AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePhase 3NCT01019694

Combivent Respimat 1-year Safety Study in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

A Phase 3 study testing Combivent CFC-MDI, Combivent Respimat 20/100 mcg and Atrovent HFA 42 mcg + Albuterol HFA 200 mcg in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 55 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate long-term safety and patient acceptability of COMBIVENT RESPIMAT Inhalation Spray as compared to the COMBIVENT Inhalation Aerosol Chlorofluorocarbon-Metered Dose Inhaler (CFC-MDI) and the free combination of ATROVENT Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) and albuterol… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What is being tested?
Combivent CFC-MDI, Combivent Respimat 20/100 mcg and Atrovent HFA 42 mcg + Albuterol HFA 200 mcg
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
470 participants
Where
55 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Nov 2009to Apr 2011
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All patients must sign an informed consent consistent with International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines prior to participation in the trial.
  • Male or female patients 40 years of age or older.
  • Patients must be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of 10 pack-years. (Patients who have never smoked cigarettes must be excluded) Pack Years = Number of cigarettes/day x years of smoking 20 cigarettes/pack
  • All patients must have a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (P95-4381), and must meet the following spirometric criteria at Visit 1:Relatively stable, moderate to severe airway obstruction with a post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) < 80% of predicted normal and FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) < 70%. Spirometry should be done at baseline and approximately 1/2 hour following 4 inhalations of albuterol. Predicted normal values will be calculated according to European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), European Community for Coal and Steel (ECCS), (R94-1408). For Height measured in inches Males: FEV1 predicted (L) = 4.30 x [height (inches) / 39.37]-0.029 x age (yrs) - 2.49 Females: FEV1 predicted (L) = 3.95 x [height (inches) / 39.37]-0.025 x age (yrs) - 2.60 For Height measured in meters Males: FEV1 predicted (L) = 4.30 x [height (meters)] - 0.029 x age (years) -2.49 Females: FEV1 predicted (L) = 3.95 x [height (meters)] - 0.025 x age (years) - 2.60
  • Patients must be able to perform all study related procedures and maintain study records during the study period as required in the protocol.
  • Patients must be able to inhale medication in a competent manner from the RESPIMAT inhaler and from a metered dose inhaler (MDI).

Who cannot join

  • Patients with significant diseases other than COPD will be excluded. A significant disease is defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or a disease which may influence the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate in the study.
  • Patients with a recent history (i.e., one year or less) of myocardial infarction.
  • Patients who have been hospitalized or being treated for heart failure within the past year.
  • Patients with clinically unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention or change in drug therapy within the past year.
  • Patients with a malignancy for which patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within last five years (patients with fully cured squamous cell or treated basal cell carcinoma are allowed).
  • Patients with a history of life-threatening pulmonary obstruction, or a history of cystic fibrosis or clinically evident bronchiectasis.
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Patients who have undergone thoracotomy with pulmonary resection. Patients with a history of a thoracotomy for other reasons should be evaluated as per exclusion criterion No. 1.
  • Patients with a current diagnosis of asthma.
  • Patients with a history of significant alcohol or drug abuse.
  • Patients with known active tuberculosis.
  • Patients using beta blocker medications are excluded. Cardioselective beta blockers are allowed with caution. Beta blocker eye medications for treatment of non-narrow angle glaucoma are allowed.
  • Patients who regularly use daytime oxygen therapy for more than 1 hour per day Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP for sleep apnea is allowed).
  • Patients using oral corticosteroid medication at a dose in excess of the equivalent of 10 mg of prednisone per day or 20 mg every other day, except as required for treatment of exacerbation during the study.
  • Pregnant or nursing women.
  • Women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral or injectable contraceptives, intrauterine devices or diaphragm with spermicide, or transdermal hormonal patches). Abstinence will not be accepted as a medically approved means of contraception. Female patients will be considered to be of childbearing potential unless surgically sterilized by hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or post-menopausal for at least two years.
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to anticholinergic drugs, any other component of the ipratropium bromide/albuterol RESPIMAT solution including Benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or the ipratropium bromide/albuterol Chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) MDI or Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) components.
  • Previous participation in this study. (The patient cannot re-enroll into this study.)
  • Patients who are currently participating in another interventional study.
  • Patients who have taken an investigational drug within 1 month or 6 half lives (whichever is greater) prior to screening.
  • Patients currently in any pulmonary rehabilitation program or scheduled to participate in any such program during the study period.

