Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveNCT01013948
Prevalence of Chronic Airway Obstruction in Subjects With a History of Cigarette Smoking in a Primary Care Setting
An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 40 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a cross-sectional study to determine the prevalence of symptomatic airway obstruction using the LFQ as a screening tool in primary care patients with a history of cigarette smoking and to provide descriptive data of this patient population. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 87 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- What is being tested?
- Non-Interventional
- How many people
- 1,574 participants
- Where
- 40 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2009to May 2009
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 87 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Current or previous cigarette smokers of at least 30 years of age with a history of cigarette smoking of ≥ 10 pack-years, recruited from primary care centers.
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 30 years or older
- Current or previous cigarette smoker with a history of cigarette smoking of ≥ 10 pack-years: number of pack years = (number of cigarettes per day/20) × number of years smoked) (e.g., 10 pack-years is equal to 20 cigarettes per day for 10 years, or 10 cigarettes per day for 20 years). Previous smokers are defined as those who stopped smoking at least 3 months prior to the study visit.
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent prior to study participation (on day of study visit).
- Able to read, write, and comprehend information in English.
Who cannot join
- Prior to enrollment, prospective subjects will be screened. A subject will be excluded from the study if he/she meets any of the following criteria:
- Regular use (i.e., prescribed for use on a daily basis) of the following respiratory medications within the 4 weeks prior to the study visit:
- Ipratropium (Atrovent, ipratropium bromide)
- Ipratropium/albuterol combinations (e.g., Combivent)
- Tiotropium (Spiriva, tiotropium bromide)
- Salmeterol (SEREVENT™)
Show all 18Show fewer
- Formoterol (Foradil)
- Inhaled corticosteroids (e.g., FLOVENT™, BECLOVENT™, Azmacort Aerobid, Pulmicort, QVAR, Vanceril)
- Inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist combinations (e.g., ADVAIR DISKUS™ , Symbicort)
- Theophyllines (e.g., Theo-dur, Slo-Bid, Uniphyl)
- Oral beta-agonists (e.g.,Volmax)
- Previous lung surgery, including lung transplant, lung resection, lung volume reduction surgery (e.g., lobectomy, pneumonectomy).
- A known diagnosis of a significant lung condition including lung cancer, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary fibrosis, active tuberculosis, or sarcoidosis. A previous diagnosis of an obstructive lung disease is not exclusionary-asthma, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, alpha1-antitrypsin (A1AT) deficiency, etc.
- Current participation in a respiratory-related research study and receiving experimental medications.
- Limited ability to provide a valid informed consent due to serious uncontrolled psychiatric disease, intellectual or cognitive deficiency, poor motivation, current substance abuse (including drugs and alcohol), or other relevant condition that, in the opinion of the site principal investigator, will interfere with the subject's participation in the study.
- Pregnant females.
- Any medical or physical condition such as acute respiratory infection that would interfere with the adequate performance of spirometry.
- Participating investigator, sub-investigator, study coordinator, employee of the participating investigator, or family member of the aforementioned site staffs.
Trial locations and contacts
40 sites in 1 country.
