidity in maintenance hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Aug;15(8):2208-18. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000133041.27682.A2.
- Background: PubMed 15934970Shahapuni I, Mansour J, Harbouche L, Maouad B, Benyahia M, Rahmouni K, Oprisiu R, Bonne JF, Monge M, El Esper N, Presne C, Moriniere P, Choukroun G, Fournier A. How do calcimimetics fit into the management of parathyroid hormone, calcium, and phosphate disturbances in dialysis patients? Semin Dial. 2005 May-Jun;18(3):226-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2005.18318.x.
- Background: PubMed 10354266Ghazali A, Fardellone P, Pruna A, Atik A, Achard JM, Oprisiu R, Brazier M, Remond A, Moriniere P, Garabedian M, Eastwood J, Fournier A. Is low plasma 25-(OH)vitamin D a major risk factor for hyperparathyroidism and Looser's zones independent of calcitriol? Kidney Int. 1999 Jun;55(6):2169-77. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00480.x.
- Background: PubMed 9380236Goldsmith DJ, Covic A, Sambrook PA, Ackrill P. Vascular calcification in long-term haemodialysis patients in a single unit: a retrospective analysis. Nephron. 1997;77(1):37-43. doi: 10.1159/000190244.
- Background: PubMed 12890843Teng M, Wolf M, Lowrie E, Ofsthun N, Lazarus JM, Thadhani R. Survival of patients undergoing hemodialysis with paricalcitol or calcitriol therapy. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 31;349(5):446-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022536.
Related trials for Chronic Renal Failure
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of Empagliflozin in Hemodialysis
End Stage Renal Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Assess the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Atrasentan in Pediatric Patients With Primary IgAN
Berger Disease, Bergers Disease
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
Not yet recruiting
An Individuation Intervention to Reduce Socioeconomic Disparities in Chronic Kidney Disease Care
Chronic Kidney Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Albert FOURNIER, Pr study director
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
Ziad MASSY, Pr principal investigator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
18 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing nicotinamide, sevelamer and cinacalcet in people with Chronic Renal Failure and Hemodialysis, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens at 18 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Financial problem). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The comparison between nicotinamide and Sevelamer was primarily to demonstrate the noninferiority of nicotinamide in terms of control of the phosphatemia observed during the 4th, 5th and 6th months before to introduce Cinacalcet ®. (time frame: 6th months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01011699, which also lists 48 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2016.