Trial locations and contacts

55 sites in 1 country.

55 sites in 1 country

United States55 sites
  • 1012.62.112 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico

  • 1012.62.132 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ann Arbor, Michigan

  • 1012.62.125 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Austin, Texas

  • 1012.62.135 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Berkeley, California

  • 1012.62.155 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Boulder, Colorado

  • 1012.62.128 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Charleston, South Carolina

  • 1012.62.147 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Cherry Hill, New Jersey

  • 1012.62.107 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio

  • 1012.62.120 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio

  • 1012.62.114 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Clearwater, Florida

  • 1012.62.113 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

  • 1012.62.122 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Danville, Virginia

  • 1012.62.146 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Decatur, Georgia

  • 1012.62.124 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    DeLand, Florida

  • 1012.62.157 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Dubuque, Iowa

  • 1012.62.130 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Easley, South Carolina

  • 1012.62.154 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    East Providence, Rhode Island

  • 1012.62.126 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Fort Collins, Colorado

  • 1012.62.140 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Fort Worth, Texas

  • 1012.62.151 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Greenville, South Carolina

  • 1012.62.161 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Greenville, South Carolina

  • 1012.62.109 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Greer, South Carolina

  • 1012.62.143 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Houston, Texas

  • 1012.62.153 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Jasper, Alabama

  • 1012.62.152 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Killeen, Texas

  • 1012.62.116 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Lafayette, Louisiana

  • 1012.62.117 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Livonia, Michigan

  • 1012.62.159 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Louisville, Kentucky

  • 1012.62.156 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mesa, Arizona

  • 1012.62.158 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Minneapolis, Minnesota

  • 1012.62.145 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mobile, Alabama

  • 1012.62.101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Morgantown, West Virginia

  • 1012.62.148 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    New Orleans, Louisiana

  • 1012.62.137 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    North Dartmouth, Massachusetts

  • 1012.62.139 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Pensacola, Florida

  • 1012.62.103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • 1012.62.104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

  • 1012.62.119 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Richmond, Virginia

  • 1012.62.142 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Richmond, Virginia

  • 1012.62.141 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Riverside, California

  • 1012.62.111 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Rochester, New York

  • 1012.62.102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    San Antonio, Texas

  • 1012.62.118 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Spartanburg, South Carolina

  • 1012.62.108 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Spokane, Washington

  • 1012.62.133 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Spokane, Washington

  • 1012.62.127 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    St Louis, Missouri

  • 1012.62.129 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    St Louis, Missouri

  • 1012.62.144 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Stamford, Connecticut

  • 1012.62.149 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Summit, New Jersey

  • 1012.62.105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Tacoma, Washington

  • 1012.62.134 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Tampa, Florida

  • 1012.62.150 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Toledo, Ohio

  • 1012.62.123 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Waterbury, Connecticut

  • 1012.62.131 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Wheat Ridge, Colorado

  • 1012.62.115 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Winter Park, Florida

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Patient Acceptability of Ipratropium Bromide/Albuteroll Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler in Adults With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate long-term safety and patient acceptability of COMBIVENT RESPIMAT Inhalation Spray as compared to the COMBIVENT Inhalation Aerosol Chlorofluorocarbon-Metered Dose Inhaler (CFC-MDI) and the free combination of ATROVENT Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) and albuterol Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) inhalation aerosols.