40 sites in 1 country
United States40 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Adamsville, Alabama, 35005
GSK Investigational Site
Altmonte Springs, Florida, 32714
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78745
GSK Investigational Site
Belle Glade, Florida, 33430
GSK Investigational Site
Brick, New Jersey, '08723
GSK Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44113
GSK Investigational Site
Conyers, Georgia, 30094
GSK Investigational Site
Cortland, Ohio, 44410
GSK Investigational Site
Elmhurst, New York, 11373
GSK Investigational Site
Flower Mound, Texas, 75028
GSK Investigational Site
Foothill Ranch, California, 92610
GSK Investigational Site
Grand Prairie, Texas, 75052
GSK Investigational Site
Green Cove Springs, Florida, 32043
GSK Investigational Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29601
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77089
GSK Investigational Site
Huntington Beach, California, 92647
GSK Investigational Site
Irving, Texas, 75061
GSK Investigational Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32277
GSK Investigational Site
Lake Jackson, Texas, 77566
GSK Investigational Site
Lansdowne, Pennsylvania, 19050
GSK Investigational Site
Los Gatos, California, 95032
GSK Investigational Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40222
GSK Investigational Site
Manhasset, New York, 11030
GSK Investigational Site
Northbrook, Illinois, 60062
GSK Investigational Site
Oviedo, Florida, 32765
GSK Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103
GSK Investigational Site
Plano, Texas, 75093
GSK Investigational Site
Reisterstown, Maryland, 21136
GSK Investigational Site
Richardson, Texas, 75080
GSK Investigational Site
Rolling Hills Estate, California, 90274
GSK Investigational Site
San Francisco, California, 94102
GSK Investigational Site
Sebastian, Florida, 32958
GSK Investigational Site
Snellville, Georgia, 30039
GSK Investigational Site
Solana Beach, California, 92075
GSK Investigational Site
Torrance, California, 90505
GSK Investigational Site
Torrance/California, California, 90505
GSK Investigational Site
Tulare, California, 93274
GSK Investigational Site
Vernon Hills, Illinois, 60061
GSK Investigational Site
West Plains, Missouri, 65775
GSK Investigational Site
Williamsburg, Kentucky, 40769
About this study
Official title: Prevalence of Chronic Airway Onstruction in a Subject Population With a History of Cigarette Smoking in a Primary Care Setting
This is a cross-sectional study to determine the prevalence of symptomatic airway obstruction using the LFQ as a screening tool in primary care patients with a history of cigarette smoking and to provide descriptive data of this patient population. The study design is multicenter, cross-sectional, and involves a single visit. This study is not intended to evaluate the efficacy or safety of any investigational products. Following completion of written informed consent, eligible study subjects will complete a single study visit encompassing all required study assessments. Study subjects will not receive blinded study medication for evaluations of efficacy and safety.
All eligible patients will complete a self-administered Web survey that will include the LFQ. To meet both the primary and secondary aims, all patients with LFQ ≤ 18 (current cut-off for obstruction), as well as 5% of patients who score > 18, will be candidates for spirometric assessment. Only this subset of patients will undergo pulmonary function tests. Albuterol will be self-administered for determination of post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one-second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio and post-bronchodilator FEV1 percentage of predicted normal. The study will end when 800 patients have been assessed spirometrically or 3,000 patients have completed the LFQ (whichever criterion is achieved first).
Prior to implementation of the full study, a pilot study will be conducted at two of the chosen study sites to pretest the proposed study procedures.
Read the detailed description
The incidence of COPD is increasing throughout the world, with the vast majority of patients with the disease remaining undiagnosed (Coultas et al., 2001) and underreported (Frank et al., 2006; Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD], 2003; Peña et al., 2000; Takahashi et al., 2003; Van Weel et al., 2002). This is highlighted in a recent study that found 63% of patients with a smoking history and spirometry-confirmed COPD had no mention of COPD in their medical records (Frank et al., 2006). These findings are indicative of a low awareness of the condition among patients with COPD (Stratelis et al., 2004).
The use of patient-completed questionnaires to assess smoking history and status, respiratory symptoms, and socioeconomic status is a reliable and valid method of screening for COPD diagnosis and severity (Bednarek et al., 2008). The range of conditions described as COPD has led to confusion about disease terminology and difficulty with diagnosis and communication, particularly in primary care (Fukuhara et al., 2005; Kesten and Chapman, 1993). Considering that approximately 80% of patients diagnosed with COPD are current and previous cigarette smokers, mass screening of these populations using office-based spirometry becomes an attractive option (Furguson et al., 2000). A questionnaire designed to capture patient answers specific to their disease condition could provide invaluable information, which, if it correlates adequately with spirometry, could markedly improve diagnosis and provide avenues for appropriate treatment decisions. There are data supporting the argument that the prevalence of physician-diagnosed COPD is much lower than the prevalence suggested by results of population-based spirometric surveys (Chapman, 2004; Fukuchi et al., 2004; Peña et al., 2000; Soriano et al., 2000). Evidently, the development of a practical and reliable tool could help bridge the gaps in diagnosis and disease awareness. Moreover, prevalence studies underscore the need to improve awareness of COPD among cigarette-smoking populations and to provide information that could potentially lead patients to seek treatment. Hence, there is a need to develop a screening questionnaire able to identify patients at risk of airflow obstruction, for further evaluation. The LFQ, developed for this purpose, consists of a series of questions pertaining to COPD risk factors and symptoms.
