AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute LeukemiaPhase 3NCT01020175

Peripheral Blood (PB) Versus Bone Marrow (BM) in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

A Phase 3 study testing Bone marrow transplantation and Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in people with Acute Leukemia and Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, run by European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

350 patients with early leukemias were assigned to receive peripheral blood or bone marrow transplantation; the occurrence of acute and chronic graft versus host disease, survival, transplantation-related mortality, and relapse rates were compared. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 years
What is being tested?
Bone marrow transplantation and Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
350 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Jan 1995to Dec 2002
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with either diagnosis of AML in first or second remission, in first untreated relapse (blast count in marrow < 30%); ALL in first or second remission, in first untreated relapse (blast count in marrow < 30%); CML in first chronic phase, in first accelerated phase (total blast and promyelocytes in marrow and or peripheral blood < 30%) or MDS (excluding RAEB-t).
  • Age between 18 and 55 years.
  • ECOG performance status between 0,1 or 2.
  • HLA-identical sibling donor.
  • Written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Serum creatinine more than 10% above the normal range for the centre.
  • Left ventricular size and function abnormal.
  • DLCO < 50%.
  • Bilirubin > 2mg/dL (34.2 µmol/L).
  • Splenectomised or splenic irradiation.
  • Psychiatric, addictive, or any other disorder, which compromises ability to give truly informed consent for participation in this study.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Currently receiving non-licensed drugs which may affect GVHD or engraftment.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Known sensitivity to E.coli derived products.
  • HIV positive.
  • Previously received BM/PBPC transplant.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Dr. Norbert Schmitz

    Hamburg, 20099

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Multicentre Trial Comparing Allogeneic Filgrastim Mobilised Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation (PBPCT) With Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT) in Patients With Acute Leukemia, Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome

350 patients with early leukemias were assigned to receive peripheral blood or bone marrow transplantation; the occurrence of acute and chronic graft versus host disease, survival, transplantation-related mortality, and relapse rates were compared.

Read the detailed description

The trial was designed to investigate the safety and outcome of allogeneic filgrastim-mobilized PBPCT compared with allogeneic BMT in patients with standard-risk leukemia. A total of 350 patients between 18 and 55 years of age with acute leukemias in remission or chronic myelogenous leukemia in first chronic phase were randomized to receive either filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells or bone marrow cells from HLA-identical sibling donors after standard high-dose chemoradiotherapy. The study was approved by the ethics committees of all participating centers, and all patients and donors gave informed consent before any study-related procedure was performed. Donor-recipient pairs were randomized to undergo either BMT or PBPCT. Randomization was carried out centrally at the International Institute for Drug Development (id2), Brussels, Belgium, and used the minimization method to allocate donor and recipient to allogeneic BMT or PBPCT. The randomization strata were as follows: diagnosis (chronic myeloid leukemia [CML] vs other diseases), sex mismatch of donor and recipient, and whether the donor was female and nulliparous. Follow-up visits were scheduled for 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after the date of transplantation.

Neutrophil and platelet recovery occurred significantly faster after transplantation of peripheral blood progenitor cells than after bone marrow transplantation. Acute graft versus host disease of grades II-IV was significantly more frequent in recipients of peripheral blood progenitor cells than in recipients of marrow cells The cumulative incidence of chronic graft versus host disease was higher with peripheral blood progenitor cells than with bone marrow cells

Being tested
Bone marrow transplantation, Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Keywords
allogeneic transplantation, Leukemia, GvHD, MDS
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Leukemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bone marrow transplantationProcedure or surgery

    Patients received bone marrow transplantation

  • Peripheral blood stem cell transplantationProcedure or surgery

    Patients received filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Study groups in NCT01020175
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bone marrow transplantationOtherPatients received bone marrow transplantation
Receives: Procedure: Bone marrow transplantation
Peripheral blood stem cell transplantationOtherPatients received filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Receives: Procedure: Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary end point of the study was the maximum grade of acute graft versus host (GVH) disease observed in the recipient.

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Incidence of acute GVH disease grade II or above

  2. Time to acute GVH disease

  3. Time to an unsupported platelet count of 20 _ 109/L and 50 _ 109/L

  4. Time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 0.5 x 10e9/L and 1 x 10e9/L

  5. Incidence and severity of chronic GVH disease

  6. Leukemia-free survival

  7. Overall survival

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Nov 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 1995
  3. Primary completionDec 1999
  4. Study completionDec 2002

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
350 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01020175
Sponsor's protocol ID
GCSF-940136
Status last verified
Nov 2009
First submitted
23 Nov 2009
Last updated
25 Nov 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Friedrichs B, Tichelli A, Bacigalupo A, Russell NH, Ruutu T, Shapira MY, Beksac M, Hasenclever D, Socie G, Schmitz N. Long-term outcome and late effects in patients transplanted with mobilised blood or bone marrow: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Apr;11(4):331-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70352-3. Epub 2010 Jan 30.

    PubMed 20117965

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Bone marrow transplantation and Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in people with Acute Leukemia and Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, run by European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary end point of the study was the maximum grade of acute graft versus host (GVH) disease observed in the recipient.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01020175, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2009.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in