Being tested
Combivent CFC-MDI, Combivent Respimat 20/100 mcg, Atrovent HFA 42 mcg + Albuterol HFA 200 mcg
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Combivent CFC-MDIDrug

    36/206 mcg Four times a day (QID)

  • Combivent Respimat 20/100 mcgDrug

    Open label randomized parallel

  • Atrovent HFA 42 mcg + Albuterol HFA 200 mcgDrug

    Open label randomized parallel

Study groups in NCT01019694
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Combivent Respimat 20/100 microgram(mcg)Experimentalpatient to take 1 inhalation 4 times a day
Receives: Drug: Combivent Respimat 20/100 mcg
Combivent CFC-MDI 36/206 microgram-mcgActive comparatorpatient to take 2 inhalations 4 times a day
Receives: Drug: Combivent CFC-MDI
Atrovent HFA 42 mcg + Albuterol HFAActive comparatorpatient to take 2 inhalations of each 4 times a day
Receives: Drug: Atrovent HFA 42 mcg + Albuterol HFA 200 mcg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 48

    Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).

    Measured: 48 weeks

Secondary outcomes (38)
  1. Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 3

    Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).

    Measured: 3 weeks

  2. Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 12

    Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 24

    Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).

    Measured: 24 weeks

  4. Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 36

    Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).

    Measured: 36 weeks

  5. Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 0

    Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).

    Measured: 0 weeks

  6. Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 3

    Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).

    Measured: 3 weeks

  7. Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 12

    Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).

    Measured: 12 weeks

  8. Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 24

    Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).

    Measured: 24 weeks

  9. Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 36

    Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).

    Measured: 36 weeks

  10. Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 48

    Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).

    Measured: 48 weeks

  11. Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 0

    CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).

    Measured: 0 weeks

  12. Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 3

    CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).

    Measured: 3 weeks

  13. Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 12

    CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).

    Measured: 12 weeks

  14. Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 24

    CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).

    Measured: 24 weeks

  15. Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 36

    CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).

    Measured: 36 weeks

  16. Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 48

    CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).

    Measured: 48 weeks

  17. Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 0

    Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).

    Measured: 0 weeks

  18. Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 3

    Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).

    Measured: 3 weeks

  19. Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 12

    Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).

    Measured: 12 weeks

  20. Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 24

    Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).

    Measured: 24 weeks

  21. Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 36

    Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).

    Measured: 36 weeks

  22. Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 48

    Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).

    Measured: 48 weeks

  23. Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Day 1

    Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose on test day 1.

    Measured: baseline, day 1

  24. Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12

    Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 12

    Measured: baseline, 12 weeks

  25. Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 24

    Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 24

    Measured: baseline, 24 weeks

  26. Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 48

    Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 48

    Measured: baseline, 48 weeks

  27. Change From Baseline in FVC at Day 1

    Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose on test day 1.

    Measured: baseline, day 1

  28. Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 12

    Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 12

    Measured: baseline, 12 weeks

  29. Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 24

    Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 24

    Measured: baseline, 24 weeks

  30. Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 48

    Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 48

    Measured: baseline, 48 weeks

  31. Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 0

    Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 0

    Measured: 0 weeks

  32. Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 3

    Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 3

    Measured: 3 weeks

  33. Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 12

    Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 12

    Measured: 12 weeks

  34. Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 24

    Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 24

    Measured: 24 weeks

  35. Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 36

    Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 36

    Measured: 36 weeks

  36. Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 48

    Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 48

    Measured: 48 weeks

  37. Number of Patients Having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations

    Measured: 48 weeks

  38. Number of Patients Having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations Leading to Hospitalization

    Measured: 48 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Nov 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2009
  3. Primary completionApr 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
470 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01019694
Sponsor's protocol ID
1012.62
Status last verified
Oct 2014
First submitted
16 Nov 2009
Last updated
23 Oct 2014

Publications

  • Ferguson GT, Ghafouri M, Dai L, Dunn LJ. COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:139-50. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S38577. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

    PubMed 23658479

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Combivent CFC-MDI, Combivent Respimat 20/100 mcg and Atrovent HFA 42 mcg + Albuterol HFA 200 mcg in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 55 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 55 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 May 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 48 (time frame: 48 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01019694, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in