Specifically, this study will aim to identify patients at risk of airflow obstruction as identified by the LFQ, the results of which will be followed for confirmation through subsequent spirometry in a subset of subjects. The LFQ will be evaluated against the spirometry results comparatively. A minimum age limit of 30 years is selected for subject participation in this study for further validation of the LFQ and to ascertain the enrollment of an adequately representative subset of subjects who may be bronchitic or asymptomatic for COPD, for comparison purposes with subjects with COPD. The study of this subject population may increase the sensitivity of COPD diagnosis and potentially provide information that could improve disease awareness and, as a consequence, possibly lead to optimization of disease management in primary care.
This is a cross-sectional study to determine the prevalence of symptomatic airway obstruction using the LFQ as a screening tool in primary care patients with a history of cigarette smoking and to provide descriptive data of this patient population. The study design is multicenter, cross-sectional, and involves a single visit. This study is not intended to evaluate the efficacy or safety of any investigational products. Following completion of written informed consent, eligible study subjects will complete a single study visit encompassing all required study assessments. Study subjects will not receive blinded study medication for evaluations of efficacy and safety.
All eligible patients will complete a self-administered Web survey that will include the LFQ. To meet both the primary and secondary aims, all patients with LFQ ≤ 18 (current cut-off for obstruction), as well as 5% of patients who score > 18, will be candidates for spirometric assessment. Only this subset of patients will undergo pulmonary function tests. Albuterol will be self-administered for determination of post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one-second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio and post-bronchodilator FEV1 percentage of predicted normal. The study will end when 800 patients have been assessed spirometrically or 3,000 patients have completed the LFQ (whichever criterion is achieved first).
Prior to implementation of the full study, a pilot study will be conducted at two of the chosen study sites to pretest the proposed study procedures.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Being tested
- Non-Interventional
- Keywords
- Spirometry, Bronchitis, COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Emphysema, Chronic Bronchitis
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Bronchitis, Emphysema, Bronchitis, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Non-InterventionalOther
Non-Investigational Product (Survey Study)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| N/A (Survey study) | Not described Receives: Other: Non-Interventional |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary outcome for this study will be the proportion of subjects at risk for airway obstruction as measured by the LFQ (LFQ total score ≤ 18) and confirmed by spirometry.
Measured: 4-Month
Secondary outcomes (1)
Screening accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of the LFQ utilizing spirometrically-defined airway obstruction (i.e., a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ≤ 0.7). Proportion of patients with chronic airway obstruction as measured by the LFQ, stratified...
Measured: 4-Month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2009
- Primary completionMay 2009
- Study completionMay 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 1,574 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01013948
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 111116
- Status last verified
- Oct 2012
- First submitted
- 12 Nov 2009
- Last updated
- 18 Oct 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Mintz ML, Yawn BP, Mannino DM, Donohue JF, Hanania NA, Grellet CA, Gilsenan AW, McLeod LD, Dalal AA, Raphiou IH, Prillaman BA, Crater GD, Cicale MJ, Mapel DW. Prevalence of airway obstruction assessed by lung function questionnaire. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 May;86(5):375-81. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0787.
PubMed 21531880Hanania NA, Crater GD, Morris AN, Emmett AH, O'Dell DM, Niewoehner DE. Benefits of adding fluticasone propionate/salmeterol to tiotropium in moderate to severe COPD. Respir Med. 2012 Jan;106(1):91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
PubMed 22040533
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Oct 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prevalence of Chronic Airway Onstruction in a Subject Population With a History of Cigarette Smoking in a Primary Care Setting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01013948
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 111116
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Keywords
- Spirometry, Bronchitis, COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Emphysema, Chronic Bronchitis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,574 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2009
- Primary completion
- May 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a cross-sectional study to determine the prevalence of symptomatic airway obstruction using the LFQ as a screening tool in primary care patients with a history of cigarette smoking and to provide descriptive data of this patient population. The study design is multicenter, cross-sectional, and involves a single visit. This study is not intended to evaluate the efficacy or safety of any investigational products. Following completion of written informed consent, eligible study subjects will complete a single study visit encompassing all required study assessments. Study subjects will not receive blinded study medication for evaluations of efficacy and safety.
All eligible patients will complete a self-administered Web survey that will include the LFQ. To meet both the primary and secondary aims, all patients with LFQ ≤ 18 (current cut-off for obstruction), as well as 5% of patients who score > 18, will be candidates for spirometric assessment. Only this subset of patients will undergo pulmonary function tests. Albuterol will be self-administered for determination of post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one-second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio and post-bronchodilator FEV1 percentage of predicted normal. The study will end when 800 patients have been assessed spirometrically or 3,000 patients have completed the LFQ (whichever criterion is achieved first).
Prior to implementation of the full study, a pilot study will be conducted at two of the chosen study sites to pretest the proposed study procedures.
Detailed description
The incidence of COPD is increasing throughout the world, with the vast majority of patients with the disease remaining undiagnosed (Coultas et al., 2001) and underreported (Frank et al., 2006; Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD], 2003; Peña et al., 2000; Takahashi et al., 2003; Van Weel et al., 2002). This is highlighted in a recent study that found 63% of patients with a smoking history and spirometry-confirmed COPD had no mention of COPD in their medical records (Frank et al., 2006). These findings are indicative of a low awareness of the condition among patients with COPD (Stratelis et al., 2004).
The use of patient-completed questionnaires to assess smoking history and status, respiratory symptoms, and socioeconomic status is a reliable and valid method of screening for COPD diagnosis and severity (Bednarek et al., 2008). The range of conditions described as COPD has led to confusion about disease terminology and difficulty with diagnosis and communication, particularly in primary care (Fukuhara et al., 2005; Kesten and Chapman, 1993). Considering that approximately 80% of patients diagnosed with COPD are current and previous cigarette smokers, mass screening of these populations using office-based spirometry becomes an attractive option (Furguson et al., 2000). A questionnaire designed to capture patient answers specific to their disease condition could provide invaluable information, which, if it correlates adequately with spirometry, could markedly improve diagnosis and provide avenues for appropriate treatment decisions. There are data supporting the argument that the prevalence of physician-diagnosed COPD is much lower than the prevalence suggested by results of population-based spirometric surveys (Chapman, 2004; Fukuchi et al., 2004; Peña et al., 2000; Soriano et al., 2000). Evidently, the development of a practical and reliable tool could help bridge the gaps in diagnosis and disease awareness. Moreover, prevalence studies underscore the need to improve awareness of COPD among cigarette-smoking populations and to provide information that could potentially lead patients to seek treatment. Hence, there is a need to develop a screening questionnaire able to identify patients at risk of airflow obstruction, for further evaluation. The LFQ, developed for this purpose, consists of a series of questions pertaining to COPD risk factors and symptoms.
Specifically, this study will aim to identify patients at risk of airflow obstruction as identified by the LFQ, the results of which will be followed for confirmation through subsequent spirometry in a subset of subjects. The LFQ will be evaluated against the spirometry results comparatively. A minimum age limit of 30 years is selected for subject participation in this study for further validation of the LFQ and to ascertain the enrollment of an adequately representative subset of subjects who may be bronchitic or asymptomatic for COPD, for comparison purposes with subjects with COPD. The study of this subject population may increase the sensitivity of COPD diagnosis and potentially provide information that could improve disease awareness and, as a consequence, possibly lead to optimization of disease management in primary care.
This is a cross-sectional study to determine the prevalence of symptomatic airway obstruction using the LFQ as a screening tool in primary care patients with a history of cigarette smoking and to provide descriptive data of this patient population. The study design is multicenter, cross-sectional, and involves a single visit. This study is not intended to evaluate the efficacy or safety of any investigational products. Following completion of written informed consent, eligible study subjects will complete a single study visit encompassing all required study assessments. Study subjects will not receive blinded study medication for evaluations of efficacy and safety.
All eligible patients will complete a self-administered Web survey that will include the LFQ. To meet both the primary and secondary aims, all patients with LFQ ≤ 18 (current cut-off for obstruction), as well as 5% of patients who score > 18, will be candidates for spirometric assessment. Only this subset of patients will undergo pulmonary function tests. Albuterol will be self-administered for determination of post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one-second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio and post-bronchodilator FEV1 percentage of predicted normal. The study will end when 800 patients have been assessed spirometrically or 3,000 patients have completed the LFQ (whichever criterion is achieved first).
Prior to implementation of the full study, a pilot study will be conducted at two of the chosen study sites to pretest the proposed study procedures.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| N/A (Survey study) | – | Other: Non-Interventional |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 87 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Current or previous cigarette smokers of at least 30 years of age with a history of cigarette smoking of ≥ 10 pack-years, recruited from primary care centers.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients aged 30 years or older
- Current or previous cigarette smoker with a history of cigarette smoking of ≥ 10 pack-years: number of pack years = (number of cigarettes per day/20) × number of years smoked) (e.g., 10 pack-years is equal to 20 cigarettes per day for 10 years, or 10 cigarettes per day for 20 years). Previous smokers are defined as those who stopped smoking at least 3 months prior to the study visit.
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent prior to study participation (on day of study visit).
- Able to read, write, and comprehend information in English.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Prior to enrollment, prospective subjects will be screened. A subject will be excluded from the study if he/she meets any of the following criteria:
- Regular use (i.e., prescribed for use on a daily basis) of the following respiratory medications within the 4 weeks prior to the study visit:
- Previous lung surgery, including lung transplant, lung resection, lung volume reduction surgery (e.g., lobectomy, pneumonectomy).
- A known diagnosis of a significant lung condition including lung cancer, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary fibrosis, active tuberculosis, or sarcoidosis. A previous diagnosis of an obstructive lung disease is not exclusionary-asthma, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, alpha1-antitrypsin (A1AT) deficiency, etc.
- Current participation in a respiratory-related research study and receiving experimental medications.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Non-InterventionalNon-Investigational Product (Survey Study) | Other | N/A (Survey study) |
Primary outcome
The primary outcome for this study will be the proportion of subjects at risk for airway obstruction as measured by the LFQ (LFQ total score ≤ 18) and confirmed by spirometry.
Time frame: 4-Month
1 secondary outcome
Screening accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of the LFQ utilizing spirometrically-defined airway obstruction (i.e., a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ≤ 0.7). Proportion of patients with chronic airway obstruction as measured by the LFQ, stratified...
Time frame: 4-Month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Oct 2012.
- Background: PubMed 21531880Mintz ML, Yawn BP, Mannino DM, Donohue JF, Hanania NA, Grellet CA, Gilsenan AW, McLeod LD, Dalal AA, Raphiou IH, Prillaman BA, Crater GD, Cicale MJ, Mapel DW. Prevalence of airway obstruction assessed by lung function questionnaire. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 May;86(5):375-81. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0787.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22040533Hanania NA, Crater GD, Morris AN, Emmett AH, O'Dell DM, Niewoehner DE. Benefits of adding fluticasone propionate/salmeterol to tiotropium in moderate to severe COPD. Respir Med. 2012 Jan;106(1):91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
Related trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
40 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 40 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 40 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary outcome for this study will be the proportion of subjects at risk for airway obstruction as measured by the LFQ (LFQ total score ≤ 18) and confirmed by spirometry. (time frame: 4-Month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01013948, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2012.